We are currently moving our web services and information to Canada.ca.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat website will remain available until this move is complete.

Financial Management Accountability: A Questionnaire for Managers



April 1992

Table of Contents



Introduction

This questionnaire is organized in terms of five main areas, which correspond to the Financial Management Accountability Framework endorsed by deputy heads and senior financial officers. The five areas are described in the booklet Financial Management Accountability in Departments and Agencies. They are: management, information and advice, control, accountability, and organization and processes. Completing this questionnaire will familiarize you with the main elements of this Framework and help you determine how well you are doing in light of it. Rather than waiting for surprises to surface, either as a part of continuing operations or as a result of audits, we hope that this questionnaire will assist you in taking a pro-active stance in carrying out your financial management responsibilities.

We recognize that financial management is only one part of the integrated function of management, but in a government environment it is a particularly important one. Managers are expected to fully understand financial management and to account for their decisions and practices in that area. However, they do not carry out these responsibilities in a vacuum. They are given tools, in the form of information, advice and instructions, which can have a strong influence on whether they are able to discharge their responsibilities well.

The results of this questionnaire may indicate that some managers are well positioned in relation to the Framework; in such cases, this exercise will help increase confidence. In others, it may identify areas where improvements are needed. In all instances, the exercise will facilitate dialogue on financial management matters.

Above all, we hope that you will find this questionnaire constructive, and that it will help you more fully understand your own financial management practices.

In addition to its use as a tool for personal self-assessment, the questionnaire may be used by departments to get an overview of financial management practices. By examining cumulative results, senior management can identify areas where improvements are required. In such applications, an independent tabulator would consolidate the results of individual responses that would be returned anonymously.

This questionnaire was designed as a self-assessment tool. Individual results are intended to be kept confidential.


INSTRUCTIONS

Each of the five sections of the questionnaire consists of "main" questions. These are numbered from 1 to 45. In italics immediately below many of these main questions are Helpful Considerations. These supportive questions are included to help you interpret the main question and to prompt reflection. They are not meant to be comprehensive or exhaustive. They are generic and could very well be substituted by other items that would be more specifically relevant to your department and particular situation. You are not asked to record answers to these italicized points. We invite you to use them to help you settle on your response to the main questions.

It should take you less than one hour to complete this questionnaire. However, the time you take has no bearing on your score.

Each question has a scale of four numbers [4] [3] [2] [1]. You are asked to answer each question in relation to either the Degree or Frequency as described below.

Degree

Frequency

[4]

Fully

To a very great extent or completely

[3]

Substantially

To great extent or a lot

[2]

Partially

To some extent or somewhat

[1]

Barely

Not much or not at all

Frequency

[4]

Usually

80% to 100% of the time (includes always and almost always)

[3]

Very often

About 55 to 70% of the time

[2]

Sometimes

About 30 to 45% of the time

[1]

Rarely

0% to 20% of the time (includes never or seldom, if ever)

Please detach the answer sheet provided as the last page of this questionnaire and use it to record your answers. The answer sheet will also be used to calculate and interpret your results.


MANAGEMENT

Your deputy head must be confident that you are delivering programs giving due consideration to obtaining the best possible value from public resources.

The expectations that support this are:

These expectations derive from a manager's responsibility for making well-informed choices in the allocation and use of resources. If you routinely consider alternatives in allocating your resources and use good analytic procedures, you can increase efficiency and effectiveness in your area of responsibility. Similarly, you can get the most out of money entrusted to you if you make choices that optimize cash flow and minimize interest and other costs.

The following questions will help you assess your practices relative to these expectations.

1. Are financial implications considered when choosing the best way of delivering services and products, or carrying out operations?

2. Is there enough incentive to make decisions that result in more money being available for other uses?

3. Do I get advice from experts on the financial viability of proposals involving significant expenditures?

4. Are my plans and proposals improved as a result of financial review-analysis?

5. Are the financial elements properly reviewed before I submit my plans and proposals for approval?

6. Do my plans and proposals meet the expectations of those who review and approve them?

7. Do I use my operational plan to forecast or adjust my resource requirements during the year?

8. Do my spending decisions reflect good cash management practices?

9. Do my asset management practices result in getting the best possible value from public funds?

10. Are we getting the most from the revenue generated by my area of responsibility?

COMMENTS:


INFORMATION AND ADVICE

Your deputy head must be confident that you are making decisions in light of timely, relevant and reliable financial information, analysis and advice.

The expectations that support this are:

Information is one of a manager's most important resources. Reliable and relevant information helps in all aspects of managerial tasks, from making decisions to monitoring. When information is deficient, management is based on assumptions or guesswork. Because information can be overwhelming or difficult to assimilate and all its implications may not always be obvious, getting advice and analysis from specialists is often wise and necessary.

The following questions are intended to help you assess your situation in this area of financial management.

11. Do I receive the right financial information, at the right time, and in the right format?

12. Is the financial information I receive already combined (or can it be easily combined) with operational data for use in decisionmaking, planning, monitoring and reporting?

13. How satisfied am I with the mechanisms used to deliver the financial information that I receive?

14. Can I share data from financial systems with other systems electronically?

15. Am I satisfied with the quality of the financial management reports I am getting?

16. Do the financial reports that I receive enable me to make better decisions?

17. Do I understand the needs of people outside my responsibility centre for information about my financial management?

18. How confident would I be if asked to confirm the accuracy and completeness of my financial management information?

19. Is expert advice available to help me carry out my financial management responsibilities?

20. Does the financial management advice I receive help me make better decisions?

COMMENTS:


CONTROL

Your deputy head must be confident that cost-effective controls, suitable to the government environment, are in place to safeguard assets and to ensure probity.

The expectations that support this are:

Controls should help you respond to situations in a consistent manner and keep you within your resource level. They can help prevent undesirable mistakes and avoid embarrassment.

The following questions will help you assess your practices in this area of financial management.

21. Are my financial authorities, and those of my staff, clearly understood?

22. Are the authorities delegated to me consistent with my financial and operational responsibilities?

23. Do I have a good sense of the level of risk associated with the authorities delegated to me?

24. Do my financial authorities provide me with enough scope to best use my resources and achieve results?

25. Are the internal control mechanisms for my area of responsibility well adapted to the nature of my operations and management style?

26. Are transactions for which I am responsible properly authorized and coded?

27. Do I clearly understand my responsibilities as a custodian of public property?

28. Are the measures for safeguarding assets under my responsibility in keeping with their value and risk level?

29. Do my staff and I know what to do if we suspect theft, fraud or misuse of government funds or property?

COMMENTS:


ACCOUNTABILITY

Your deputy head must be confident that you understand and report appropriately on your financial accountability.

The expectations that support this are:

These expectations address the obligation to account for the responsibilities and authorities entrusted in you. It is essential that these expectations be understood and accepted by each manager. The obligation to account can be discharged by making assertions (sometimes called management representations) and by providing assurances on the state of financial management.

The following questions will help you assess your practices in this area of financial management.

30. How well do I understand my financial management responsibilities?

31. Am I getting the right kind of training and information to keep uptodate with regard to my financial management responsibilities?

32. Do I know how well I am doing in terms of my financial management responsibilities?

33. Do I achieve the financial objectives established for my area of responsibility?

34. How effective are audits and reviews in providing relevant, credible and objective information on the effectiveness of my financial management practices?

35. How responsive am I to audits and reviews?

36. Am I required to formally account for my financial management through management contracts, accountability accords or similar managerial agreements?

37. How well do I report on my accountability up the line and to my constituents/clients?

38. Am I as accountable as I am empowered?

COMMENTS:


ORGANIZATION AND PROCESSES

Your deputy head needs to be confident that the financial management organization, systems and processes meet the department's contemporary needs.

The expectations that support this are:

This section focuses on the infrastructure that supports your financial management responsibilities. Cost-effective support services can enhance your ability to implement your managerial agenda. An appropriate infrastructure is required to support your access to resources, to make it possible for your decisions to be properly communicated, and to help you monitor progress and the achievement of results. As your needs change, it is necessary for the organization, systems, and processes to keep up with new priorities and approaches.

The following questions will help you assess your practices in this area of financial management.

39. Are financial management roles, objectives and policies clearly communicated as they apply to me and my area of responsibility?

40. Am I familiar with the services that support my financial management responsibilities?

41. Are these services in line with the current needs of my operations?

42. Do I consider that the services I am getting to support my financial management responsibilities are costeffective?

43. Am I getting the most out of today's technology for improving the efficiency of my management?

44. Do I seek to eliminate or reduce duplication and overlap in the processes and products that support my financial management responsibilities?

45. Do my staff and I have access to the training and tools that we need to make full use of the systems and services that support my financial management responsibilities?

COMMENTS:


Calculating Your Results

Now that you have completed the questionnaire, you should determine your score for each section, as well as your overall result on the answer sheet (bottom right). An interpretation of your results is provided on the reverse side of the answer sheet.


Financial Management Accountability

QUESTIONNAIRE ANSWER SHEET

Each question has a scale of four numbers [4] [3] [2] [1]. You are asked to answer each question in relation to either Degree or Frequency, as indicated for each one. You can refer to the following explanations to help you with your choice.

Degree

Degree

[4]

Fully

To a very great extent or completely

[3]

Substantially

To great extent or a lot

[2]

Partially

To some extent or somewhat

[1]

Barely

Not much or not at all

If a question does not apply to your situation (for example, the question is about revenue and you have no revenue), simply do not select an answer for that question.

Frequency

Frequency

[4]

Usually

80 to 100% of the time (includes always/almost always)

[3]

Very often

About 55 to 70% of the time

[2]

Sometimes

About 30 to 45% of the time

[1]

Rarely

0 to 20% of the time (includes never or seldom, if ever)

MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION AND ADVICE

MANAGEMENT

1. Financial implications?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

2. Enough incentive?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

3. Expert advice on viability of plans?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

4. Plans improved by reviews?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

5. Financial elements reviewed?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

6. Plans meet expectations?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

7. Use plans to forecast/adjust?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

8. Good cash management?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

9. Best value from public funds?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

10. Most from revenue?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

Sub-total

 

 

 

INFORMATION AND ADVICE

11. Right information,time and format?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

12. Financial information combined?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

13. Satisfied with delivery?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

14. Share data electronically?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

15. Satisfied with quality of reports?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

16. Reports enable better decisions?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

17. Understand outside information needs?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

18. Confident about accuracy?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

19. Is expert advice available?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

20. Advice help my FM responsibilities?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

Sub-total

 

 

 

CONTROL

21. Financial authorities understood?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

22. Authority/responsibility consistent?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

23. Good sense for risk?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

24. Enough scope in authorities?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

25. Internal control well adapted?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

26. Transactions properly authorized?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

27. Understand custodial responsibilities?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

28. Assets guarded based on value & risk?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

29. Know what to do if illegal act?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

Sub-total

 

 

 

ACCOUNTABILITY

30. Understand financial responsibilities?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

31. Right training to keep up to date?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

32. How well I am doing?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

33. Financial objectives achieved?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

34. Are audits and reviews effective?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

35. Am I responsive to audit findings?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

36. How do I account for FM responsibilities?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

37. How well do I report on accountability?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

38. As accountable as empowered?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

Sub-total

 

 

 

ORGANIZATION AND PROCESSES

39. Roles and objective clearly communicated?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

40. Familiar with financial services?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

41. Services meet operational needs?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

42. Consider services cost-effective?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

43. Getting the most from technology?

Fully

4  3  2  1

Barely

44.Seek to eliminate duplication and overlap?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

45. Good access to training and tools?

Usually

4  3  2  1

Rarely

Sub-total

 

 

 

GRAND TOTAL

 

 

 

Calculate your score

1. Add up the points for each section and write the sum in column A below.

2. n column B write the number of questions you answered in each section.

3. Calculate totals for columns A and B, and compute averages.

Sum of Questions

Averages

Points Answered

(A / B)

A

B

Management

 

 

 

Information and Advice

 

 

 

Control

 

 

 

Accountability

 

 

 

Organization and Processes

 

 

 

Totals

 

 

Overall average (Total A divided by Total B)

 

 

SEE Interpretation


INTERPRETATION

In assessing the results, please bear in mind that there are many factors that influence your financial management practices. Some are within your control, others are not. For example, the financial information, systems and policies that satisfy the needs of many managers may not be fully compatible with your own needs and preferences. So these results reflect your financial management practices in the context of your particular environment. This assessment can provide you with information to initiate discussions and changes so that the financial information, systems and policies may better serve your needs and those of other managers in your organization. You can apply the following interpretations to averages in each section and to the overall average.

Average scores close to 4 indicate very healthy financial management practices and support services in relation to the Financial Management Accountability Framework. You should have confidence in making assertions about this. You may want to identify sources of evidence that you could use to provide assurances, should you be asked to do so.

Average scores close to 3 indicate that financial management is sound. While there may be room for some improvement, current practices are effective. You may want to take a closer look at your responses to see if there is any need for further review or adjustments on specific aspects. If you were called upon to make assertions on the Framework, you would have to decide whether a qualification is necessary for certain areas.

Average scores close to 2 indicate some vulnerability, and some attention is required to some financial management practices and support services. Further, more detailed analysis and review would be advisable. It would be helpful to review your answers to determine which areas of weakness are within your control. There may be cause for concern but not necessarily alarm. You should consider discussions with colleagues and those responsible for the organization and processes that support your financial management. You may notice some aspects of financial management that are relatively strong, and other areas where some difficulties are being experienced. You would probably have to qualify assertions you make about financial management.

Average scores close to 1 indicate notable difficulty in some areas of financial management. Current practices and support services are significantly different from the expectations of the Financial Management Accountability Framework. A more detailed examination may be in order. A more systematic review may be worthwhile under these circumstances. You should discuss your concerns with your supervisor, your colleagues or your advisor on financial management matters.

If there is one message that we want to leave with you, it is that almost all decisions you make have financial management implications. The boundary between effective general management skills and financial management as such has become blurred, and will become increasingly so. Partly this is a result of a change in the corporate culture of the Public Service and efforts that flow from it. Partly, too, it is a result of improved information technology that makes it possible for managers to command more scope and authority than was possible just a few years ago.

We hope that this exercise has given you an update concerning current expectations in this area, and that you now have a sense of how you are doing in relation to these expectations.

COMMENTS:


Date modified: