Directive on Security Screening
Ensures that security screening in the Government of Canada is conducted in a way that is effective, rigorous, consistent and fair, and enables greater transferability of security screening between departments.
Date modified: 2025-01-07
Supporting tools
Directive:
Mandatory procedures:
- Management of Personal Information for the Purpose of Security Screening
- Security Screening Activities
- Collective Evaluation of Security Screening Activities
- Resolution of Doubt and Review for Cause
- Security Screening Decisions and Notifications
- Granting, Ongoing Maintenance and Assurance of the Security Screening of an Individual
- Informing Individuals of their Rights of Review and Redress
- Chief Security Officers to Manage Temporary Access to Sensitive Information or Assets
More information
Policy:
Terminology:
Topic:
Hierarchy
Appendix E: Mandatory Procedures for Resolution of Doubt and Review for Cause
E.1 Effective date
- E.1.1These procedures take effect on January 6, 2025.
E.2 Procedures
- E.2.1These procedures provide details on the requirements set out in subsections 4.1.1.1.2, 4.1.1.1.3, 4.1.1.2 and 4.1.6 of the Directive on Security Screening.
- E.2.2Mandatory procedures are as follows:
- E.2.2.1Demonstrate and document that adverse and missing information have been thoroughly addressed; and
- E.2.2.2Conduct a resolution of doubt or review for cause as expeditiously as possible;
Resolution of doubt
- E.2.2.3Initiate a resolution of doubt when unverifiable, missing or adverse information is uncovered during the security screening of an individual;
- E.2.2.4Provide the individual with a summary of the adverse, missing and unverifiable information in question:
- E.2.2.4.1Prior to disclosure to the individual:
- E.2.2.4.1.1Consult the investigative body when adverse information is uncovered as a result of:
- An RCMP law enforcement records check; or
- A CSIS security assessment;
- E.2.2.4.1.2Exclude information that cannot be disclosed:
- For reasons of national security;
- That could endanger the safety of any person; and
- That would be exempt under the Privacy Act sections 18, 19, 20 and 21, and subsections 22(1) to 22(3);
- E.2.2.4.1.1Consult the investigative body when adverse information is uncovered as a result of:
- E.2.2.4.1Prior to disclosure to the individual:
- E.2.2.5Conduct additional security screening activities:
- E.2.2.5.1To resolve doubt when information is available or reported about an individual that may cast doubt on their reliability or loyalty to Canada; and
- E.2.2.5.2Where:
- E.2.2.5.2.1Individual consent has been obtained; and
- E.2.2.5.2.2The department has the legal authority to do so;
- E.2.2.6Before a decision is rendered, conduct a resolution-of-doubt interview to provide the individual an opportunity to discuss any matters of concern and to explain the situation; and
- E.2.2.7Consider information obtained through a resolution of doubt toward the eligibility of an individual to be granted a security status or clearance;
Review for cause
- E.2.2.8Initiate a review for cause of the security status or clearance previously granted to an individual when:
- E.2.2.8.1Information is uncovered or reported about an individual that may call into question their reliability or loyalty to Canada; or
- E.2.2.8.2Adverse information reflects:
- E.2.2.8.2.1Recent questionable judgment or dishonesty; or
- E.2.2.8.2.2A recurring pattern of questionable judgment or dishonesty;
- E.2.2.9When conducting a review for cause, in accordance with subsection F.2.2.11 of Appendix F: Mandatory Procedures for Security Screening Decisions and Notifications, pending the outcome, consider a decision to suspend:
- E.2.2.9.1A security status or clearance; or
- E.2.2.9.2Access to sensitive information and assets, including IT systems and facilities;
- E.2.2.10Undertake the review-for-cause process, as an administrative investigation, including an interview of the individual;
- E.2.2.11When a review for cause is conducted in parallel to a disciplinary process for an employee:
- E.2.2.11.1Administer the processes with distinct decisional authorities; and
- E.2.2.11.2Record a disciplinary decision in the security file only where it relates to a security concern; and
- E.2.2.11.3Consult with:
- Departmental human resources management; and
- The Centre for Labour and Employment Law, as required; and
- E.2.2.12Consider information obtained through a review for cause on the continued eligibility of an individual to retain a security status or clearance.
"Page details"
- Date modified: