This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Honourable Michael M Fortier
Minister of Public Works and Government Services Receiver General of Canada
Minister's Message
Management Representation Statement
Section I - Departmental Overview
Section II - Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome
Section III - Supplementary Information
Section IV - Other Items of Interest
I am pleased to present Public Works and Government Services Canada’s Departmental Performance Report for the period ending March 31, 2007.
During the past fiscal year, my department continued to make important progress on our business transformation and to improve our management practices.
In procurement, we pursued our efforts to simplify the way we buy goods and services to make it easier for Canadians and the private sector to do business with the government. We introduced new standing offers for goods and services most commonly purchased by the Government of Canada. My department also supported critical military procurement including the award of an $869 million contract for the acquisition of four C-17 aircraft, which was completed within eight months following the announcement of the project.
In real property, we began to move towards a corporate real estate model to align ourselves with industry best practices and help us manage the government’s real estate portfolio more strategically. With the assistance of leading industry experts, we assessed cost-effective options for accommodating federal departments. This led to our recent annoucement about the sale of nine buildings across Canada. Also, we furthered our work on the Ontario:Quebec 75/25 distribution ratio. This resulted in the release, in May 2007, of a request for information for the development of new office space in Gatineau, Quebec.
To directly support the Federal Accountability Act and Action Plan’s commitment to promoting fairness, openness and transparency in the procurement process, an independent advisor was appointed to review the government’s public opinion research. As well, we completed the process leading to the appointment of a Procurement Ombudsman Designate. Finally, the rules governing public opinion research across government were amended. As a result, federal departments and agencies are now legally required to make public, within six months of the completion of fieldwork, their written public opinion research reports obtained under contract.
As the government-wide centre of expertise for greening government operations, my department provided leadership for initiatives such as the clean-up of contaminated sites, energy efficient buildings, and green procurement.
Once again, my department has demonstrated over the past year an unwavering commitment to strengthening accountability and transparency.
The Honourable Michael M Fortier
I submit for tabling in Parliament, the 2006-2007 Departmental Performance Report (DPR) for Public Works and Government Services Canada.
This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2006-2007 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports:
Having recently been appointed as Deputy Minister, my department is committed to continuous improvement, building on the results of 2006-2007. We will be focusing on the fundamentals of service delivery with people dedicated to excellence, while continuing with the implementation of our business transformation agenda.
François Guimont
Deputy Minister of Public Works and Government Services
The mandate of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) is to ensure optimum value to Canadians and the government in the provision of common, central and shared services. Through the delivery of our services, we enable other government departments and agencies to provide their programs and services to Canadians.
PWGSC Business Highlights *
|
* Sources: Departmental databases, Acquisitions Performance Management Report, IT Services Sustainable Development Strategy Report, Translation Integrated Ordering System. |
PWGSC is the government's manager of office space and provider of real estate services. We are its central purchasing agent, banker and accountant. We provide services in the areas of payroll and pensions, information technology, linguistic services, audit, communications and consulting. In addition, we lead e-Government and greening of government initiatives. We directly service Canadians as the Receiver General, sending Universal Child Care Benefit cheques and Goods and Services Tax (GST) refunds to citizens.
Canadians, in Canada and abroad, benefit directly and indirectly from our services. PWGSC has two strategic outcomes, Quality Services and Sound Stewardship, with 28 program activities. Our ongoing operations support the Government of Canada's outcomes related to Economic, Social, International, and Government Affairs spending areas. (See Canada's Performance 2007 at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca). Under the Treasury Board Secretariat's (TBS) whole-of-government framework, PWGSC contributes to all of the Government of Canada's outcomes by providing services to government departments and agencies (See Figure 1).
Figure 2: | Summary of Planned and Actual Spending Program Activities are organized by Strategic Outcome: Quality Services & Sound Stewardship |
(In millions of dollars) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-2007 | ||||||
Actual 2005- 2006 |
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual | ||
GOVERNMENT SERVICES PROGRAM | ||||||
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotments), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | ||||||
Quality Services (16 Program Activities) | ||||||
Federal Accommodation and Holdings | 1,647.2 | 1,890.4 | 2,237.9 | 1,891.5 | 1,728.3 | |
Real Property Services Revolving Fund | - | - | - | - | - | |
Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund | (3.0) | (8.0) | (8.0) | (8.0) | (6.1) | |
Acquisition Services | 180.2 | 152.2 | 154.4 | 167.2 | 169.5 | |
Optional Services Revolving Fund | (1.4) | - | - | - | (0.9) | |
Defence Production Revolving Fund | - | - | - | - | - | |
IM/IT Services | 282.1 | 143.5 | 143.2 | 263.3 | 259.0 | |
Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund | 4.0 | - | - | - | (6.8) | |
Receiver General Services | 7.1 | 9.0 | 8.8 | 6.6 | 7.3 | |
Public Service Compensation Services | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | |
Government Information Services | 49.5 | 32.9 | 32.3 | 31.7 | 30.8 | |
Business Integration Services | 15.9 | 10.2 | 10.0 | 16.9 | 15.5 | |
Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund | (0.4) | (0.4) | (0.5) | (0.5) | (0.5) | |
Translation and Interpretation to Parliament, Conference Interpretation, Terminology | 51.4 | 52.3 | 51.9 | 57.1 | 58.2 | |
Translation Bureau Revolving Fund | (9.2) | - | - | 6.0 | 4.6 | |
Office of Greening Government Operations Services | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total Quality Services | 2,224.9 | 2,283.9 | 2,631.7 | 2,433.8 | 2,260.8 | |
Sound Stewardship (10 Program Activities) | ||||||
Real Property Stewardship | 57.1 | 34.1 | 33.7 | 54.9 | 51.3 | |
Supply Operations Stewardship | 52.4 | 39.7 | 39.1 | 87.9 | 64.4 | |
IM/IT Stewardship | 11.3 | 12.8 | 9.8 | 14.2 | 14.2 | |
Receiver General Stewardship | 116.3 | 127.4 | 126.9 | 137.8 | 128.0 | |
Public Service Pay Stewardship | 28.3 | 27.9 | 27.7 | 33.2 | 31.9 | |
Public Service Pension Stewardship | 19.2 | 20.0 | 20.2 | 25.2 | 23.3 | |
Government Information Stewardship | 10.0 | 18.5 | 18.1 | 18.6 | 20.3 | |
Business Integration Performance Management | 6.1 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 6.1 | |
Translation Stewardship | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | |
Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship | - | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.7 | |
Total Sound Stewardship | 303.2 | 289.4 | 284.7 | 382.4 | 342.6 | |
Gross Expenditures | 4,850.2 | 4,579.2 | 4,922.3 | 5,108.5 | 5,031.2 | |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 2,322.1 | 2,005.9 | 2,005.9 | 2,292.3 | 2,427.9 | |
DEPARTMENT TOTAL | 2,528.1 | 2,573.3 | 2,916.4 | 2,816.3 | 2,603.4 | |
Less: Non-Respendable revenues | 67.4 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 22.8 | 63.8 | |
Plus: Cost of services received without charge | 53.5 | 37.9 | 37.9 | 38.3 | 60.2 | |
NET COST OF DEPARTMENT | 2,514.2 | 2,589.7 | 2,932.8 | 2,831.8 | 2,599.8 | |
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTEs) | 12,483 | 12,043 | 12,502 | 12,626 | 12,338 | |
Please note that this financial table has not been audited. Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Note: PWGSC's Program Activity Architecture has 26 Program Activities organized by two Strategic Outcomes. The overview can be found on page 11. The two additional program activities of Corporate Management and Business Integration Client Relations Management are not shown in the table above because, for Treasury Board Secretariat's financial reporting purposes, their costs have been re-allocated to the other program activities.
Figure 3: Summary of Performance Results 2006-2007 | ||
---|---|---|
Key Planned Results1 | Actual Performance Results | Status |
Real Property | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology Services | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receiver General and Public Service Compensation | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting, Information and Shared Services | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Integration | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
Consulting and Audit Canada | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
Translation Bureau | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office of Greening Government Operations | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Management | ||
|
|
Met most expectations |
|
|
1 The information above is a summary of performance highlights for 2006-2007. Performance reporting against PWGSC's Program Activity Architecture is presented in Section II.
Our Report on Plans and Priorities, 2006-2007, set out priority areas for strategic change to guide our work and to ensure continued best value to government and Canadians.
Our performance results for 2006-2007 reflect many challenges and accomplishments in the following strategic priorities:
In 2006-2007, PWGSC continued to improve management practices, strengthening accountability and transparency.
On December 12, 2006, the Federal Accountability Act became law. The implementation of the Federal Accountability Act and its related Action Plan was of particular importance to PWGSC. We played a significant role in the areas of procurement reform and public opinion research management and controls.
PWGSC supported the development of the Office of the Procurement Ombudsman to review procurement practices as well as complaints concerning government contracts and contract administration, and also be responsible for ensuring the availability of a Contract Related Alternative Dispute Resolution Program. A Procurement Ombudsman Designate was appointed in September 2007.
The Action Plan related to the Federal Accountability Act made reference to the appointment of an independent advisor to review public opinion research practices in government. An advisor has been appointed for the implementation of this process.
In support of the Federal Accountability Act, PWGSC provided advice and input to the Treasury Board Secretariat for the new Communications Policy of the Government of Canada. Specific changes include: increasing the emphasis on openness, fairness and transparency in public opinion research and advertising bidding processes; distinguishing advertising from collateral services and non-paid messages such as public service announcements; and, ensuring that departments make written public opinion research reports public within six months of completion of field work.
As one of the government’s initial series of measures to implement the Federal Accountability Act and Action Plan, PWGSC announced in February 2007 that we would seek input from all stakeholders on the development of a Code of Conduct for Procurement. The Code will provide a comprehensive statement of the government’s expectations for handling of procurement activities by suppliers and public service employees. It will also consolidate the government's existing legal, regulatory and policy requirements into a concise statement of the expectations government has of its employees and its suppliers. This will strengthen the integrity and transparency of all government procurement transactions.
PWGSC is committed to being more open and transparent. We are proactively disclosing information regarding travel and hospitality, contracts over $10,000 and reclassification of jobs. We are also improving our reporting to Parliament and Canadians through greater linkages to government priorities and strategic outcomes as well as increased electronic reporting.
Internal audit and evaluation functions are key to strengthened accountability. We are working diligently to maintain an effective workforce of qualified, broadly experienced auditors and evaluators. This has been, and will continue to be, important for strengthened accountability.
In 2006-2007, PWGSC implemented the second year of our business renewal agenda to deliver services smarter, faster and at reduced cost in the areas of procurement, real property and information technology.
The November 2006 Economic and Fiscal Update identified adjustments to the savings forecast after determining that the savings were overestimated. Budget 2007 indicated that "after further analysis, it has become clear that the revised savings targets will not be realized. The government, however, has determined that the savings for 2008-2009 and beyond will need to be achieved by departments through overall cost efficiencies including continued efforts to reduce procurement costs. Accordingly, departmental budgets will be reduced to reflect the fiscal targets projected in the November 2006 Economic and Fiscal Update."
We have exceeded our 2006-2007 target for procurement savings of $204 million, achieving procurement savings of $225 million.
In December 2006, PWGSC unveiled the Government of Canada Marketplace (GoCM), which offers simplified access to mandatory standing offers and supply arrangements. The initial launch was made available to all government departments and agencies to collect feedback in order to further refine and improve the GoCM in preparation for the full launch in March 2008. The intent is to develop an end-to-end solution for purchasing goods and services throughout the Government of Canada.
During 2006-2007, PWGSC worked closely with the private sector to better understand suppliers' concerns as changes to government procurement were introduced. Following consultations with suppliers, we announced that we would create an ongoing consultation mechanism. Feedback from suppliers will help us achieve our goal of reducing procurement costs while ensuring fair, simple and open access for all suppliers - irrespective of their size - across Canada.
To improve its outreach, PWGSC expanded the Office of Small and Medium Enterprise (SME), opening six regional offices across the country. The regional offices are working to identify and reduce barriers to SMEs in the procurement system. To this end, we are providing information, counselling and training services to help small and medium enterprises and PWGSC employees improve their procurement practices. SME participation by dollar value has already jumped, increasing by 85% to 300% in certain commodity areas. Currently, the overall participation rate by dollar value of SMEs exceeds 37% of total volume, representing approximately $5 billion per year being awarded to an average of 9,500 SMEs.
At PWGSC, we face many challenges managing our real estate portfolio. These include the condition and age of buildings, our recapitalization needs (estimated at $ 4.5 billion over 15 years, adjusted for inflation and some acceleration, includes almost $1.0 billion indeferred capital expenditures), and the limited flexibility of the assets.
We have looked at private sector best practices, to improve the management of customer relationships and our assets. We also undertook more rigorous application of accommodation standards, improved inventory management, and the maintenance of overhead efficiencies. In 2006-2007, we tracked $134 million of efficiencies within PWGSC's Real Property Branch and $17 million attributable to organizations that reimburse PWGSC for services and accommodation for a total of $151 million against a target of $150 million.
In September 2006, we awarded a competitive contract to study 40 of the 325 Crown-owned real estate assets and to provide recommendations on the most cost-effective and efficient ways to accommodate federal government departments, while generating savings for Canadians. On August 20, 2007, the Government of Canada announced that it entered into an agreement for the sale of nine office buildings and their subsequent lease-back for a period of twenty-five years.
PWGSC is leading the "whole-of-government" approach to modernizing Information Technology (IT). This initiative, called IT Shared Services, aims to consolidate IT infrastructure, services and facilities across government, to streamline processes, realize efficiencies and provide high-quality and cost-effective services to Canadians. It views government as a single enterprise whose goal is to reduce technical complexity and increase interoperability and information exchange. For example 98% of Government of Canada on-line programs are supported by our secure channel network.
To manage the growth strategies of IT Shared Services, we launched the Identification, Qualification, Transition and Transformation (IQTT) process. This initiative was started with six partner departments and agencies. Eventually, specific IT services, currently administered by each department or agency, will be transferred to a single IT Shared Services environment. Some of these organizations have begun to move the people, business processes and technology to the shared services model as part of the IT Shared Services Initiative.
PWGSC undertook a wide range of major projects of national importance, including those in the following areas:
Clean-up of Contaminated Sites: Federal contaminated sites are managed under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP). The Program is managed by Environment Canada (EC) and the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS). Funding is directed to highest risk federal contaminated sites. FCSAP contains commitments for remediation of more than 600 federal contaminated sites. PWGSC is responsible for 209 contaminated sites. This includes the Sydney Tar Ponds clean-up, jointly supported by the government of Nova Scotia and Canada. Of the 209 PWGSC contaminated sites, the 2006-2007 annual report to the Treasury Board Secretariat indicates that:
Restoration of the Vimy Ridge Monument: PWGSC completed the high profile restoration of 12 First World War monuments in Europe, including the Vimy Ridge Monument. In close partnership with Veterans Affairs Canada, this collaborative project brought together a unique multi-disciplinary team of heritage conservation experts from Canada, France and Belgium.
Renewal of Pension Administration Systems: We are continuing to work with the Treasury Board Secretariat in our efforts to renew our pension administration systems and business processes to replace the existing services to public service employees, employers and pensioners. The Pension Modernization Project will replace outdated technology and business processes by a multi-plan solution based on commercial off-the-shelf software. In 2006-2007, the design of a new system architecture was completed and cost estimates were validated by two external audits.
Military Procurement: PWGSC has been working with the Department of National Defence to streamline the procurement process with respect to military purchases to better meet the needs of the Armed Forces while ensuring best value for Canadians. An example was the award of an $869 million contract for the acquisition of four C-17 aircraft within eight months following the announcement of the project. This was a marked improvement when compared to the average 63 months it took in the past for similar large size military projects.
Details on all of the major projects of national importance above, and other major projects, can be found throughout Section II, in Section III — Table 12, and on our website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html.
PWGSC continued to support the government's security agenda through a broad range of activities. We ensured public safety and security through the Industrial Security Program, designed to prevent the loss of classified information, secure assets and controlled goods. We facilitated military procurement by providing timely contract security services and we enabled Canadian industry to compete where contracts contain sensitive or classified government information or access to secure assets.
More specifically, we provided personnel security screening services to Canadian private sector organizations involved in protected/classified government contracts. We inspected organizations with access to protected and classified information and assets and those dealing with controlled goods or technology. We also processed Canadian and foreign visit requests for visitors requiring access to contract-related classified/protected information and assets.
PWGSC continued to negotiate industrial security Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with foreign governments that enable the government to share foreign sensitive technologies with Canadian industry. This helps Canadian industry to participate in foreign classified contracts. It also helps maintain the trust and confidence of NATO and our other allies and it supports Canada's anti-proliferation, public safety, security and global security priorities.
Military procurement is a large and important component of our work. Through enhanced working relationships with the Department of National Defence and improved processes, we have achieved significant reductions in delivery times directly supporting Canada's initiatives in Afghanistan and other areas abroad. The average timeline for new capability procurements is now estimated to be less than 25 months, which is an over 60% reduction from past procurements.
Since being given the responsibility to lead in the greening of government two years ago, we have developed initiatives to: reduce energy consumption, greenhouse gases and other polluting emissions; promote green procurement; improve the management of waste; direct or advise on the remediation of contaminated sites; and improve the environmental performance of the government's vehicle fleet.
PWGSC assists federal government departments in meeting their environmental regulatory requirements. In the past year, we provided training and advice to operational managers in the areas of storage tanks, hazardous materials and waste, ozone-depleting substances, air emissions, and waste-water management. As a result of these efforts, more than 75% of the Sustainable Development Strategies have incorporated recommendations for greening government operations. For example, guidance for vehicle fleets was taken up by 22 of the 28 departments that tabled their Sustainable Development Strategies in December 2006, increasing the use of hybrid vehicles and alternative transportation fuels.
We also helped establish steering groups on greening government operations and sustainable development. These federal-provincial-territorial and interdepartmental groups provide opportunities to share information, best practices and environmental management tools.
PWGSC has committed to ensuring that new buildings be at least 25% more energy-efficient than the Model National Energy Code for Buildings, and that buildings we renovate be at least 15% more energy-efficient after their renovation. New government office buildings also apply the Canada Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Gold standard.
One new building on the forefront of sustainable design is Yellowknife's Greenstone Building. This will be the first North of 60 LEED®-Canada-Gold-standard-certified office building.
In 2006-2007, direct deposit participation levels increased by 3%, generating significant savings in processing, handling, postage and paper. Not only does this initiative have positive environmental impacts across the country, it also delivers funds to the client faster, with greater satisfaction to Canadians. Such measures are noted in Section II.
The linguistic and interpretation services that PWGSC provides to Parliament are essential for its work. The Translation Bureau provided overnight translation of more than 9.5 million words of parliamentary debates last year, compared with an average of 7 million words in the previous three years. It also provided translation and interpretation for 82 parliamentary committees and sub-committees, compared to 70 the prior year.
This growing workload, combined with increased retirement expectations, represents a major challenge for the government. Canada needs 1,000 new translators every year, but Canadian universities produce only 300 graduates.
To face this growing need, PWGSC has established partnerships with Canadian universities and the language industry. The work of the Translation Bureau is highlighted in more detail in Section II.
A number of key challenges, with their related risks and opportunities, were identified during 2006-2007. Specifically, working with our client departments and central agencies, we face the challenges of:
Challenge: maintaining momentum for business renewal.
We have undergone two years of complex renewal of our main business areas, encountering various challenges in meeting targets. Although we have made major adjustments to our plans during 2006-2007, we remain committed to moving ahead with our renewal agenda to realize long-term efficiencies for Canadians.
Our challenge is to continue the renewal and modernization of our business processes so that we become a "Best in Class" organization in our delivery of common, central and shared services. For example, we must apply the real property and procurement management best practices found in the private and public sectors, domestically and internationally. We must also take a best practice approach to shared IT services and pension modernization by applying proven solutions found in other jurisdictions.
The momentum must be maintained for continuous improvement by achieving our performance expectations and using best practice standards to ensure quality services. Results-based planning and reporting can help to ensure that our performance will be measured and judged by our tangible past, present and future results.
Challenge: improving quality control and performance measurement to improve service delivery and performance reporting across the department.
To ensure PWGSC achieves our objectives, we must improve quality control and performance measurement in the delivery of our services (including reporting results in a transparent and balanced manner).
Quality assurance activities are being enhanced in all major business lines to improve service delivery. Key performance indicators for each business line provide a basis for measuring and reporting on results achieved.
We will also continue to improve our financial management as well as our integration of business, human resources, and financial planning.
Together, these activities build upon the government’s Performance Management Framework, integrating results for Canadians with strategic outcomes, expected outputs and performance indicators to provide the basis for our performance story.
Challenge: sustaining a qualified, skilled and motivated workforce.
Public Service Renewal is a government-wide priority. For PWGSC, employee retirement, normal attrition, employee movement and recruitment difficulties continue to threaten our ability to provide, on a day-to-day basis, the consistent level of quality services and sound stewardship that our clients and Canadians expect.
To become a "Best in Class" organization, we will continue to need a workforce of knowledgeable, skilled and enthusiastic people, whose hard work and dedication will help maintain and improve the quality of our services and support our ongoing commitment to sound stewardship.
We must continue to seek and apply better ways of attracting and retaining qualified and competent staff in all areas of operation, but in particular, those related to translation and interpretation, auditing and evaluation, and information technology.
This section of the report provides information about PWGSC’s program activities. These program activities are organized by our two strategic outcomes to provide quality services in support of government operations and sound stewardship of its assets.
Quality Services: PWGSC delivers common, central and shared services to federal departments in support of government operations. In addition to supporting departments directly, we use economies of scale and specialized expertise to generate efficiencies and improve government-wide performance for the benefit of Canadians.
Sound Stewardship: PWGSC safeguards the assets entrusted to us, including the skills and knowledge of our employees, as well as our physical infrastructure and systems. In doing so, we maintain and grow our capacity to provide services into the future.
Note: The Program Activities of Corporate Management and Business Integration Client Relations Management are not shown in the table above because, for Treasury Board Secretariat's financial reporting purposes, their costs have been re-allocated to the other Program Activities as departmental overheads.
To better reflect the PWGSC approach to service delivery and organizational structure, our program activities have been grouped to highlight our key service areas:
In each of the subsections which follow, our performance over the past year is presented by the strategic priorities the department pursued in 2006-2007, as well as by our long-term and enduring program activities.
In 2006-2007, there were a number of organizational changes throughout the department; however, this report is structured to respond as directly as possible to the commitments made in our 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities. Where programs have been ended or activities reassigned, the changes are clearly identified at the outset of each of the subsections, which follow.
PWGSC provides departments and agencies with office and common use accommodation and acts as a steward for various engineered public works such as bridges and dams, and national treasures such as the Parliamentary Precinct and other heritage assets across Canada.
PWGSC also provides other federal departments and agencies with expert professional and technical services. These cover the areas of architecture, engineering, environment and real estate, as well as asset and facilities management for the acquisition, development, construction, management, operation, maintenance, repair and disposal of real property.
On behalf of the federal government, PWGSC administers the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program to local taxing authorities, and the Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund, which facilitates the disposal of properties surplus to government requirements.
Real Property supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through four program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above program activities are summarized at the end of this Real Property section.
Key Facts*
|
* Source: PWGSC databases |
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC strategic priorities, as follows:
Our business transformation initiatives are primarily related to the following program activities: Federal Accommodation and Holdings and Real Property Services Revolving Fund.
In September 2006, BMO Capital Markets Real Estate Group and RBC Capital Markets Real Estate Group Inc. were hired to study 40 Crown-owned assets and a broad range of options to determine the most cost-effective and efficient ways to accommodate federal government departments. In March 2007, the Government of Canada announced it was moving forward on the first step in a two-step process for the possible sale-leaseback of nine federal government office properties. This would result in long-term positive benefits by:
A review of the top bid by Deutsche Bank clearly demonstrated that the transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to the Crown. The firm also found the marketing process had been robust and thorough, and endorsed the top bidder.
On August 20, 2007, the Government of Canada announced that it had entered into an agreement for the sale of nine office buildings and their subsequent lease-back $1.6 billion. The impact of this agreement, once finalized, will be reflected in the 2007-2008 financial statements.
For more information on PWGSC's Real Estate Study see:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/text/buildings/index-e.html.
In 2006-2007, we tracked $134 million of efficiencies within PWGSC’s Real Property Branch and $17 million attributable to organizations that reimburse PWGSC for services and accommodation, for a total of $151 million against a target of $150 million. These results were achieved through the rigorous application of accommodation standards, improved inventory management, and the maintenance of overhead efficiencies.
Rigorous Application of Accommodation Standards: PWGSC consistently applied space and fit-up standards and optimized space utilization to bring government occupancies more in line with private sector norms. The aim is to reduce the average space per Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) to 18 rentable square metres by 2009-2010. In 2006-2007, the average space per FTE employee was 19.7 rentable square metres, a reduction of 1.7 rentable square metres per FTE from the previous year. We identified efficiencies of $71 million internal to PWGSC and $11 million attributable to reimbursing organizations.
Improved Inventory Management: PWGSC continued to focus on longer-term program planning and optimizing our accommodation portfolio. This included improving the management of our leased portfolio and facilities operations, resulting in efficiencies of $47 million in 2006-2007. Leasing improvements included more timely lease negotiations and longer term leases, resulting in reduced fit-up and administrative costs, as well as more rigorous rental rates for negotiating targets for new leases and renewals. Facilities operations efficiencies included exercising options to increase the amount of services delivered by our alternative service provider, SNC Lavalin ProFac Inc.
Efficiencies in Service Delivery: We continued to take full advantage of efficiencies and reduced overhead while maintaining a satisfactory level of service delivery, through attrition in our workforce (a 15% reduction since 2004-2005), co-location with other levels of government, and the use of technology to interface with our clients. We tracked related efficiencies of $15 million in 2006-2007.
We continued to work towards becoming an industry leader in business performance and best practices. In 2006-2007, we developed a Corporate Real Estate (CRE) model that focuses on strategic decision-making, service performance, client satisfaction and accountability, and allows alignment to industry best practices and process requirements. Clear accountabilities, defined roles and responsibilities, and standard competencies are key attributes of a CRE model. This new structure was unveiled on April 1, 2007.
A global scan of public and private corporate real estate organizations revealed that most successful organizations use integrated workplace management systems to address their business and client needs. As a result, PWGSC prepared a business case that assessed options for pursuing a business and systems transformation initiative supported by a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) real estate product, with the associated business process integration. The COTS product is an Integrated Workplace Management System (IWMS), which will provide comprehensive and consistent management information to support our business and client activities. Also, in support of our transformation, Real Property has become actively involved in the Open Standards Consortium for Real Estate to develop an open standard for data exchange.
To improve service delivery and increase client satisfaction, Real Property launched its National Project Management System (NPMS), based on industry best practices. The NPMS provides the methodology, web-based tools, and project governance structure, as well as enhanced client and quality management focus, to deliver our projects on time, on budget and within their defined scope. The NPMS covers the broad range of projects of national interest we deliver, from lease projects, to major re-fit and Crown construction projects. As part of the NPMS, we are putting in place a performance measurement and assessment framework to improve project management.
Efforts to strengthen accountability are primarily related to the Real Property Stewardship Program Activity. Real Property continued to ensure sound and ethical management and stewardship of the resources entrusted to it.
PWGSC worked with the Office of the Chief Risk Officer to embed risk management and quality assurance into our business processes. In 2006-2007, the department established the Risk Management and Quality Assurance functions and began developing and integrating the branch risk profile into its business planning process. As well, collaboration between sectors and regions resulted in entrenching risk management concepts in the National Project Management System.
To foster a strong culture of values and ethics, we strengthened our commitment to provide timely and thorough responses to recommendations from the Auditor General and PWGSC's Audit and Evaluation Branch.
PWGSC is custodian of the buildings and grounds of Canada's legislative buildings on Parliament Hill and surrounding streets of Ottawa, known collectively as the Parliamentary Precinct. In addition to being the seat of Canada's government, and a symbol of Canada's democratic traditions and values, the Parliamentary Precinct receives Canadian and international visitors for business and tourism. PWGSC's mandate is to ensure that these remarkable heritage structures remain safe, useful and beautiful for future generations.
Long-Term Vision and Plan: The Long-Term Vision and Plan (LTVP) is the planning framework that guides development within the Parliamentary Precinct and projects to restore its buildings and grounds over the next quarter century. The original LTVP was approved in 2001 but changes in circumstances have led PWGSC to comprehensively review the plan, in consultation with Parliament and our advisory organizations.
The revised LTVP endorses the high-level vision and principles of the 2001 LTVP that aim to restore the Parliament buildings and grounds to a condition that will reflect their importance as the seat of Canada's government. The revised LTVP has a new implementation framework founded on rolling five-year programs of work and a number of enhanced oversight and governance provisions.
Library of Parliament: From 2002-2007, PWGSC led the rehabilitation of the Library of Parliament to preserve and enhance this Victorian Gothic architectural treasure for future generations. Inside and out, every aspect of the Library building was in need of attention, from the weathervane atop the roof to the cramped and crowded basements below ground. A heritage building, more than 130 years old, the Library demanded a unique approach and rare skills. The project was not only about the conservation of an architectural gem. It also covered the design and construction of a state-of-the-art research facility to better assist parliamentarians in doing their work.
West Block Renovation: PWGSC began renovations of the West Block, the main focus of the current five-year LTVP implementation phase. Initial work involved the stabilization and repair of some of its significant exterior components, such as the southeast tower, to ensure the safety of users of the building and visitors to Parliament Hill. The extent of the renovations has required parliamentary functions, currently housed in the West Block, to be moved. Projects to provide interim space included the advancement of plans for La Promenade and Wellington Buildings, which will temporarily house West Block offices and committee rooms.
See Section III — Table 12 for more information on individual LTVP Major Crown Projects or visit our website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
Canada's First World War monuments were erected to honour and remember the achievements and sacrifices of Canadians and Newfoundlanders during the First World War. Since 1996, PWGSC's heritage conservation experts, in collaboration with Veterans Affairs Canada, investigated the deterioration of these monuments and recommended appropriate conservation measures. This led to a $30-million project to restore 12 war monuments in France and Belgium.
Vimy Ridge Monument: As a National Historic Site of Canada with great historic, symbolic and architectural significance, the Vimy Ridge Monument required a very careful conservation approach that respected the intent of Walter Allward's original design. A multi-disciplinary project team of experts from Canada, France and Belgium worked on the rehabilitation of the site. PWGSC provided the project management services for this high-profile project, which was rededicated at the Canadian National Vimy Memorial on April 2, 2007.
In 2006-2007, the planning was done to meet the Ontario:Quebec distribution ratio of 75:25. As part of our National Capital Area Office Accommodation Strategy, we expect to reach an Ontario:Quebec distribution ratio of 75:25 by 2010 through a three-year action plan. This includes a Gatineau-specific accommodation strategy that clearly outlines how PWGSC will increase the inventory of office space in Quebec by 120,000 square metres.
PWGSC contributed to the government's sustainable development goals through its use of environmental management practices designed to minimize the environmental footprint of both existing and future facilities with special focus on greenhouse gas reductions, green leasing, green purchasing and environmental impact assessments.
PWGSC is providing leadership in greening government by committing to achieve the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED® — Canada) Gold standard for new construction and major renovations.
PWGSC developed a Green Lease Standard, which addresses such key environmental standards as wastewater management, indoor air quality, recycling, energy-efficient lighting fixtures and greenhouse gas reductions. Over 70 new leases or lease renewals have applied the new green lease provisions.
The Jean Canfield Government of Canada Building in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island is expected to obtain the LEED® — Canada Gold standard when it opens in 2007-2008. The Jean Canfield Building will house 500 federal employees from various departments.
The new Government of Canada Yellowknife Building in the Northwest Territories was built according to the latest environmental and energy-efficient standards. The four storey, 7,200-square metre building houses 200 public service employees from approximately 15 departments and agencies and will be the first "North of 60" LEED® — Canada Gold certified office building.
PWGSC introduced its first "green roof" in downtown Ottawa: shrubs, plants and flowers now cover roughly a third of the rooftop on the 29-year-old CD Howe building. Green roofs reduce the amount of energy required to heat and cool the building, lower greenhouse gas and sulphur dioxide emissions, improve air quality and allow both pollutants and nutrients from rainwater to be absorbed by the soil rather than entering storm drainage systems.
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments for the following four program activities: Federal Accommodation and Holdings; Real Property Services Revolving Fund; Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund; and Real Property Stewardship.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 2,516.3 | 2,363.8 | 2,200.6 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 278.4 | 472.3 | 472.3 |
Net Expenditures | 2,237.9 | 1,891.5 | 1,728.3 |
Federal Accommodation and Holdings Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 2,402 | 2,402 | 2,325 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between authorities and actual spending is due to project slippage caused by uncontrollable and unpredictable factors inherent to the nature of real property activities, such as: market fluctuation driving the price of commodities; weather conditions impacting the consumption of utilities and the delivery of some projects; and also, delays in the delivery of several repair and fit-up projects. It is also attributable to the reprofiling of the Action Plan on Climate Change not approved and to the carry forward of capital projects, as well as to the annual Treasury Board directed lapse to cover employee benefit and health care costs related to the special purpose allotment.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Effective management of real property investment, under the custodianship of PWGSC, in support of the delivery of government programs. | Government departments and agencies have safe, healthy, productive and affordable work environments and facilities that enable them to deliver programs and services. The real property portfolio is managed as an investment on behalf of the taxpayer. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 847.2 | 847.2 | 984.8 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 847.2 | 847.2 | 984.8 |
Net Resources (Provided) Used (Note 1) | - | - | - |
Real Property Services Revolving Fund Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 1,261 | 1,261 | 1,133 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The drawdown authority used at year-end was nil. The business volume increase reflected between the authorities and actual spending is mostly due to increased work for Third Party Clients (Alaska Highway bridge work), Parks Canada (Western Asset Management Service Center Highways), Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (mining work), Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, and PWGSC. The drop in FTEs is the direct consequence of services repatriated by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
Note 1: The amounts reported for the Real Property Services Revolving Fund are on a modified cash basis.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
The provision on a fee-for-service basis of optional real property services to other custodial departments, and to other departments and agencies requesting services over and above those provided under the Federal Accommodation and Holdings Service Line program. | Quality, affordable services are provided to government departments and agencies. Revenues will cover the full cost of service delivery. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.8 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 12.0 | 12.0 | 8.9 |
Net Resources (Provided) Used Note 1 | (8.0) | (8.0) | (6.1) |
Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | - | - | - |
Note: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund authorities and actual spending is due to the uniqueness of the real estate and the uncertainty of the condition of properties prior to sale.
Note 1: The amounts reported for the Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund are on a modified cash
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
The provision, on a cost-recovery basis, of routine disposals of real property assets no longer required in order to generate revenue for the Crown. | Realization of value (net proceeds of sale) from surplus properties. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 35.1 | 56.9 | 53.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Net Expenditures | 33.7 | 54.9 | 51.3 |
Real Property Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 245 | 250 | 283 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between authorities and actual spending is mainly due to lower than anticipated translation costs, and to personnel costs related to collective agreements that did not materialize as initially anticipated. The increase in FTEs is mainly due to the transfer of mandated activities from the special purpose allotment to Real Property Stewardship.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of strategic leadership and proactive management of the resources and real property assets to support the delivery of government programs. | Government program delivery is facilitated by a consistently applied, modern real property and program management framework that reflects a whole-of-government perspective in decision-making. |
|
PWGSC is the government's primary procurement service provider, offering client departments and agencies procurement solutions such as specialized contracts, standing offers, supply arrangements and online access to specially developed marketplaces (e-procurement). The role of Acquisitions is to provide the federal government with timely, value-added acquisitions and related common services. These services are provided within a framework that promotes quality services and the stewardship of key program areas: procurement renewal, policy improvements, quality assurance of contracting and client-supplier relations. The provision of acquisition services requires stringent and ethical procurement standards.
As a strategic partner with federal government clients, Acquisitions:
The role of Acquisitions includes military and Major Crown Project procurements. In addition, Acquisitions offers specialized services, such as marine inspection and technical services; forensic accounting services; management of seized property; central removal and freight services; travel management; standards for and certification of goods and services; surplus asset disposal; procurement of vaccines and drugs on behalf of provinces and territories; and the registration of quality (ISO 9000) and environmental (ISO 14001) management services.
Acquisitions supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through four program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above program activities are summarized at the end of this Acquisitions section.
Key Facts*
|
* Sources: PWGSC databases, The Way Forward, 2006-2007 Performance Management Report |
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC strategic priorities, as follows:
PWGSC undertook a number of strategic change initiatives in support of the Acquisition Services Program Activity.
In 2006-2007, Acquisitions continued to work on the delivery of efficiencies, productivity gains, and cost reductions, thereby contributing to the reallocation of resources to higher government priorities. While the initial commitment of government-wide acquisitions savings was to realize net savings of $2.5 billion over five years, in the Fiscal and Economic Update tabled in November 2006, the government announced adjustments to its savings forecast after determining that the projected savings were over-estimated. Savings for 2008-2009 and beyond will need to be achieved by departments through overall cost efficiencies, including continued efforts to reduce procurement costs.
There has been considerable progress in renewing procurement over the past two years. Acquisitions' total procurement savings for 2006-2007 was $225 million. This value is the estimated gross savings resulting from purchases conducted by PWGSC's Acquisitions Branch and its regions, which represents about 2% of our total procurement volume. It does not include all of the procurement savings resulting from purchases made by other government departments using the Consolidated Procurement Instruments, which PWGSC put in place prior to the end of March 2007.
Commodity management is a PWGSC-led strategic and consultative framework used to plan and manage the procurement of selected goods and services on a life-cycle basis to optimize value for the government.
One of our key commitments in the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities was to embed commodity management practices into daily operations. Commodity councils set savings targets for each commodity and PWGSC monitors overall efficiencies. Significant achievements were made. For example, we:
In 2006-2007, PWGSC continued the development and roll-out of the Government of Canada Marketplace (GoCM). This is an online tool that provides federal employees with an electronic catalogue of pre-approved goods and services available through standing offers and supply arrangements. This project will help generate efficiencies by delivering volume price discounts, consolidating procurement instruments such as standing offers and improving and simplifying purchasing processes.
In December 2006, the GoCM was released to all government departments and agencies, offering one-stop access to mandatory standing offers and supply arrangements. This preliminary release was intended to collect feedback on usability, functionality, training and content, as well as to further refine and improve the GoCM in preparation for the full launch in March 2008. As a result, Acquisitions Branch will improve the layout and usefulness of the tool and improve communications. Over the longer term, it is our intent to develop an end-to-end solution for purchasing goods and services available through Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements.
See Section III — Table 20 for more information on the GoCM project, or visit our website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/ih-hi-e.html.
Review sessions and workshops were held with clients in support of the establishment of comprehensive departmental procurement strategies and service-level agreements. These workshops have resulted in greater client buy-in and an improved working relationship between client departments and PWGSC.
Client engagement activities in 2006-2007 included meetings with 17 departments where procurement specialists provided detailed analysis and validation of departmental spending. An intense review of client departments' procurement processes, structures, practices, achievements and assessments against best practices was supported by recommendations on how the clients could improve their procurement practices and realize operational and procurement efficiencies.
In 2006-2007, PWGSC developed a range of communication materials, fact sheets on new instruments and the development of a website to provide procurement support to client departments. Through the website, PWGSC will work in partnership with departments and agencies to align their procurement processes and practices with the government's procurement transformation initiative.
The Office of Small and Medium Enterprise (OSME) plays a key role in procurement transformation initiatives. Through OSME, the department works to ensure open, fair and transparent competition for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). OSME's mission is to make certain that SMEs have a fair opportunity to compete for government business.
To improve outreach activities, six new OSME regional offices were established in Halifax, Montreal, Toronto, Edmonton and Vancouver, with an additional office in Ottawa. In 2006-2007 OSME:
SME participation by dollar value has already jumped, increasing by 85% to 300% in certain commodity areas. Currently, the overall participation rate by dollar value of SMEs exceeds 37% of total volume, representing approximately $5 billion per year being awarded to an average of 9,500 SMEs per year.
Finally, OSME has participated in a number of stakeholder sessions focused on socio-economic interests, including Aboriginal procurement, green procurement and, most notably, innovation-oriented procurement policy.
PWGSC has a key role in the Supply Operations Stewardship Program Activity, ensuring strong accountability in the government's procurement efforts. In support of the Federal Accountability Act and Action Plan, PWGSC started a public recruitment process in February 2007 to find candidates for the new position of Procurement Ombudsman. The Ombudsman will help to ensure that the government's procurement practices are fair and transparent. The appointment of a Procurement Ombudsman designate occurred in September 2007.
PWGSC started to develop the Code of Conduct for Procurement in 2006-2007. The Code's comprehensive statement of the government's expectations for the handling of procurement activities by suppliers and public service employees complements integrity provisions already contained in all procurement documents.
A draft Code was released for public consultation in February 2007. The feedback from the consultations resulted in significant changes that improved the document. The Code was released in September 2007. The complementary Vendor Performance Policy, expected in February 2008, will incorporate more specific implementation processes for evaluating vendor performance, identifying irregularities and facilitating the dispute resolution process.
The following is primarily related to the Acquisition Services Program Activity.
PWGSC works closely with the Department of National Defence to ensure timely contract awards and delivery of equipment and services that satisfy the needs of the men and women in the Canadian Forces, while ensuring best value for Canadians. The procurement, related to seven major military capabilities, announced by the government since June 2006, is now well underway, with the average timelines for these new capability procurements estimated at less than 25 months, well under the 63 month average for past major military projects.
PWGSC is also looking to buy goods that, where appropriate, are readily available in the marketplace instead of those that require development. In the case of the Strategic Airlift (C-17) project, as an example, PWGSC awarded a contract eight months after approval of the statement of requirements, and the contractor delivered the first aircraft in August 2007, 14 months after the project was announced.
Overall PWGSC is working with DND and TBS to develop a more efficient and coherent means to procure military equipment and services that balance the operational objectives of the Canadian Forces with broader policy objectives (the right equipment at the right time for the right price, obtained fairly and transparently with the best possible socio-economic benefits package).
The Shared Travel Services Initiative (STSI), jointly led by PWGSC and the Treasury Board Secretariat, is aimed at improving and streamlining the government's travel management practices and increasing the satisfaction of travelling employees.
STSI has developed and deployed the following services across the government:
PWGSC is continuing to improve transparency and accountability of government travel with the implementation and adoption of these activities across the government. The STSI saved the Government of Canada approximately $20 million in 2006-2007.
More information on the Shared Travel Services Initiative may be found in Section III — Table 20 and on our website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/ih-hi-e.html.
PWGSC is assisting client departments to identify, acquire and adopt environmentally friendly "green" procurement alternatives. For instance, Acquisitions assisted the Office of Greening Government Operations in updating the Green Procurement templates that provide buyers with information on environmental considerations.
PWGSC worked closely with Environment Canada, Natural Resources Canada and the Office of Greening Government Operations to develop and implement commodity specific green procurement plans to improve environmental sustainability. The posting of commodity templates on Publiservice, covering such areas as IT hardware and fuels, for example, will increase the visibility of the green procurement potential to all government departments and combined with increased usage of our standing offers, will allow government to clearly demonstrate progress and performance in this area.
Over the past two years, Acquisitions has been developing a process to capture, categorize and analyze government procurement expenditures to support commodity management, client engagement and performance reporting activities. This process culminated in the launch of an expenditures analysis tool and related databases in early 2006-2007. This database of detailed and consistent spending information outlines basic reports and multi-year analysis to support client engagement and commodity management. It allows departments to consider the bundling of requirements and establishment of a demand management regime. This consolidated approach to spend analysis (spend management) will also have considerable benefits in terms of supporting comptrollership and sound management.
In addition, commodity management is a key element in improving government procurement requiring a government-wide consultative and strategic framework. This will involve the implementation of Consolidated Procurement Instruments, which include standing offers, supply arrangements and government-wide contracts. Once integrated into a robust electronic procurement tool such as the GoCM, these instruments will provide the optimal environment for achieving benefits such as:
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through four program activities: Acquisition Services; Optional Services Revolving Fund; Defence Production Revolving Fund; and Supply Operations Stewardship.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 195.3 | 227.7 | 230.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 40.9 | 60.5 | 60.5 |
Net Expenditures | 154.4 | 167.2 | 169.5 |
Acquisition Services Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 1,800 | 1,824 | 1,861 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actual spending is mainly due to higher than anticipated costs related to ongoing operations. The FTE increase is attributed to unadjusted authority transfers between Acquisition Services and Supply Operations Stewardship.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Acquisition of goods and services on behalf of the federal government. Management of the supply process by assisting clients with requirements definitions, bid solicitation and evaluation, contract negotiation and administration. Management of all procurement-related aspects of major projects (over $100 million). Operation of regional offices to carry out PWGSC acquisition activities across Canada, as well as offices in the United States and Europe, principally to service the needs of the military. | Timely and cost-efficient acquisition services are provided to other government departments and agencies with enhanced service levels. |
Percentage reduction in cost of goods and services; percentage reduction in time for procurement transaction; percentage reduction in cost of government purchasing:
Percentage of client departments satisfied with PWGSC services:
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 100.4 | 100.4 | 94.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 100.4 | 100.4 | 95.2 |
Net Resources (Provided) Used (Note1) | - | - | (0.9) |
Optional Services Revolving Fund Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 44 | 44 | 44 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The Optional Services Revolving Fund variance between the authorities and actual spending is due to lower than anticipated sales and related expenditures in the Traffic Management Program.
Note 1: The amounts reported for the Optional Services Revolving Fund are on a modified cash basis.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision to client departments of specialized services such as marine inspection and technical services, travel management, consensus standards and conformity assessment services. Procurement of vaccines and drugs on behalf of provinces and territories. |
Quality, affordable services are provided to government departments and agencies. Revenues offset the full cost of service delivery. |
Recoveries as a percentage of cost:
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | - | - | - |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - |
Net Resources (Provided) Used (Note1) | - | - | - |
Defence Production Revolving Fund Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | - | - | - |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Maintenance of a legacy fund for acquisition of military supplies in an emergency. | Funding of defence acquisition emergencies on a cost-recovery basis. |
Recoveries as a percentage of cost:
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 47.7 | 91.6 | 68.1 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 8.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Net Expenditures | 39.1 | 87.9 | 64.4 |
Supply Operations Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 339 | 342 | 327 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actual spending is mainly due to lower than anticipated expenditures related to the business transformation generated by the government's change in procurement strategic direction. The FTE decrease is attributed to unadjusted authority transfers between Supply Operations Stewardship and Acquisition Services which is reflecting an increase.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Management and administration of the department's acquisition policy; contract quality assurance, professional development, and vendor performance review; and other activities that support program delivery. |
Procurement community is satisfied with the policy advice, quality assurance, strategic planning and human resources support provided. Corporate goals related to professional development are met. Federal employees' knowledge of green procurement increases. |
Percentage of satisfied employees:
Percentage of achieved official language targets:
Percentage of minimum training investment:
Number of outreach sessions provided to Federal employees:
|
PWGSC's Information Technology Services (ITS) provides IT services to other government departments, including electronic access by Canadians to government information and services, and manage PWGSC's internal Information Management/Information Technology (IM/IT) services. It manages voice and data networks, data centres, distributed computing applications, Secure Channel, and information management enabling services.
ITS provides key leadership in supporting government-wide IT transformation initiatives and PWGSC's modernization. ITS works closely with client departments and agencies to understand and respond to their IT requirements, while delivering highly reliable, cost-effective and secure IT services and solutions.
ITS supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through three program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The 2006-2007 three program activities' expenditures and actual results are summarized at the end of this ITS section.
Key Facts*
|
* Source: PWGSC databases, Sustainable Development Strategy Report. |
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC strategic priorities, as follows:
The IT Shared Services (IT-SS) initiative, which primarily supports the IM/IT Services Program Activity, is a major component of the government's overall plan to consolidate IT infrastructure services and facilities to ensure effective, efficient and cost-conscious technology solutions. This complements the ongoing delivery of services currently provided to departments and agencies in the areas of telecommunications, network infrastructure and computing.
IT Services, in growing the IT-SS initiative, views the government, holistically, as an enterprise whose goal is to reduce technical complexity and increase interoperability and information exchange. Under this approach, departments and agencies will continue to have the flexibility to deliver their own programs and services, while the government as a whole will achieve more efficient, cost-effective operations through economies of scale and standardization.
ITS worked with six organizations (Canada School of Public Service, Health Canada, Veterans Affairs Canada, Parks Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada and Privy Council Office) to transfer IT services to a shared services model. Health Canada's service desk and all of the Canada School of Public Service's IT services have completed the transfer, while others are at various stages of transition.
In 2006-2007, ITS established an ambitious change agenda to strengthen internal PWGSC IM/IT methods and procedures, in order to create a leading edge, best practice organization. During this period a seven-point IM/IT change agenda was approved and implementation is now well underway. This initiative included the implementation of a best practice business model that focuses on clients and service delivery. The model, which enhances our ability to deliver services, is divided into the three phases of IM/IT service provisioning: plan, build and operate.
Accomplishments, directly supporting the IM/IT Stewardship Program Activity, included:
IM/IT is a critical component of PWGSC's transformation initiatives. During 2006-2007, ITS provided strategic advice, technical solutions and support to other departmental transformation initiatives including:
ITS began the year working on three major initiatives - the Shared Travel Services Initiative (STSI), the Government of Canada Marketplace (GoCM) and the closeout of Government On-Line (GOL).
ITS transitioned the STSI from a Major Crown Project to a Government of Canada program and transferred it to the Acquisitions Branch in October 2006.
The GoCM, an Internet-based tool that provides Government of Canada employees with simplified access to an electronic catalogue of goods and services, was informally launched in December 2006. It is a key initiative of PWGSC's procurement transformation agenda.
The GOL initiative was successfully completed in September 2006 with the GOL closeout submission, which was approved by the Treasury Board. The GOL initiative was the primary catalyst for Canada being recognized internationally by an independent authority, five years in a row, as the government most connected to its citizens online. Canadians, businesses and international clients now have a more accessible government, where information and services are organized according to their needs, and are available 24/7 around the world, in English or French.
The IM/IT Stewardship Program Activity is supported through ITS's outcomes-based management model, which rigorously measures and monitors all aspects of its operations, plans and projects. This model enabled ITS to quickly identify variances. During the monthly senior executive review in January 2007, a Secure Channel performance variance was noted and quickly resolved with the vendor. In March 2007 the Daylight Saving Project, consisting of over 500 changes across thousands of infrastructure components, was implemented without incident.
Operational excellence was further enhanced through the Services Management Improvement Program (SMIP). ITS implemented a client centred external service delivery strategy that drives efficiencies; respects client privacy rights; reflects an enterprise view of government services; and results in effective service delivery. It measured the effectiveness of service delivery, the results of which were used to improve processes and, where appropriate, migrate clients to lower cost solutions. Resulting improvements are projected to produce $3.5 million in savings for 2007-2008.
The Records, Documents and Information Management System (RDIMS), an IT Shared Service launched in September 2005 to improve the collection and alignment of information, met its 2006-2007 targets of 60,000 active licenses and participation of more than 50% of government departments and agencies.
ITS also achieved major accomplishments with Secure Channel such as:
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through three program activities: IM/IT Services; Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund; and IM/IT Stewardship.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 283.3 | 459.3 | 455.1 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 140.1 | 196.0 | 196.0 |
Net Expenditures | 143.2 | 263.3 | 259.0 |
IM/IT Services Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 1,506 | 1,547 | 1,587 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The operating vote variance between the total authorities and actual spending is due to Long Term Contract savings related to the Secure Channel project as well as to procurement delays and increase in business volume late in fiscal year.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of IM/IT solutions to the Government of Canada, including infrastructure, design, and leadership of major government-wide service projects. | Shared services and systems used by departments and agencies. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 135.8 | 135.8 | 161.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 135.8 | 135.8 | 168.2 |
Net Resources (Provided) Used (Note1) | - | - | (6.8) |
Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund Full-Time Equivalents(FTEs) | 194 | 194 | 183 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund actuals were higher than anticipated due to a large increase in revenue and cost of sales attributable to the Network Equipment Support Services (NESS) being implemented along with client growth in some of our other services.
Note 1: The amounts reported for the Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund are on a modified cash basis.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of network and infrastructure services; voice telecommunications services; satellite services; and managed services. This activity is the only one currently managed through a fully compensatory client-paid revolving fund. | Departments and agencies receive competitively priced and innovative business solutions, leading to government-wide cost savings. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 10.4 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Net Expenditures | 9.8 | 14.2 | 14.2 |
IM/IT Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 97 | 125 | 126 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of IM/IT standards, architecture, engineering, security, client interface/relationship, branch program management, strategy and governance. | Sound leadership of IM/IT resources in GC. |
|
PWGSC manages the Receiver General and Public Service Compensation functions of the government.
The organizations supporting the Receiver General function manage the operations of the federal treasury, including issuing payments and collecting revenue for all government departments; preparing the Public Accounts; and producing the government's Monthly Statements of Financial Operations. These activities ensure the government's financial stability and public confidence through accurate and timely issuance of payments to Canadians and reporting of the government's financial activities. For example, the Public Accounts are subject to the single largest annual audit conducted by the Office of the Auditor General. As a result of the Receiver General's ongoing efforts, the Auditor General has named Canada a world leader in financial reporting by a national government.
As Canada's largest payroll and pension administrator, Public Service Compensation provides payroll, benefits and pension plan administration services for the Public Service of Canada. This includes: the administration of payroll, pension and insurance services for public service employees and pensioners; specialized pension services and dental plan services for the Canadian Forces, Lieutenant Governors and Diplomatic Services pensioners; payroll and dental insurance services for members of the RCMP; and pay and pension services for current and former Members of Parliament.
Public Service Compensation helps departments and agencies achieve their objectives through automated compensation services and some integration of its central pay system with their human resources systems. This integration allows them to administer pay and benefits in accordance with collective agreements and compensation policies established by the Treasury Board Secretariat and certain separate employers, as well as to fulfill the requirements of the Public Service Superannuation Act.
Key Facts* The Receiver General:
Public Service Compensation:
|
* Source: PWGSC databases |
Through the use of systems and processes and a complex and wide-ranging network of partnerships and alliances, the organization contributes significantly to the integrity, transparency and accountability of government transactions. Receiver General and Public Service Compensation are central functions that contribute to the achievement of the government's objectives of quality and cost-efficiency.
Receiver General and Public Service Compensation (RGC) supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through five program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above program activities are summarized at the end of this RGC section.
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC strategic priorities, as follows:
In 2006-2007, in support of the Receiver General Stewardship Program Activity, the branch continued to improve reporting to Parliament and to the public. The Monthly Statements of Financial Operations were consistently produced according to schedule within established standards. The 2005-2006 Public Accounts of Canada were produced in compliance with the schedule established with the Office of the Comptroller General, Department of Finance and the Office of the Auditor General. For these Public Accounts, a new accounting standard regarding the government reporting entity was retroactively adopted, introducing some organizations not previously included in the financial statements.
The Auditor General of Canada commented in her observations that this results in a financial statement that presents the government's financial position more completely and fairly. Control frameworks, quality assurance programs and continuous risk management contribute to the Receiver General and Public Service Compensation's ability to maintain its core operations.
Today's pay and pension systems use outdated technology and rely on the expertise of staff due to retire in the next few years. The business processes are complex and heavily dependent on manual intervention.
Participation in two benchmarking groups, one national and one international, has confirmed that the cost of delivering public service pension services is amongst the highest of those organizations surveyed. This is attributable to the limitations of the legacy systems supporting the business.
Two pay benchmarking studies conducted in the past fiscal year identified that PWGSC falls in the bottom range of performance measures for cost (four times more costly than the benchmark median), quality/efficiency (40% worse than the benchmark) and cycle time (60% worse than the benchmark), where it is dependent upon upstream human resources processes (compensation advisor pay data input) and technology, and where there has been less investment in modern systems and automation.
Two initiatives are under way in pension administration to replace the systems and modernize the services and processes: the Government of Canada Pension Modernization Project (GCPMP) and the Centralization of Pension Services Delivery and Pay Modernization.
The Pay Modernization Project will renew PWGSC's pay administration business processes and legacy pay systems using a commercial off-the-shelf pay solution. The modernized pay solution will address operational sustainability issues; provide greater flexibility and improved functionality including seamless integration of the Government of Canada payroll and human resource systems; and enable operational savings from efficiencies gained with the introduction of self-service.
The business case for the Preliminary Project Approval was done with the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS). Iterative exchanges of information and analysis with TBS contributed to firm up the business case. Three other key activities were initiated: business process mapping; gathering and documenting of business requirements for the future; and conducting of two detailed benchmarking studies to compare the GC payroll administration processes, quality and costs to those of industry.
The Pay Modernization Project team has also ensured alignment with, and participation in, related GC horizontal initiatives; the Corporate Administrative Shared Services initiative and the Canada Public Service Agency's streamlining of government human resources processes.
In support of the Public Service Compensation Services Program Activity, the objective of the project is to replace outdated technology and business processes by a multi-plan solution based on commercial off-the-shelf software products that will ensure ongoing sustainability of pension administration and enable industry standard levels of service.
Since receiving Preliminary Project Approval we have defined 16 key business processes and developed the business renewal strategy. We have also completed the new system architecture and developed plans for implementation, including the conversion and release strategies. The project's management processes have been audited internally and are considered appropriate to the successful management of the project. Substantive cost estimates for Crown and vendor implementation activities have been developed and they have been validated by two external audits.
Further information on the Pension Modernization Project may be found in Section III — Table 12 or on our website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
In conjunction with the Pension Modernization Project implementation of new technology and business processes, pension services to employees who are members of the Public Service Superannuation Act pension plan will be centralized progressively, consolidating the delivery within a centre of expertise in PWGSC. This year, the centralization of the retirement planning information sessions was completed to add the already centralized Division of Pension Benefits and Pension Transfers. The level of client satisfaction for these services has increased from 66% to an average of 79%. A business case was finalized for Effective Project Approval for centralizing the remaining nine pension services in PWGSC with associated savings.
During the year, we expanded existing optional services related to document imaging and automated data capture. These services accounted for 29 Full-Time Equivalent positions in 2006-2007. As part of our objective to provide new cost-effective services to government departments, PWGSC set up a satellite office of its National Capital Area Compensation Services in Matane, Quebec. Furthermore, preliminary plans were initiated to establish a satellite office of PWGSC Regional Pay System operations in Matane for implementation in 2007-2008.
Foreign banking arrangements helped to improve payment processes for the Department of National Defence for paying local suppliers in Kandahar. To improve relations, the Canadian Forces needed a simple and rapid means to pay suppliers and others in Kandahar in local currency. This proved challenging because of the difficulties associated with buying Afghani currency, which is not directly available through Canadian banks.
With the objective of measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of the Receiver General's operations, we engaged an independent third party to undertake a benchmarking review against comparable operations in the public and private sectors. Although the initial analysis determined that it was not possible to find comparable benchmarks in the public and private sectors due to the complexity and uniqueness of operations, the study concluded that the Receiver General has established its operations so as to render them efficient and effective and that the vast majority of leading practices are in place.
In 2006-2007, the volume of activity continued to increase in Compensation Administration, following increases of 6% and 3.5% in the previous two years.
Although the national level of service to departments and agencies for pay and pension interventions improved by 2% over the previous year, the overall average of 88% was still below the 95% standard. This was due to a number of factors including a decrease in the quality of data received from departments, a lack of trained/qualified resources and the deployment of skilled resources to other priorities. As well, a national survey conducted at year-end indicated that client satisfaction has suffered somewhat, declining 13% (to 81%) from the 94% attained in the previous survey conducted two years ago.
Measures taken to address both of these issues include: closer monitoring of budgetary provisions to ensure funds are deployed to areas where they will have the most impact; seeking additional funding, where required, for recruitment and training; and implementing stringent quality control measures.
In the pension administration area, significant improvements have been made to meet the level of service standard for processing prior service purchase options. While the present number of non-finalized files over the 275-day objective is at its lowest for the last 10 years, reaching less than 2,000, challenges remain in closing the gap between the actual processing result of 73.2% and the 90% service standard. Means are being put in place to improve management of the workload, increase production levels and ensure that effective controls are in place to monitor and follow up on requests for required documentation.
In 2006-2007, direct deposit participation increased by an additional 5.3 million for a total of 172 million direct deposit payments. Already available in Canada and the United States, this method of payment was established in Australia, New Zealand and 12 European countries. Enrolment in the foreign direct deposit program is as high as 55.8% of eligible recipients, depending on the country. The direct deposit program eliminated requirements for some 2,500 metric tonnes of paper last year, saving approximately 50,000 trees.
In 2006-2007, a new cheque format was developed that adheres to the industry-wide standard, offers increased security, and simplifies the cheque management and printing process. Testing with the financial institutions is scheduled to start in 2007-2008.
Compensation Web Applications (CWA) provide employees with easy, online secure access to pay, benefits and pension information as well as tools to calculate pay and pension-related projections. Deployment of CWA continued across the Government of Canada. In departments where CWA was launched, 102,000 employees have access to the site and now have the option to choose not to receive the printed version of their pay stub. This new feature will reduce the usage of paper and, in turn, contribute to the greening of government and the environment.
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against these commitments through five program activities: Receiver General Services; Public Service Compensation Services; Receiver General Stewardship; Public Service Pay Stewardship; and Public Service Pension Stewardship.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment) and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 11.2 | 10.0 | 10.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 2.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Net Expenditures | 8.8 | 6.6 | 7.3 |
Receiver General Services Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 52 | 61 | 49 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actual spending is due to an expenditure coded by error in this progarm activity instead of the Receiver General Stewardship.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Maintenance operations for the Departmental Financial Management System. Provision of optional document-imaging services for departments. Provision of optional payment-related printing such as tax information statements and pay statements. |
Receiver General Services are timely, efficient and delivered within defined service standards. Business development is based on growing imaging expertise. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
Net Expenditures | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
Public Service Compensation Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 50 | 56 | 52 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actual spending is mainly due to the Corporate Management allocation.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Administration of payroll, pension and health/disability insurance processes for public service employees and pensioners. Provision of pension services to the Department of National Defence (DND). |
Communications to public service employees and pensioners via pay envelope inserts are provided in a timely manner. Administration of pensions for Canadian Forces annuitants. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment) and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 148.2 | 155.8 | 146.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 21.3 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
Net Expenditures | 126.9 | 137.8 | 128.0 |
Receiver General Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 520 | 494 | 423 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actuals spending is due to the following factors : The reallocation of sound management cost, an expenditure coded to Receiver General Services instead of Receiver General Stewardship, and, in the Special Purpose Allotment : retroactive triennial costs not required; lower credit card volumes; lower postage requirements for the Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB) program as a result of higher than anticipated enrolment in direct deposit; and lower infrastructure costs for the Receiver General Settlement Streamlining (RGSS) project. These surplus were not allocated to other priorities due to funding mechanism restrictions.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Maintenance of high-quality support for the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) and the Accounts of Canada (revenue collection, cash management operations, payment services, Public Accounts, Monthly Statement of Financial Operations, Central Accounts). | The integrity of the CRF and the Accounts of Canada is preserved. Functions essential to the financial safety and security of the Canadian public are executed effectively. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment) and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 31.3 | 41.0 | 39.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 3.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
Net Expenditures | 27.7 | 33.2 | 31.9 |
Public Service Pay Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 379 | 383 | 422 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actual spending is mainly due to the Corporate Management allocation. Other factors such as delays in staffing and revenues higher than expected explain the remaining portion of the variance.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Administration of payroll and health/disability insurance processes for public service employees and pensioners. | The integrity of pay and benefits administration is assured. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotment) and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 64.3 | 77.8 | 75.9 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 44.1 | 52.6 | 52.6 |
Net Expenditures | 20.2 | 25.2 | 23.3 |
Public Service Pension Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 679 | 781 | 804 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authorities and actual spending is mainly due to the Corporate Management allocation.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Administration of pension processes for public service pensioners. | Assurance of the integrity of pension administration. |
|
Consulting, Information and Shared Services (CISS) has undergone significant changes since 2005 with the transfer of a number of programs (refer to Crosswalk of CISS Programs). In order to conform to the reporting structure of the Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007 and our approved Program Activity Architecture reporting structure, only the results of the original components of CISS (formerly Government Information and Consulting Services) are reported in this section.
CISS provides four distinct common services: government communications, public sector management, shared services and industrial security:
Crosswalk of CISS Programs Government Information Services
Former Public Access Programs
Government Consulting Services
Former Business Integration Services
|
Throughout 2006-2007, in addition to completing the transition of the Public Access Programs to Service Canada, the branch concluded its internal transition activities to integrate Government Consulting Services, Shared Services Integration, and Industrial Security with its existing Communications Services.
Consulting, Information and Shared Services supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through two program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above activities are summarized at the end of this CISS section.
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC strategic priorities, as follows:
At the beginning of 2006-2007, the new CISS branch was fragmented, with incomplete internal corporate support functions providing services to the branch's business lines and the Consulting and Audit functions of the now segregated Consulting and Audit Canada.
CISS successfully "right-sized" its support functions to meet the needs of its four business lines. Economies were generated by eliminating positions with overlapping responsibilities. Some support positions were transformed into revenue-generating positions for Government Consulting Services (GCS).
The branch required a strong foundation to ensure the integrity of operations. Work groups were created to target key areas to strengthen the focus on delivery during the transition. These areas included governance and organizational design, integration of support services, and strengthening the management control framework.
As part of its transition activities, CISS refocused GCS to offer services requiring public sector expertise in support of government initiatives such as sustainable development strategies, public service renewal, human resources management modernization, and program evaluations. In 2007-2008, CISS will engage key GCS clients to further refine service offerings.
In response to the November 2005 Auditor General's Report, Chapter 2, "The Quality and Reporting of Surveys." Public Opinion Research and Advertising Coordination (PORAC) created an advisory panel on telephone survey quality. The panel comprised public and private sector subject matter experts. The initiative's objective is to strengthen the quality of telephone surveys conducted on behalf of the government by developing survey standards and guidelines for departments. The panel made a range of recommendations focusing on ways to address the long-term, worldwide trend toward declining response rates.
The report has been made available to the public, the marketing research industry and the public opinion research community within the federal government. Recommendations from the report will guide the development of new public opinion research contracting tools. This work contributed directly to the Government Information Stewardship Program Activity.
Key Facts*
|
* Source: PWGSC databases, Integrated Publications Management System, Publications.gc.ca, EMM client list, Advertising Management Information System, Research Information Management System, Financial Management System. |
In support of the Federal Accountability Act and Action Plan, PORAC provided advice and support to the Treasury Board Secretariat that assisted in developing amendments to the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada by:
With continual improvement to management controls and processes over the past three years, PORAC received a favourable assessment in the February 2007 Auditor General's Report, Chapter 1, "Advertising and Public Opinion Research." The report made no critical observations or recommendations for improvement.
Through its commitment to the Government Information Services Program Activity, CISS provides communications services to citizens and other government departments based on the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada.
CISS carried out client satisfaction surveys in 2006-2007. Client satisfaction ratings for CISS communications services were high, ranging from 77% to 97%.
CISS is responsible for publication of the Canada Gazette within legislated timelines. In 2006-2007, the Canada Gazette met all legislated deadlines and maintained an error rate of less than one tenth of a percent.
The Canada Gazette initiated a pilot project to gauge the feasibility of and interest in an interactive online tool to educate future Canadian voters. Focus group sessions led to a realignment of the initiative. The Canada Gazette will now partner with Library and Archives Canada to develop a fully digitized, indexed online research tool to chronicle the history of the Canada Gazette. This tool will assist the work of researchers, librarians, genealogical associations and the legal community. One section will be dedicated to educational resources for secondary school curricula.
Publishing and Depository Services (PDS) continued to make government publications accessible to Canadians in print and electronic versions. In 2006-2007, PDS:
The Government of Canada Exhibitions Program (GCEP) informs Canadians about government priorities, programs, services and access channels at exhibitions and events across Canada. Coordination of government participation at events ensures economies of scale by co-locating individual departments and programs at events in all parts of Canada. Through the Canada Pavilion, the program provides Canadians with one-stop access to a broad range of government programs and services and how to access them.
In 2006-2007, GCEP:
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through two program activities: Government Information Services; and Government Information Stewardship.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 43.6 | 40.9 | 40.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 11.3 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
Net Expenditures | 32.3 | 31.7 | 30.8 |
Government Information Services Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 201 | 216 | 180 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Consulting, Information and Shared Services Branch (CISSB) includes activities for Government Information Services and Stewardship, as well as Business Integration Services and Consulting Services. CISSB ended the year at almost breakeven (0.8% variance overall) because, in accordance with the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities, the Branch covered the Consulting shortfall under the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Funds.
This table also includes $14.1 million of net actual expenditures relating to the Public Access Programs Sector that was transferred to Human Resources and Social Development Canada (HRSDC) by Order in Council Sept 12, 2005.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Management of the Government of Canada's (GC) communications platform by providing multi-channel access to information on government programs and services. | Information about federal government programs and services is provided effectively and cost-efficiently using a broad range of communications channels and services that are fairly and transparently obtained. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 18.2 | 18.6 | 20.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 0.1 | - | - |
Net Expenditures | 18.1 | 18.6 | 20.3 |
Government Information Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 64 | 61 | 55 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Consulting, Information and Shared Services Branch (CISSB) includes activities for Government Information Services and Stewardship, as well as Business Integration Services and Consulting Services. CISSB ended the year at almost breakeven (0.8% variance overall) because, in accordance with the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities, the Branch covered the Consulting shortfall under the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Funds.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of government-wide strategic management, coordination and monitoring in the areas of advertising, public opinion research and electronic media monitoring, activities that are detailed in the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada and its associated procedures. | Government information services are provided from a whole-of-government perspective with transparency and accountability, and their finances are managed soundly. |
|
Prior to February 2006, PWGSC's program activities associated with Business Integration were the responsibility of the Service Integration Branch. This branch no longer exists, and its four Business Integration functions have been reassigned: two across the department and two to the Consulting, Information and Shared Services Branch.
Until a new Program Activity Architecture has been approved by the Treasury Board Secretariat, we will report the strategic plans and initiatives of these functions against the Business Integration program activities.
Business Integration supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through two program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above program activities are summarized at the end of this Business Integration section.
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC 2006-2007 strategic priorities, as follows:
The centralized PWGSC client consultancy unit in the former Service Integration Branch was phased out in 2006, with the client consultancy resources moving to Acquisitions and Real Property. This arrangement contributed to the continued support of the Business Integration Performance Management Program Activity.
We developed a client relationship management tool, Client Data Integration Plus (CDIPlus), to track key client issues and create a central repository of client information in PWGSC. Centralizing this information is all the more important with the phase-out of the central client consultancy unit. The various branches and regional offices will enter client information into CDIPlus.
Centralizing the client information will permit analysis across business lines and regions with client departments. That information will be supplemented by a client survey to collect key information for measuring results and, ultimately, establish performance targets.
To give PWGSC's clients ready access to product and service details, including fee structures, a menu of products and services was drafted and installed on the CDIPlus application.
Listings for the Office of Greening Government Operations; Consulting, Information and Shared Services; and Information Technology Services are being added to the menu. Updates planned for the coming year include the revised performance measures and fee schedules being developed.
The Treasury Board Secretariat's Service Policy Framework is resulting in a new policy suite that requires organizations to have an inventory of the services they offer. In PWGSC's case, the menu of products and services will fulfil this requirement and contribute to the Business Integration Services Program Activity. We will also meet the Treasury Board Secretariat's requirement to access interdepartmental service agreements by housing these agreements in CDIPlus.
The Industrial Security Sector (ISS) has two main functions, both of which contribute to the Business Integration Services Program Activity:
In 2006-2007, ISS worked to improve and streamline services, facilitate access to foreign government contracting opportunities for Canadian industry, and strengthen stakeholder relationships. For example, ISS:
Shared Services Integration (SSI) is a full cost-recovery program dedicated to reducing government's investment in corporate administrative systems and processes, thereby reducing overall costs.
SSI provides services to clusters of departments and agencies using four corporate administrative shared systems:
In 2006-2007, PWGSC used a common approach to move Oracle/PeopleSoft and IFMS members to new government standards. Standardization will allow for common data capture; horizontal integration of administrative support activities, including finance, human resources and materiel management; significantly more informed and better decision-making; and cost reductions.
SSI also provides full cost-recovery transaction-based Shared Human Resources Services (SHRS) for 20 small departments and agencies. In 2006-2007, plans were made to move SHRS to a cluster model of operations to maximize economies of scale. As a first step, MOUs were standardized for SHRS clients and a revised costing model was created.
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006–2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through two program activities: Business Integration Services and Business Integration Performance Management.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 22.2 | 39.8 | 38.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 12.2 | 22.9 | 22.9 |
Net Expenditures | 10.0 | 16.9 | 15.5 |
Business Integration Services Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 133 | 159 | 167 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Consulting, Information and Shared Services Branch (CISSB) includes activities for Government Information Services and Stewardship, as well as Business Integration Services and Consulting Services. CISSB ended the year at almost breakeven (0.8% variance overall) because, in accordance with the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities, the Branch covered the Consulting shortfall under the CACRF.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Identification and development of strategic business and process opportunities to integrate services provided by PWGSC, and to take advantage of economies of scale with colleague departments, the Government of Canada and all other interjurisdictional agencies and organizations, including regions. |
PWGSC is an organization that fosters a harmonized environment, including:
|
Results for Industrial Security Sector
Results for Shared Services Integration Sector
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 43.9 | 40.7 | 40.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 38.5 | 34.6 | 34.6 |
Net Expenditures | 5.4 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Business Integration Performance Management Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 459 | 449 | 449 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Note 1: Business Integration Performance Management program activity figures reflect internal recoveries that cannot be charged to other program activities
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Establishment of client service expectations and monitoring of overall service performance of PWGSC. This will include ensuring that customer satisfaction is effectively measured, and contribute to the thought process for branch initiatives on strategic process improvements. |
PWGSC is an organization that:
|
When the Service Integration Branch (SIB) was dismantled in February 2006, this program activity was changed to focus on changes to revolving funds for Internal Services for transparency purposes. Due to the complex financial reporting structure of PWGSC, a portion of the internal services related to our revolving funds cannot be allocated department-wide and must therefore be captured under this program activity. |
The financial expenditures for Business Integration Client Relations Management are not shown because, for the Treasury Board Secretariat’s financial reporting purposes, these costs have been re-allocated to the other program activities as departmental overheads.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Strategic management of client relationships at an enterprise level with the goal of generating high levels of sustainable client satisfaction through the most efficient and effective means possible, including regular performance measurements. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) will focus on a strategy that is enabled by technology in improving efficiency for taxpayers and the Government of Canada. |
PWGSC is an organization that:
|
|
PWGSC has two special operating agencies (SOAs): The Translation Bureau and Consulting and Audit Canada (CAC) which is made up of two distinct entities: Audit Services Canada (ASC) and Government Consulting Services (GCS), the latter being integrated within Consulting, Information and Shared Services (CISS). Since the two entities continue to share the CAC revolving fund, and to comply with reporting requirements, Government Consulting Services forms part of the current subsection.
17 years ago, the Bureau of Management Consulting was merged with the Audit Services Bureau to create Consulting and Audit Canada (CAC), a Special Operating Agency (SOA) financed by a revolving fund with a mission to contribute to public sector management and operations and the achievement of the Government of Canada's (GC) priorities. It does so by providing consulting, audit and assurance services to public sector managers in Canada and abroad.
Based on reviews of CAC in 2005 and the industry trend to segregate consulting and audit functions in firms involved in both these business lines, it was decided to restructure CAC. Audit Services Canada (ASC) was created and Government Consulting Services (GCS) was integrated with Consulting, Information and Shared Services. ASC and GCS both operate under a fee-for-services structure.
CAC supports PWGSC's Quality Services strategic outcome through one program activity:
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above program activity are summarized at the end of this CAC section.
Key Facts* Audit Services Canada
|
*Source: PWGSC databases, Client Satisfaction Survey. |
The strategic change and improvement initiatives, impacting the results of the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund Program Activity, are presented for ASC and GCS.
ASC's mission is to contribute to improving public sector management, accountability and operations by providing assurance, audit and accounting services. ASC has a large group of professionally qualified auditors with excellent knowledge of government. The services have been provided for over 60 years.
In 2006-2007 ASC conducted more than 300 assignments in the areas of:
ASC achieved this year's business goals of:
For ASC to be officially recognized, it needed a new charter, which has been developed and is awaiting approval. We also developed and maintained a strategic partnership with the OCG in order to support and enhance the internal audit capacity within the federal government.
During 2006-2007, ASC created the Professional Practices Group to provide a robust quality assurance process, including peer reviews and practice inspections. All ASC offices were subject to inspection of their internal practices to determine what improvements are required to meet Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants standards. The Group developed an action plan that is being implemented.
ASC also developed human resources and succession plans, which were approved and are being implemented. Internal and external competitions have been launched to fill vacant positions, but an acute shortage of audit professionals has made it impossible to do so quickly. Where there were critical staff shortages, ASC closely supervised the use of private sector resources on a limited basis.
In compliance with the new Public Service Employment Act, ASC evaluated and renewed the Audit Professional Development Program to ensure its auditors' skills and knowledge are kept up to date. In 2006-2007, the program reached its target of five training days per Full-Time Equivalent.
In 2006-2007, ASC maintained its regional delivery network to minimize travel costs and to ensure that regional clients have every access to ASC's services. On a limited basis, ASC used private sector resources, working under supervision, where there were critical staff shortages and time constraints.
Serving as the government in-house management consulting group, GCS provides specialized advice and solutions to improve public sector management in Canada and abroad. GCS recently realigned its activities to focus on the core consulting services most relevant to managers in government departments and agencies.
GCS provides a wide range of expertise and knowledge to support public sector managers in responding to government-wide and program-specific priorities and challenges. Federal departments seek GCS services to obtain advice and identify solutions that allow them to meet their program objectives and accountabilities. Services offered by GCS support government operations in areas such as:
Overall in 2006-2007, GCS met its planned business objectives. It carried out more than 200 projects, with a total value of $54 million. About half of these projects addressed government priorities in the areas of:
The remainder of the projects supported departmental priorities and management issues.
GCS maintained a consistently high level of client satisfaction, achieving an overall rating of 91%, surpassing its target of 85%. However, the continuing impact of the reorganization of GCS created instability with personnel. In addition, the decision to accelerate the divestiture of project/contract management services affected GCS 2006-2007 financial results.
Key Facts* Government Consulting Services
|
*Source: PWGSC databases, Client Satisfaction Survey System database, Assignment Management System. |
In response to a 2005 KPMG report that identified deficiencies related to the procurement and the project and contract management processes in CAC's consulting arm, GCS has been undertaking several activities to enhance internal controls and realign key contracting activities. Activities in 2006-2007 included:
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through one program activity: Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Statutory Vote | |||
Gross Expenditures | 98.7 | 98.7 | 71.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 99.2 | 99.2 | 71.9 |
Net Resources (Provided) Used (Note1) | (0.5) | (0.5) | (0.5) |
Consulting and Audit Canada Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 390 | 390 | 285 |
Note: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The reduction in business volume is mainly attributable to a decrease of staff fee revenue due to difficulties encountered with the staffing process, resulting in 105 fewer FTEs than planned. In accordance with the Policy on Special Revenue Spending Authorities, the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund received $5.4 million from the Operating Vote to cover the shortfall. The Consulting Services portion of $2.1 million was absorbed by Government Information and Business Integration Services while the Audit Services deficit of $3.3 million was funded through internal reallocations.
Note 1: The amounts reported for the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund are on a modified cash basis.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Audit Services Canada Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision, on an optional and fee-for-service basis, of consulting and audit services to federal departments and agencies and, on request, to provincial, territorial, municipal and Aboriginal governments in Canada and to foreign governments and international organizations. | Improved public sector management and operations. High-quality and professional services. Cost-effective delivery of services. Cost-effective delivery of services. |
|
Government Consulting Services Actual Results | ||
|
The Translation Bureau is a key component of the government's service delivery infrastructure. It helps the government serve Canadians and communicate with them in the official language of their choice, as well as in Aboriginal and foreign languages, by standardizing terminology within the public service and providing translation, revision, interpretation, terminology and technolinguistic services for Parliament, the judiciary, and federal departments and agencies.
The Bureau ensures that a critical mass of skilled language professionals—employees and suppliers—is available. Thus it enables the government to operate smoothly, meet its official languages obligations, and promote the values of linguistic duality and multiculturalism that make up the Canadian identity. The Bureau provides services in more than 100 languages to support the government in its international relations and in its communications with those Canadians who have difficulty communicating in either official language.
The Translation Bureau supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through three program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for the above program activities are summarized at the end of this Translation Bureau section.
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC 2006-2007 strategic priorities, as follows:
Key Facts*
|
*Sources: Departmental databases, Translation Integrated Ordering System |
During the fiscal year, the Bureau continued its adoption of a strategic, value-added approach rather than a transactions-based approach for its operations. It accelerated the implementation of its new business model by assigning 47 on-site translators and designating 243 dedicated translators to serve clients better. It began implementing a translation memory in its points of service. This initiative will ultimately increase the efficiency of the translation process and help to more effectively manage the knowledge contained in the body of translations provided for the government. The Bureau also introduced electronic billing, making its operations more environmentally friendly. All of this contributed to the Translation Stewardship Program Activity and Translation Bureau Revolving Fund Program Activity.
The Bureau reviewed its roles and responsibilities and drew up an action plan for carrying out its mandate more fully, while providing additional benefits for the government through its operational expertise. The Bureau continued to improve the quality and uniformity of government communications by assigning additional resources to revision and quality control. It began developing standards and common practices for the purchase of linguistic services. The Bureau also initiated discussions with Acquisitions to set up a commodity council for translation services and develop a linguistic services strategy for the government.
The Bureau maintained a satisfaction rate of 94% for its interpretation services and 84% for its translation services. It increased its market share to 64% while remaining focused on its objective of generating savings for its clients. As of April 1, 2006, the rate charged for administrative translation was reduced by 17%.
As a bilingual nation whose prosperity is closely tied to international trade, Canada needs a reliable source of efficient, high-quality linguistic services. However, Canada faces a shortage of qualified language professionals. The labour shortage affects not only the government, but also the provinces and territories. It is particularly serious in the areas of interpretation and foreign languages because of a lack of university programs and already scarce qualified resources.
The Bureau, together with the Language Industry Association, produced a brochure to provide young people with information on language professions. It actively promoted these professions to young people in colleges and secondary schools in provinces with universities offering language study programs. It also increased and diversified its participation in a variety of recruiting forums and intensified its cooperation with colleges and universities. As part of its succession planning, the Bureau maintained its partnership with the University of Ottawa, notably with respect to the master's degree in interpretation.
To further strengthen the industry and ensure a secure supply of linguistic services for the government and Canada as a whole, some measures were implemented in partnership with other industry players. As a result, 57% of the total value of linguistic services contracts awarded by the Bureau were made up of contracts worth $200,000 or more. This helps to ensure the viability and competitiveness of small and medium-size translation and interpretation services firms. The Language Technologies Research Centre, resulting from a partnership between the Translation Bureau, the National Research Council of Canada and the Université du Québec en Outaouais, opened in June 2006.
The Bureau continued to provide Canada's Parliament with quality translation and interpretation services while handling a substantially greater workload resulting from an upsurge in parliamentary activities and increasingly tighter deadlines. This was carried out in support of the Translation and Interpretation to Parliament, Conference Interpretation, Terminology Program Activity.
It continued to set up the necessary infrastructure for meeting the new delivery timeframes for House of Commons and Senate committee deliberations. It participated in a House of Commons review of the production of committee reports and developed a solution for French-language captioning of House debates, which will go into service when Parliament reconvenes in the fall of 2007. The Bureau also provided interpretation services during large-scale conferences and visits by foreign heads of state.
In fulfilling its terminology standardization mandate and making tools available to public servants to enable them to work in English and French, the Bureau contributed to the effectiveness of government communications and the maintenance of an exemplary public service from the official languages standpoint. During 2006-2007, it developed a program to promote the use of plain language, providing an increasing number of public servants with resources such as Language Nook, and launching a new series of linguistic recommendation notices. The Bureau published various lexicons, for example, the Diamond Cutting Vocabulary, which was compiled at the request of the Northwest Territories and adjoining provinces. It also strengthened its multilingual capacity; it hired two specialized terminologists for Spanish and Portuguese to provide support for projects related to Free Trade Area of the Americas activities, and it launched the Portuguese version of its terminology educational software, which alread enjoys an international reputation.
The Bureau completed the design of a Linguistic Portal project that will enable all Canadians to benefit from its terminology and linguistic resources. It is developing the next generation of TERMIUM®, which will help client departments and organizations store and update their own terminology.
The Bureau continued to represent Canada at major national and international language forums and standardization networks and committees. At the national level, the Bureau coordinated the activities of the Joint Committee on Terminology in Canada, which published the Directory of Terminologists in Canada, and worked with the Université du Québec en Outaouais and the Office québécois de la langue française to organize the international symposium Terminologie et approches transdisciplinaires, held in Gatineau in the spring of 2007. Internationally, Bureau representatives attended meetings of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in Beijing and helped develop new international standards. It obtained the authorization of the European Association for Terminology to hold the 4th World Terminology Summit in Gatineau in October 2008, and it signed five new international cooperation agreements. The Bureau also continued to store in TERMIUM® the information technology terminology of the ISO's International Electrotechnical Commission.
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through three program activities: Translation and Interpretation to Parliament, Conference Interpretation, Terminology; Translation Bureau Revolving Fund; and Translation Stewardship.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 51.9 | 57.1 | 58.2 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - |
Net Expenditures | 51.9 | 57.1 | 58.2 |
Translation and Interpretation to Parliament, Conference Interpretation, Terminology Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | - | - | - |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between the authority of $57.1 million and the actuals of $58.2 million is due to the $1.1 million technical adjustment of the transfer of the collective bargaining amount funding received from TB in salaries expenditures into operating that has not been reflected in the authority.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of translation and interpretation services to Parliament, of conference interpretation and of terminology services. |
|
|
1 The data are taken from a survey on federal public sector client satisfaction with suppliers of translation and interpretation services (Sondage sur la satisfaction des clients du secteur public fédéral envers les fournisseurs de services de traduction et d'interprétation) conducted by TNS/Groupe ANTIMA on behalf of the Translation Bureau. The firm selected a stratified, disproportional random sample of federal government employees who have used the Bureau's services since April 1, 2006. For translation services, the data were gathered from 832 respondents between September 5 and September 27, 2006. The response rate was 45% and the margin of error (higher in the case of sub-samples) was +/-3.4%, 19 times out of 20. For conference interpretation services, the data were gathered from 100 respondents between September 5 and 15, 2006. The response rate was 31% and the margin of error (higher in the case of sub-samples) was 9%, 19 times out of 20. In both cases, a posteriori weighting was used to correct the results so that they were representative of the entire targeted population.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 205.9 | 211.9 | 211.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 205.9 | 205.9 | 207.1 |
Net Resources (Provided) Used (Note1) | - | 6.0 | 4.6 |
Translation Bureau Revolving Fund Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 1,684 | 1,584 | 1,580 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The increase of $1.2 million in respendable revenue is mainly due to a decrease in translation revenues (a 17% price decrease of general texts) and an increase mainly due to $6.0 million of funds received from Treasury Board to offset increased payroll with new collective bargaining agreement. Gross expenditures increase is mainly due to outsourced translation contracts higher than planned and strategic investments as approved by Treasury Board.
Note 1: The Bureau's revolving fund provides services to Parliament and collects the related revenues from its own operating vote. Accordingly, the revolving fund's gross expenditures and respendable revenue include the net expenditures reported in Translation and Interpretation to Parliament, Conference Interpretation, Terminology and Translation Stewardship Program Activities.
Note 2: The amounts reported for the Translation Bureau Revolving Fund are on a modified cash basis.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of translation, technolinguistic and other linguistic services to the judiciary and federal departments and agencies on a cost recovery basis. Upon request, provision of translation, technolinguistic and other linguistic services to other governments in Canada and international organizations on a cost-recovery basis. |
The Translation Bureau is a financially viable organization offering best value service to the judiciary and other government organizations to ensure the government's ability to function in both official languages, and other languages as required. |
|
The data are taken from a survey on federal public sector client satisfaction with suppliers of translation and interpretation services (Sondage sur la satisfaction des clients du secteur public fédéral envers les fournisseurs de services de traduction et d'interprétation) conducted by TNS/Groupe ANTIMA on behalf of the Translation Bureau. The firm selected a stratified, disproportional random sample of federal government employees who have used the Bureau's services since April 1, 2006. For translation services, the data were gathered from 832 respondents between September 5 and September 27, 2006. The response rate was 45% and the margin of error (higher in the case of sub-samples) was +/-3.4%, 19 times out of 20. For conference interpretation services, the data were gathered from 100 respondents between September 5 and 15, 2006. The response rate was 31% and the margin of error (higher in the case of sub-samples) was 9%, 19 times out of 20. In both cases, a posteriori weighting was used to correct the results so that they were representative of the entire targeted population.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - |
Net Expenditures | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Translation Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | - | - | - |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Program management, strategy, governance, monitoring and support activities, also encompassing activities that are necessary to:
|
The Translation Bureau has the capacity to effectively manage and deliver its translation and terminology functions and ensure Canada's representation and leadership at national and international levels. |
|
To help the government become a model of environmental excellence in its operations, the Office of Greening Government Operations (OGGO) was created within PWGSC in 2005. OGGO works closely with other federal departments and agencies, particularly with the Treasury Board Secretariat and Environment Canada, to provide government-wide leadership, guidance and services related to the greening of government operations and sustainable development.
The Office of Greening Government Operations supports PWGSC's two strategic outcomes through two program activities:
Quality Services
Sound Stewardship
The expenditures and actual results for 2006–2007 for the above program activities are summarized at the end of this OGGO section.
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our program activities are presented by the PWGSC strategic priorities, as follows:
OGGO is taking a strategic approach to help green government operations, in order to ensure that "thinking green" becomes an automatic and integral part of government-wide business transformation, and that the intended results are lasting and far-reaching. During 2006-2007, OGGO met its commitments to greening government operations and its Office of Greening Government Operations Services Program Activity by:
Key Facts*
|
* Sources: PWGSC databases. |
The Government of Canada Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) contains commitments of $3.5 billion over the next 15 years for the remediation of federal contaminated sites and $500 million to be directed toward shared responsibility sites. This money is currently directed at 188 FCSAP projects involving more than 600 sites. PWGSC is the custodian for 209 known contaminated sites. PWGSC, and OGGO in particular, provides optional environmental services to other government departments, and offers the FCSAP Secretariat expert support.
To help custodian departments with remediation projects, PWGSC has developed project management tools and best practices. We are collecting and disseminating information on innovative technologies employed through the FCSAP program and working with the environmental industry to ensure that it is aware of, and can build adequate capacity to respond to, future demand arising from the FCSAP program.
The Sydney Tar Ponds project is one of the most high-profile Government of Canada remediation projects. PWGSC is leading, federal participation in this project as manager of the federal-provincial cost-sharing agreement and as responsible authority at the federal level, liaising with First Nations, the contractor and provincial authorities.
In July 2006, the ministers of environment of the governments of Canada and Nova Scotia received an independent review panel report of the Sydney environmental assessment. In January 2007, the governments jointly released their formal response. Their support for proceeding with the full remediation concluded a successful collaboration and preliminary construction has now commenced.
For more information on the remediation of the Sydney Tar Ponds, see Section III — Table 20 or visit our website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/ih-hi-e.html.
PWGSC's approach to reducing energy consumption and related air pollutants, including greenhouse gas emissions, has been to focus on two major opportunities: sustainable buildings and vehicle fleets. Both of these are an integral part of the Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship Program Activity.
Sustainable Buildings: The adoption of industry-developed assessment tools by PWGSC and the government as a whole is helping to ensure that all federal office accommodations, whether Crown-owned or leased, adhere to high standards of environmental performance, particularly with regard to energy consumption and the emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants.
PWGSC continued to lay the foundation for greening the real property portfolio in 2006-2007. We developed guidance for all Crown-owned office buildings for implementing BOMA Go Green Plus assessments (BOMA is the Building Owners and Managers Association). This assessment tool identifies the most cost-effective options to improve the management, operation and environmental performance of existing buildings.
For new construction projects across government, OGGO provided advice and guidance to departments on the application of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED® – Canada) – Gold standard.
The department also made a commitment during 2006-2007 with respect to the government's extensive portfolio of leased office buildings. By revising lease documents, PWGSC will require private sector landlords with buildings of more than 10,000 square metres to complete the BOMA Go Green Plus (or equivalent) assessment of these buildings and share the results with PWGSC before arrangements are finalized. This will provide PWGSC with the tools to make more environmentally sensitive leasing decisions.
The standards adopted by government and PWGSC are helping to shape the Sustainable Building Policy that OGGO is currently developing for implementation by 2010. The Sustainable Building Policy will further integrate environmental considerations into PWGSC's standard building planning processes and contracts.
The objective of PWGSC's approach is to not only improve the environmental performance of its own inventory, but in doing so, to also lay the groundwork for other custodial departments and jurisdictions to do the same, and to help influence the market in which we do business. Already, PWGSC's lead in sustainable buildings has helped Manitoba and Quebec adopt BOMA Go Green for their buildings.
Vehicle Fleets: PWGSC works with departments and agencies to develop guidance for vehicle fleets, encourage the ongoing review of vehicle fleets and help to integrate environmental considerations into the federal vehicle procurement process.
The guidance for vehicle fleets was taken up by 22 of 28 departments that tabled their Sustainable Development Strategies in December 2006. The proposed initiatives include increasing the use of ethanol-blended gasoline; purchasing more hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles; conducting regular fleet reviews; encouraging defensive driver training; and using fleet management systems to analyze driving behaviours.
For its own fleet, PWGSC has been promoting the use of renewable fuels. Further, over the past 10 years, PWGSC has reduced its fleet from 438 to 254 vehicles, of which 41 are hybrid and 89 use alternative transportation fuels (primarily E85 alcohol fuel).
During 2006-2007, OGGO helped with the government-wide implementation of the Policy on Green Procurement by developing green procurement training and tools in cooperation with colleagues at Environment Canada and Natural Resources Canada. Green procurement training is now being provided through the Canada School of Public Service and the school's online Campus Direct.
OGGO held interdepartmental workshops on implementing the Policy on Green Procurement across Canada. It developed a guidance document and several other tools during 2006-2007 to help departments and agencies set their own green procurement targets, and integrate environmental considerations into day-to-day procurement decision-making.
During 2006-2007, OGGO took the first steps to develop a strategic government-wide approach to managing the electronic waste from federal operations by coordinating stakeholder input into the issue. The approach will continue to be developed in fiscal year 2007-2008.
More than 75% of the Sustainable Development Strategies tabled by departments and agencies in December 2006 incorporated recommendations of the overarching goals set out in the Greening Government Operations Guidance for Organizations Developing Sustainable Development Strategies (2007-2009). This demonstrates OGGO's success in focusing the efforts of departments on government-wide environmental priorities: sustainable buildings, vehicle fleets and green procurement.
During 2006-2007, OGGO helped integrate the guidance document into Environment Canada's overall guidance for federal Sustainable Development Strategies. OGGO also worked with interdepartmental steering groups to provide direction and support for common approaches and tools, including the refinement of a performance measurement framework that would facilitate government-wide reporting on greening government operations. Although interdepartmentally agreed, the performance indicators were not widely adopted, due, among other things, to a lack of consistent data.
OGGO led the department in drafting the PWGSC Sustainable Development Strategy during 2006-2007. A key consideration was the way PWGSC's own targets and commitments could assist and influence the greening of operations in other departments and agencies.
In 2006-2007, OGGO continued to strengthen partnerships interdepartmentally and interjurisdictionally to promote collaboration on and sharing of best practices and environmental management tools. OGGO played a lead role in coordinating the activities and work of six interdepartmental steering groups for greening government operations, and the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Sub-committee on Sustainable Development.
During 2006-2007, OGGO commissioned an operational review of its environmental services with the aim of consolidating and strengthening financial and human resources to improve service delivery. The review recommended a strengthened organizational model, and concluded that supporting the department's due diligence requirements and addressing service delivery issues were key opportunities for improvement. This is key in our contribution to the Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship Program Activity.
OGGO provided assistance to PWGSC and other government departments throughout the year on a nation-wide basis.
In the National Capital Area, OGGO provided services to 28 departments and agencies. This included support in areas such as indoor air quality, environmental assessment, waste water, hazardous waste and recycling among others.
OGGO supported Real Property in PWGSC, in: developing commitments for the Sustainable Development Strategy; providing national and regional leadership on numerous environmental aspects of building management; and updating and delivering a renewed training program on environmental liabilities and responsibilities for operational and management staff.
In support of the Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship Program Activity, the overall goal of the Green Stewardship Program is to provide employees with a meaningful opportunity to reduce the environmental impacts of their day-to-day activities. In 2006-2007, OGGO supported green stewardship by serving as co-chair of the interdepartmental Green Stewardship Steering Group, and working with client departments to implement a range of Environment Week activities and special programs such as vermi-composting in the Parliamentary Precinct. OGGO also began to lay the foundation for a strengthened and reinvigorated government-wide Green Stewardship Program that will be instrumental in developing and implementing national goals and targets to support the Greening of Government Operations priorities: sustainable buildings, vehicle fleets and green procurement.
In the following tables, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments through two program activities: Office of Greening Government Operations Services, and Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship.
The Office of Greening Government Operations Services has no financial expenditures to report. Although this program activity was not funded, OGGO remained committed to achieving actual results.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of environmental services at the established service standards, to federal departments and agencies. | Government departments and agencies receive high-quality, affordable and timely environmental services. |
|
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Net Expenditures 2006-2007 | Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
---|---|---|---|
Operating and Statutory Votes | |||
Gross Expenditures | 1.3 | 7.5 | 6.2 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Net Expenditures | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Note : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The variance between Office of Greening Government Operation's total authorities and the actuals are due mainly to the fact that there were delays in staffing senior positions in the Contaminated Sites unit that led to a lapse of approximately 25 % of the total funding received for the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) as well as unanticipated funding received from the Real Property Branch through the annual Memorandum of Understanding process.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Provision of government-wide leadership and expertise on the greening of government operations (GGO). |
Leadership and guidance in achieving on the greening of government operations is provided to other federal departments and agencies. The whole-of-government ability and capacity to reduce the environmental impact of its operations is increased, and improvement of its overall performance for key priority areas is achieved. The development and implementation of PWGSC's sustainable development strategy and the governance of environmental management frameworks demonstrate excellence. |
|
The Corporate Management function provides internal support to all of PWGSC's branches and special operating agencies through: Corporate Services, Policy and Communications; Human Resources; the Office of the Chief Risk Officer; Audit and Evaluation; Finance; the Investigations and Litigation Office; Legal Services; and offices in the Pacific, Western, Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic regions.
The expenditures and actual results for 2006-2007 for our program activities are summarized at the end of this Corporate Management section.
The strategic change and improvement initiatives impacting the results of our activities are highlighted by the PWGSC 2006-2007 strategic priorities, which are as follows:
In February 2007, the duties and responsibilities of the Strategic Transformation Branch, which was responsible for planning, coordinating and monitoring the Business Transformation Agenda, were integrated into the Finance, Human Resources and various program branches. This was a reorganization brought about as a result of the successful integration of much of the Way Forward plans and strategies into normal branch operations. During the past year, Strategic Transformation Branch:
In April 2006, the Inquiry Liaison Office refocused its efforts towards investigations and litigation. This reflected the cessation of support to the Gomery Commission and related post-inquiry activities. PWGSC is providing strategic direction and supporting activities related to the recovery of Sponsorship funds and the criminal trials, ensuring full transparency regarding the management of these activities. In 2006-2007, the government recovered $1 million of improperly received funds, for a total recovery of $3.8 million, as of March 31, 2007.
In 2006-2007, the Office of the Chief Risk Officer:
The Audit and Evaluation Branch continued to strengthen the internal audit and evaluation functions and to implement the new Treasury Board Policy on Internal Audit.
In 2006-2007, Audit and Evaluation moved forward towards this goal with many initiatives, for example:
In 2006-2007, PWGSC produced a variety of materials for Canadians, Parliamentarians and other government departments to build greater awareness of PWGSC's programs and services. We achieved more than 85% of planned communications activities in support of the Way Forward business transformation and expanded the Outreach Program to better communicate with suppliers and associations.
The Access to Information and Privacy program administers the Access to Information Act (ATIA) and the Privacy Act (PA) within PWGSC. Subject to certain specific and limited exceptions, these acts give Canadians, and people present in Canada, the broad legal right to information recorded in any form and controlled by most federal government institutions. The PA deals with personal information and the ATIA deals with all other information. In 2006-2007, one of PWGSC's objectives was to complete the processing of 95% of access to information requests within their legislated timelines. Due to resource constraints, which reduced the department's capacity to reach this objective, 81% of access requests were completed on time.
In 2006-2007, we improved our management practices and delivery of corporate services, in particular through:
In 2006-2007, PWGSC:
PWGSC's financial management capacity was enhanced through:
PWGSC continued with the implementation of Human Resources Modernization in support of our business transformation and ongoing business agendas. Building on the results achieved will contribute to continued capacity-building efforts for dealing with demographic challenges and meeting the needs of the business transformation agenda. Our Human Resources Branch:
In the following table, we identify the commitments made in our Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007, as well as our performance against those commitments.
The financial expenditures for Corporate Management are not shown because, for Treasury Board Secretariat's financial reporting purposes, those costs have been re-allocated to the other program activities as departmental overheads.
Program Activity | Planned Results | Actual Results |
---|---|---|
Support for the transformation of PWGSC to deliver the government's agenda. Establishment of strategic priorities and development of tools for sound, integrated management practices. Enhancement of human resources management and maintenance of strong labour relations. Delivery of a suite of corporate services. Timely and effective administration of compensation and benefits. |
PWGSC programs are provided with corporate functions that are ethical, cost-efficient and delivered within agreed service levels and standards with respect to public service values. |
|
This section provides more detailed information on the financial and operational performance of the department. The tables and charts have been prepared in accordance with the Treasury Board guidelines. The financial information appearing in the tables below is in accordance with the Main Estimates, Supplementary Estimates and the Public Accounts.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
2006-2007 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |
GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |||
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotments), Contributions and Statutory | |||
Gross | 3,530.3 | 3,710.5 | 3,504.9 |
Less: Respendable | 605.4 | 891.8 | 891.8 |
Net | 2,924.9 | 2,818.7 | 2,613.1 |
Revolving Funds |
|||
Gross | 1,392.0 | 1,398.0 | 1,526.3 |
Less: Respendable | 1,400.5 | 1,400.5 | 1,536.1 |
Net Resources (Provided) | (8.5) | (2.5) | (9.7) |
DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL (Note 1) | 2,916.4 | 2,816.3 | 2,603.4 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding. | |||
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS | 12,502 | 12,626 | 12,338 |
Note 1: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
The following explains the significant changes between planned spending, total authorities and actual spending in the Department for 2006-2007. | ||
(In millions of dollars) | ||
PLANNED SPENDING (2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities) |
$2,916.4 | |
Secure Channel Project | 94.2 | |
Operating Budget Carry Forward | 40.4 | |
Statutory Adjustments (including EBP) | 29.4 | |
Accommodation expenditures | 28.8 | |
Collective Bargaining | 27.2 | |
Government of Canada Marketplace Project and Acquisition Business Transformation | 27.0 | |
Government contingencies - Centralized Costs | 16.6 | |
Universal Child Care Benefit | 8.4 | |
Access to Translation Bureau Revolving Funds accumulated Surplus to sustain funding for the Translation Bureau's investment program | 6.0 | |
Information Technology Shared Services Organization implementation | 5.2 | |
Multiple Projects Under $5M | 2.3 | |
New requirements under the Policy on Internal Audit | 0.6 | |
Real Property Special Purpose Allotment funding reprofiled | (15.9) | |
Capital funding reprofiled | (67.5) | |
Earmarked items not called or reprofiled | (302.8) | |
TOTAL AUTHORITIES | $2,816.3 | |
Special Purpose Allotments Budget Lapse | ||
Real Property Services | 81.5 | |
Receiver General Services | 6.2 | |
Capital Funding Lapse | 41.2 | |
Conversion Factor | 40.2 | |
Operating Budget Lapse | 27.1 | |
Frozen Allotments at year-end | 9.0 | |
Other Adjustments | 7.7 | |
ACTUAL SPENDING | $2,603.4 | |
In 2006-2007 the PWGSC managed, within its approved spending authorities, to deliver quality services and pursue efficiencies in all its operations. The Department maintained ongoing operations while implementing the transformation agenda and giving constant attention to client engagement on the Way Forward
initiative. The variance between total authorities and actual spending in the Votes is attributable to delays in staffing and project deliveries as well as deferral of capital purchases. The frozen allotment at year-end for the Shared Travel Services Initiative, along with a forced lapse to cover the conversion factor for Employee Benefit Plans and Health Care insurance costs in the Federal Accommodation and Holdings Special Purpose Allotment, are other factors of the year-end variance. Five of the six revolving funds broke even or made profits in 2006-2007, with the exception of the Translation Bureau Revolving Fund which closed the year with a deficit, as pre-authorized by Treasury Board. Although the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund made a profit, a transfer from the operating budget was required in order to achieve its targets. |
(In millions of dollars) | ||||||
2006-2007 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual 2004- 2005 |
Actual 2005- 2006 |
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |
GOVERNMENT SERVICES PROGRAM | ||||||
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotments), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | ||||||
Quality Services | ||||||
Gross Expenditures | 2,044.5 | 2,083.5 | 2,168.8 | 2,516.3 | 2,363.8 | 2,200.6 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 456.5 | 436.3 | 278.4 | 278.4 | 472.3 | 472.3 |
Federal Accommodation and Holdings |
1,588.0 | 1,647.2 | 1,890.4 | 2,237.9 | 1,891.5 | 1,728.3 |
Gross Expenditures | 786.5 | 912.3 | 847.2 | 847.2 | 847.2 | 984.8 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 786.5 | 912.3 | 847.2 | 847.2 | 847.2 | 984.8 |
Real Property Services Revolving Fund | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Gross Expenditures | 1.9 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.8 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 9.3 | 6.7 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 8.9 |
Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund | (7.4) | (3.0) | (8.0) | (8.0) | (8.0) | (6.1) |
Gross Expenditures | 174.4 | 235.4 | 193.1 | 195.3 | 227.7 | 230.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 40.8 | 55.2 | 40.9 | 40.9 | 60.5 | 60.5 |
Acquisition Services | 133.6 | 180.2 | 152.2 | 154.4 | 167.2 | 169.5 |
Gross Expenditures | 78.0 | 92.6 | 100.4 | 100.4 | 100.4 | 94.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 82.7 | 94.0 | 100.4 | 100.4 | 100.4 | 95.2 |
Optional Services Revolving Fund | (4.7) | (1.4) | - | - | - | (0.9) |
Gross Expenditures | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Defence Production Revolving Fund | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Gross Expenditures | 444.5 | 501.1 | 283.6 | 283.3 | 459.3 | 455.1 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 177.3 | 219.0 | 140.1 | 140.1 | 196.0 | 196.0 |
IM/IT Services | 267.2 | 282.1 | 143.5 | 143.2 | 263.3 | 259.0 |
Gross Expenditures | 125.8 | 135.5 | 135.8 | 135.8 | 135.8 | 161.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 129.7 | 131.5 | 135.8 | 135.8 | 135.8 | 168.2 |
Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund | (3.9) | 4.0 | - | - | - | (6.8) |
Gross Expenditures | 13.1 | 11.9 | 11.4 | 11.2 | 10.0 | 10.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 4.9 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Receiver General Services | 8.2 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 8.8 | 6.6 | 7.3 |
Gross Expenditures | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 2.6 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
Public Service Compensation Services | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
Gross Expenditures | 58.3 | 64.3 | 44.1 | 43.6 | 40.9 | 40.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 11.0 | 14.8 | 11.2 | 11.3 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
Government Information Services | 47.3 | 49.5 | 32.9 | 32.3 | 31.7 | 30.8 |
Gross Expenditures | 35.7 | 31.3 | 22.4 | 22.2 | 39.8 | 38.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 10.2 | 15.4 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 22.9 | 22.9 |
Business Integration Services | 25.5 | 15.9 | 10.2 | 10.0 | 16.9 | 15.5 |
Gross Expenditures | 121.2 | 103.2 | 98.2 | 98.7 | 98.7 | 71.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 124.6 | 103.6 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 71.9 |
CAC Revolving Fund | (3.4) | (0.4) | (0.4) | (0.5) | (0.5) | (0.5) |
Gross Expenditures | 48.5 | 51.4 | 52.3 | 51.9 | 57.1 | 58.2 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Translation and Interpretation to Parliament, Conference Interpretation, Terminology | 48.5 | 51.4 | 52.3 | 51.9 | 57.1 | 58.2 |
Gross Expenditures | 193.1 | 195.7 | 205.9 | 205.9 | 211.9 | 211.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 199.7 | 204.9 | 205.9 | 205.9 | 205.9 | 207.1 |
Translation Bureau Revolving Fund | (6.6) | (9.2) | - | - | 6.0 | 4.6 |
Gross Expenditures | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Office of Greening Government Operations Services | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total - Quality Services | 2,093.4 | 2,224.9 | 2,283.9 | 2,631.7 | 2,433.8 | 2,260.8 |
Sound Stewardship | ||||||
Gross Expenditures | 60.4 | 58.8 | 35.5 | 35.1 | 56.9 | 53.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Real Property Stewardship | 58.7 | 57.1 | 34.1 | 33.7 | 54.9 | 51.3 |
Gross Expenditures | 49.7 | 59.8 | 48.3 | 47.7 | 91.6 | 68.1 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 10.0 | 7.4 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Supply Operations Stewardship | 39.7 | 52.4 | 39.7 | 39.1 | 87.9 | 64.4 |
Gross Expenditures | 37.9 | 14.5 | 13.4 | 10.4 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 5.0 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
IM/IT Stewardship | 32.9 | 11.3 | 12.8 | 9.8 | 14.2 | 14.2 |
Gross Expenditures | 124.3 | 130.5 | 148.6 | 148.2 | 155.8 | 146.0 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 14.2 | 14.2 | 21.3 | 21.3 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
Receiver General Stewardship | 110.1 | 116.3 | 127.4 | 126.9 | 137.8 | 128.0 |
Gross Expenditures | 33.3 | 35.2 | 31.5 | 31.3 | 41.0 | 39.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 6.9 | 6.9 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
Public Service Pay Stewardship | 26.4 | 28.3 | 27.9 | 27.7 | 33.2 | 31.9 |
Gross Expenditures | 61.4 | 68.1 | 64.1 | 64.3 | 77.8 | 75.9 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 44.3 | 48.9 | 44.1 | 44.1 | 52.6 | 52.6 |
Public Service Pension Stewardship | 17.1 | 19.2 | 20.0 | 20.2 | 25.2 | 23.3 |
Gross Expenditures | 6.8 | 10.2 | 18.6 | 18.2 | 18.6 | 20.3 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - |
Government Information Stewardship | 6.6 | 10.0 | 18.5 | 18.1 | 18.6 | 20.3 |
Gross Expenditures | 48.9 | 44.3 | 43.9 | 43.9 | 40.7 | 40.7 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 40.2 | 38.2 | 38.5 | 38.5 | 34.6 | 34.6 |
Business Integration Performance Management | 8.7 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Gross Expenditures | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Translation Stewardship | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
Gross Expenditures | - | - | 1.3 | 1.3 | 7.5 | 6.2 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | - | - | - | - | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship | - | - | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
Total - Sound Stewardship | 302.7 | 303.2 | 289.4 | 284.7 | 382.4 | 342.6 |
Gross Expenditures | 4,554.4 | 4,850.2 | 4,579.2 | 4,922.3 | 5,108.5 | 5,031.2 |
Less: Respendable Revenues | 2,158.3 | 2,322.1 | 2,005.9 | 2,005.9 | 2,292.3 | 2,427.9 |
DEPARTMENT TOTAL (Note 1) | 2,396.1 | 2,528.1 | 2,573.3 | 2,916.4 | 2,816.3 | 2,603.4 |
Less: Non-Respendable revenues | 62.8 | 67.4 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 22.8 | 63.8 |
Plus: Cost of services received without charge | 55.6 | 53.5 | 37.9 | 37.9 | 38.3 | 60.2 |
NET COST OF DEPARTMENT | 2,388.9 | 2,514.2 | 2,589.7 | 2,932.8 | 2,831.8 | 2,599.8 |
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTEs) | 12,510 | 12,483 | 12,043 | 12,502 | 12,626 | 12,338 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Note 1 : Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
2006-2007 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |
GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |||
Operating (including Special Purpose Allotments), Capital, Grants and Contributions and Statutory Votes | |||
Real Property | 2,263.6 | 1,938.4 | 1,773.5 |
Acquisitions | 193.5 | 255.1 | 233.0 |
Information Technology | 153.0 | 277.5 | 266.4 |
Receiver General and Public Service Compensation | 185.3 | 204.8 | 192.4 |
Consulting, Information and Shared Services | 50.4 | 50.3 | 51.1 |
Business Integration | 15.4 | 23.0 | 21.6 |
Consulting and Audit Canada | (0.5) | (0.5) | (0.5) |
Translation Bureau | 54.4 | 65.5 | 65.2 |
Office of Greening Government Operations | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL(Note 1) | 2,916.4 | 2,816.3 | 2,603.4 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding
Note 1: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
(In millions of dollars) | |||||
2006-2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vote or Statutory Item | Vote or Statutory Wording | Total Main Estimates | Total Planned Spending(Note 1) | Total Authorities(Note 2) | Actual |
1 | Operating expenditures | 2,154.8 | 2,141.6 | 2,365.4 | 2,201.3 |
5 | Capital expenditures | 342.6 | 654.8 | 298.0 | 256.7 |
10 | Grants and contributions | 3.6 | 47.7 | 45.4 | 45.4 |
(S) | Minister of Public Works and Government Services - Salary and motor car allowance | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 80.6 | 80.6 | 107.4 | 107.4 |
(S) | Real Property Services Revolving Fund | - | - | - | - |
(S) | Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund | (8.0) | (8.0) | (8.0) | (6.1) |
(S) | Optional Services Revolving Fund | - | - | - | (0.9) |
(S) | Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund | - | - | - | (6.8) |
(S) | Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund | (0.5) | (0.5) | (0.5) | (0.5) |
(S) | Translation Bureau Revolving Fund | - | - | 6.0 | 4.6 |
(S) | Defence Production Revolving Fund | - | - | - | - |
(S) | Payment in lieu of taxes to municipalities and other taxing authorities | - | - | (0.3) | (0.3) |
(S) | Refunds of amounts credited to revenue in previous years | - | - | 1.9 | 1.9 |
(S) | Spending of proceeds from the disposal of surplus Crown assets | - | - | 1.0 | 0.6 |
DEPARTMENT TOTAL(Note 1) | 2,573.3 | 2,916.4 | 2,816.3 | 2,603.4 | |
Totals may not add up due to rounding. (S) = Statutory
Note 1: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Note 2: Total Planned Spending is the amount included in the Department's 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities and indicates amounts planned at the beginning of the year.
Note 3: Total Authorities include the 2006-2007 Main Estimates plus Supplementary Estimates, transfers from Treasury Board Votes ( 5 - Government Contingencies - Paylist shortfalls: 10 - Government-Wide Initiatives and 15 - Compensation Adjustments) and other authorities.
(In millions of dollars) | |
Actual | |
---|---|
Contributions covering the employer's share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (excluding revolving funds) (Note 1) | 52.3 |
Worker's compensation coverage provided by Human Resources and Social Development Canada |
2.6 |
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada |
5.3 |
Total - 2006-2007 Services received without charge | 60.2 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Note: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Note 1: Includes employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat for the salary portion spent in the Real Property special purpose allotment within Vote 1.
(In millions of dollars) | |||
Actual as of March 31 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Program | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |||
Seized Property Working Capital Account (Note 1) | (2.8) | (0.2) | 2.0 |
OTHER | |||
Miscellaneous accountable imprest and standing advances (Note 2) | 16.1 | 20.8 | 10.7 |
Total - Loans, Investments and Advances (Note 3) | 13.3 | 20.6 | 12.7 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Note: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Note1: The Seized Property Working Capital Account was established by Section 12 of the Seized Property Management Act . The total amount authorized to be outstanding at any time is $50 million.
Note 2: The miscellaneous accountable imprest and standing advances represent amounts recoverable from all federal departments and agencies by the Receiver General. The total amount authorized to be outstanding at any time is $22 million.
Note 3: Further details on the above loans, investments and advances can be found in Volume 1 of the Public Accounts of Canada - Summary Report and Financial Statements.
(In millions of dollars) | |||||
2006-2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government Services Program Activity |
Actual 2004- 2005 |
Actual 2005- 2006 |
Planned Revenues |
Total Authorities | Actual |
Respendable Revenues | |||||
Real Property | |||||
Federal Accommodation and Holdings | |||||
Rentals and Concessions | 456.5 | 436.3 | 278.4 | 472.3 | 472.3 |
Real Property Stewardship | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Real Property Services Revolving Fund | |||||
Recoveries of disbursements on behalf of clients | 619.5 | 742.3 | 678.3 | 678.3 | 831.4 |
Fee revenues from real property related common services | 167.0 | 170.0 | 168.9 | 168.9 | 153.4 |
786.5 | 912.3 | 847.2 | 847.2 | 984.8 | |
Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund |
|||||
Sales of real properties | 9.3 | 6.7 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 8.9 |
Total – Real Property | 1,254.0 | 1,357.0 | 1,139.0 | 1,333.5 | 1,468.0 |
Acquisitions | |||||
Acquisition Services | |||||
Major Crown Projects | 8.3 | 12.1 | 6.6 | 13.0 | 16.9 |
Acquisitions | 21.8 | 19.2 | 14.9 | 23.2 | 19.6 |
Canadian General Standards Board | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
Crown Assets Distribution (Note 1) | 2.4 | 2.6 | - | - | 2.5 |
Seized Property Management | 6.0 | 6.5 | 8.6 | 10.7 | 6.7 |
Others | - | 12.7 | 9.0 | 11.2 | 12.5 |
40.8 | 55.2 | 40.9 | 60.5 | 60.5 | |
Supply Operations Stewardship | 10.0 | 7.4 | 8.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Optional Services Revolving Fund | |||||
Traffic and Vaccine | 72.6 | 83.3 | 90.0 | 90.3 | 85.8 |
Communication Procurement | 3.6 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 3.1 |
Locally Shared Support Services | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 7.2 | 6.3 |
82.7 | 94.0 | 100.4 | 100.4 | 95.2 | |
Total – Acquisitions | 133.5 | 156.6 | 149.9 | 164.6 | 159.4 |
Information Technology | |||||
IM/IT Services | 177.3 | 219.0 | 140.1 | 196.0 | 196.0 |
IM/IT Stewardship | 5.0 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Telecommunications and Informatics Common Services Revolving Fund | 129.7 | 131.5 | 135.8 | 135.8 | 168.2 |
Total – Information Technology | 312.0 | 353.7 | 276.5 | 332.6 | 365.0 |
Receiver General and Public Service Compensation | |||||
Receiver General Services | 4.9 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Receiver General Stewardship | 14.2 | 14.2 | 21.3 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
Public Service Compensation Services | 2.6 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
Public Service Pay Stewardship | 6.9 | 6.9 | 3.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
Public Service Pension Stewardship | 44.3 | 48.9 | 44.1 | 52.6 | 52.6 |
Total – Receiver General and Public Service Compensation | 72.9 | 77.7 | 73.3 | 84.4 | 84.4 |
Government Information | |||||
Government Information Services | 11.0 | 14.8 | 11.3 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
Government Information Stewardship | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | - |
Total – Government Information | 11.2 | 15.0 | 11.4 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
Business Integration | |||||
Business Integration Services | 10.2 | 15.4 | 12.2 | 22.9 | 22.9 |
Business Integration Performance Management | 40.2 | 38.2 | 38.5 | 34.6 | 34.6 |
Total - Business Integration | 50.4 | 53.6 | 50.7 | 57.5 | 57.5 |
Consulting and Audit Canada | |||||
Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund | 124.6 | 103.6 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 71.9 |
Translation Bureau | |||||
Translation Bureau Revolving Fund | |||||
Translation Services | 195.9 | 200.7 | 201.4 | 201.4 | 202.7 |
Interpretation Services | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Terminology Services | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
Total – Translation Bureau | 199.7 | 204.9 | 205.9 | 205.9 | 207.1 |
Office of Green Government Operations | |||||
Office of Greening Government Operations Services | - | - | - | - | - |
Office of Greening Government Operations Stewardship | - | - | - | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Total Office of Green Government Operations | - | - | - | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Total Respendable Revenues | 2,158.3 | 2,322.1 | 2,005.9 | 2,292.3 | 2,427.9 |
Non-Respendable Revenues | |||||
Dry Docks | 3.8 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 |
Miscellaneous non-tax revenues | |||||
Seized Properties (Note2) | 16.5 | 17.2 | - | - | (4.4) |
Other non-tax revenues | 42.5 | 45.1 | 16.5 | 17.8 | 62.7 |
Total Non-Respendable Revenues | 62.8 | 67.4 | 21.5 | 22.8 | 63.8 |
DEPARTMENT TOTAL | 2,221.1 | 2,389.5 | 2,027.4 | 2,315.1 | 2,491.7 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding
Note: Please note that this financial table has not been audited.
Note 1: Crown Assets distribution has been transferred to the appropriation as of April 01, 2004, as per Treasury Board decision number 831793.
Note 2: The 2006-2007 amount represents the variance between the amount paid to the shareholders of the program for the prior fiscal year and the sharing results for the current fiscal year to be paid at a future date.
The financial statements of the Real Property Services Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frsi-rpsrf-e.html
The financial statements of the Real Property Disposition Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frdi-rpdrf-e.html
The financial statements of the Defence Production Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frpd-dprf-e.html
The financial statements of the Optional Services Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frso-osrf-e.html
The financial statements of the Telecommunications Services Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frstd-tisrf-e.html
The financial statements of the Consulting and Audit Canada Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frcvc-cacf-e.html
The financial statements of the Translation Bureau Revolving Fund may be found on PWGSC's website at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rmr-dpr-2006-2007-frbt-tbrf-e.html
Details of actual against planned spending by Branch/Sector and Program Activity are provided in Tables 1 and 2.
2006-2007 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
User Fee | Fee Type | Fee- setting Authority |
Date Last Modified | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Performance Standard | Perfor -mance Results |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Other Products and Services (O) | ATIA | 1992 | 11.6K | 11.75K | 2.2M | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. | 83.3% |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
12.34K 12.96K 13.61K |
2.31M 2.43M 2.55M |
Total 11.6K |
Total 11.75K |
Total 2.2M |
Total 38.91K |
Total 7.29M |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: N/A |
|||||||||||
C) Other Information: In an effort to reduce the amount of paper copied, applicants can request that certain information be provided to them by electronic means, such as by diskette, CD or email. in order to reduce the amount of fees to be paid. In 2006-2007, 13% of responses to ATI requests were made by electronic means. |
Canada Gazette
2006-07 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
User Fee | Fee Type | Fee -setting Authority |
Date Last Modified | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Perfor- mance Standard |
Perfor- mance Results |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Subscription rates charged to external/private sector clients for printing and distributing the hardcopy version of the Canada Gazette |
Regulatory (R) |
Subscription fees are set in the Statutory Instruments Act assented to in 1971 | Subscription fees last revised in 1985 | 150.9 | 35.91 | 220.02 |
Meet all the legislated publication deadlines for the Canada Gazette and meet the publication deadlines for each of our clients. Achieve less than 1% error in all editions of the Canada Gazette. |
100%: All notices were published within the legislated deadlines. 100%: The Canada Gazette met all its publication dates for all formats of the Canada Gazette. 100%: The error count was 0.053% which represents only 3 errors in 5,567 pages published. |
2007-2008 Subscriptions 2008-2009 Subscriptions 2009-2010 Subscriptions |
38.0 38.0 38.0 |
$220.0 $220.0 $220.0 |
Insertion fees charged to government and private sector clients meeting their legal obligation to publish in the Canada Gazette |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total 150.9 |
Total 35.91 |
Total 220.02 |
Total 114 |
Total 660.03 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: Aug 29, 2007. |
|||||||||||
C) Other Information: |
Table 9.1 User Fees - Licensing and Certification
The departmental performance reports for 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 reported licensing and certification fees charged to external/private sector clients by the Canadian General Standards Board. A recent legal opinion found that these fees are not subject to the reporting requirements of the User Fees Act, and for this reason they are no longer reported in the Departmental Performance Report. Information on external service fees charged by the Canadian General Standards Board can be found at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/cgsb/home/index-e.html.
Public Ports and Harbours – Esquimalt Graving Dock (EGD)
2006-07 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
User Fee | Fee Type | Fee -setting Autho-rity |
Date Last Modified | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Perfor -mance Standard |
Perfor -mance Results |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Booking | Regulatory (R) as per Esquimalt Graving Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-332 and SOR/95-462 | Order-in-Council | 1995 | See Note 2 | 140.0 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity |
EGD meets on a regular and on-going basis with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met. | Last fiscal EGD met on a formal basis every other month (6 times/yr) with all tenant clients. Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were met. |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
See Note 2 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity |
Draining | 145.0 | ||||||||||
Dockage for a vessel per unit of gross tonnage (minimum 2500 tons), per day | 1,480.7 | ||||||||||
Dockage for cargo on board per tonne of cargo, per day | - | ||||||||||
Berthage at North Landing Wharf, per metre, per day (a) working vessels | 155.8 | ||||||||||
Berthage at North Landing Wharf, per metre, per day (b) non-working vessels | 3.1 | ||||||||||
Berthage at South Jetty, per metre, per day | 122.4 | ||||||||||
Storage of cargo, building materials, equipment or machinery, per tonne, per day | 4.3 | ||||||||||
Top wharfage, per tonne (minimum 50 tonnes) (one-time charge) | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Crane per hour (a) with light hook | 688.4 | ||||||||||
Crane per hour (b) with main hook, up to 50 tonne lift | 70.4 | ||||||||||
Crane per hour (c) with main hook, over 50 tonne lift | 21.0 | ||||||||||
Mobile Crane, per hour (a) 9-tonne crane | 99.4 | ||||||||||
Mobile Crane, per hour (b) 20-tonne crane | 0.8 | ||||||||||
Forklift per hour | 0.7 | ||||||||||
Air Compressor, per manifold hour | 541.6 | ||||||||||
Motor work boat, per hour | 2.1 | ||||||||||
Fresh water, per cubic metre | 33.0 | ||||||||||
Electric power, per kilowatt hour | 867.0 | ||||||||||
Parking, per section, per shift | 82.6 | ||||||||||
Tie-up and letting go | 5.6 | ||||||||||
Flood-lights (a) per standard (high mast), per hour | - | ||||||||||
Flood-lights (b) per caisson (4 lights), per hour | - | ||||||||||
Overtime labour of dry-dock employees, per employee, per hour | 260.2 | ||||||||||
Commissionaire service, per employee, per hour | 201.1 | ||||||||||
Other User Fees (see Additional Tariff Items below) | Other Products and Services (O) | Order-in-Council | 1995 | See Note 2 | 617.2 |
See Note 2 No Costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity |
EGD meets on a regular and on-going basis with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met. |
Last fiscal EGD met on a formal basis every other month (6 times/yr) with all tenant clients. Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were met. |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
See Note 2 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity |
Sub-total (R) Sub-total (O) |
Sub-total (R) Sub-total (O) |
Sub-total (R) Sub-total (O) |
|
Sub-total Sub-total Sub-total |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
|||||
Total |
Total 5,542.5 |
Total 9,027.6 |
Total 17,400.0 |
Total 44,640.4 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: No substantial modification has been made since March 31, 2004. |
|||||||||||
C) Other Information: Note 1: Revenue forecast assumes no rate increase during planning horizon. Submission to change rates currently under way. Note 2: Since revenues are not forecasted and costs are not calculated based on individual fee items, only the total figures are provided for all user fees at the EGD. |
Public Ports and Harbours – Esquimalt Graving Dock Additional Tariff Items
TARIFF ITEMS | UNIT RATE |
---|---|
1" Rope | $240.00 / ea |
16 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
16 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
18 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
24/25 Grit Abrasive | $0.60 / lb |
Administration | $100.00 / hr |
Air compressor(secondary) | $25.00 / hr |
Air compressor(portable) | $8.00 / hr |
Aluminum Oxide | $0.80 / lb |
Aluminum Oxide,"A" Grade | $0.80 / lb |
AVAC | $40.00 / hr |
Berthage at Jenkins Footprint | $0.00 / m-d |
Berthage at S. Jetty (working vessel) | $2.75 / m-d |
Berthage at Tug Wharf | $2.50 / m-d |
Boat Rental | $55.00 / hr |
Bond | $10,000.00 / ea |
Brown Aluminum Oxide (All Grades) | $0.80 / lb |
Clean up | $1,000.00 / ea |
Commissionaire service (new rate) | $317.21 / d |
Damages | $1,000.00 / ea |
EBE 250V - SP10 | $1.20 / ft2 |
EBE 250V - SP5 | $1.30 / ft2 |
EBE 250V - SP6 | $1.10 / ft2 |
EBE 250V - SP7 | $1.00 / ft2 |
EBE 350 DECK | $0.70 / ft2 |
EBE 350 (Deck) - SP10 | $0.91 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP10 | $0.91 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP5 | $1.58 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP6 | $0.70 / ft2 |
EBE 350H - SP7 | $0.53 / ft2 |
EBE 350V - SP10 | $1.75 / ft2 |
EBE 350V - SP5 | $2.10 / ft2 |
EBE 350V - SP6 | $1.30 / ft2 |
TARIFF ITEMS | UNIT RATE |
---|---|
EBE 350V – SP7 | $0.60 / ft2 |
EBE 500 DECK | $1.00 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP10 | $1.30 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP5 | $2.25 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP6 | $1.00 / ft2 |
EBE 500H - SP7 | $0.75 / ft2 |
ENVIROBLAST 500VH | $150.00 / hr |
EBE 500V - SP10 | $2.00 / ft2 |
EBE 500V - SP5 | $2.25 / ft2 |
EBE 500V - SP6 | $1.50 / ft2 |
EBE 500V - SP7 | $0.75 / ft2 |
EBE A-Vac | $40.00 / ft2 |
EBE Operator | $0.15 / ft2 |
Fine | $100.00 / ea |
Freight | $155.48 / ea |
Lease | $398.00 / m2 |
Miscellaneous | $7,500.00 / ea |
Miscellaneous Parts | $7,500.00 / ea |
Road Sweeper | $55.00 / hr |
Property lease | $2,916.68 / ea |
S360 Steel shot | $0.60 / lb |
S390 Steel shot | $0.60 / lb |
S460 Steel shot | $0.60 / lb |
Service Charge | $55.00 / hr |
Shackles | $29.45 / ea |
Short term lease | $3.33 / m2 |
Storage by Area | $3.33 / m2 |
Storage by Weight | $1.00 / t/day |
Supplementary Charge | $0.67 / ft2 |
Thimbles | $3.28 / ea |
Vessel on EDC Floating Drydock | $0.00 / month |
350 VH | $2,500.00 / day |
Public Ports and Harbours – Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock
2006-07 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
User Fee | Fee Type | Fee -setting Autho-rity |
Date Last Modified | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Perfor -mance Standard |
Perfor -mance Results |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
See Tariff Items below | Regulatory (R) as per Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-331) | Department of Public Works and Government Services Act (1996, c.16) |
1989 PC 1989-1198 |
15.0 See Note 1 |
15.0 See Note 1 |
62.4 See Note 1 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity |
The user fees were introduced prior to March 31, 2004. Performance standards have not yet been established as contracts are established on an individual custom basis. | Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock services are responsive to, and satisfy the specific needs of each external user, in accordance with the Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock regulations. |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
17.7 17.7 17.7 |
143.0 50.4 51.3 |
Sub-total (R) 15.0 |
Sub-total (R) 15.0 |
Sub-total (R) 62.4 |
Sub-total Sub-total Sub-total |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 |
2007-2008 2008-2009 2000-2010 |
||||||
Total 15.0 |
Total 15.0 |
Total 62.4 |
Total 53.1 |
Total 244.7 |
|||||||
B) Date Last Modified: No substantial modification has been made since March 31, 2004. |
|||||||||||
C) Other Information: Note 1: Since revenues are not forecasted and costs are not calculated based on individual fee items, only the total figures are provided for all user fees. |
Public Ports and Harbours – Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Tariff Items
TARIFF OF DOCK CHARGES | |
---|---|
ITEM SERVICES AND FACILITIES | DOCK CHARGES ($) |
Entry fee | 655.00 |
Setting up keel and bilge blocks | 655.00 |
Hauling out vessel | 515.00 |
Launching vessel | 515.00 |
Accommodation of vessel in the dry dock per day, per unit of gross tonnage | 1.05 |
Fee for the winter term, one vessel | 6,000.00 |
Fee for the winter term, tow vessels, per vessel | 3,000.00 |
Additional charge pursuant to subsection 36(1) up to a maximum of $1000.00 per day, per unit of gross tonnage | 1.80 |
The departmental performance reports for 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 reported registration fees for listing as pre-qualified suppliers with the Translation Bureau. A recent legal opinion found that these fees are not subject to the reporting requirements of the User Fees Act, and for this reason they are no longer reported in the Departmental Performance Report.
As of 2006-2007, Table 9.2: Service Standards for External Fees will no longer be included in the print copy of the DPR. An electronic version of this table can be found at: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/fu-exf-e.html.
No major regulatory initiatives have been undertaken by PWGSC in 2006-2007.
(In millions of dollars) | ||||||
Project | Current Estimated Total Cost |
Actual 2004- 2005 |
Actual 2005- 2006 |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Total Authorities (at March 31, 2007) |
Actual 2006-2007 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REAL PROPERTY SERVICES | ||||||
Office Accommodation Projects | ||||||
Nova Scotia | ||||||
Halifax - New Government of Canada Building, Bedford Institute of Oceanography - Construction (PPA)2 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 0.3 |
Halifax - New Royal Canadian Mounted Police Government of Canada Building - Construction (PPA) 1 | 57.6 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 8.5 | 1.0 |
Prince Edward Island | ||||||
Charlottetown - Proposed Government of Canada Building - Construction (EPA) | 50.2 | 2.7 | 13.8 | 20.5 | 50.3 | 19.4 |
Quebec | ||||||
Montreal - 740 Bel-Air Street - Construction (EPA) | 54.7 | 17.4 | 25.0 | 2.1 | 60.3 | 2.0 |
National Capital Region (Quebec) | ||||||
Gatineau - Laurier Taché Garage - Renovation (EPA) 6 | 61.5 | 12.0 | 13.4 | 12.9 | 61.5 | 11.6 |
National Capital Region (Ontario) | ||||||
Ottawa - Federal Judicial Building - New Construction (PPA)1 | 157.7 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 16.0 | 0.0 |
Ottawa - Skyline Campus - Renovation and Federal Occupancy 3 | 105.8 | 4.3 | 7.4 | 20.0 | 105.8 | 9.3 |
Ottawa - Central Heating and Cooling Plant - East Tunnel Replacement (PPA)1 | 31.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 0.2 |
Parliamentary Precinct | ||||||
Ottawa & Gat, Que - Library of Parliament - Conservation, Rehabilitation and Upgrade (EPA) | 127.9 | 25.2 | 17.5 | 12.4 | 127.9 | 7.4 |
Ottawa - West Block - Renovation (PPA)3 | 769.2 | 4.4 | 15.3 | 35.0 | 177.7 | 13.5 |
Ottawa - Site Infrastructure - New Construction (PPA)3 | 82.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 0.0 |
Ottawa - Wellington Building - Renovation (PPA)3 | 150.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 7.4 | 1.0 |
Ottawa - Bank Street - New Construction (PPA) 1, 2 &3 | 18.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 18.9 | 0.0 |
Saskatchewan | ||||||
Regina - Government of Canada Building - New Construction (EPA) | 47.8 | 5.8 | 20.0 | 13.4 | 47.8 | 4.7 |
British Columbia | ||||||
Surrey - Royal Canadian Mounted Police "E" Division Headquarters, Purchase Land and Crown Construct (PPA)1 | 204.0 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 13.7 | 0.8 |
Non-Office Accommodation Projects6 | ||||||
Parliamentary Precinct | ||||||
Ottawa - Portrait Gallery of Can. - Renovation (EPA) 2,5 | 32.3 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 13.2 | 32.3 | 0.8 |
Lease Accommodation Projects | ||||||
National Capital Region (Ontario) | ||||||
269 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, (LPA) | 29.1 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 22.9 | 112.8 | 24.0 |
131 Queen Street, Ottawa, (LPA)3 | 166.3 | 0.5 | 4.3 | 32.4 | 166.3 | 39.2 |
181 Queen Street, Ottawa, (LPA)3 | 59.9 | 8.4 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 59.9 | 6.3 |
Ontario | ||||||
180 Queen Street West, Toronto, (LPA) | 239.0 | 0.8 | 9.3 | 17.8 | 0.8 | 12.8 |
277 Front Street East, Toronto, Lease (LPA) | 75.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
Engineering Assets Projects | ||||||
Newfoundland and Labrador | ||||||
Argentia - Environmental remediation (EPA) | 93.5 | 3.9 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 93.5 | 4.8 |
National Capital Region (Quebec) | ||||||
Laniel Dam - Reconstruction (EPA) | 21.7 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 12.6 | 21.9 | 6.7 |
National Capital Region (Ontario) | ||||||
Between Ott. & Gat - Alexandra Bridge - Renovation/Deck Replacement (PPA)1 | 18.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.3 |
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ||||||
IT Shared Services | ||||||
ITSS - Proof of Concept | 15.4 | N/A | N/A | 5.6 | 5.2 | 4.9 |
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPENSATION | ||||||
Pension Modernization Project | 115.17 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 7.98 | 18.48 | 7.8 |
CORPORATE MANAGEMENT - FINANCE | ||||||
Financial Systems Transformation Project9 | 62.6 | N/A | N/A | 16.7 | 13.7> | 10.9 |
1: Current Estimated Total Cost has been reduced to the PPA Approved amount.
2: Project currently deferred.
3: Additional information is available in the Status report on Major Crown Projects (Table 12).
4: Project closed – transferred to Library and Archives Canada.
5: Transferred from National Capital Area to Parliamentary Precinct.
6: Current Estimated Total Cost has been reduced to the EPA amount.
7: This figure reflects the amount approved by TB at PPA, which was still in effect as of March 31, 2007. It should be noted that subsequent to the end of FY 2006-2007, on June 13, 2007, the project received EPA, revising the Estimated Total Cost to $203.1.
8: These figures represent the authorities for the Definition Phase of the project, last revised and approved by TB on March 29, 2007.
9: TB decision approved EPA for $59.6 million, which excludes the $3 million pre-development costs.
a. Long Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct
The Long-Term Vision and Plan (LTVP) for the Parliamentary Precinct was originally approved in 2001. In May 2005, Cabinet instructed the Minister of PWGS to return by December 2006 with options to reorganize the LTVP and its associated costs. The revised LTVP was completed by PWGSC in a consultation process with the Parliamentary Partners: the Senate, the House of Commons and the Library of Parliament. The LTVP was completed and approved in June 2007. The plan is a framework that provides direction for the renewal of Canada's seat of government - the Parliamentary Precinct. The revised LTVP builds on the strengths of the original LTVP and reconfirms the original vision of balancing the evolving functional needs of parliamentarians and other users with the overriding commitment to preserve the historic, environmental and symbolic primacy of the site.
The new implementation framework is focused on achieving the long-term vision through five-year programs of work that have three components:
In addition to a new implementation framework that enables us to set both long-term direction and achieve immediate priorities, the revised LTVP has strong new oversight and accountability measures that will ensure effective management of the costing, planning and scheduling of the LTVP. This requires new government approvals every five years, annual reports to the Treasury Board
Secretariat and quarterly report cards to the Minister of PWGSC and the Parliamentary Precinct Oversight Advisory Committee.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
b. Conservation, Rehabilitation and Upgrade of the Library of Parliament
The scope includes the rehabilitation of the main library building on Parliament Hill, fit-up of swing space locations, and building components and connectivity for all locations. The project is the first in the 2001 Long-Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct, although the project has been under way since 1995. The objective is to renew the main library building for at least another 50 years so that it may continue as a functioning library and significant tourist attraction. The work involves full rehabilitation from the weathervane to the foundation, including the excavation of three new basement levels. The total approved budget is $127.9 million.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
c. Bank Street Building (New Parliamentary Precinct Building)
The purpose of this project was to construct a new Parliamentary Precinct building of about 20,500 square metres, to include 39 offices for Senators, 12 modern committee rooms and support spaces for the House of Commons, plus an additional 10,000 square metres for a 300-car underground parking garage. This building was identified as a priority in the Long-Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct. It would allow parliamentary functions to be located within the Parliamentary Precinct while other parliamentary buildings badly in need of renovations are vacated.
This project was put on hold in December 2003 while the government conducted an expenditure review. In May 2005, the West Block Renovation Program, which was originally scheduled within Phase 2 of the LTVP, was advanced to Phase 1 due to the accelerated deterioration of the masonry and health and safety concerns related to asbestos. As a result of the rescheduling of the West Block project, the architectural design competition for the Bank Street Building was cancelled in June 2005, and the Bank Street Building and Site Infrastructure projects were suspended pending a review of the overall LTVP. The cost estimate at the time the project was put on hold was $325.1 million.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
d. Wellington Building Renovation Project
The Wellington Building is a classified heritage building that is located at 180 Wellington Street, across from Parliament Hill. It is a six-storey structure built in 1925. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company completed the last major renovation in 1959. The House of Commons has been the major tenant since the Crown expropriated the building in 1973.
Renovations are required for health and safety reasons, to replace obsolete building systems and to meet current building code requirements. The planned start of construction is in December 2009, with completion of the committee rooms scheduled for July 2013. The building will be completely vacated during the renovations. The current cost estimate is $279.1 million.
The work will be completed in two phases to expedite project delivery.
This project is a key enabler of the West Block Building Renovation Program, because during renovations the Wellington building will provide interim accommodations for the West Block committee rooms.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
e. West Block Renovation Project
The West Block is a classified heritage building that is located on Parliament Hill. It is the oldest of the parliamentary buildings forming a triad with the Centre Block and the East Block. It provides accommodation for Members of Parliament and for parliamentary functions. The building requires major renovations for health and safety and asset integrity reasons.
The renovation project was initiated in 1992 under the Parliamentary Precinct Long-Term Construction Program and received EPA in February 1997. In 1998, the project was put on hold and was subsequently placed under Phase 2 of the June 2001 Long-Term Vision and Plan (LTVP) for the Parliamentary Precinct. However, due to the accelerated deterioration of the masonry walls and the high risk of friable asbestos in the ceiling plenum, in May 2005, Cabinet approved advancing the major renovations to Phase 1 of the LTVP.
Construction will be undertaken in phases. Emergency stabilization will involve the erection of scaffolding around the towers to eliminate the risk of collapse. Engineered stabilization work, as well as repairs and conservation of the masonry, will follow.
Implementation of the subsequent Program will be carried out in two phases. Stage 1 will focus primarily on the provision of interim space that will allow the progressive vacating of the West Block Building, as well as a limited amount of exterior masonry repairs. The building will be vacated during phase 2. Occupants will be relocated to swing space during Stage 1 and for the duration of Stage 2 work.
In June 2005, Treasury Board granted Revised PPA in the amount $769.2 million (indicative estimate, current dollars, excluding GST) including swing space. In December 2006 and February 2007, an EPA of $235 million (excluding GST) for the Stage 1 projects as well as $17.2 million spending authority to advance the planning and design of the Stage 2 projects were also approved.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
f. Pension Modernization Project
The Government of Canada Pension Modernization Project (GCPMP) is a major component of PWGSC's Transformation of Pension Administration agenda. The purpose of this project is to renew PWGSC's pension administration systems and services, and transform its business processes. This will allow PWGSC to provide industry standard pension administration services to employees, employers and pensioners.
PWGSC's approximately 40-year-old systems and business-process infrastructure for pension administration is in grave need of renewal. The limited capabilities of existing processes and the archaic technology of the legacy systems severely compromise PWGSC's ability to sustain current service levels. As well, they severely limit PWGSC's ability to offer future services that are comparable to the delivery performance and cost-effectiveness of industry leaders.
Employers are looking to provide better and broader services to their employees. Demographic trends indicate that by 2016, approximately 40% of the current public service will have become eligible for retirement. As a result, increasingly large numbers of employees are seeking retirement counselling and want access to capabilities that allow them to analyze their pension benefit options. Similarly, demands for enrolment services are increasing as new employees are hired to replace retirees. At the same time, pension administration business units face significant losses of experienced, trained personnel, as approximately 42% of the compensation trainers, supervisors, managers and coaches will be eligible to retire by the fall of 2009.
The GCPMP has completed its Project Definition Phase. A Requirements Mapping and Gap Analysis for the business and technical requirements and a proposed solution were completed in the spring of 2006. This exercise included the mapping of the future business processes as well as the core processes built into the solution’s commercial products. The project team also completed the preliminary system design and implementation planning, developed substantive estimates, and submitted a Treasury Board submission seeking effective project approval, which was received in June 2007. The project is now beginning its Implementation Phase activities, which are expected to take 4½ years to complete.
Further information on the Pension Modernization Project may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rpe-cpt-e.html
(In millions of dollars) | |||||
2006-2007 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual 2004- 2005 |
Actual 2005- 2006 |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual | |
GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |||||
Federal Accommodation and Holdings | |||||
GRANTS | |||||
Municipalities and Other Taxing Authorities (Note 1) | 0.81 | 1.16 | - | - | (0.27) |
Grants in support of activities and projects to increase the understanding and appreciation of Canadian identity and to develop social awareness | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
0.81 | 1.16 | 1.00 | - | (0.27) | |
CONTRIBUTIONS | |||||
Argentia Management Authority (Note 2) | - | 4.00 | 1.17 | 1.27 | 1.25 |
Divestiture of the Trois-Rivières harbourfront park (Note 2) | - | 5.07 | - | - | - |
Divestiture of the 3 Dams (Laniel, Kipawa and Des Quinze) | - | - | - | 44.12 | 44.12 |
Canadian Standards Association | - | - | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 |
Contributions in support of activities and projects to increase the understanding and appreciation of Canadian identity and to develop social awareness | - | - | 1.45 | - | - |
- | 9.07 | 2.63 | 45.40 | 45.38 | |
TOTAL FEDERAL ACCOMMODATION AND HOLDINGS | 0.81 | 10.23 | 3.63 | 45.40 | 45.11 |
Total Transfer Payments | 0.81 | 10.23 | 3.63 | 45.40 | 45.11 |
Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Note 1: Funding for Payments to Municipalities and Other Taxing Authorities was devolved to the applicable custodial departments. The figures reported represent payments not recovered by year-end from custodial clients.
Note 2: The 2005-2006 Actual amount was adjusted to reflect the amount published in the 2005-2006 Public Accounts of Canada.
PWGSC is not responsible for administering conditional grant funding agreements.
Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accrual accounting principles. The unaudited supplementary information presented in the financial tables in the DPR is prepared on a modified cash basis of accounting in order to be consistent with appropriations-based reporting. Note 3 on page 111 of the financial statements reconciles these two accounting methods.
Consistent with our commitment to deliver a more robust financial management framework, PWGSC is moving towards the implementation of the government-wide Audited Departmental Financial Statements Initiative (ADFSI). The readiness assessment exercise and the implementation action plan for this initiative are both completed. At the same time, PWGSC is implementing a new integrated
financial and materiel management system. This system is on schedule to be implemented in fiscal year 2008-2009. Given that system control documentation and assessment are important contributors to the success of the ADFSI, PWGSC will experience some delays in obtaining an audit opinion on its financial statements.
Consolidated Departmental Financial Statements 2006-2007
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
---|
Government Response to the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts Entitled "Chapter 7, Acquisition of Leased Office Space of the May 2006 Report of the Auditor General of Canada" Further information may be found on the website located at: http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10466&Lang=1&SourceId=173138 |
Responses to the Auditor General of Canada and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD) | |
---|---|
Auditor General 2006 May Report |
Chapter 1 - Managing Government: Financial Information The objective was to assess the extent to which departments and agencies have addressed the key internal financial control weaknesses we identified in the 2001, 2002, and 2003 control assessments. The assessments were conducted as part of the audit of the federal government's summary financial statements. The objective of that audit was to report on the fairness of the presentation of the summary financial statements. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
Auditor General 2006 May Report |
Chapter 3 - NATO Flying and Training Canada The objective was to determine how well National Defence has progressed in its management of the NATO Flying Training in Canada program since the 2002 audit. The audit examined whether the Department was getting back what is owed to the Crown and if the pilot training program is meeting requirements. |
Recommendation | 3.18 PWGSC and National Defence should begin action to ensure that compensation is received in a timely manner. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20060503ce.html |
Auditor General 2006 May Report |
Chapter 4 - Canadian Firearms Program The objective was to assess the progress the Centre has made in addressing our 2002 recommendation aimed at the Department of Justice and in managing the Canadian Firearms Program. |
Recommendation | 4.88 PWGSC should review how client departments use the contracting tools it has developed. It should be able to provide assurance that its tools are not being used to circumvent contracting policies and regulations. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20060504ce.html |
Auditor General 2006 May Report |
Chapter 7 - Acquisition of Leased Office Space The objectives were to assess the progress PWGSC has made in responding to the observations and recommendations in the December 2002 Report, Chapter 8, and to assess whether the Department has adequately incorporated principles of risk management into its strategic planning for acquiring leased office space. |
Recommendations | 7.20 In its Departmental Performance Report, PWGSC should include progress against projected savings and the cost of those instances where the most cost-effective accommodation option was either not accepted or not enforced. 7.28 The Treasury Board Secretariat and PWGSC should ensure that funding methods support the selection of the most cost-effective option that meets the long-term accommodation requirements. 7.37 PWGSC should continue to improve the availability, accessibility, and reliability Public Works and Government Services Canada 130 Departmental Performance Report 2006-2007 Quality Services Sound Stewardship of information to support sound decision making for real property investments. 7.53 PWGSC should continue its efforts to develop guidance and to implement continuous risk management as part of the process for acquiring office accommodation, and provide staff with the necessary training in risk management. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20060507ce.html |
Auditor General 2006 May Report |
Chapter 9 - Government Decisions Limited Parliament's Control of Public Spending The objective was to assess the government's management of the decision not to seek Supplementary Estimates for the Canada Firearms Centre in 2003–2004 and the accounting treatment it used for the related transactions. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
CESD 2006 September Report |
Chapter 4 - Sustainable Development Strategies The objective was to assess the actions of 21 departments and agencies in implementing 39 commitments in their sustainable development strategies. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
CESD 2006 September Report |
Chapter 5 - Environmental Petitions The objective of this chapter is to inform Parliament and Canadians on the use of the petitions process and monitoring of commitments and statements made in response to petitions. |
Recommendation | 5.54 Natural Resources Canada, Environment Canada, and PWGSC, in consultation with the Treasury Board Secretariat, should establish an appropriate management structure (for example, identification of a lead department) to manage the Purchase of Electricity from Renewable Resources program. The appropriate management structure should review program objectives and priorities for the purchase of green power within the context of broader initiatives such as the Green Procurement Policy, the national renewable energy strategy currently under discussion, and the Federal House in Order commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in federal operations; set appropriate targets and timelines; secure funding for an appropriate period of time to enable suppliers to finance the development of new green power facilities; and report on progress annually to Parliament and to the public. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/c20060905ce.html |
Auditor General 2006 November Report |
Chapter 2 - Expenditure Management System in Departments The general objective was to determine whether departments have effective procedures to ensure that spending complies with direction from the government centre and meets program funding requirements. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
Auditor General 2006 November Report |
Chapter 3 - Large Information Technology Projects The objectives were to determine: whether the process for reviewing and approving projects was sufficiently rigorous; whether the business cases and the project charters for the projects that were examined had clearly identified the expected results, and how they would contribute to meeting the business needs of the government and the sponsoring department; and whether the projects were managed effectively. |
Recommendations | 3.61 Government departments and agencies should improve their internal quality reviews of IT projects. Senior departmental executives should review the key decision documents that are produced to support the IT project and ensure that the analysis is thorough and supportable before signing off on the submission. 3.89 Before seeking effective project approval, departments and agencies should prepare a business case that includes, at a minimum, precise and measurable objectives; a full analysis of options, benefits, costs, and risks; and an implementation plan. 3.90 The Treasury Board Secretariat should improve the requirements for sound business cases prepared by departments and agencies to ensure that they include, at a minimum, precise and measurable objectives; a full analysis of options, benefits, costs, and risks; and an implementation plan. 3.98 At the start of a project, departments and agencies should clearly demonstrate that their organization is ready to accept the business transformation that comes with the project and has the capability and commitment to successfully deliver the project. Specifically, departments and agencies should analyze their track record in completing projects of similar size and complexity; completing skills appraisals and plans to address shortfalls; planning for business preparation, transition, and operational phases; and considering key stakeholder buy-in and commitment. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20061103ce.html |
Auditor General 2006 November Report |
Chapter 4 - Proper Conduct of Public Business – Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Agencies The objectives were to determine: the adequacy of the design and operation of programs supporting ethical conduct and awareness of ethical problems in areas that have an impact on resource management; the adequacy of the design and operation of processes in place to respond to internal disclosures made by employees within an organization; whether internal audit adequately supports compliance; and whether controls on contracting, acquisition cards, and overtime and leave are adequate. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
Auditor General 2006 November Report |
Chapter 5 - Relocating Members of the Canadian Forces, RCMP, and Federal Public Service The objectives were to determine whether: the contracts for the Integrated Relocation Program were awarded according to the Treasury Board Contracting Policy, government contracting regulations, and the PWGSC Supply Manual; whether the contracts were managed and administered according to the terms and conditions of government and departmental relocation policies; and whether the Treasury Board Secretariat and the departments involved established performance measures to demonstrate and report that objectives of the program are being met. |
Recommendations | 5.40 For significant and high-risk proposals, PWGSC should ensure that more than one person evaluates the financial component of bids. 5.48 When recommending a contract award for significant and high-risk proposals, PWGSC contract officers should ensure that briefing material prepared for senior management contains sufficient detail to allow appropriate management oversight and review. 5.99 PWGSC should ensure that all ceiling rates are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20061105ce.html |
Auditor General 2006 November Report |
Chapter 9 - Pension and Insurance Administration – Royal Canadian Mounted Police The objectives were to determine whether the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has responded adequately to all significant deficiencies that the Ottawa Police Service (OPS) found during its investigation of the RCMP pension and insurance plans; and whether breakdowns in controls resulted in excess costs, poor value-for-money, or misuse of funds. During the audit, another objective was added: to determine whether the agreement between the RCMP and the OPS was structured to avoid undue RCMP direction or bias. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
Auditor General 2006 November Report |
Chapter 10 - Award and Management of a Health Benefits Contract – PWGSC and Health Canada The objective was to determine whether PWGSC awarded the contract to First Canadian Health Management Corporation Inc. (FCH) in accordance with the Treasury Board Contracting Policy, and whether Health Canada complied with relevant authorities and exercised adequate control over public funds spent. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
Auditor General 2007 February Report |
Chapter 1 - Advertising and Public Opinion Research The objectives were to determine: the extent to which the government had taken corrective action in response to our past recommendations; whether the government had implemented adequate control over the spending of public money on advertising and public opinion research activities, and was complying with relevant authorities; and whether the results of the activities had been measured and reported in accordance with the requirements of the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada. |
Recommendation | No recommendation |
Auditor General 2007 February Report |
Chapter 2 - The Conservation of Federal Built Heritage The objective was to determine the measures that the federal government had put in place to improve the protection of built heritage in order to follow up on the recommendations concerning built heritage made in Chapter 6 of the November 2003 report, Protection of Cultural Heritage in the Federal Government. The audit also sought to determine the specific protection interventions the federal government had carried out to maintain or restore heritage status, based on a sample of national historic sites and federal heritage buildings. |
Recommendations | 2.35 The government should strengthen its conservation regime for built heritage by establishing overall objectives for conservation of built heritage, setting priorities for conservation and monitoring organizations activities, covering all elements of built heritage of custodian departments, combining the functions of designation and
conservation, and reporting to Parliament on the results of conservation activities. 2.36 Federal departments and agencies should set conservation objectives for built heritage for themselves, and should let Parliament know that performance information is accessible. |
Departmental Response | http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20070202ce.html |
Internal Audit Projects | Status |
---|---|
Audit of the Administrative Costs related to the Public Service Superannuation Account | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Audit of the Management of the Government of Canada’s Pension Modernization – Phase II | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Follow-up to Health Canada's Management Letter on First Canadian Health Service Contract | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Directed Audit of the Validation of the Proposal Values for the NATO Flying Training in Canada Settlement | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Audit of PWGSC Compliance to DP078 - Workplace Emergency Evacuation Plans | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Follow-up to the Audit Survey of Overtime Pay within PWGSC | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Financial Report of Administrative Costs Chargeable to the Canada Pension Plan Account | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Audit of PWGSC's Implementation of Changes to the Management of Government Advertising | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Audit of the Management Control of the Project Business and Management System (PBMS) | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Audit of IM/IT Funding within PWGSC with a Focus on Infrastructure Sustainability | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Internal Audit of Release 3.0 of the Shared Travel Services Initiative (STSI) / Travel AcXess Voyage Solution | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Annual Attest Audits of the Financial Statements of Revolving Funds for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2006:
|
Completed in 2006-2007 |
Audit of the Quality Management of the Government of Canada Pension Modernization Project | Completed (planned 2006-2007 audit) |
Audit of Contract Related to Business Transformation Initiative | Completed (requested 2006-2007 audit) |
Audit of Information Technology (IT) Security | Carried forward to 2007-2008 |
Audit of Cost Recovery and Determination of Fees | Carried forward to 2007-2008 |
Audit of Revenue from Commercial and Retail Letting | Carried forward to 2007-2008 |
Audit of the Management Practices Related to PWGSC Bridges | Carried forward to 2007-2008 |
Evaluation Projects | Status |
Evaluation Framework for PWGSC's Surplus Federal Real Property for Homelessness Initiative | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Evaluation of PWGSC's Surplus Federal Real Property for Homelessness Initiative | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Evaluation Follow-up - The Institute | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Evaluation Framework for PWGSC's Shared Travel Services Initiative | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Evaluation for PWGSC's Shared Travel Services Initiative | Completed (carry forward from previous year) |
Evaluation Framework for the Interim Cost-Share Agreement for the Sidney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites Remediation Project | Completed (planned 2006-2007 evaluation) |
Evaluation of the Interim Cost-Share Agreement for the Sidney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites Remediation Project | Completed (planned 2006-2007 evaluation) |
Summative Evaluation of the Government of Canada Exhibitions Program | Completed (planned 2006-2007 evaluation) |
Evaluation Framework of the Green Procurement Policy | Carried forward to 2007-2008 |
More information on these audits and evaluations may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/aeb/text/toc-e.html
Points to Address | Departmental Input |
---|---|
What are the key goals, objectives, and/or long-term targets of the Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS)? |
The PWGSC Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) 2003 was tabled in Parliament in February 2004. SDS 2003 contained departmental commitments relating to four goals:
More information on SDS 2003 is available at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/sds2003/strategy/toc-e.html. |
How do your key goals, objectives and/or long-term targets help achieve your department’s strategic outcomes? | Overall, experience gained throughout the previous SDSs has led to smarter target development, improved management processes and enhanced results monitoring systems. PWGSC is well positioned to build on its successes with the implementation of its Sustainable Development Strategy 2003 and the continuation of the more comprehensive, streamlined and transparent approach taken in its SDS 2007-2009. More information on SDS 2007-2009 may be found at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/sds2007/strategy/sdd-sds2007-tc-e.html. |
What were your targets for the reporting period? | For a list of the Targets and Objectives and Targets in the PWGSC SDS 2003, please see http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/sds2003/strategy/toc-e.html. |
What is your progress to date? | For the reporting period, PWGSC continued to make progress on its four overarching goals and respective objectives. Detailed progress is provided in the PWGSC Sustainable Development Performance Report. This report is available on the internet at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/text/performance-report-e.html. |
What adjustments have you made, if any? | Fiscal year 2006-2007 was the last year of implementation for SDS 2003. The transition to the department’s new SDS 2007-2009 is described in the Sustainable Development Performance Report 2006-2007 available at the following link: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/sd-env/text/performance-report-e.html. Furthermore, for SDS 2007-2009, PWGSC is integrating SDS planning and reporting in the corporate dashboard as a part of overall business planning processes. The SDS is to be included in 2007-2008 mid-year review and year-end review processes. |
As of 2006-2007, Table 18: Procurement and Contracting will no longer be included in the print copy of the DPR. An electronic version can be found at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/am-pc-e.html.
As of 2006-2007, Table 19: Client-Centred Service (formerly "Service Improvement") will no longer be included in the print copy of the DPR. An electronic version can be found at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/scc-ccs-e.html.
a. Government of Canada Marketplace
The GoCM is an on-line tool that provides Government of Canada (GC) employees with access to an electronic catalogue of pre-approved goods and services available through Standing Offers (SOs) and Supply Arrangements (SAs). The current scope of GoCM allows users to search for standing offers and supply arrangements; browse, search and compare goods and services that are available in on-line catalogues; select goods and services from on-line catalogues to add to a "shopping cart;" save "shopping cart(s)" for re-use; create and print orders; and run detailed reports on what was selected for order, by whom, for whom and at what price.
These anticipated and quantifiable benefits are derived from the contribution of electronic tools to facilitate compliance with mandatory procurement instruments, achieve efficiencies due to automated business processes and facilitate lower prices through accurate and timely purchasing information needed to leverage the buying power across government spending.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website located at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/ih-hi-e.html
b. Shared Travel Services Initiative
The STSI is a Government of Canada initiative, jointly led by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) and the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS). STSI is delivering value to the Government of Canada and savings to Canadian taxpayers. Its objective is to improve services to employees; increase direct savings on government-wide travel; reduce and streamline administrative costs and processes; improve management of information for negotiations and informed decision-making; and provide high quality travel services within an integrated, "end-to-end" travel management system that enables departments and agencies to realize savings.
STSI has successfully developed and deployed the following services:
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/ih-hi-e.html
c. Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Clean-up Project
In July 2006 the Governments of Canada and Nova Scotia received a report of an independent review panel environmental assessment of the project, and in January 2007 jointly released their formal response in support of the report recommendations along with key decisions on proceeding with the full remediation. These decisions followed a successful period of collaboration in planning as well as implementation of preliminary construction work in advance of the main project, which will begin in the 2007 construction season. The chosen approach involves solidifying and stabilizing the contaminated soils before the sites are contained and capped, followed by site development and long-term monitoring and maintenance.
Further information on this subject may be found on the PWGSC website located at:
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/ih-hi-e.html
PWGSC complies with the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Special Travel Authorities and the Travel Directive on Rates and Allowances.
As of 2006-2007, Table 22: Storage Tanks will no longer be included in the print copy of the DPR. An electronic version can be found at: http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/reports/text/dpr_2006-2007/rs-st-e.html.
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The ATIA provides more details.
Statutory deadlines met 83.3% of the time.
The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments made in 1986 and 1992.
Subscription rates are charged for the printing and distribution of the Canada Gazette.
100% compliance with the legislated publication deadlines for the Canada Gazette and the legislated publication deadlines for each of its clients.
Error rate was less than 1%.
100% of all notices were published within the legislated deadlines. The Canada Gazette Directorate met all its publication dates for all formats of the Canada Gazette.
Error count was 0.053% which represents only 3 errors in 5,567 pages.
The subscription rates have not been modified since 1985.
The establishment of the current fee structure pre-dates the November 2004 Policy On Service Standards for External Fees.
Project Phase: Project Definition
The Long-Term Vision and Plan (LTVP) for the Parliamentary Precinct was originally approved in 2001. In May 2005, Cabinet instructed the Minister of PWGS to return by December 2006 with options to reorganize the LTVP and its associated costs. The revised LTVP was completed by PWGSC in a consultation process with the Parliamentary Partners: the Senate, the House of Commons and the Library of Parliament. The LTVP was completed and approved in June 2007. The plan is a framework that provides direction for the renewal of Canada's seat of government - the Parliamentary Precinct. The revised LTVP builds on the strengths of the original LTVP and reconfirms the original vision of balancing the evolving functional needs of parliamentarians and other users with the overriding commitment to preserve the historic, environmental and symbolic primacy of the site.
The new implementation framework is focused on achieving the long-term vision through five-year programs of work that have three components:
See separate notes for the status of current active projects. (West Block Program, Wellington Building, Library of Parliament)
In addition to a new implementation framework that enables us to set both long-term direction and achieve immediate priorities, the revised LTVP has strong new oversight and accountability measures that will ensure more effective management of the costing, planning and scheduling of the LTVP through new government approvals every five years, annual reports to Treasury Board Secretariat and quarterly report cards to the minister of PWGSC and his Parliamentary Precinct Oversight Advisory Committee.
See separate notes for current projects.
See separate notes for current projects.
See separate notes for current projects.
See separate notes for current projects.
Project Phase: Project Implementation
The scope includes the rehabilitation of the Main Library Building on Parliament Hill, fit-up of swing space locations, and Building Components and Connectivity for all locations. The project is the first in the 2001 Long-Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct, although the project has been under way since 1995. The objective is to renew the Main Library Building for at least another 50 years so that it may continue as a functioning library and significant tourist destination. The work involves full rehabilitation from the weathervane to the foundation, including the excavation for three new basement levels. The total approved budget is $127.9 million.
Prime Contractor (Main Library):
Major Sub-Contractors (Main Library):
Prime Contractor (125 Sparks Street, Ottawa – completed):
Prime Contractor (45 Sacré–Cœur, Gatineau – completed):
Pre-Planning Start – June 1995
Preliminary Project Approval – June 1998
Effective Project Approval – December 1999
Swing Space Construction Completed – December 2001
Revised Effective Project Approval – January 2002
Main Library Construction Start – March 2002
Revised Effective Project Approval – December 2004
Main Library Construction Completion – May 2006
Library Moves Back – June to August 2006 and June to August 2007
The swing space locations were completed on budget and are operational. The Main Library construction started March 2002 and was completed May 2006. The Library moved back staff and most of collections during June to August 2006. The rare books are being moved back during summer 2007. The project budget, approved in December 2004, is $127.9M and is being respected. Expenditures for fiscal year 2006-2007 were $4.9 million less than forecast. The reduction reflects the decision to hold off the move of rare books until summer 2007 to verify the mechanical systems through four seasons, and the unsettled claims, which were not received until late in fiscal year. The forecast for future years has been increased to reflect reduced expenditures in 2006-2007. Expenditures for claims will occur in the year that claims are settled.
The project is in the close out phase. The remaining key risk associated with the project is claims. The project has detailed risk management plans for the consultant contract and for the main construction contract. These risks are continually monitored, and are reassessed in detail on a regular basis. The project budget contingencies are managed on the basis of these
plans. A team resource is responsible for monitoring the risks.
The communications plans adopted for the project are based on open and transparent communication. Information about work that was done on the Library is available through the Web site "A Treasure to Explore" tours, lectures and articles in various media publications.
An Environmental Assessment Screening (EAS) was conducted in September 1999. The project was deemed acceptable from an environmental point of view. Any negative impacts were assessed to be minor or avoidable through simple mitigation measures. The recommendations of the report were incorporated into the project.
Public consultation was determined to be unnecessary due to the justification for the project and because the EAS predicted insignificant impacts. A priority for the project was to mitigate, as much as possible, any inconveniences associated with the project that may have affected the essential operations of Parliament. Communication about the project to the public is an
important aspect of the mitigation measures, including compensating for the temporary loss of access to the building by tourists.
Multi-million dollar contracts were awarded for architectural design and conservation expertise, and for all aspects of construction in heritage buildings. Canadian expertise in conservation and adaptation of heritage structures to modern use has been furthered.
($ millions) | Current Estimated Total Expenditure | Forecast Expenditures to March 31, 2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Future Years' Requirements |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Library Rehabilitation including all swing spaces | $127.9M | $123.0M | $4.9M |
Project Phase: Project Definition
The purpose of this project was to construct a new Parliamentary Precinct building of about 20,500 square metres, to include 39 offices for Senators, 12 modern committee rooms for the House of Commons, and support spaces, plus an additional 10,000 square metres for a 300-car underground parking garage. This building was identified as a priority in the Long Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct. It would allow parliamentary functions to be located within the Parliamentary Precinct while other parliamentary buildings badly in need of renovations are vacated.
This project was put on hold in December 2003 while the government conducted an expenditure review. In May 2005, the West Block Renovation Program, which was originally scheduled within Phase 2 of the LTVP, was advanced to Phase 1 due to accelerated deterioration of the masonry plus health and safety concerns related to asbestos. As a result of that emergency rescheduling of the West Block project, the architectural design competition for the Bank Street Building was cancelled in June 2005, and the Bank Street Building and Site Infrastructure projects were suspended pending a review of the overall LTVP. The cost estimate at the time the project was put on hold was $325.1 million.
No prime contractor or major sub-contractors are under contract at this time.
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) - June 7, 2001.
Project put on hold and design competition cancelled - June 14, 2005
The project has been on hold since December 2003, first due to the Government expenditure review on Major Capital Projects. On June 14, 2005 the architectural design competition was cancelled following a decision to advance the West Block building renovation from Phase 2 to Phase 1 of the LTVP. As a result the Bank Street Building and Site Infrastructure projects were suspended pending a review of the overall LTVP. The program requirements and the Bank Street Building project will now be reviewed as part of the review and update of the Long Term Vision and Plan for the Parliamentary Precinct.
The cost estimate at the time the project was put on hold was $325.1 million (current dollars). This represented an increase of $127.2 million from the original estimate of $197.9 million (constant 2001 dollars). The increase breaks down as follows:
A number of multi-million dollar contracts would be awarded for building construction, information technology systems, multimedia systems, furniture and other equipment. The number of available jobs would be determined after the award of the general construction contract.
Project Phase: Project Definition
The Wellington building is a classified heritage building that is located at 180 Wellington Street, across from Parliament Hill. It is a six-storey structure built in 1925. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company completed the last major renovation in 1959. The House of Commons has been the major tenant since the Crown expropriated the building in 1973.
Renovations are required for health and safety reasons, to replace obsolete building systems and to meet current building code requirements. The planned start of construction is in December 2009, with completion of the committee rooms in July 2013. The building will be completely vacated during the renovations. The current cost estimate is $279.1 million.
The work will be completed in two phases to expedite project delivery.
This project is a key enabler of the West Block Building Program, as the Wellington building will provide interim accommodations for the West Block committee rooms during its renovation.
No prime contractor is under contract at this time.
LTVP MC Approval June 2007
Revised PPA and Spending Authority – November 2007
Consultant Contract Award: March 2008
Phase I – Construction Start: December 2009
Phase 2 – EPA: June 2009
Phase 2 – Construction Start: September 2010
Construction Completion: July 2013
Health and safety requirements necessitate the relocation of tenants and the client’s programs to other locations during the renovation. Interim space projects noted below have received separate approvals to enable the renovation of the building.
Wellington Building Renovation – Updating of the Investment Analysis Report and the TB Submission are underway to support the Revised PPA for the Phase 1 demolition and asbestos abatement and special spending authority to complete design and tender documents for the entire renovation, anticipated to be submitted for Treasury Board approval in the fall 2007.
Other related projects:
181 Queen Street – Completed
131 Queen Street – Project Implementation
Security Operation Centre – Project Definition
Trade Shops Relocation – Project Definition
The current estimate of $279.1 (Same issue as noted above) million for the Wellington Building Renovation project is exclusive of the 10 committee rooms, for which the West Block Program received TB approval for $70.6 million of fit-up, fees and Building Components and Connectivity (BCC). These 10 committee rooms are to be relocated from the West Block building to the Wellington Building consistent with the approved LTVP.
A number of multi-million dollar contracts will be awarded for building construction phases, information technology systems, multimedia systems, furniture and miscellaneous equipment. The number of available jobs will be determined upon award of contracts.
The West Block is a classified heritage building that is located on Parliament Hill. It is the oldest of the Parliamentary buildings forming a triad with the Centre Block and the East Block. It provides accommodation for Members of Parliament and for parliamentary functions. The building requires major renovations for health and safety and asset integrity reasons.
The renovation project was initiated in 1992 under the Parliamentary Precinct Long Term Construction Program and received EPA in February 1997. In 1998, the project was put on-hold and was subsequently placed under Phase 2 of the June 2001 Long Term Vision and Plan (LTVP) for the Parliamentary Precinct. However, due to the accelerated deterioration of the masonry walls and the high risk of friable asbestos in the ceiling plenum, in May 2005, Cabinet approved a recommendation to advance the major renovations to Phase 1 of the LTVP.
Construction will be undertaken in phases. Emergency Stabilization - will involve the erection of scaffolding around towers to eliminate the risk of collapse. Engineered stabilization work as well as repairs and conservation of the masonry will follow this.
Implementation of the subsequent Program will be carried out in two phases. Stage 1 of the implementation will focus primarily on the provision of interim space that will allow the progressive vacating of the West Block Building, as well as a limited amount of exterior masonry repairs. The building will be vacated during phase 2. Occupants will be relocated to swing space during Stage 1 and for the duration of Stage 2 work.
In June 2005, Treasury Board granted Revised PPA in the amount $769.2 million (indicative estimate, current dollars, excluding GST) including swing space. In December 2006 and February 2007, an EPA of $235 million (excluding GST) for the Stage 1 projects as well as $17.2 million Spending Authority to advance the planning and design of the Stage 2 projects.
Project Phase: | Stage 1 - Project Implementation |
Stage 2 - Project Definition |
West Block Building: Prime Contractor (design consultant); ARCOP/Gersowitz Moss, architects in joint venture 1244 Ste-Catherine Ouest, 3rd floor, Montreal PQ, H3G 1P1
La Promenade Building: Prime Contractor (design consultant); KWC Architects Inc.; 110 Argyle Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1B4
South East Tower Masonry Restoration: General Contractor; Ellis-Don Corporation, 150, Isabella Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 1V7
Effective Project Approval – February 1997
Preliminary Project Approval (for Building Components and Connectivity (BCC)) – February 1997
Revised PPA – June 2005
Partial EPA, and revised SA – December 2006 & February 2007
MPs move into La Promenade Building – 2009/10
Start renovations of West Block South Wing – 2009/10
Committee Rooms to be vacated, start of North Wing renovations – 2012/13
Renovations are scheduled for completion in Summer 2017
In comparison with the 1997 project that was to address the renovation of the West Block building only, the current program has been expanded to include interim space for committee rooms, Members of Parliament and administration staff. The program of work consists of sub-projects involving emergency stabilization of towers and masonry, several interim space projects, major renovations of the building and construction of a Courtyard infill. The renovations of the West Block building are scheduled to start in late 2009, with completion in the summer 2017.
Stabilization:
Swing space:
The current estimate of the total program of works is $1.11 billion (current dollars, excluding GST). This current estimate is $349.3 million greater than the June 2005 TB approval of $769.2 million. Following is a summary of the variance with explanations (constant dollars, excluding GST):
COST ITEM | VARIANCE | COMMENTS |
---|---|---|
Construction | $45.7 M | More extensive deterioration of masonry and foundations than previously expected. |
Professional Fees | $42.7M | Inclusion of $23M for PM/CM Services plus increase to prime consultant and PWGSC fees as a percentage of increased construction cost. |
Swing Space | $114.9M | Additional swing space projects include Room 200, Production Kitchen and Classrooms. |
Contingency | $95.7M | In 2005, total contingency allowances were based on the industry standard of 10 % of the construction cost estimate. To better reflect reality, the rates have been varied from 15% to 27% on specific projects to reflect new knowledge gained from investigations of the West Block. |
Risk Allowance | $76.5M | A risk factor of 10% was used in 2005; however, due to experience with renovations to the Library of Parliament, a comparable heritage asset, the risk allowance was increased to 25%. |
BCC | ($ 26.3 M) | The 2005 cost was based on updating the 1997 requirements. The 2006 cost has been reduced due to a better understanding of the requirements. |
TOTAL | $349.2 M |
Currently, the overall Program baseline is being reviewed in light of the completion of a number of sub-projects. The results of this analysis will be presented to management in the fall 2007.
A number of multi-million dollar contracts will be awarded for building construction, information technology systems, multimedia systems, furniture and other equipment. The number of available jobs will be determined after the award of the general construction contract.
Project Name:Government of Canada Pension Modernization Project (GCPMP)
The GCPMP is a major component of PWGSC's Transformation of Pension Administration agenda. The purpose of this project is to renew PWGSC's pension administration systems and services, and transform its business processes. This will allow PWGSC to provide industry standard pension administration services to employees, employers and pensioners.
PWGSC's approximately 40-year-old systems and business-process infrastructure for pension administration are in grave need of renewal. The limited capabilities of existing processes and the archaic technology of the legacy systems severely compromise PWGSC's ability to sustain current service levels. As well, they severely limit PWGSC's ability to offer future services that are comparable to the delivery performance and cost-effectiveness industry standards.
Employers are looking to provide better and broader services to their employees. Demographic trends indicate that by 2016, approximately 40% of the current public service will have become eligible for retirement. As a result, increasingly large numbers of employees are seeking retirement counselling and want access to capabilities that allow them to analyze their pension benefit options. Similarly, demands for enrolment services are increasing as new employees are hired to replace retirees. At the same time, pension administration business units face significant losses of experienced, trained personnel, as approximately 42 percent of the compensation trainers, supervisors, managers, and coaches will be eligible to retire by the fall of 2009.
The GCPMP has completed its Project Definition Phase. A Requirements Mapping and Gap Analysis for the business and technical requirements and the solution proposed was completed in the spring of 2006; this exercise included the mapping of the proposed future business processes as well as the core processes built into the solution’s commercial products. The project team has also completed the preliminary system design and implementation planning, developed substantive estimates, and submitted a Treasury Board submission, seeking effective project approval (EPA), which was received in June 2007. The project is now beginning its Implementation Phase activities, which are expected to take 4½ years to complete.
The two Transformation of Pension Administration projects, the GCPMP and the Centralization of Pension Services Delivery Project are currently in their Implementation Phases. Implementation activities began in July 2007 and are expected to be completed in January 2012.
Prime Contractor: EDS Canada Inc. (EDS)
Major Sub-Contractors: James Evans and Associates, Siebel Systems, and Vangent (formerly Pearson Canada Solutions)
Milestone | Date completed |
---|---|
Project Definition Phase (from PPA to EPA): | |
Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) received from TB | May 3, 2004 |
Release of draft RFP (Completion: May 2004) |
May 25, 2004 |
Consultations with vendors (Completion: July 2004) |
July 2004 |
Release of final RFP (Completion: September 2004) |
October 22, 2004 (Release of RFP was delayed to allow the project to address feedback from consultations) |
Close of bidding period (Completion: December 31, 2004) |
January 31, 2005 (Bidding period was extended at the request of the bidders) |
Evaluation of bids (Completion: December 31, 2004) |
May 27, 2005 (Completion date was deferred to accommodate the extended bidding period and the larger than expected number of bids) |
Preparation of the TB submission for contract authority / Contract award (Completion: June 2005) |
November 4, 2005 – Contract signed with EDS November 7, 2005 – Vendor began work (contract award was deferred to accommodate the extended bidding and evaluation periods. TB approved the contract award to EDS Canada Inc. on October 31, 2005) |
Requirements Mapping and Gap Analysis These activities were rescheduled from original planned date of January 2006 to April 2006 following contract award. |
April 2006 |
Architecture and Design (Completion: September 2006) |
September 2006 |
Effective Project Approval (Completion: November 2006) |
June 13, 2007 (Completion of the Treasury Board Submission was delayed to accommodate Treasury Board’s request to prepare a single submission for both the GCPMP and the Centralization of Pension Services Delivery Project) |
Implementation Phase (EPA to Close-Out): | |
Phase 5–EPA Start-Up Activities (Completion: January 2008) |
|
Phase 6–Design, Construction and Implementation:
|
(See note below) |
Phase 7–Final Maintenance Transition (Completion: January 2012) |
|
Phase 8–Close-out Phase (Completion: January 2012) |
Note: The dates for the implementation phase have been updated to reflect the implementation plans completed during the preparation of the TB Submission for EPA.
The initiation and preliminary planning phases were conducted from September 2000 to January 2004, leading up to the finalization and presentation of the Treasury Board Submission for PPA in April 2004. Approval in principle was received from the Treasury Board in March 2004. Preliminary Project Approval was received in May 2004, and the project proceeded with the Project Definition Phase.
Following the receipt of PPA, the GCPMP completed and released a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for the procurement of a contractor for the development and implementation of business transformation and the COTS software-based solution. Industry feedback was analyzed and integrated into the final RFP, which was released in October 2004. The close of the bidding period was extended from December 2004 to January 2005 at the request of bidders. The evaluation of bids was conducted from February to May 2005. Contractor selection was based on the evaluation processes and scoring specified in the RFP. These processes included: the evaluation of hard copy proposals; an evaluation of each bidder’s corporate capabilities, references, presentations and readiness assessment; and the evaluation of financial proposals.
As the EDS Canada Inc. proposal was fully compliant and obtained the highest proposal score, EDS was the recommended bidder. An independent third party (fairness monitor) was engaged to observe and verify that the evaluation process was conducted with integrity, objectivity and impartiality. The fairness monitor reported that the recommended bidder was selected appropriately
On November 4, 2005, following approval from Treasury Board, a contract was signed with EDS for the provision of professional services to complete the Project Definition Phase for the new commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) based pension administration system. The EDS team, including product specialists from James Evans and Associates Ltd. (Penfax), Siebel Systems, and Pearson Canada Solutions (now named Vangent), joined the GCPMP team on November 7, 2005.
The Project Definition Phase activities completed in 2006-2007 included:
Following the completion of these activities in late 2006, the GCPMP completed its business case and prepared its request for Effective Project Approval from the Treasury Board. The presentation of the TB Submission for EPA was delayed from its original target date of December 2006 to June 2007, to accommodate more pressing Treasury Board priorities.
The project will now proceed with the actual implementation of the new COTS software pension administration systems and services. The contract with EDS includes options for the completion of the releases of the GCPMP solution. These options include professional services, COTS software, and maintenance and support services as required to implement the new pension system for the Public Service Superannuation Act (PSSA). Although the project is focused on the PSSA administration, the project will implement a multi-plan solution that will provide for other pension plans within the public service.
A multi-million dollar contract has been awarded for the COTS products, as well as for the implementation of the new systems and business processes, support services and ongoing maintenance. The implementation will be conducted in several phases over a four and a half year period (July 2007 to January 2012). During that time, it is expected that there will be some temporary positions required to support the system implementation and business transformation activities in both the National Capital Area and Shediac, New Brunswick. In the long term, the project will provide the infrastructure and processes essential to the sustainability of current pension administration operations, and positions, in Shediac, New Brunswick.
As a provider of Quality Services, PWGSC acquires goods, services and construction on behalf of the departments and agencies of the Government of Canada.
In 2006-2007, over 61,000 contractual documents covering 15,000 goods and services, for a total value of $10.770 billion, were processed.
Original contracts, excluding amendments, accounted for over 34,000 documents valued at $8 billion. Of these, 63.3% were awarded through competitive process, 7.3% used Advance Contract Award Notices (ACANs) and 29.4 percent were non-competitive. The increase in non-competitive contracts this year can be attributed in part to 10 contracts valued at almost $1 billion that were awarded on behalf of the Department of National Defence for national security reasons or exclusive rights (i.e., only one supplier firm is capable of performing the contract) reasons.
PWGSC provides opportunities to Aboriginal businesses through contracting and, this year, awarded 1,253 contracts in Aboriginal procurements, worth over $253 million.
The Department of National Defence continues to be PWGSC's largest client, accounting for about 47 percent of business volume. PWGSC's top ten clients accounted for 92 percent of the business volume and 79 percent of the documents processed.
To support its role in providing the above quality services, PWGSC continued to reinforce its sound stewardship framework of procurement procedures and policies. Sound stewardship fosters the cost-effective and efficient delivery of contracting services to the government, while complying with legislative obligations, including those related to national and international trade agreements.
Further information regarding how PWGSC manages the contracting function, including related contracting authorities, delegations and policies can be viewed at:
http://contractscanada.gc.ca/en/index.html
PWGSC primarily provides internal government services with some selected external citizen-centred services. We demonstrate value for money to taxpayers by continuously meeting the evolving needs of our clients.
Client satisfaction surveys help us identify areas to improve service delivery. The department has developed a Client Data Integration Plus (CDIPlus) system, a client relationship management tool to track key client issues and create a central repository of client information. Business lines are collecting client satisfaction surveys. The services directly to Canadians with fees can be found in User Fee Tables 9-1 and 9-2.
The Receiver General’s year-end national survey indicated that client satisfaction has declined 13% (to 81%) from the 94% attained the previous year. The branch also completed the centralization of the retirement planning information sessions in addition to the already centralized Division of Pension Benefits and Pension Transfers. The level of client satisfaction for these services has increased from 66% to an average of 79%.
Consulting, Information and Shared Services had client satisfaction ratings for communications services ranging from 77% to 97%. The 2006-2007 client satisfaction survey found 90% of Canada Pavilion visitors increased their awareness of government services available to them while 81% received information that might otherwise have been difficult to find. Other client satisfaction results included: Canada Gazette 97%, Crown Copyright and Licensing 93%, Publishing 77%, Depository Services 79%, Public Opinion Research and Advertising Coordination 80%.
Government Consulting Services had a client satisfaction rate of 91%, surpassing its target of 85%.
Audit Services Canada had an overall client satisfaction rate of 92%, due, in part, to the quality assurance support of the newly established Professional Practices Group.
The Translation Bureau undertook an independent client satisfaction survey that found 84% of clients were satisfied with translation services and 94% with interpretation services.
Real Property launched its National Project Management System (NPMS) to improve service delivery and increase client satisfaction. The NPMS provides the methodology, web-based tools, and project governance structure, as well as enhanced client and quality management focus, to deliver projects on time, on budget and within their defined scope. A performance measurement and assessment framework to improve project management is also an integral part of the NPMS.
The Office of Greening Government Operations (OGGO) worked with Real Property to integrate its client satisfaction survey into the department-wide client satisfaction survey and monitoring process. This will help assess the quality, timeliness and affordability of all OGGO services.
Acquisitions focused on the transformation of its procurement processes working towards a centralized client service model. As a result, its client consultancy survey will take place in 2007-2008.
ITS implemented a client centered external service delivery strategy through its Services Management Improvement Program (SMIP) to measure the effectiveness of service delivery, the results of which were used to improve processes and, where appropriate, move clients to lower cost solutions.
Lead Department(s): PWGSC
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: December 2002
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Ongoing
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $34.1M
Description:
Over a six-year timeframe, the Government of Canada Marketplace (GoCM) project, conceived as part of the Electronic Supply Chain (a Government On-Line initiative), has emerged as a core component of Public Works and Government Services Canada’s (PWGSC’s) procurement agenda.
The GoCM is an on-line tool that provides Government of Canada (GC) employee access to an electronic catalogue of pre-approved goods and services available through Standing Offers (SOs) and Supply Arrangements (SAs). The current scope of GoCM allows users to search for standing offers and supply arrangements; browse, search and compare goods and services that are available in on-line catalogues; select goods and services from on-line catalogues to add to a "shopping cart"; save "shopping cart(s)" for re-use; create and print orders; and run detailed reports on what was selected for order, by whom, for whom and at what price.
Shared Outcome(s):
The GoCM will contribute $127M of savings for departments and agencies. These anticipated and quantifiable benefits are derived from the contribution of electronic tools to facilitate compliance with mandatory procurement instruments, process efficiencies due to automated business processes and facilitating lower prices through accurate and timely purchasing information needed to leverage the buying power across Government spending.
Governance Structure(s):
PWGSC, in addition to being responsible for the development of the economic and business models to support this initiative, will conduct oversight for the various elements of the GoCM Service throughout its implementation and operational lifecycle. The GoCM project addresses potential policy and legislative changes as opportunities arise for doing business in a different manner through the GoCM. This is done in collaboration with PWGSC legal and policy/program groups, TBS and departments/agencies.
The GoCM involves the following key committee:
Federal Partners Involved in each program | Total Allocation | Planned Spending for 2006–07 | Actual Spending in 2006–07 | Expected Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
PWGSC* | $34.1M | $13.7M | $13.2M |
|
Total $34.1M | Total $13.7M | Total $13.2M |
Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners - N/A
Contact Information: Stephe Cooper, Director, Electronic Acquisitions Business Directorate and GoCM
Approved by: Liliane saint pierre, Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch
Date Approved:
Lead Department(s): PWGSC and TBS
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Spending authority for Travel Modernization Project approved April 2001 Relabeled STSI in June 2003 Contract signed November 2003—implementation role transferred to PWGSC.
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: End of fiscal year 2009/10
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $94.097M to end of fiscal year 2006/07. Original spending authority $96.184M
Description:
The STSI is a Government of Canada initiative, jointly led by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) and Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS). STSI is delivering value to the Government of Canada and savings to Canadian taxpayers. Its objective is to improve services to employees; increase direct savings on government-wide travel; reduce and streamline administrative costs and processes; improve management of information for negotiations and informed decision-making; and provide high quality travel services within an integrated, "end-to-end" travel management system that enables departments and agencies to make savings.
Shared Outcome(s):
STSI is now fully deployed and proceeding through implementation. STSI will allow government to better control spending on travel, with the dual benefits of maximizing savings by taking advantage of GC purchasing power and improving travel experience for travellers.
Governance Structure(s):
Senior Project Advisory Committee (SPAC) – The STSI SPAC is comprised of 10 major department and agency stakeholders, co-chaired by the Comptroller General of Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat and the ADM, Acquisitions Branch, PWGSC. SPAC oversees the implementation of the STSI solution government-wide, financial requirements for amendments and/or further developments, and delivers a procurement review function for ongoing operations. SPAC recommends courses of action to the Deputy Minister of PWGSC.
Commodity Council – The STSI Commodity Council consists of members from departments and agencies that align with SPAC membership, as well as the PWGSC contracting authority. Members are typically the Directors General (DG) of the departments and agencies they represent. The Commodity Council sets the overall objectives and targets for commodities and participates in the development of annual commodity management plans.
Federal Partners: | Total Allocation: | Planned Spending for 2006–07: | Actual Spending in 2006–07: | Planned Results for 2006–07: | Actual Results Achieved in 2006–07: |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All GC departments and agencies. | $8,647,200 | $6,653,800 | $7,912,533 | Implementation of the Expense Management Tool. | The following services have been fully developed and delivered: Travel Call Centre, Travel Portal, Designated Travel Card (DTC), On-line Booking Tool (OBT), Expense Management Tool (EMT), the Accommodations and Car Rental Directory, and negotiated airline agreements. |
Total $8,647,200 | Total $6,653,800 | Total $7,912,533 |
Contact Information: Michael Corbett, A/Senior Director, Shared Travel Services Initiative
Approved by: George Butts, Director General, Services and Specialized Acquisitions Management Sector
Date Approved:
Lead Department(s): PWGSC
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 12 May, 2004
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2014
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $280M (+$120M Province of NS share = total project funding of $400M)
Description:
Remediation of the Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens sites. These lands are located in the heart of downtown Sydney, and are owned by Canada and Nova Scotia. They were contaminated as a result of a century of coke and steel production. This project supports the federal governments' sustainable development initiative. It also recognizes the environmental, social and economic dimensions of the Sydney area. The project will have long-term benefits for the local communities.
The website for the provincial agency is:
http://www.tarpondscleanup.ca//
The website for the Environmental Review Panel is:
http://stpco-review.ca//
Shared Outcome(s):
The project will help rejuvenate downtown Sydney and create further opportunity for development, economic growth and job creation. It will help Sydney return to its status as an economic asset to Nova Scotia and Canada as a whole. Special considerations have been given to the meaningful participation of First Nations in this remediation project.
Governance Structure(s):
Memorandum to Cabinet (MC) dated April 2004 defined the Federal lead for the Project and OIC approval in December 2006 provided key direction and decisions in moving forward with the full remediation.
Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) between the Province of Nova Scotia and the Government of Canada was signed in May 2004. This document describes the management of the project, which includes the following:
Federal Partners Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs | Total Allocation from start to end date |
Planned Spending for 2006 — 2007 |
Actual Spending in 2006 — 2007 |
Planned Results for 2006 — 2007 |
Results Achieved in 2006 — 2007 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | Remediation | $7,640,000 | $678,087 | $788,000 | Expert and technical advice | Expert and technical advice |
Health Canada | Remediation | $5,500,000 | $550,000 | $550,000 | Expert and technical advice | Expert and technical advice |
Department of Justice | Legal | $3,000,000 | $1,021,457 | $448,639 | Class Action Litigation Management | Class Action Litigation Management |
Total $16,140,000 | Total $2,249,554 | Total $1,786,639 |
The Department of Justice (DoJ) balance remaining from the full allocation of $3M for fiscal year 2007/2008 is $106,320. Any additional funds will require DoJ to seek funding from other federal departments or further approval from Cabinet.
Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): Nova Scotia Sydney Tar Ponds Agency payments for remediation costs in 2007-2008 are estimated at $31,750,752.
Contact Information: Randy Vallis, Director
Approved by: Ken Swain
Date Approved:
As required under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), Part IV, Registration of Storage Tank Systems for Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products on Federal Lands Regulations, this report provides the information set out in Schedule II of the aforementioned regulation, for the period of January 1, 2006 up to December 31, 2006.
For the reporting period there were a total of 75 storage tanks on PWGSC-owned land, 22 above ground and 53 underground. Of the 22 aboveground storage tanks, all 22 were registered, and 18 were in compliance with Environment Canada's Technical Guidelines for Aboveground Storage Tank Systems Containing Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products. The four aboveground storage tanks that were not in compliance are owned by the Town of Moosenee. Of the 53 underground storage tanks, 52 were registered, 46 complied with the Technical Guidelines for Underground Storage Tank Systems Containing Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products, and seven were not in compliance. The single non-registered (third party owned) underground storage tank noted for the reporting period was recently identified to PWGSC. It has now been registered.
For this reporting period, eleven non-compliant storage tanks have been upgraded, replaced, removed and/or divested to other custodians.
The following number of aboveground storage tank systems:
The following number of underground storage tank systems: