This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Peter G. MacKay, Minister
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
As the government works to bring about real change, create opportunity and build a strong and united Canada, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency has an important role to play. A strong Atlantic economy contributes to a strong Canada.
ACOA will continue to work within its economic development programs to focus on enterprise development, community development, and advocacy.
ACOA will work to maximize the impact of its investments in enterprise development by focusing on aiding the growth and competitiveness of small and medium-sized businesses. This means helping increase the productivity of individual businesses by targeting the development of areas such as innovation, skills and trade development.
ACOA will work with Atlantic universities, other government departments and the private sector on strategically-focused activities to promote innovation and commercialization. This is key to making Atlantic Canada more competitive overall, and creating attractive jobs that will help us retain our youth – the future of our region.
For almost to 20 years, ACOA has worked to increase opportunity for economic development in Canada's four Atlantic provinces, responding to economic and regional challenges in a strategic way, pooling resources, and bringing a regional perspective to national issues.
Strong communities, a dynamic economy,and opportunities for Atlantic Canadians – these are the priorities that guide the Agency as it works with its partners for the benefit of the Atlantic region and Canada.
____________________________________ |
I submit for tabling in Parliament, the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA).
This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2006-2007 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports:
____________________________________ |
Minor editorial changes have been made to ACOA's Program Activity Architecture since 2005-2006. These have been made solely for the purpose of more accurately reflecting the nature of the activities. No changes were made to the PAA structure.
2006-2007 Program Activity Architecture (changes are indicated in bold type)
Strategic Outcome |
Program Activity |
Program Sub-activity |
Enterprise Development |
Fostering SME Development and Regional Economic Capacity Building |
Innovation |
Entrepreneurship and Business Skills Development |
||
Trade |
||
Investment |
||
Tourism |
||
Other Support to SMEs |
||
Access to Business Information |
||
Community Development |
Community Economic Development |
|
Special Adjustment Measures |
||
Infrastructure Programming |
||
Policy, Advocacy and Co-ordination |
Policy Research |
|
Advocacy |
||
Co-ordination |
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
380.4 |
348.7 |
321.8 |
Human Resources(FTEs) |
612 |
592 |
592 |
The Agency has three strategic outcomes that reflect its mandate of helping increase employment opportunities and earned income for Atlantic Canadians:
ACOA is the arm of the federal government whose mission is to work in partnership with Atlantic Canadians to improve the economy of communities in the region. The Agency accomplishes this through a regional strategy that aims to improve economic performance and enhance the region's competitiveness. Working with partners in all orders of government, the private sector, academia and non-governmental organizations, ACOA seeks to advance economic opportunities and innovation in order to serve the needs of businesses, organizations, individuals and communities in Atlantic Canada.
Established in 1987, ACOA offers a broad range of programs and services designed to improve the climate for business growth. The Agency ensures that a wide variety of business development tools and resources are available to Atlantic entrepreneurs throughout all stages of the business life cycle, from the time they are thinking about setting up a new business, to the time they are planning for growth and expansion. ACOA is a federal agency with a difference; its mandate and organizational structure were determined following consultations with Atlantic Canadians from across the region. The result was that, for the first time, a federal organization charged with regional economic development in Atlantic Canada was headquartered in the Atlantic region.
The Agency takes an aggressive approach to identifying opportunities and overcoming regional barriers to growth, recognizing that an economy must have a number of conditions in place in order to succeed. It is felt that the Agency's broad-based approach to regional economic development addresses the underlying structural challenges in the economy in an effective and equitable manner.
At the national level, the Agency carries out this mandate by advocating for Atlantic Canada's interests, priorities and concerns in other federal government policy-making decisions and investments that have a direct impact on the Atlantic economy.
The Agency also participates in several horizontal initiatives. It is the lead department for Team Canada Atlantic and the International Business Development Program. In addition, the Agency is a partner on several horizontal initiatives led by other federal departments. More information on horizontal initiatives can be found in Section III, Table 8, of this report.
At the regional level, ACOA conducts policy research and analysis that helps provide the intellectual foundation for a comprehensive and strategic approach to regional development. Furthermore, the Agency plays a key role in co-ordinating pan-Atlantic development strategies, programs and initiatives, working closely with the provincial governments, Atlantic universities and research institutes, business organizations, other federal departments, and other stakeholders in the region to reduce duplication and maximize impact.
Locally, the Agency works with its partners to provide communities with the tools and resources they need to build more self-reliant local economies. Partnerships are a major element, not only in the delivery of programs and activities, but also in the development of programs and policies. ACOA partners with the private sector, universities, non-government organizations, as well as governments at all levels.
The Agency also works locally to improve the growth and competitiveness of Atlantic enterprises through a variety of programs and services designed to increase start-ups, expansions and modernizations.
Recognizing the growing correlation between innovation and productivity, Agency programs place emphasis on fostering research and development, technology adoption, skills development, and the improved access to capital required to make these kinds of investments in innovation possible. The Atlantic Innovation Fund continues to be a driving force behind the latest acceleration of Atlantic research and development. The Business Development Program and other ACOA programs are helping thousands of entrepreneurs to start up and expand businesses, optimize trade and export opportunities, develop new tourism products, and to improve business management practices to grow and compete in the global economy. These programs are strategically important. In the 1990s, 70% of the jobs created by new firms in Atlantic Canada were attributed to small businesses[1].
The Atlantic Investment Partnership – The Second Wave (AIP II) is a broad-based modern approach to economic development. This initiative will allow the Agency to build on the success of the first phase of the Atlantic Investment Partnership (AIP) in critical areas such as:
[1] The State of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Atlantic Canada – 2005, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Following a gain of 1.4% in 2004, economic activity in Atlantic Canada improved in 2005, with real GDP increasing by 2.2%. Output in the goods-producing industries is estimated to have risen by 2% in 2005, led by a strong increase in mining, mainly iron ore production and the start-up of the Voisey's Bay mine. Activity in the construction sector weakened, as work on the White Rose and Voisey's Bay projects wound down. The services-producing industries registered good growth (2.4%) in 2005, with the exception of more moderate activity in business and personal services.
Atlantic Canada's labour market improved slightly in 2005 with employment up by 2,500. The unemployment rate fell from 10.7% in 2004 to 10.4%, reaching its lowest level in 30 years.
Foreign exports of commodities from Atlantic Canada rose by 5.3% during the first 10 months of 2005. With the exception of a large increase in the value of shipments of refined petroleum products (29.1%) due to higher energy prices, results for Atlantic Canada's major export products were mainly down in 2005. Total non-energy exports fell by 3.4%. The strong Canadian dollar, as well as a decline in production and demand for many products, contributed to the weak export performance.
Difficult market conditions exist for forestry products, as lower prices led to a decline in the value of exports of softwood lumber (-13.3%), and weak demand resulted in lower shipments of newsprint (-2.4%). The value of pulp exports also fell (-34.6%), mainly due to the closure of a mill in New Brunswick. Exports of fish products declined (-11%), due to lower shipments of crab products resulting from the late start to the fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador. Atlantic Canada's exports to the United States, the destination for over 80% of the region's foreign shipments of goods, increased by 3.8%.
The economy of Atlantic Canada is expected to strengthen further in 2006, led by a full year of production at both the Voisey's Bay mine and White Rose offshore oil field. The manufacturing sector should do well, while a slight decline is expected in the construction sector as work on major projects ended in 2005. The services-producing industries should register solid growth, led by gains in transportation, and personal and business services. Real GDP in Atlantic Canada is forecasted to increase by 3.1% in 2006, while employment is expected to rise by 1.9%.
The economy of Atlantic Canada has become much more diversified over the past few years, with new opportunities being pursued in the knowledge-based economy. This diversification is a result of the emergence of new high-technology sectors that are knowledge-intensive and export-oriented; the development of offshore oil and gas; and the establishment of new capacity for processing natural resources into value-added products.
The development of emerging sectors(e.g. information and communications technologies; biotechnology, life sciences and bioresources; aerospace and defence; advanced manufacturing; and marine technologies) underscores the progress that is being made in the region.
The outlook is generally positive, but there are a number of risk factors that could affect the economic outlook. These factors are largely external, relating to the volatility of oil prices as well as sustained global current account imbalances and potential weakness in key U.S. markets.
Consumer confidence could be affected further if oil prices continue to rise, leading to slower consumer spending and weaker economic growth. The large and persistent U.S. current account deficit could lead to further depreciation of the U.S. dollar against all major currencies, including the Canadian dollar. This would pose additional challenges for Canada's export sector.
The appreciation of the Canadian dollar since the end of 2002 has posed a challenge to Atlantic Canadian firms that are highly exposed to international trade. For example, employment in the region's manufacturing sector fell from 108,000 in 2004 to 99,000 in 2005 — a reduction of 9,000, or 8.3%.
There are a number of major social and economic challenges facing Atlantic Canada over the short and medium term. Slow or negative population growth, in conjunction with an aging population, will constrain future economic growth, particularly in rural areas. More effort will need to be placed on increasing immigration levels to ensure an adequate supply of labour.
Structural changes to traditional industries also continue to present adjustment challenges for Atlantic Canada's economy. Some fishery and forestry-dependent communities face significant challenges in terms of finding alternative employment opportunities. In addition, large industrial manufacturers must continue to adapt to higher energy costs for both the production and shipping of products.
The region must continue to enhance its overall competitiveness as global competition intensifies, especially from countries such as China and India. In order to increase the region's competitiveness, there is a need to have sustained growth in productivity levels. Productivity growth in Atlantic Canada has performed relatively well in recent years; however, labour productivity is still only at 86% of the national level. For the region's manufacturing sector, labour productivity is at 76% of the national level.
In an effort to improve productivity, increased emphasis must be placed on encouraging companies to undertake more spending on research and development; acquire advanced technologies; invest in worker training and managerial skills; and become more export-oriented
Further information on specific challenges facing provinces can be found in Section IV.
Strategic Outcome Enterprise Development |
||
Expected Results:
|
||
Planned Spending and Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) |
||
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
$ 282.4 million 462 FTEs |
$ 262.0 million 440 FTEs |
$ 259.4 million 440 FTEs |
*Key Priorities: Client approach to enterprise development in collaboration with partners Proactive support to innovation Evaluate priorities on an ongoing basis to provide best possible support to clients |
Strategic Outcome Community Development |
||
Expected Results:
|
||
Planned Spending and Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) |
||
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
$81.2 million 86 FTEs |
$70.0 million 88 FTEs |
$45.7 million 88 FTEs |
*Key Priorities: Holistic approach to community development Facilitation of partner collaboration Capacity building Adjustment initiatives |
||
Strategic Outcome Policy, Advocacy and Co-ordination |
||
Expected Results:
|
||
Planned Spending and Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) |
||
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
$16.8 million 64 FTEs |
$16.7 million 64 FTEs |
$16.7 million 64 FTEs |
*Key Priorities: A strong policy and advocacy role Co-ordinated engagement strategy |
* All priorities are ongoing.
Enterprise Development
ACOA's legislation mandates the Agency to give particular emphasis to the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Accordingly, the Agency seeks to ensure that the relevant business development tools and resources are available to serve the needs of the region's existing and emerging entrepreneurs.
Small entrepreneurial firms have taken their place as vital contributors to economic health. Their strengths are their flexibility, resourcefulness, efficient use of limited resources and sensitivity to the market. In fact, over 70% of gross employment created by new firms in Atlantic Canada was by small business.[2]
Enterprise Development priorities focus on improving value for money and achieving better results for Atlantic Canadians. In 2006-2007, ACOA will continue to work to ensure better integration of its programs when dealing with clients, and will endeavour to assist clients to access other sources of federal programming where needed. The Agency will also pursue more client interaction by working with partners to develop stronger relationships with industry. Accordingly, ACOA attaches the highest importance to developing and collaborating with other stakeholders in the region as partners in growth. Innovation remains a key priority and ACOA will continue its proactive support to innovation by undertaking more strategically focused activities.
[2] The State of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Atlantic Canada – 2005, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (data for period 1989 to 2000)
Community Development
The Agency's vision is to create viable and sustainable Atlantic Canadian communities that have the resources and capacity to take full responsibility and accountability for their own economic development. The Agency works as an agent of change to empower and help communities to achieve their economic development goals and to ultimately increase economic opportunities for Atlantic Canada. The Agency works in partnership with other levels of government, other federal departments, non-government organizations, and community groups to lever support and co-ordinate economic development efforts.
From time to time communities in Atlantic Canada face the need for sudden or phased adjustment to an economic shock such as the fishery moratorium or significant lay-offs by a major employer. In these situations all levels of government must work together to ameliorate the problem. Due to the Agency's broad economic development mandate, its established network, and knowledge of the region, other departments and other levels of government often turn to ACOA. The challenge for the Agency is to map out a realistic and responsive role in these situations. While the cause of the adjustment itself may not always fall clearly within the Agency's mandate, there is usually an expectation that ACOA will play a major role in the response.
To achieve its community development vision, the Agency has identified four key priorities that will be the focus of its efforts in the coming year. These priorities are shown at right.
Policy, Advocacy and Co-ordination
As the federal agency responsible for economic development in Atlantic Canada, ACOA plays a lead role in identifying critical issues that need to be addressed in helping to foster economic opportunity, meet new economic challenges and bring forward actions and initiatives to see that these opportunities are realized and economic challenges are addressed.
The Agency's policy function exists to inform and support the decision-making of the Agency, the Minister, and the government by providing intelligence, analysis, and well-grounded advice. It is carried out by means of internal and external policy research on significant economic issues, through ongoing analysis of issues, trends, challenges and opportunities facing the region, and through stakeholder engagement and consultative initiatives such as round tables and conferences. A strong policy presence in the region is key to influencing national policy development.
In its advocacy role, the Agency works to influence national policies, programs and initiatives to reflect the interests of Atlantic Canada. The Agency's mandate also requires it to co-ordinate the policies and programs of the Government of Canada in relation to economic development.
The Agency will continue to implement initiatives to strengthen its accountability and planning regime as follows:
Agency FTEs by Fiscal Year |
||
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
612 |
592 |
592 |
ACOA has integrated its human resource planning into its business planning by including human resources as a formal, integral and mandatory part of the Agency planning process for fiscal year 2006-2007 and beyond. The Agency has established a Human Resources Planning Committee.
The integration has been fully implemented and is now part of the annual executive planning forum and the human resource
planning requirements are specifically included in the President's call letter for the preparation of operational plans. The
Human Resources Branch at Head Office has taken a functional leadership role in the human resource planning exercise and there
is a formal review, analysis and roll-up of all human resource plans each fiscal year.
The Government of Canada's annual report on performance entitled Canada's Performance 2005 focuses on three key policy areas – Sustainable Economy, Canada's Social Foundations, and Canada's Place in the World. In addition, the 2005 report includes a special chapter on Aboriginal Peoples.
The following table depicts the relationship between the Government of Canada's outcomes and ACOA's contribution toward them.
Government of Canada's Outcomes Canada's Performance 2005 |
ACOA's Response |
Economic |
|
An innovative and knowledge-based economy |
Enterprise Development |
Strong economic growth |
Enterprise Development Community Development Policy, Advocacy and Co-ordination Sustainable Development Strategy |
Income security and employment for Canadians |
Enterprise Development Community Development |
A fair and secure marketplace |
Enterprise Development : |
A clean and healthy environment |
Enterprise Development Community Development Sustainable Development Strategy |
Social |
|
A vibrant Canadian culture and heritage |
Community development : - Interdepartmental Partnership with the Official Language Communities - Memorandum of Understanding with Industry Canada -- Investment in Acadian and Francophone Youth |
Aboriginal Peoples |
Community D43evelopment |
To review the complete document Canada's Performance 2005 refer to:
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/report/govrev/05/cp-rc-eng.asp.
ACOA 2006-2007 Program Activity Architecture
Improved growth and competitiveness of Atlantic SMEs,
leading to increased productivity, earned incomes and job creation.
Expected Results: Increased earned income and employment opportunities in Atlantic Canada. |
||||
Indicators: |
Annual Target: (2006-2007) |
|||
|
|
|||
Five-year Targets: (2003-2004 to 2007-2008) |
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Five-year targets will be measured through analysis of data from Statistics Canada and internal systems, using econometric modelling. The annual target will be measured through analysis of Statistics Canada data. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
282.4 |
262.0 |
259.4 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
462 |
440 |
440 |
|
The region's economic growth in recent years has been positive, driven mainly by increased exports and investment in infrastructure, new manufacturing capacity and offshore oil and gas projects. Foreign exports of commodities from Atlantic Canada continue to increase and, while exports have grown, there is room for expansion, with less than 3%[3] of the region's SMEs involved in export activities.
There is a transformation to a knowledge-based economy, with the emergence of new sectors in information technology, bioscience and aerospace while, at the same time, resource-based industries are becoming more knowledge-intensive.
Despite this progress, some significant challenges remain, and great opportunities exist for development. One of the most telling indicators of this is that, in a number of sectors, productivity remains significantly lower than in leading countries and other regions of Canada. A higher degree of competitiveness is crucial for Atlantic firms, particularly SMEs, to grow and increase their penetration in export markets.
[3] Source: Statistics Canada, Business Register, Exporter Register, 2003
Enterprise Development client focus |
|
To increase productivity, it is necessary for companies to invest in advanced technologies and worker training, and pay more attention to commercializing the results of research and development (R&D). It is necessary for these firms to become more export-oriented, both to access larger markets and, through exposure to foreign competition, to learn of innovative ways of doing business from technology and marketing perspectives. Among the greatest barriers to the start-up and expansion of SMEs is insufficient access to capital. Breaking down these barriers, in association with public and private sector partners, is a priority.
In 2006-2007, as an initial step, the Agency will continue to restructure its offices to enable a better, more holistic approach to its key themes. This promises to enable single points of contact for many of its clients. Furthermore, the Agency is continuing to enhance the level of engagement between its various areas of functional expertise, for example, by engaging trade expertise in the development of initiatives targeted at key areas such as youth and women.
Through its network of development offices across the Atlantic region, the Agency will continue to work with its clients and various levels of government, to maximize access to other sources of funding.
It is within this context that the Agency will work in partnership with other stakeholders and industry to improve the growth and competitiveness of Atlantic SMEs. In 2006-2007 and subsequent years, the Agency will continue to approach its work in a strategic manner, and will focus on selected key themes; namely, maximizing the impact of ACOA investments, promoting and supporting improved productivity, sector development strategies, and creating an environment for new investments. The enterprise development approach will be client-focused, in that it will work with clients in a holistic manner focusing on their needs rather than promoting various programs and themes.
ACOA regional offices will continue their consultative and outreach work with the business community in order to obtain continual feedback on the effectiveness and relevance of their efforts. Information gathered through its networks, outreach activities and consultations will form the basis on which the Agency will evaluate its priorities on an ongoing basis to provide the best possible support to its clients.
Program Activity: To improve the region's capacity for economic growth through a variety of mechanisms, including assistance to SMEs to start, expand, or modernize their business; partnering with universities and other institutions to increase the region's research and development capacity, commercialization and productivity; and to promote and participate in the region's transition to the knowledge economy.
|
||||
Expected Results: Improved growth and competitiveness of Atlantic SMEs. |
||||
Indicators: |
Annual Targets: (2006-2007) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from Statistics Canada. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
279.6 |
262.0 |
259.4 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
440 |
440 |
440 |
|
Fostering SME Development and Regional Economic Capacity Building through: |
|
ACOA's activities, whether investing in research and development, providing SME skills and training, expanding trade, or promoting foreign direct investment and venture capital, are directed at enhancing the competitive strength of SMEs in Atlantic Canada. Small firms create the larger share (60%) of new jobs in Atlantic Canada, making them critical to economic development[4]. SMEs, unfortunately, have a high failure rate in their first few years of existence, and thus find it difficult to attract capital to start and grow, and to get the right advice. Overcoming these hurdles is one of ACOA's priorities.
The Agency provides assistance to SMEs to help them start, expand or modernize, enabling these firms to increase their productivity and be competitive in the world market. To achieve these results, ACOA will focus on selected key themes; namely, maximizing the impact of ACOA investments, promoting and supporting improved productivity and sector development strategies, and creating an environment for new investments.
[4] The State of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Atlantic Canada – 2005, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, page 29
Program Activity: |
|
Description: Increase activity in and build capacity for innovation, research and development (R&D) of technologies, products, processes or services, technology adoption/adaptation and commercialization of R&D outputs that contribute to economic growth in Atlantic Canada. |
|
Expected Results: Strengthen Atlantic Canada's innovation and commercialization capacity. |
|
Indicators: |
Annual Targets: (2006-2007) |
|
|
|
|
Five-year Target: |
|
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from internal systems. |
* This is an initial target. Data will be gathered throughout 2006-2007, which will provide for the establishment of an appropriate baseline and possible adjustments to the target
ACOA will continue to advance its innovation strategy through five key themes |
|
The focus of innovation is to strengthen the capacity and performance of the Atlantic Canadian economy through the adoption/adaptation of leading-edge technologies, the research and development of new or improved technologies and their commercialization, and the growth of strategic sectors/clusters. ACOA's vision for innovation in Atlantic Canada is a region that is recognized for its innovative capacity and its competitiveness in global markets, with an environment conducive to innovation.
The principal tools available to ACOA to advance its innovation strategy are the Atlantic Innovation Fund, which focuses on accelerating the development of the knowledge-based industry; the Business Development Program, which is used to provide funding for R&D projects via its Innovation element; and the Productivity and Business Skills Initiative, which aims at improving small and medium-sized businesses' competitiveness through a number of activities such as training, hiring skilled personnel, and improving productivity and/or quality. These tools support ACOA's objective of increasing innovation capacity, ultimately leading to productivity improvement. ACOA's investments will, among other things, contribute to leveraging funds toward innovation projects, encourage the development of partnerships for technology development and commercialization, and increase the number of commercialized technologies, products, processes and services.
In 2006-2007, through its Springboard[5] initiative, ACOA will work to engage the Atlantic Association of Universities (AAU) to enhance the transfer of technology from universities to the private sector. Furthermore, ACOA will work in collaboration with other government departments engaged in innovation, such as Industry Canada, National Research Council, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. A key focus in this work will be to harmonize an approach to maximizing the effectiveness of federal funding. Proactive development of innovation projects along key sectors will continue to be an important strategy in maximizing the effectiveness of programming. As well, ACOA will explore opportunities to work with industry associations in identifying opportunities for developing the innovative capacity within certain sectors.
[5] Springboard Atlantic Inc. is an association involving 14 AAU members and is supported by ACOA. The focus is on the effective and efficient transfer of technology among universities in Atlantic Canada. It also aims to advance the commercialization of research within both universities and the region's private sector.
Program Activity:
|
|
Program Sub-activity: Entrepreneurship and Business Skills Development |
|
Description: Facilitates projects, other than community economic development or tourism or trade (export development projects), which increase opportunities for Atlantic Canadians to develop the motivation and business skills required to start, sustain or grow their businesses. |
|
Expected Results: More Atlantic Canadians with the motivation and skills required to successfully start, sustain or grow a business. |
|
Indicators: |
Three-Year Targets: (2005-2006 to 2007-2008) |
|
|
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from internal database system. |
* This indicator was implemented in 2005-2006. Although this indicator has been in use for only a short time, a preliminary target was set, and it will be tracked closely. Additional data will be gathered throughout 2006-2007, which will provide for the establishment of an appropriate baseline, and possible adjustments to the target.
A key to achieving better economic opportunities and growth in Atlantic Canada is to ensure that there are more entrepreneurs and, even more importantly, that owners of SMEs have the business skills needed to succeed and grow their enterprises.
SMEs are at the heart of Atlantic Canada's economy, and in fact over 70% of gross employment created by new firms in Atlantic Canada during the 1989 to 2000 period was in small businesses[6]. ACOA is an advocate of entrepreneurs and has adopted an Entrepreneurship and Business Skills Development Strategy focused on increasing the number of people with the motivation and skills to successfully start, sustain, or grow a business.
The strategy is designed to create an entrepreneurial climate where entrepreneurship is widely perceived as a career option and business skills development is part of the business culture. Much of the work has a clear emphasis on young people and women business owners, with projects spanning various stages of business development, from exploring entrepreneurship to business retention and growth.
[6] The State of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Atlantic Canada – 2005, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Recognizing that strong business skills are critical to business survival and growth, ACOA supports initiatives that enhance awareness and adoption of such skills. Increased networking, training and mentoring are some of the developmental tools used to this end. However, business skills development comes with a wide array of challenges. Often, owners of SMEs either are not aware of the bottom-line benefits that can flow from improved competencies, or simply don't have the time or the financial resources required to enhance those skills.
To meet those challenges, in 2006-2007 ACOA will continue to support awareness, promotion and co-ordination activities to change attitudes toward self-employment with special focus on investment in business skills. These activities will go beyond merely encouraging the exploration of entrepreneurship as a career choice, and will get down to the development of the skills needed to allow entrepreneurs to sustain and grow their businesses. Examples include workshops, Web-based business management courses, internships in SMEs, conferences targeting entrepreneurs, mentoring, business advisory and counselling services, and skills development partnerships with universities.
Two key initiatives are:
Key partners and clients are non-commercial entities, including not-for-profit business support organizations, industry associations, educational institutions, other government departments, and similar groups.
Program Activity: |
||
Description: Projects other than community economic development and tourism projects that strengthen the international marketing capabilities of SMEs; assist business to enter international markets (new exporters); and facilitate SMEs improved international business performance (increased sales to existing international markets). |
||
Expected Results: Increased export capacity and sales for SMEs in Atlantic Canada. |
||
Indicators: |
Annual Targets: (2006-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from Statistics Canada, surveys and internal reports. |
Exporting is one of the nation's leading engines of economic growth. It builds revenues, fuels business opportunities, and generates jobs. Close proximity to the rich markets of the United States and Europe, as well as increased levels of exportable, value-added and knowledge-based goods and services, render Atlantic Canada particularly well suited as a base for exporting.
Exports have grown by more than 130% during the last decade (1994 to 2004)[7]. However, there is room for expansion. With less than 3%[8] of the region's SMEs involved in export activities, ACOA has focused on proactive measures aimed at building the export capacity within Atlantic Canada.
The Agency works both directly and in partnership with other federal departments and the four provincial governments to deliver its strategic approach to trade development. This approach is focused on four strategic elements: awareness; skills development; capacity building; and policy, advocacy and co-ordination.
The awareness initiatives promote SME interest in exporting as a growth strategy, enhance the knowledge of current and potential exporters regarding major trade issues and opportunities, and increase awareness within selected export markets of the Atlantic SME export capability.
[7] Source: Statistics Canada, International Merchandise Trade database
[8] Source: Statistics Canada, Business Register, Exporter Register, 2003
ACOA's trade education and skills development activities apply to existing, export-ready and potential exporters, providing training and mentoring tailored to their specific requirements. It also builds a cadre of capable trade consultants in the region. The Agency will continue to increase its focus on women, Aboriginal and young exporters within the region. Key initiatives, including missions and export-readiness training, will address barriers these groups face, and will assist their export development.
Support for ACOA's trade strategy is provided through: |
|
The capacity building element assists companies in international market expansion and product development, and includes the organization of ACOA-led and partnered trade missions to select U.S. and European markets. In 2006-2007 the Agency will increase its efforts and focus on emerging markets and after care and follow-up with exporting Atlantic SMEs. This will be undertaken through various training and research initiatives in collaboration with regional and federal stakeholders and foreign posts. Sectors of focus will include aquaculture, aerospace and defence, and energy.
ACOA's trade strategy incorporates a research agenda focusing on SME export development needs and sectoral export capability.
The Agency will continue to develop Atlantic Canadian emerging sectors through the implementation of sector export strategies
developed both on a pan-Atlantic and regional basis. The advocacy function provides for an enhanced Agency advocacy role in
influencing national and regional policy.
Program Activity:
|
|
Description: Projects designed to attract foreign direct investment (i.e. encourage foreign corporations to establish/invest in Atlantic Canada). |
|
Expected Results: Increased foreign direct investment in Atlantic Canada. |
|
Indicators: |
Annual Targets:(2006-2007) |
|
|
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Annual targets will be measured through analysis of data from internal reports. |
Foreign direct investment (FDI) creates jobs and generates revenues; it strengthens economic infrastructure and builds industrial critical mass required to successfully compete in a global economy. Atlantic Canada's share of inward FDI is less than 5% of the national amount, compared with 4% for R&D, 6% of the gross domestic product (GDP), and 7.4% of population.[12] Therefore, the potential for economic growth through FDI in Atlantic Canada is significant.
Greater only than the benefits of FDI in Atlantic Canada is the challenge of attracting it. Success requires a focused strategy and a dedicated champion. As the sole arm of the Government of Canada mandated to work toward a better economic future for the region, ACOA will continue to embrace FDI as a strategic focus and an Agency priority in 2006-2007.
In recognition of the importance of FDI as a vehicle for economic growth, ACOA's Atlantic Investment Strategy is designed to increase FDI in Atlantic Canada through a greater pan-Atlantic co-operative effort in the areas of investment research, awareness and promotion, investment intelligence dissemination, partnerships, and lead development.
[9] Suspect - for marketing purposes, a member of a target group that may only be
known by demographic information
[10]Lead - a qualified response with very limited interaction with an Atlantic
Canadian company
[11]Prospect - a party interested in a particular solution that has been identified
[12] Foreign Direct Investment in Atlantic Canada, Atlantic Province
Economic Council, May 2002
Elements of the Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership supporting the investment strategy include:
In 2006-2007 the Agency will increase its efforts and focus on lead development. This will be undertaken through various marketing/research initiatives in collaboration with regional and federal stakeholders and foreign posts. Specific efforts will be made to promote the region in key sectors, including IT outsourcing (nearshoring), advanced manufacturing and innovation, to attract inward foreign direct investment.
Program Activity:
|
|
Description: Projects designed to contribute to increased growth, profitability and wages in the tourism sector through planning, advocacy and market research; product development, marketing and readiness; strategic investment in infrastructure, amenities and facilities; enhancing quality of tourism product; and extending the tourism season or multi-seasonal expansion. |
|
Expected Results: Increased growth and competitiveness of tourism industry. |
|
Indicators: |
Annual Targets:(2006-2007) |
|
|
|
|
Three-year Target: |
|
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Annual targets will be measured through analysis of data from Statistics Canada. Three-year target will be measured through analysis of data from provincial tourism departments. |
As an economic sector, tourism offers significant wealth and job creation opportunities for Atlantic Canadians. Tourism represents almost 6% of the region's gross domestic product, generates $3.03 billion in new revenues annually, $500 million in tax revenues and 110,000 jobs for Atlantic Canadians[13].
Tourism demand refers to the activities of persons traveling to, and staying in, places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year. It includes leisure time spent touring and sightseeing, visiting with friends and relatives, or time spent taking a vacation. Tourism demand includes people participating in conventions, conferences and other kinds of business or professional activities. Tourism supply is a composite of service providers that collectively deliver a travel experience. It includes transportation and accommodation operators, restaurant and retail shopping establishments, entertainment and recreation facilities, and other providers of visitor-related services.
ACOA's operational definition of tourism will result in the delivery of a wide and varied range of diverse marketing, capacity building and capital investment initiatives. As the catalyst for tourism innovation in Atlantic Canada, ACOA's partnerships with tourism industry associations, private sector groups, provincial and municipal governments, and other federal departments and agencies will foster an unprecedented, co-operative, regional approach to tourism in Atlantic Canada. This leadership will focus government and industry attentions on strategic tourism investments and activities that will increase the growth and competitiveness of the region's tourism industry.
[13]Source data provided by the Atlantic provinces tourism departments
Expanding tourism in Atlantic Canada is one of ACOA's most sustained efforts. In 2006-2007 ACOA will continue to deliver projects that will:
Program Activity:
|
|
Description: Projects, which cannot be attributed to other sub-activities, that directly support increased private sector investment, business planning, marketing for the domestic market, or establish venture and seed capital funds. |
|
Expected Results:
|
|
Indicators: |
Three-year Targets: |
|
|
Dollars of financing involved |
|
Dollars leveraged from investors based outside the region |
|
2. Increase in sales |
|
Increase in wages and salaries |
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from Statistics Canada, internal systems, project reviews and evaluations, as well as published documents from venture capital firms and industry associations. |
Among the greatest barriers to the start-up and expansion of SMEs in Atlantic Canada is insufficient access to capital. Breaking down these barriers, in association with public and private sector partners, is a priority for ACOA. The Agency aims to help address the most critical financing gaps such as soft-cost investments in new technology, staff training and trade development. There is evidence of some higher risk, project-related gaps in rural areas and in the tourism and aquaculture sectors. There are also client-related gaps (e.g. women, youth) and gaps in equity and micro credit.
SMEs need better access to conventional financing. Hence, ACOA is working with its partners to broaden the supply of financing available through banks, credit unions, caisse populaires, the Community Business Development Corporations, and others. For high growth and high potential SMEs, alternative sources of financing such as venture capital and the stock market are required if ACOA is to achieve its vision of a self-sustaining, viable Atlantic economy. In this regard, ACOA has recently made a $10 million investment in GrowthWorks Atlantic Venture Fund, a local labour-sponsored venture capital fund that operates in the Atlantic provinces. This investment was significant because it also allows for capital retention, i.e. Atlantic Canadians investing in Atlantic Canada's emerging SMEs.
The Agency also funds projects that directly support increased private sector capital investment, business planning, domestic marketing, establishment of facilities and infrastructure, and establishment of venture and seed capital funds. An example of such projects is ACOA's contribution to host the Global Microcredit Summit in Halifax in November 2006, that will result in over 2,000 delegates from all over the world converging to Atlantic Canada to bring microcredit to the forefront.
The Business Development Program is the principal instrument used by the Agency to provide support, in accordance with the Agency's risk management framework, for the higher risks of doing business in Atlantic Canada. It is designed to enable SMEs to obtain interest-free and unsecured loans that act much like equity and can be used to leverage capital from other sources.
In the next three years, ACOA will work closely with its private sector partners in an effort to increase the supply of patient capital available for Atlantic SMEs. The patient capital gap has been identified as being in the $100,000 to $500,000 range. Potential interventions by ACOA include the formation of capital pools, finding the right mechanism to support the "angel" network, and investor-readiness workshops for SMEs that are searching for development or growth capital.
For projects that directly support the business community, ACOA will focus on supporting strategic initiatives and sectors identified in the regional workplans.
Providing counselling, mentoring, information referrals to Atlantic Canadians.
|
||||||
Expected Results: Access for Atlantic Canadians to accurate, timely, and relevant business information, counselling and referrals. |
||||||
Indicator: |
Two-year Target: (2006-2007 to 2007-2008) |
|||||
|
|
|||||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from client surveys. |
||||||
|
2006-2007* |
2007-2008* |
2008-2009* |
|||
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
2.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|||
Human Resources (FTEs) |
22 |
0 |
0 |
|||
* Funding has been provided for a one-year extension of CBSC funding for 2006-2007.
Entrepreneurs require access to a wide variety of business development tools and resources throughout all stages of the business life cycle, from the time they are thinking about setting up a new business, to the time they are planning for growth and expansion. The Government of Canada provides this service through the Canada Business Network, with ACOA acting as the federal managing partner for the Canada Business Service Centres (CBSCs) in Atlantic Canada.
The objective of this network of CBSCs is to improve service to small business and start-up entrepreneurs by providing comprehensive information and referrals on government services, programs and compliance requirements for both the federal and provincial orders of government. Serving the business community and entrepreneurs of Canada for over 11 years, the CBSCs reduce the complexity of dealing with various levels of government by serving as a central resource for Canadian business. CBSCs are innovative service providers that facilitate partnerships with other levels of government and business service organizations, all with a view toward providing the best possible client service.
In Atlantic Canada, CBSCs are located in each provincial capital city with access being further enhanced through 108 regional access sites across the region, including 43 Aboriginal Business Service Network sites. Clients may access the CBSCs' services via their website (below), by calling their toll-free number, or visiting one of their locations.
In 2006-2007, the focus will include sustaining a high level of service to clients, enhancing awareness of services, and working with the Canada Business Network partners to implement an improved planning process across the network. For more information, please refer to the following websites:
http://canadabusiness.gc.ca/gol/cbec/site.nsf/en/index.html
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/library/reports/rpp2006/index.shtml
Improved community economic infrastructure and strategic planning capacity, leading to
improved employment opportunities and economic growth in the Atlantic region
Expected Results: Increased economic opportunities for Atlantic Canada. |
||||
Indicators: |
Five-year Targets:(2003-2004 to 2007-2008) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from Statistics Canada. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
81.2 |
70.0 |
45.7 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
86 |
88 |
88 |
|
The Atlantic economy is built on the region's many communities. From small remote villages, to larger urban centres, the opportunities and challenges vary significantly. ACOA's focus on community development reflects the important role of the federal government in addressing Canada's rural/urban dichotomy, in working with Aboriginal Canadians, and in welcoming immigrants, to ensure continued prosperity and productivity. The Agency's approach requires flexibility based on community realities, their strengths and challenges, while still being strategic on a regional level to maximize economic growth. The traditional strengths of the region's natural resources and challenges of seasonal employment are well documented, as are the recognized needs of communities in Atlantic Canada for economic diversification, skills development and transformative change.
While overall the economy of the Atlantic region has fared quite well over the past five years, some challenges remain. One of the true challenges facing community developers in Atlantic Canada is communities in transition, those with limited economic capacity and infrastructure, and those requiring assistance in order to capitalize on economic opportunities. These communities are typically found in the region's more rural and remote areas. In some cases, they have experienced an economic downturn through industry closure or demographic declines, or have limited new job growth that has resulted in a smaller population and a limited economic base. Although adjustment measures may have been in place in some communities, the long-term impacts of these changes continue to have an effect. Youth are leaving, or have left, in search of employment and social opportunities elsewhere – either to a larger centre in the region, or to central or western Canada.
From time to time, communities in the Atlantic region face the need for sudden or phased adjustment to an economic shock such as the fishery moratorium, significant layoffs by a major employer, or the sudden or pending closure of a mine, mill or other major industry. In these situations, all levels of government must work together with the community to develop a quick response and a plan for the future. Due to the Agency's broad economic development mandate and strong presence in the region, the community, other departments, and other levels of government turn to ACOA. The challenge for ACOA is to map out a realistic and responsive role in these situations.
In 2006-2007 a new pan-Atlantic framework for community development will be developed. This framework will ensure a cohesive, holistic and integrated approach to investments, with the flexibility to respond to regional and community differences. Throughout its history, ACOA has supported community economic development within the region. A number of program areas have been brought together in a new configuration that offers an excellent opportunity for a strategic re-examination of community economic development that builds on best practices and lessons learned from within the region and beyond. The primary focus of the framework will be to ensure that ACOA investments through all funding streams work together to support the ongoing work of communities and the region in achieving strategic economic development goals.
The region's larger towns and urban centres face different opportunities and challenges. The opportunities for economic growth, the challenge of globalization and international competitiveness factor into daily decision making. Embracing innovation, and developing and retaining a skilled work force, are critical for future growth. The most dramatic and immediate impact of community development is in those that have clearly identified strengths and potential on which to build. Innovation and creativity in these communities can lead to significant development opportunities. Often there is potential to take advantage of these opportunities due to previous significant work in strengthening community development capacity. Leadership is strongest in these transforming communities, and partnerships are in place to build on existing potential. ACOA provides continued support to enhance or improve their economic base, building on their assets, and increasing their capacity to be competitive.
In addition to geographic communities, there are significant communities of interest in the Atlantic region. The limited economic capacity in First Nations communities is a fundamental development issue in the economic future of the region's Aboriginal populations, that requires ACOA to work with its many partners toward a strategic approach to development. Similarly, economic development of French language minority communities requires partnership with other governments and federal departments to ensure complementary interventions.
The building of economic capacity in Atlantic communities relies to a large extent on community-level volunteer leadership through local economic development organizations and, to an increasing extent, there is a strong role for municipalities and local government. ACOA recognizes that building on these community level partnerships is a critical factor of any community development strategy.
Projects which help communities build their capacity and confidence in order to identify and co-ordinate the implementation of priorities for economic development in their region. These projects would be supported via Community Economic Development Organizations (CEDOs) that ,in turn provide financial and technical assistance to businesses and communities; conduct strategic planning; and co-ordinate economic development projects under a range of self-sustaining development projects under strategic Community Economic Development (CED) initiatives.
|
||||
Expected Results: Enhanced business and economic opportunities for Atlantic Canada communities. |
||||
Indicators: |
Annual Targets: (2006-2007) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from CBDC reports and internal systems. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
42.8 |
44.6 |
44.8 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
79 |
81 |
81 |
|
ACOA supports economic development with communities through projects that build their capacity to identify and co-ordinate the implementation of priorities for economic development in their region. In some cases these projects are supported by other community economic development organizations that in turn provide financial and technical assistance to businesses and communities; conduct strategic planning; co-ordinate economic development; and implement a range of self-sustaining development projects.
The Agency also works to establish and strengthen partnerships with other levels of government and community organizations; engages municipalities on community development priorities; and continues to work in partnership with the provinces on joint community economic development priorities and strategies.
The Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) is a primary program tool for investing in community development priorities. This program supports strategic investments and capacity building initiatives in the context of community/regional strategic economic development plans.
In 2006-2007, ACOA staff will continue to work with communities and community organizations to identify, develop, and support projects that will improve the economic base and long-term development of the community/region.
In addition, the Agency will foster networking and improved communication between community development partners to encourage sharing of best practices and to leverage investments. Agency staff will engage municipalities on community development priorities, and continue to work in partnership with the provinces and the private sector on joint community economic development priorities and strategies.
The Agency will build on the strengths and relationships at the community level and processes such as the Joint Economic Development Initiative (in New Brunswick) and the Nova Scotia Tripartite partnership that focuses on Aboriginal economic development. ACOA will also work in collaboration with Industry Canada and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada in their roles as lead departments for Aboriginal development. The Agency will also work with other federal departments for continued economic development of French language minority communities and development of culturally-sensitive economic policies.
As part of its overall focus on population, the Agency will work toward creating an environment that will support the retention and repatriation of Atlantic Canadians in the short term, while recognizing the opportunity for immigration as a possible long-term population development strategy to address the skills and labour force issues facing the region.
To facilitate socio-economic development at the local level, and to increase the capacity of communities to reach their economic development potential, the Agency supports community-based economic development organizations such as the 41 Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs) and the 51 Regional Economic Development Organizations (REDOs). CBDCs enhance business and economic opportunities in Atlantic Canada's rural communities, through the provision of investment capital and business counselling. REDOs, often funded in partnership with provincial and local governments, play a leadership role in strategic community development planning project development.
In 2006-2007, ACOA will continue to work in partnership with the CBDCs and urban-based business support organizations to help Atlantic Canadians, through the Seed Capital Program, to acquire the business skills and capital they need to start, modernize and expand their businesses.
Supports initiatives designed to address the specific economic adjustment needs
|
||||
Expected Results: Partner with communities to manage and mitigate economic crises. |
||||
Indicator: |
Three-year Target:(2005-2006 to 2007-2008) |
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Evaluation of data from studies, surveys and internal evaluations. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
24.5 |
24.5 |
0.0 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
The Agency supports initiatives designed to address the specific economic adjustment needs of Atlantic Canadian communities. From time to time, the federal government announces special program initiatives to help affected individuals and communities adjust to their changing economic circumstances. These situations may arise as a result of a downturn in an industry or closure of a major employer and usually are high profile and involve sensitive issues. Economic adjustments to industry closures, resource reductions and other factors require a co-ordinated and effective response by ACOA, other government departments and other levels of government.
Taking advantage of its established network and knowledge of the region, ACOA delivers special development initiatives on behalf of the federal government to facilitate alternate and replacement economic opportunities in communities or areas that experience closure of significant employers or other significant shocks to employment. The Agency assists with planning and strategy development to reduce the impact of economic downturns and improve the economic base of communities in the long term.
ACOA has been asked in the past, for example, to deliver adjustment programs that responded to the closure of military bases, the closure of the cod fishery, and the termination of the ferry service from New Brunswick to Prince Edward Island.
Typically, targeted funding is available for adjustment that is the result of a government decision or that clearly falls within the government's mandate. Currently, the only targeted adjustment program being delivered by ACOA is the Saint John Shipyard Initiative, in response to the closure of the shipyard in Saint John, New Brunswick.
A more common response to adjustment, such as factory closures or major downsizing, sees ACOA work in collaboration with a community, other federal departments and other levels of government to use existing programs to best respond to the situation. Economic adjustment to industry closures, resource reductions and other factors requires a co-ordinated and effective response by ACOA and other government departments. The challenge is to map out a realistic and responsive role in these situations.
To aid in the development of such realistic approaches, ACOA staff will examine work that ACOA and other government departments have done to date in delivering adjustment initiatives in order to capture lessons learned from these experiences, as well as from ACOA's ongoing work with communities in the diversification of their economies in response to economic challenges. From this information, as well as information from other jurisdictions, ACOA will be better positioned to provide advice to communities and government and propose action in response to adjustments that may be required in the future.
Programming designed to renew and build infrastructure in rural and urban municipalities in Atlantic Canada.
|
||||
Expected Results: Enhanced infrastructure in urban and rural communities, and public infrastructure. |
||||
Indicator: |
Three-year Target: (2006-2007 to 2008-2009) |
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from Shared Information Management System for Infrastructure (SIMSI). |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
13.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
7 |
7 |
7 |
|
Community infrastructure is an essential building block for community development. Investments in infrastructure ensure safe drinking water, effective waste management systems, and key transportation projects that facilitate the safe movement of people and goods. As well, strategic infrastructure that supports community development and economic growth can be a catalyst for a community to grow and prosper.
Community-based infrastructure programs are implemented by ACOA in the Atlantic region on behalf of the Government of Canada. Provinces and municipalities manage these projects. In most cases, the Government of Canada matches provincial contributions and generally provides up to one-third of the cost of infrastructure projects. Under various funds, Infrastructure Canada provides national co-ordination among delivery partners in the implementation of the projects.
ACOA regional vice-presidents act as federal co-chairs on the federal-provincial infrastructure management committees. ACOA remains committed to deliver on these important federal initiatives.
For more information on infrastructure programming, see Infrastructure Canada's website at: http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/funding/index_e.shtml.
Strategic researched policy positions that reflect the region's potential;
influence on national policies and programs that affect Atlantic development and interests;
and co-ordination of other federal departments' policies and programs within the region to form
integrated approaches to development, leading to strengthened Atlantic economic development
Expected Results: Provide policy leadership and advocate Atlantic Canada's interest in economic policy and programming. |
||||
Indicator: |
Five-year Target: (2003-2004 to 2007-2008) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of information from ACOA's Policy Network and key informant survey, as well as indicators from the federal government's budget speech, Speech from the Throne, and decisions by central agency. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
16.8 |
16.7 |
16.7 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
64 |
64 |
64 |
|
Key Objectives of PAC |
|
ACOA's legislation provides the mandate for the Agency's policy, advocacy and co-ordination (PAC) role, which has become central to identifying and analyzing the critical issues facing the regional economy. The PAC function at ACOA exists to inform and support decision-making by the Agency and the Minister, providing intelligence, analysis, and well-grounded advice on a broad range of issues and topics.
The PAC role takes on an added importance as the region undergoes a transformation, with both traditional industries accommodating new global circumstances, and new endeavours, largely urban-based, entering the industrial mix. Resource industries are struggling to deal with both resource constraints and competitive pressures that are currently seeing rationalization in the pulp and paper sector during 2005. All companies must confront the need to modernize their productive processes and technologies. Communities must face up to necessary adjustments, both to stay competitive and to attract or foster new enterprise. Improved productivity is key to this whole process, at the level of the region, a sector, a community, or a company. In addition, the demographic challenge is very real, both as the region loses population, and as those who remain get older. There is a shift of population within the region, as well, from rural to urban areas, which places stress on many smaller and remote communities. Skill shortages are developing in many industries, particularly those in new and knowledge-based sectors.
One of the initiatives to be undertaken in 2006-2007 is designed to gain greater insight on how to increase Atlantic Canada's productivity and competitiveness, this will be essential to take advantage of some of the opportunities and challenges that will occur with the economic emergence of China and India, and to address the economic challenges of significant demographic change and population shifts from rural to urban areas in Atlantic Canada.
The immigration strategy developed in 2005 guides the Agency in its work to help address the demographic challenges faced by the Atlantic provinces, by fostering activities to attract and retain immigrants in Atlantic Canada. This strategy is leading to a wider Atlantic Population Strategy currently being developed in collaboration with the provinces and other federal departments, which seeks to help address some of the impact of a declining and aging population, as well as continuing shifts of population from rural to urban areas.
Another initiative is to redefine the Agency's community adjustment strategy, which will guide the collaboration with affected communities and help them identify and develop a new economic future. Such a strategy can build on the Agency's vast experience in community development, and on best practices in community adjustment collected both in the region and elsewhere.
Sector strategies are also a means to help communities adjust. An example is the evolving strategy for aquaculture in Atlantic Canada, which takes into account industry opportunities and challenges related to competitiveness, fish health, international trade and regulation, and policy or program issues at the local, provincial, federal and international levels. In 2006-2007, ACOA will continue to work closely with Fisheries and Oceans Canada in developing a national aquaculture framework agreement.
Both horizontal and sectoral strategies, developed in collaboration with other federal departments, provinces and industry, guide the Agency in its advocacy efforts and in federal-provincial discussions.
One of the management priorities to be carried out in 2006-2007 is the establishment of a process to identify and review policy and advocacy priorities on an ongoing basis. This will help ensure that the Agency's efforts reflect the changing global economic environment; the economic opportunities and challenges; provide a basis to reallocate resources; and modify program instruments and policies.
ACOA's work, in co-ordination with its partners, must address these and many other critical requirements, while staying relevant both to the Government of Canada's overall policy directions and to ACOA's central mandate of economic development in Atlantic Canada.
Carrying out policy analysis and research to determine the areas in which
|
||||
Expected Results: Increase internal and external capacity to identify and explore issues critical to developing policies and designing and improving programs. |
||||
Indicators: |
Targets: (2006-2007) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Annual analysis of information from project reports, key informant survey managed by the Agency's policy network, and Atlantic Policy Research Initiative reports. In addition, every five years, the Agency will conduct a formal evaluation to measure the two Indicators "Impact of new policies/strategies on programs and initiatives" and "Usefulness and impact of studies". |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
11.0 |
10.9 |
10.9 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
29 |
29 |
29 |
|
The policy function is carried out by means of internal and external research on significant Atlantic economic issues, through ongoing analysis of issues, trends, challenges, and opportunities facing the region, and through stakeholder engagement and consultative initiatives, including roundtables and conferences. Within ACOA, officials in head office, regional offices and the Ottawa office carry out the policy function.
A policy network has been established to engage policy resources from all parts of the Agency in corporate policy initiatives, to provide an internal "think tank" on policy issues, and to contribute to well-informed positions on key issues, federal-provincial relations and sectoral or horizontal strategies.
The Agency undertakes research internally and funds research undertaken by a range of partners, including researchers at Atlantic Canada's universities and in public policy organizations. A dedicated research program, the Atlantic Policy Research Initiative, supports region-wide research projects, and is designed to contribute to building a critical mass of public policy research capacity in Atlantic Canada.
Some of the research areas ACOA intends to undertake in 2006-2007 and subsequent years relate to innovation and commercialization. These could include innovation benchmarking, sector/cluster analysis, community-based innovation, Atlantic Canada's trade relationships and trade environment.
The Agency's policy work aims to provide a well-grounded base of understanding for the development of ACOA strategic priorities and initiatives, for program design, and as input to major resource allocation decisions. It is also a source of input to national policy development and provincial and federal-provincial relations.
Advocating the interests of Atlantic Canada
|
||||
Expected Results: Effective defence and promotion of Atlantic Canada's interests. |
||||
Indicators: |
Five-year Targets: (2003-2004 to 2007-2008) |
|||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Analysis of data from interviews with senior officials of economic development departments, and from the Agency's files and procurement network. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
|
Advocacy priorities |
|
The advocacy function influences national decision-making processes through rapid and reactive responses to federal initiatives. Equally important is proactive advocacy, ensuring that the federal system is informed on the issues and priorities essential for Atlantic Canada's development. Advocacy ensures a two-way flow of information from and to the region, particularly on topics related to ongoing strategic priorities.
Advocacy efforts have ensured that the federal government is able to respond quickly and effectively to unexpected economic challenges in Atlantic Canada. ACOA has advocated on behalf of communities to ensure they have the support needed to build sustainable economies.
Since early 2005, the Agency has focused its advocacy efforts on several priorities (see box at right), each led by a vice-president champion. The objective of having defined priorities is to ensure national policies and programs reflect the regional context and environment and promote Atlantic Canadian opportunities. For example, the Atlantic population strategy addresses several key Government of Canada priorities, including immigration, youth, cities and communities and regional economic development. Advocacy efforts are focused on strategically increasing the population of the region through activities that will increase the availability of skilled labour, productivity enhancements and community capacity.
These advocacy priorities are strategically aligned with the economic development direction of the region. Sustained, high-profile senior commitment and leadership ensure access and effective integration of these priorities at the national level. ACOA's advocacy activities also involve strategic partnerships and alliances with stakeholders at all levels of government, industry and communities across Atlantic Canada.
The federal government's attention to cities and communities has allowed ACOA, through its advocacy priorities, to provide an ongoing regional perspective to national infrastructure program development and delivery. For example, future infrastructure investments under economic, social and cultural pillars complement ACOA's existing programs and efforts. These common benefits have ensured the continued inclusion of ACOA in priorities setting discussions for national, city and community initiatives.
The federal industrial regional benefits (IRB) policy is a framework for using major procurements as a lever to promote industrial and regional development objectives to improve industrial competitiveness; gain market access; and increase investment and exports in high technology sectors. ACOA uses the IRB policy to inform and advocate to national and multi-national companies about Atlantic Canadian industrial capacity, and encourages bidders to work and partner with these companies.
The IRB component of advocacy concentrates on major Crown projects in excess of $100 million. Currently, IRBs are pursued through the Department of National Defence's annual capital spending of approximately $1.5 billion. Recent industrial benefits activity undertaken by ACOA has resulted in $1 billion in work being committed to Atlantic Canada. Current regional efforts are ongoing with regard to maritime helicopters; search and rescue helicopters; space development contracts; aerospace overhaul and repair; land vehicle refurbishment; and aerospace in-service support contracts.
ACOA participates in the review of all procurements over $2 million for socio-economic potential, and is a member of the Senior Project Advisory Committee on all major Crown projects (those over $100 million). The Agency advocates for a strong IRB strategy in all major Crown projects and for their subsequent inclusion in requests for proposals. IRB plans are submitted by bidders; they are evaluated and become contractual obligations that are negotiated, monitored and verified. The Agency plays an important role in the procurement system, working with government and industry, focusing on strategic initiatives that meet national and regional goals, and contributing to industrial development and economic prosperity.
A number of current major Crown projects that the Agency will be following in 2006-2007 include: tactical airlift, fixed-wing search and rescue, joint support ships; mobile gun system; medium-support vehicle system; multi-mission effects vehicle; Victoria class in-service support; and the Halifax class modernization. There will be significant benefits accruing to Canada as a result of these programs and, because of the strong working relationship between Atlantic industry, businesses and ACOA, Atlantic firms are well-placed and well-prepared to meet the needs and expectations of the Government of Canada.
Engaging economic partners in addressing the Atlantic region's strategic economic priorities.
|
||||
Expected Results: Co-ordination of activities among ACOA, federal departments and provincial governments in Atlantic Canada. |
||||
Indicators: |
Annual Targets: (2006-2007) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Five-year Target: (2003-2004 to 2007-2008) |
||||
|
|
|||
Performance Measurement Strategy: Annual targets will be measured through analysis of data from ACOA's policy network, the Privy Council Office (Intergovernmental Affairs). Five-year targets will be measured through analysis of data from project reports and interviews. |
||||
|
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
The co-ordination role is critical to ensuring that all the policy players within the region aim toward the same goals, with no duplication of effort. At one time, this co-ordination role was limited to the economic mandates of other federal departments within the region, but this has become both refined and broadened over time. Currently, federal-provincial policy efforts are focusing on productivity, competitiveness, and rural-urban issues. In addition, in 2006-2007, ACOA will continue to work toward a new population strategy for the region, in collaboration with partners that include Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the provinces, post-secondary institutions, communities, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector.
ACOA's relationship with central agencies and, in particular, the other regional development agencies has become more important. In part, this is to share experiences in developing the regional economies in different parts of Canada. In part, it is to refine and re-define what the role of regional agencies has become, is becoming, and should be. All of these partnerships and co-ordination efforts aim to accomplish objectives that ACOA alone would find difficult. Examples of this involvement include membership in:
More information on people in charge and the organizational structure of ACOA may be found at: http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/about/people.shtml.
The Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, the Honourable Peter MacKay, is responsible for the policies and programs designed to encourage economic development in Atlantic Canada and, particularly, to enhance the growth of earned incomes and employment opportunities. The Minister is also responsible for the Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation (ECBC) and the Cape Breton Growth Fund Corporation (CBGF).
The President of ACOA, Ms. Monique Collette, is located in Moncton, New Brunswick. The President is also the Chair of the Agency's Atlantic Canada Opportunities Board, President and CEO of ECBC, and Chair of ECBC's Board of Directors.
While ECBC and ACOA have a close working relationship, ECBC is a separate entity. It is a Crown corporation that reports separately to Parliament.
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Board members provide direction and support through expert advice to the President and Minister on a broad spectrum of Agency strategy and policy matters. This board includes the ACOA President as chair, and seven other members who are successful entrepreneurs, business professionals and community leaders from each of the four Atlantic provinces. The Governor in Council appoints board members on the recommendation of the Minister.
ACOA's mandate and organizational structure were determined following consultations with Atlantic Canadians across the region. The result was – for the first time – a federal organization charged with regional economic development in Atlantic Canada being headquartered in the region. The Agency has 36 regional and field offices in cities and towns across the four Atlantic provinces. Consequently, ACOA's funding and policy decisions are made by and for Atlantic Canadians.
The President of ACOA is responsible for the administration of the Agency's operations and its employees. Located in Moncton, New Brunswick, ACOA's Head Office is home to the President's Office, as well as the branches responsible for Policy and Programs, Finance and Corporate Services, Human Resources, Communications and Legal Services. The Executive Vice-President has corporate responsibility for program areas and policies, as well as delivery of the pan-Atlantic projects and initiatives.
Regional vice-presidents located in each provincial capital are responsible for the delivery of ACOA programs. Based in Sydney, Nova Scotia, the Vice-President of ECBC is responsible for delivering ACOA's programs on Cape Breton Island. Through its Ottawa office, ACOA ensures that Atlantic Canada's interests are reflected in both the policies and programs developed by other departments and agencies of the federal government. This office, which reports to the Executive Vice-President, also works to ensure Atlantic Canadians are aware of and able to take advantage of the opportunities to provide services and sell products to the Government of Canada.
($ millions) | Forecast Spending 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Fostering SME development and regional economic capacity building |
264.1
|
280.9
|
262.7
|
260.1
|
Access to business information |
2.8
|
2.8
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Community economic development |
75.9
|
42.8
|
44.6
|
44.8
|
Special adjustment measures |
26.2
|
24.5
|
24.5
|
0.0
|
Infrastructure programming |
52.2
|
13.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
Policy research |
11.0
|
11.0
|
10.9
|
10.9
|
Advocacy |
3.9
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
Co-ordination |
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
Total Main Estimates |
437.9
|
381.7
|
349.4
|
322.5
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
Procurement savings | ||||
Fostering SME development and regional economic capacity building |
0.0
|
(0.7)
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Reduced cost of the new Ministry – smaller Cabinet |
0.0
|
(0.7)
|
(0.7)
|
(0.7)
|
Governor General Special Warrants |
|
|
|
|
Additional funding to support community economic development in rural and disadvantaged urban areas (Community Futures Program) |
0.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Additional resources to meet official language objectives in the Federal Public Service related to: information exchange, regional bilingualism needs, learning and language retention, bilingual networks and service delivery (Official Languages Innovation Program) |
0.5
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Funding for the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund that will invest in public infrastructure projects designed to improve the quality of life in both urban and rural communities |
0.4
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Funding related to government advertising programs |
0.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Collective bargaining agreements |
4.5
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Funding for activities that are essential to the implementation of the Public Service Modernization Act |
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Operating budget carry forward |
3.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Treasury Board Vote 10 |
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Employee Benefit Plan |
0.6
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Total Adjustments |
9.8
|
(1.4)
|
(0.7)
|
(0.7)
|
Total Planned Spending |
447.7
|
380.4
|
348.7
|
321.8
|
Less: non-respendable revenue |
67.3
|
57.0
|
57.0
|
57.0
|
Plus: cost of services received without charge |
7.6
|
6.8
|
6.8
|
6.8
|
Total Agency Spending |
388.0
|
330.2
|
298.5
|
271.8
|
Full-time Equivalents |
678
|
612
|
592
|
592
|
In 2005 2006:
Planned spending in 2006 2007 shows a decrease of $66.7 million from 2005 2006, a large part of which ($38.3 million) is due to the winding down of the Infrastructure Canada Program (replaced by the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund, with funding and expenditures reported by Infrastructure Canada). The balance of the decrease is primarily in the Community Economic Development program activity (in the Strategic Community Investment Fund), which saw increased requirements as approved projects matured and cash flows were reprofiled to 2005 2006 in anticipation of the winding up of the program.
Planned spending in 2007 2008 shows a decrease of $31.7 million (from $380.4 million in 2006 2007 to $348.7 million in 2007 2008). The decrease is due to a $13 million reduction for the Infrastructure Canada Program as the program winds down, a decrease of $7 million in adjustments to planned spending arising from Expenditure Review Committee reductions, and a decrease of $9.9 million due to adjustments arising from the timing of collections from repayable contributions. Other minor adjustments account for the remaining $1.8 million.
Planned spending in 2008 2009 shows a decrease of $26.9 million (from $348.7 million in 2007 2008 to $321.8 million in 2007
2008). The decrease is due to a $24.5 million reduction for the Saint John Shipyard Adjustment Initiative as the program winds
down. Other minor adjustments account for the remaining $2.4 million.
Program Activity |
Budgetary |
Total Main Estimates |
Total Planned Spending |
|
Operating |
Grants and Contributions |
|||
Fostering SME development and regional economic capacity building |
65.9 |
215.0 |
280.9 |
279.6 |
Access to business information |
2.8 |
0 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
Community economic development |
10.8 |
32.0 |
42.8 |
42.8 |
Special adjustment measures |
0 |
24.5 |
24.5 |
24.5 |
Infrastructure programming |
0.9 |
13.0 |
13.9 |
13.9 |
Policy research |
5.1 |
5.9 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
Advocacy |
4.0 |
0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
Co-ordination |
1.8 |
0 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
Total |
91.3 |
290.4 |
381.7 |
380.4 |
Vote |
|
2005-2006 Main Estimates |
2006-2007 Main Estimates |
1 |
Operating expenditures |
78.8 |
82.8 |
5 |
Grants and contributions |
350.1 |
290.4 |
(S) |
Minister of Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency - Salary and motor car allowance |
0.1 |
0 |
(S) |
Contributions to employee benefit plans |
8.9 |
8.5 |
|
Total |
437.9 |
381.7 |
The $56.1 million decline (mains over mains) can be attributed to reduced funding for community economic development and infrastructure programming, offset by growth in fostering SME development and regional economic capacity building.
Accommodations, provided by |
3.4 |
Employer's contribution to employees' insured benefits plans and expenditures, paid by Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) |
3.4 |
Salaries and associated expenditures of legal services, provided by the |
0 |
Total |
6.8 |
Forecast Revenue 2005-2006 |
Planned Revenue 2006-2007 |
Planned Revenue 2007-2008 |
Planned Revenue 2008-2009 |
|
Fostering SME Development and Regional Economic Capacity Building |
||||
Repayable contributions |
59.5 |
55.0 |
55.0 |
55.0 |
All other |
7.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Total Non-respendable Revenue |
67.3 |
57.0 |
57.0 |
57.0 |
More information on non-respendable revenue may be found at:
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/financial/repayable/index.shtml
Newfoundland and Labrador |
67.6
|
0.6
|
13.0
|
---
|
3.2
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
85.9
|
Prince Edward Island |
33.4
|
0.4
|
3.6
|
---
|
1.2
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
39.1
|
New Brunswick |
66.4
|
0.8
|
11.0
|
24.5
|
3.7
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
107.4
|
Nova Scotia |
77.4
|
1.0
|
9.0
|
---
|
5.8
|
0.6
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
94.3
|
Corporate* |
34.8
|
---
|
6.2
|
---
|
---
|
9.2
|
2.8
|
0.7
|
53.7
|
Total
|
279.6
|
2.8
|
42.8
|
24.5
|
13.9
|
11.0
|
4.0
|
1.8
|
380.4
|
* Includes the Minister's and President's Offices, Human Resources, Finance and Corporate Services, Legal Services, Communications, and Policy and Programs.
Information templates have been completed regarding each transfer payment program where total transfer payments will exceed $5 million in 2006-2007.
These templates can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20062007/p3a-eng.asp
ACOA will act as the lead partner on:
ACOA will act as a partner on:
ACOA's detailed report on these horizontal initiatives can be found on the Agency's website at: http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/library/reports/rpp2006/index.shtml.
Information on all Government of Canada horizontal initiatives can be found on the Treasury Board of Canada's website at:
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/eppi-ibdrp/hrdb-rhbd/profil-eng.asp.
ACOA's Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) III continues to focus on initiatives that contribute to sustainable businesses and communities in Atlantic Canada.
Points to address |
Agency Input |
1. How does your department plan to incorporate SD principles and values into your mission, vision, policy and day-to-day operations? |
ACOA will be working to integrate SD into its operational planning process for 2006-2007 to make it more visible to staff and facilitate performance measurement. Monitoring of commitments and initiatives will be done on a regular basis. Awareness training to all staff is planned for May 2006 to reinforce the principles and values of SD in the Agency. |
2. What goals, objectives and targets from your most recent SDS will you be focusing on this coming year? How will you measure your success? |
The target for the reporting period will be to complete most of the outstanding commitments under SDS III. ACOA will work with other federal departments to hold one workshop on national environmental programs. Information sessions will form part of the consultations process in preparing SDS IV. Success will be measured in the number of participants who attend the sessions and hear the message. ACOA will investigate the cap and trade emissions policies in the southeastern U.S. and the New York Energy Smart Program to build policy capacity in this region, and identify opportunities for Atlantic Canada in this key market and lessons learned that could be applicable. The success will be measured in the compilation of valuable information on economic and achievable energy management in this region. A pilot project in New Brunswick will be undertaken to determine the feasibility of encouraging New Brunswick SMEs to permanently integrate pollution prevention (P2) and eco-efficiency (E2) practices into the management of their operations in order to improve their productivity and economic sustainability. This program is expected to reduce client operating costs, and thereby increase their long-term viability and their competitiveness. Success will be measured by the number of companies who participate in the pilot project. With respect to internal operations, ACOA will purchase at least one additional alternative fuel vehicle; provide awareness training to all staff,and at least one procurement officer at Head Office and each regional office will complete the online course, entitled Guide to Buying Green. The Agency will purchase recycled toner cartridges,recycled paper and green products.The Agency's success will be measured by the increase in alternative fuel vehicles, more knowledge in green procurement,and an increase in purchasing green products. |
3. Identify any sustainable development tools, such as strategic environment assessments or environmental management systems, that will be applied over the next year. |
ACOA established an environmental management system (EMS) in 2000 and revised it in 2003. The main section of the EMS is the action plan which records progress against the commitments made under the sustainable development strategy.During the 2006-2007 fiscal year, ACOA will put the EMS on its intranet site to make it more easily accessible to staff. |
For the most recent detailed report on ACOA's progress in its sustainable development strategy, refer to the ACOA website
at:
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/library/reports/performance2005/sustainable.shtml
Internal Audits and Evaluations |
||
Internal Audits: This list represents approximately 80% of ACOA's audit workload. The remaining 20% will include audits and other engagements expected to be received during each fiscal year (e.g. from Treasury Board, the Auditor General, ACOA's Review/Audit Committee, and from other sources such as ACOA's regional offices). |
||
|
Estimated |
|
2006-2007 |
||
Innovation – comprehensive audit |
Apr. 2006 |
Jun 2006 |
Finance/Administration (Nova Scotia Region) – comprehensive audit |
May 2006 |
Jun 2006 |
Finance/Administration (Newfoundland and Labrador Region) – comprehensive audit |
May 2006 |
Jun 2006 |
Community Economic Development – comprehensive audit |
Jul 2006 |
Sep. 2006 |
Operational and Financial Planning and Reporting – comprehensive audit |
Aug. 2006 |
Dec. 2006 |
Access to Information (CBSCs) – comprehensive audit |
Oct. 2006 |
Dec. 2006 |
Entrepreneurship and Business Skills Development – comprehensive audit |
Jan. 2006 |
Mar. 2007 |
Appointment Delegation and Accountability Instrument and Public Service Employment Act |
Jan. 2007 |
Mar. 2007 |
Grants and contributions payment system – reliability audit |
Apr. 2006 |
Mar. 2007 |
Follow-up engagements |
Apr. 2006 |
Mar. 2007 |
Selected government-wide sectoral, thematic or horizontal audits |
Apr. 2006 |
Mar. 2007 |
Specialized projects – compliance audit |
Jan. 2007 |
Mar. 2007 |
Infrastructure Canada Program – compliance audit |
Mar. 2006 |
Jun 2006 |
2007-2008 |
||
Trade – comprehensive audit |
||
Tourism – comprehensive audit |
||
Finance and Administration (New Brunswick region) – comprehensive audit |
||
Finance and Administration (PEI region) – comprehensive audit |
||
Organizational governance – comprehensive audit |
||
IT high-risk areas – comprehensive audit |
||
Grants and contributions payment system – reliability audit |
||
Follow-up engagements |
||
Selected government-wide sectoral, thematic or horizontal audits |
||
Specialized projects – compliance audit |
||
Infrastructure Canada Program – compliance audit |
||
2008-2009 |
||
Investment – comprehensive audit |
||
Other support to SMEs – comprehensive audit |
||
Finance and Administration, Head Office – comprehensive audit |
||
Integrated risk management – comprehensive audit |
||
IT – areas of control not previously covered in 2007-2008 engagement |
||
Collection and recovery – comprehensive audit |
||
Grants and contributions payment system – reliability audit |
||
Follow-up engagements |
||
Selected government-wide sectoral, thematic or horizontal audits |
||
Specialized projects – compliance audit |
||
Infrastructure Canada Program – compliance audit |
Internal Audits and Evaluations |
||
Internal Evaluations: |
||
|
Estimated |
|
2006-2007 |
||
Strategic Community Investment Fund – summative evaluation |
Feb. 2006 |
Mar. 2007 |
International Business Development Program – formative evaluation |
Sep.2006 |
Mar. 2007 |
Advocacy (aerospace and defence) |
June 2006 |
Feb. 2007 |
Canada/Newfoundland Comprehensive Economic Development Agreement – summative evaluation |
May 2005 |
Jun 2006 tp |
2007-2008 |
||
Saint John Shipbuilding (Industrial Development Program) – summative evaluation |
||
Saint John Shipbuilding (Sustainable Resource Policy) – summative evaluation |
||
Community Futures Program – summative evaluation |
||
2008-2009 |
||
Business Development Program – summative evaluation |
There are two main types of evaluations: formative and summative.
Formative evaluations are conducted mid-cycle in the program (or policy or initiative) and examine the effectiveness of program implementation in order to facilitate improvements.
Summative evaluations are generally conducted toward the end of the program cycle and examine impacts to make conclusions about overall program effectiveness.
Note: A number of umbrella results-based management and accountability frameworks (RMAFs) will be undertaken in an effort to adopt a more strategic and risk-based approach to performance measurement and evaluation. These RMAFs will facilitate program-readiness for upcoming evaluations.
In New Brunswick the rationalization in the forestry sector continues to have a major impact, with several permanent and temporary mill closures occurring again in 2005-2006, including the permanent shutdown of Smurfit-Stone in Bathurst. The Agency is working with local communities to develop responses to these job losses and diversify the economies. Positive growth continues in the construction sector, with large projects being planned in the 2006-2007 period including the liquefied natural gas terminal in Saint John and the refurbishment of Point Lepreau nuclear-powered electrical generating plant. Large road construction projects will contribute to the growth of GDP during 2006-2007. The slowdown in the resource sectors is having a negative impact on the manufacturing sector, and is expected to continue into 2006-2007. The manufacturing sector lost 7,900 jobs between January and September 2005, and the appreciation of the Canadian dollar could continue to constrain production.
Prince Edward Island's main challenges in promoting business growth are to achieve further economic diversification through cluster development in the bio-resource, aerospace, information and communications technology, tourism, and wind energy sectors. Human capital development, along with more highly developed immigration policy approaches, will be a vital lever of economic growth in both the short and long term. Key learning and research initiatives with both Holland College and the University of Prince Edward Island will be further developed. The role of private industry in the federal-provincial labour development area will be enhanced through the vehicle of the new Association of Sector Councils. Implementation of infrastructure projects under Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund, gas tax, and the federal-provincial umbrella governance framework will be a key feature of the coming year. To take greater advantage of emerging economic opportunities, federal-provincial partnerships in innovation, human capital, trade, tourism, and investment will be enhanced in an increasingly targeted and strategic manner.
The challenge in Nova Scotia continues to be ensuring that economic growth is experienced not only in urban areas but also rural ones. A recent Conference Board of Canada analysis of Nova Scotia's economy[14] predicts that, overall, real GDP growth in Nova Scotia in 2005 and 2006 will be driven by the services and retail sectors. As these sectors tend to be concentrated in urban centres, it will provide stimulus to these specific areas. The report goes on to forecast continued difficulties for the sectors primarily located in the rural areas of Nova Scotia. These include the mining and construction sectors, fisheries and forestry, and tourism. In the mining sector, results of drilling for natural gas have not been as encouraging as was hoped, and this has resulted in a number of delays and cancellations of exploration activity. Reduced quotas on the herring and crab fisheries, combined with a late season start due to bad weather, have impacted negatively on the fishery. Expected declining housing starts, both domestically and in the U.S., are expected to slow the forestry and construction sectors. Finally, rising costs of gasoline have discouraged motorists from visiting the province. For many rural communities, tourism provides not only revenues but seasonal work. These economic developments are likely to increase the division between urban and rural development.
Economic restructuring continues to evolve in Cape Breton after the closure of the island's two major industries, coal and steel. Investments in a number of sectors over the past five years have helped to mitigate the negative impact of these closures. Employment in the tele-service industry has meant the addition of 3,500 jobs, and this is leading to a restructuring in the type of work being done in Cape Breton. Value-added manufacturing has been a growing segment of the economy, notably auto-parts manufacturing, with potential for future expansion. It is anticipated that a liquefied natural gas terminal will be operational in the strait area by late 2008. Construction of the terminal is expected to take about 36 months and will employ approximately 600 people at peak construction. Keata Pharma Inc. began construction of a new building to house a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility. The venture is expected to create 177 new jobs. Cape Breton University, in partnership with the company, launched a new Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Technology Certificate Program to train potential employees. It is anticipated that the facility will be operational by September 2006.
A particular challenge for Newfoundland and Labrador is the loss of employment in rural resource-based industries.
The closure or downsizing of major facilities over the past year has seriously affected the economic prospects of several
communities. The coming year holds the possibility that other operations, particularly fish plants, will also close or
will cut back production. This is expected to exacerbate rural outmigration in these areas. An opportunity lies in
the much-improved fiscal position of the government of Newfoundland and Labrador. The renegotiation of the Atlantic
Accord benefits, and increased revenue from offshore oil and gas, transformed a projected 2005-2006 budget deficit of $492.5
million into a surplus of $1.5 million. The provincial government now has greatly increased flexibility to deal with
emerging opportunities. Another opportunity is the robust economic growth of the St. John's area, fuelled largely by
offshore oil and gas development. Close to half of the province's population now resides within commuting distance of
St. John's.
[14] Provincial Outlook Autumn 2005: Economic Forecast, Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa, 2005
Since 1995 ACOA has provided interest-free, unsecured loans to SMEs under the Business Development Program (BDP) to help them start up, expand, improve productivity, develop new markets or undertake other growth-oriented activities. Commercial assistance is repayable over an average repayment term of five to seven years. The collection of repayable contributions under the BDP is expected to total at least $55.2 million in 2006-2007. The cumulative rate of defaulted contracts and write-offs since 1995 is 14.2% ($117.9 million of a total $831.2 million). Over the past two years, the average annual combined default and write-off rate was 3.38% (3.8% as at December 31 in fiscal year 2005-2006). It is anticipated that the Agency will write off approximately $15 million in 2006-2007.
Historically, ACOA collects approximately 78% of its forecast scheduled repayments on all repayable programs. Approximately 16% of those annually forecasted revenues end up being rescheduled to future years, and approximately 6% represent defaulted contracts and write-offs.
Risk Rating |
Current Mix |
Anticipated Mix |
Low Low-medium Medium Medium-high High |
11% 24% 37% 22% 6% |
10% 25% 35% 25% 5% |
Risk Mix
The planned risk mix for 2006-2007 is shown in the table at right. The current portfolio mix is approaching the desired risk mix distribution. The latest BDP evaluation suggested that the Agency may have drifted toward more capital asset-based or lower-risk lending; however, more emphasis is being placed on "incrementality" and "need" in the due diligence process. This, in turn, is leading to a slightly higher risk mix for the receivables.
For more information on repayable contributions,
see: http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/financial/repayable/index.shtml
egional Prescence Init
Federal Regional Councils bring together senior officials of federal departments and agencies. Councils play an important role as an executive forum to help improve service delivery, communication with provincial governments and other federal departments on regional perspectives and federal initiatives, as well as co-operation and co-ordination with other jurisdictions.
It is anticipated that the Federal Regional Councils will take on an enhanced role in 2006-2007 and will be asked to implement a new initiative aimed at strengthening the federal presence in the regions.
Some of the specific regional initiatives to be undertaken are outlined below.
New Brunswick
While continuing to address priority public management files in 2006-2007, the Federal Council will focus on enhancing the federal presence in the region and providing horizontal input into national policy and program development.
The council will also look at renewing its involvement in several other projects, including accessing funding through the Public Service Modernization Act's Strategic Investment Fund and the Official Languages Innovation Fund.
Prince Edward Island
The Prince Edward Island Federal Council will focus in support of the Federal Presence in the Regions Initiative. This will include developing and strengthening working relationships with central agencies; deputy ministers and assistant deputy ministers; line departments/agencies; provincial government officials; and stakeholders at all levels (national, regional, provincial and municipal). The council will develop a Government of Canada strategic plan for the P.E.I. region, which embarks on a whole-of-government approach and outlines how federal policy and program instruments might help serve P.E.I. in its objective to become a stronger, more self-reliant partner in the federation.
The council will continue to focus on regional horizontal priorities such as official languages, human resources, rural community development, and communications.
The council will work to support the achievement of common national priorities as identified by the chairs of the Federal Councils. They include:
Nova Scotia
The Nova Scotia Federal Council will continue to support transitional and corporate initiatives. Transitional initiatives include work on Aboriginal, strong neighbourhoods, and security files. Corporate initiatives include work on official languages, human resources modernization, service delivery, diversity and learning.
To enhance its regional presence, the Nova Scotia Federal Council will work with other Federal Regional Councils on four common priorities that were identified by council chairs. These include:
Newfoundland and Labrador
The Newfoundland and Labrador Federal Council will continue to deliver the programs of the Canada School of Public Service, which provides interdepartmental training to members of the federal public service. The council will carry out a needs assessment for French language training among federal public service employees, and will also hire a French language training co-ordinator.
On the national front, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency will maintain its active participation on the National Committee on Economic Development and Employability and on the National Committee of Co-ordinators Responsible for the Implementation of Section 41 of the Official Languages Act. The Agency's President will actively pursue participation in the deputy ministers' committee on Official Languages with the Privy Council Office, and Agency personnel will continue to collaborate on Citizenship and Immigration Canada's Francophone Minority Communities Steering Committee.
ACOA will maintain its working relationship with the Economic Development and Employability Network (Réseau de Développement économique et d'employabilité), both nationally and in each of the Atlantic provinces. In addition to the regular contacts it maintains with organizations representing Acadians and Francophones in the four Atlantic provinces and the assistance it provides for their activities, the Agency will continue to collaborate with the region's four French-language economic development organizations.
In the Atlantic region, the Agency will continue its participation in the official languages sub-committee of each of the region's four Federal Councils. ACOA will continue to help various Acadian and Francophone organizations in the region to stimulate and drive economic development in their communities. The Agency also works with minority language communities to ensure that their needs are an integral consideration in ACOA's research into economic development and entrepreneurship.
ACOA will continue to implement measures identified in the memorandum of understanding it entered into with Industry Canada, under which the Agency has already invested over $2 million in tele-learning for the region's French-language post-secondary institutions and it will, over the next two years, invest $400,000 in internships for Acadian and Francophone youth.
ACOA will continue to oversee contributions awarded to Acadian and Francophone groups by regional economic development organizations and local business development corporations. The Agency also promotes Acadian and Francophone representation on the boards of these funding organizations, and requires the provision of services in both official languages at Canada Business Service Centres throughout the four Atlantic provinces.
The Agency continues to support the Service Improvement Initiative. Building on excellent results from its second client survey in 2003-2004, the Agency will continue to refine service delivery practices. A third client survey based on the common measurement tool (CMT) process will be completed during 2006-2007.
The service improvement plan (SIP) compiled during 2005-2006 will require continual modification to maintain relevance. As the Agency repositions to reflect changing economic circumstances, pressures and strategic directions, the improvement plans will be adjusted to meet client priorities as identified in the client survey. It is expected that the SIP will be formalized during this period.
While current work practices support responding to client input, a formal complaint redress mechanism will be finalized and put in place.
The Agency will continue with the development of client-driven service standards for project application processing. Both client surveys identified the "turnaround time for project approval under the Business Development Program" as an area for improvement. In addition to providing online access to assist clients in following up on the status of their application, the Agency intends to publish standards that identify for the client information required for an efficient review and project approval process under the Business Development Program.
Results-based management (RBM) is a government-wide approach to improving program and management effectiveness and accountability, and is oriented toward achieving results. It uses results as a basis for planning, managing and reporting, and aims to improve performance by having managers compare and analyze actual results against planned results through regular monitoring, evaluation, reporting, feedback and adjustments. ACOA has made reporting, accountability, transparency and protecting the public interest the cornerstones of its RBM approach.
The Agency will continue to invest in the development and implementation of its Management, Resources and Results Structure, a framework to integrate financial and non-financial information in a way that links the results achieved and the resources used. The Agency is engaged in providing evidence-based information contained in performance measurement systems, audits, evaluations and reviews to external stakeholders such as central agency officials, parliamentarians and the general public. The Agency will continue to do so in a format that will facilitate their analysis and be useful to gauge Agency performance to deliver results. The same information also serves ACOA managers in making strategic and operational decisions on improving the overall effectiveness of the Agency's programming, and in being accountable for results.
Providing guidance and co-ordinating the planning, performance measurement and reporting with regard to the Agency's programs is an integral part of ACOA's Corporate Planning and Performance Management (CPPM) division. The CPPM division, through its evaluation unit, also brings value to the Agency by providing independent, objective and evidence-based information on the results of ACOA's activities. The CPPM division promotes RBM best practices and works closely with Agency managers who have a responsibility for demonstrating performance and acting on performance information. The division does so with the collaboration of the Audit and Evaluation Secretariat, which monitors the implementation of audit and evaluation recommendations, and provides administrative support to the Review Committee.
The Agency's Review Committee (which is chaired by ACOA's President and includes the vice-presidents from Head Office and the regions, and other senior managers) meets regularly to plan, review and revise the Agency's three-year rolling review plan. This plan essentially details all audits, evaluations and reviews to be undertaken over a three-year period, in order to provide timely, relevant strategic information for use by Agency managers, Treasury Board, the government and Canadians. Details on ACOA's review plan for fiscal year 2006-2007 may be found in Section III, Table 10.
In the coming months the Agency will review the governance of the evaluation function, in order to continue to enhance
both its capacity to produce and use result-based performance information and implement the new policy on internal audit.
The Agency intends to review its audit and evaluation policy for the same reasons.
The Corporate Services function includes a wide range of activities that support Agency outcomes. Corporate Services works for continuous improvement in the provision of timely and quality corporate administration and the promotion of sound management.
Activities in 2006-2007 and beyond:
Corporate Planning and Performance Management
Communications
Finance and Administration
The Agency is focusing its plans and priorities on achieving excellence in the stewardship of public funds. Three priority areas, namely management performance, expenditure management, and financial management and control, will be strengthened by focusing on the following:
Corporate Systems (Information Management/Information Technology)
Internal Audit
Human Resources
1) Transfer Payment Program: | ||||
Business Development Program (BDP) – Voted | ||||
2) Start Date: | 3) End Date: | |||
August 1, 1995 | March 31, 2010 | |||
4) Description: | ||||
The program helps set up, expand or modernize businesses, and focuses on SMEs. More information on the BDP can be found at http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/financial/business.shtml. | ||||
5) Strategic Outcome(s): | ||||
The BDP is linked to the following strategic outcomes: Enterprise Development, Community Development, and Policy, Advocacy and Co ordination. | ||||
6) Expected Results: | ||||
Short term results expected to be generated by the BDP include, among other things:
|
||||
($ millions) | 7) Forecast Spending 2005 2006 | 8) Planned Spending 2006 2007 | 9) Planned Spending 2007 2008 | 10) Planned Spending 2008 2009 |
11) Program Activity: Fostering SME Development and Regional Economic Capacity Building | ||||
12) Total grants |
1.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
12) Total contributions – BDP Regular |
114.8
|
123.4
|
113.6
|
111.0
|
– AIP (Trade, Investment, EBSD*) |
32.7
|
23.9
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
148.5
|
148.3
|
132.6
|
130.0
|
11) Program Activity: Community Economic Development | ||||
12) Total grants |
1.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
12) Total contributions |
22.8
|
8.2
|
7.7
|
7.7
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
23.8
|
9.2
|
8.7
|
8.7
|
11) Program Activity: Policy Research | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
2.8
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
2.8
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
14) Planned Audits and Evaluations | ||||
Audits:
Evaluations:
*EBSD = Entrepreneurship and Business Skills Development |
1) Transfer Payment Program: | ||||
Atlantic Innovation Fund (AIF) – Voted | ||||
2) Start Date: | 3) End Date: | |||
May 10, 2001 | March 31, 2011 | |||
4) Description: | ||||
AIF focuses on increasing research and development linked to economic development and commercialization objectives in areas that are of strategic importance to the region, particularly those that support the growth of strategic sectors/clusters. AIF emphasizes building the Atlantic system of innovation, including components that bridge the gap between
research institutions and the marketplace, and encouraging synergies among the various components of this system through partnerships, alliances and networks. AIF also supports research and development projects that focus on the areas of natural sciences, applied sciences, and social sciences and humanities, where these are linked explicitly to the
development of technology based products, processes or services or their commercialization, thereby strengthening the region's system of innovation. |
||||
5) Strategic Outcome(s): | ||||
The program is linked to the Enterprise Development strategic outcome. Two ultimate outcomes for AIF are: increased productivity/competitiveness of the region and a stronger Atlantic Canadian innovation system. |
||||
6) Expected Results: | ||||
Immediate results to be generated by the AIF include, among other things: Support Climate
|
||||
($ millions) | 7) Forecast Spending 2005 2006 | 8) Planned Spending 2006 2007 | 9) Planned Spending 2007 2008 | 10) Planned Spending 2008 2009 |
11) Program Activity: Fostering SME Development and Regional Economic Capacity Building | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
59.9
|
65.0
|
65.0
|
65.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
59.9
|
65.0
|
65.0
|
65.0
|
14) Planned Audits and Evaluations | ||||
No evaluations of AIF are scheduled during fiscal years 2006-2007 through 2008-2009.
Audits during fiscal years 2006 2007 through 2008 2009 on the strategic outcome Enterprise Development will include the application of the AIF. |
1) Transfer Payment Program: | ||||
Community Futures Program – Voted | ||||
2) Start Date: | 3) End Date: | |||
May 18, 1995 | October 2, 2010 | |||
4) Description: | ||||
Provides financial and technical assistance to SMEs in rural areas, and is delivered through the 41 Community Business Development Corporations across the Atlantic region. More information on these services provided through the CBDCs can be found on ACOA's website at: |
||||
5) Strategic Outcome(s): | ||||
The program is linked to the Community Development strategic goal and outcome. | ||||
6) Expected Results: | ||||
Assisting selected communities in the development of their economies, and supporting the growth of small businesses, the Community Futures short term results are:
|
||||
($ millions) | 7) Forecast Spending 2005 2006 | 8) Planned Spending 2006 2007 | 9) Planned Spending 2007 2008 | 10) Planned Spending 2008 2009 |
11) Program Activity: Community Economic Development | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
12.2
|
12.3
|
12.6
|
12.8
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
12.2
|
12.3
|
12.6
|
12.8
|
14) Planned Audits and Evaluations | ||||
Summative evaluation during fiscal year 2007-2008
Comprehensive audit during fiscal year 2006 2007 on the program activity Community Economic Development will include the application of the Community Futures Program. |
1) Transfer Payment Program: | ||||
Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) – Voted | ||||
2) Start Date: | 3) End Date: | |||
April 1, 2005 | March 31, 2010 | |||
4) Description: | ||||
Working with communities at various stages in economic development, this program supports non commercial/non profit strategic initiatives that target the economic development needs of rural communities, and stimulates transformative changes. More information can be found at |
||||
5) Strategic Outcome(s): | ||||
The program is linked to the strategic outcome of Community Development.. | ||||
6) Expected Results: | ||||
ICF short term results, aimed at the economic development needs of rural communities, are:
|
||||
($ millions) | 7) Forecast Spending 2005 2006 | 8) Planned Spending 2006 2007 | 9) Planned Spending 2007 2008 | 10) Planned Spending 2008 2009 |
11) Program Activity: Community Economic Development | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
0.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
0.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
14) Planned Audits and Evaluations | ||||
No evaluations of ICF are scheduled during fiscal years 2006-2007 through 2008-2009.
Comprehensive audit during fiscal year 2006 2007 on the program activity of Community Economic Development will include the application of the ICF. |
1) Transfer Payment Program: | ||||
Saint John Shipyard Adjustment Initiative – Voted | ||||
2) Start Date: | 3) End Date: | |||
May 28, 2003 | May 31, 2008 | |||
4) Description: | ||||
To ensure closure of the shipyard operations and redevelopment of the site for other economic development use. |
||||
5) Strategic Outcome(s): | ||||
The initiative is linked to the strategic outcome of Community Development. | ||||
6) Expected Results: | ||||
To respond to the lack of manufacturing activities and its economic impact on the province of New Brunswick, the Saint John Shipyard Adjustment Initiative short term results are:
|
||||
($ millions) | 7) Forecast Spending 2005 2006 | 8) Planned Spending 2006 2007 | 9) Planned Spending 2007 2008 | 10) Planned Spending 2008 2009 |
11) Program Activity: Community Economic Development | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
0.7
|
24.5
|
24.5
|
10.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
0.7
|
24.5
|
24.5
|
10.0
|
14) Planned Audits and Evaluations | ||||
Industrial Development Program – summative evaluation during fiscal year 2007-2008 Sustainable Resource Policy – summative evaluation during fiscal year 2007-2008 |
1) Transfer Payment Program: | ||||
Infrastructure Canada Programs (ICP) – Voted
Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Agreement
Canada-Prince Edward Island Agreement Canada-Nova Scotia Agreement Canada-New Brunswick Agreement |
||||
2) Start Date: | 3) End Date: | |||
December 12, 2000 | March 31, 2009 | |||
4) Description: | ||||
Improve Canadians' quality of life through investments that enhance the quality of the environment, support long term economic growth, and improve community infrastructure. More information on the ICP can be found at: http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/financial/infrastructure.shtml and http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/index_e.shtml. | ||||
5) Strategic Outcome(s): | ||||
The initiative is linked to the strategic outcome of community development. | ||||
6) Expected Results: | ||||
Investments in infrastructure projects in Atlantic Canada. | ||||
($ millions) | 7) Forecast Spending 2005 2006 | 8) Planned Spending 2006 2007 | 9) Planned Spending 2007 2008 | 10) Planned Spending 2008 2009 |
Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Agreement | ||||
11) Program Activity: Infrastructure Programming | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
12.0
|
4.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
12.0
|
4.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Canada-Prince Edward Island Agreement | ||||
11) Program Activity: Infrastructure Programming | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
1.4
|
8.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
1.4
|
8.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Canada-Nova Scotia Agreement | ||||
11) Program Activity: Infrastructure Programming | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
11.1
|
4.4
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
11.1
|
4.4
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Canada-New Brunswick Agreement | ||||
11) Program Activity: Infrastructure Programming | ||||
12) Total grants |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total contributions |
5.0
|
4.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
12) Total other types of transfer payments |
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
13) Total program activity: |
5.0
|
4.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
14) Planned Audits and Evaluations | ||||
No evaluations of ICP are scheduled during fiscal years 2006-2007 through 2008-2009.
Annual compliance audits of ICP have been scheduled for fiscal years 2006 2007 through 2008 2009. |
1. Horizontal Initiative: | 2. Lead Department: | |
International Business Development Program (IBDP) also / formerly known as International Business Development Agreement (IBDA) |
ACOA | |
3. Start Date: | 4. End Date: | 5. Total Federal Funding: |
April 11, 2005 | March 31, 2010 | $7.0 million |
6. Description: | ||
The International Business Development Program (IBDP) involves four Atlantic provincial governments and three federal departments: ACOA, International Trade Canada (ITCan) and Industry Canada (IC). The previous International Business Development Agreement (IBDA) was first signed in May 1994 for three years and $3 million, and was extended in March 1997 for a
further three years and $2 million. A second extension, for $8 million, involved the seven partners in international business development for a further four years from 2000 to 2004.
The new $10 million IBDP will continue the work of the partners until 2010. Funding for the agreement is shared 70/30 by the federal and provincial governments. The IBDP’s mandate is: to undertake specific measures to optimize regional co ordination on a pan Atlantic scale and combine limited resources to co ordinate trade related activities. The
commitment to this IBDP, with the increased funding allocation, attests to both the IBDA’s positive results and its significance for the future of the region’s international business development. See http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/e/ibda/index.shtml. |
||
7. Shared Outcomes: | ||
The shared outcomes for the IBDP are as follows, and support ACOA’s priority outcome for trade:
Since the original IBDA commenced in 1994, the Agency and its partners have administered over 177 projects involving some 2,500 Atlantic Canadian companies. The IBDA assisted 172 companies to begin exporting, 313 exporters to increase their export sales, and 358 exporters to expand to new markets. |
||
8. Governance Structure: | ||
ACOA is the lead organization for this initiative and houses the secretariat responsible for administering the agreement. A management committee made up of a representative from each of the partners is responsible for the planning and management of the agreement’s programs and the evaluation of projects. | ||
9. Federal Partners involved in each program: | ||
ACOA – lead department International Trade Canada – non funding partner Industry Canada – non funding partner |
||
10. Program Name: | 11. Total Federal Allocation | 12. 2006-2007 Planned Spending |
International Business Development Program (IBDP) | $7.0 million | $1.8 million |
13. Expected Results for the life of the agreement (2005 through 2010): Data collection continues for two years after the term of the agreement. Therefore, the target date to fully achieve these expected results is in 2012. |
||
Increase the number of new exporters |
40 companies
|
|
Existing exporters reporting sales to new markets |
75 companies
|
|
Existing exporters reporting increased sales to existing markets |
150 companies
|
|
14. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners: | ||
Same as above. | ||
15. Contact Information: | 16. Approved by: | 17. Date Approved: |
Serge Langis, Director General, Trade and Investment, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency Telephone: (506) 851-6240 E-mail: serge.langis@acoa-apeca.gc.ca |
Serge Langis, Director General, Trade and Investment |
July 11, 2006
|
1. Horizontal Initiative: | 2. Lead Department: | |
Team Canada Atlantic | ACOA | |
3. Start Date: | 4. End Date: | 5. Total Federal Funding: |
April 1999 | March 2010 | $11.14 million |
6. Description: | ||
Team Canada Atlantic (TCA) is a partnership of ACOA and the four Atlantic provinces, with support from Agriculture and Agri Food Canada, Industry Canada, Foreign Affairs Canada, and International Trade Canada. TCA is committed to strengthening the trade and investment relationship between Atlantic Canada and the United States. Since 1999,
approximately $5.37 million has been spent on TCA missions. Overall, mission participants reported actual sales in excess of $36 million. The core of the TCA approach is the trade mission, which enables small and medium sized businesses from across Atlantic Canada to meet with potential buyers, agents, distributors and strategic partners in the United States. The mission format features a comprehensive program that equips private sector participants with the knowledge, contacts and advice they require to make the best of their international opportunities before, during and after their venture abroad. Missions also provide the Government of Canada and the Atlantic provincial governments with crucial opportunities to promote the region as a tremendous location for foreign investment. http://www.teamcanadaatlantic.com |
||
7. Shared Outcomes: | ||
The Team Canada Atlantic (TCA) trade missions are focused on small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in Atlantic Canada, and are intended to assist SMEs to increase exports and attract investments in key markets. The mission objectives are to:
|
||
8. Governance Structure: | ||
A management committee, comprising ACOA officials and members from each of the four provincial trade departments, is the decision making body that directs and oversees the co ordination and implementation of the TCA missions. The TCA organizing committee is responsible for the organization of the mission and includes representation from the four provincial trade departments in Atlantic Canada, Foreign Affairs Canada, International Trade Canada, Industry Canada, Agriculture and Agri Food Canada and the Team Canada Atlantic Secretariat. The secretariat, housed at ACOA, is responsible for the overall co ordination and implementation of the TCA missions. | ||
9. Federal Partners involved in each program: | ||
|
||
10. Program Name: | 11.Total Federal Allocation | 12. 2006-2007 Planned Spending |
Team Canada Atlantic | $11.14 million: ACOA $132,000: AAFC |
$828,970: ACOA $12,000: AAFC |
13. 2006-2007 Expected Results: | ||
Increased export readiness for SMEs | 60 | |
Forecasted export sales by SMEs | $20 million | |
Increased number of potential buyers in export markets | 180 | |
14. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners: | ||
Not applicable. | ||
15. Contact Information: | 16. Approved by: | 17. Date Approved: |
Serge Langis, Director General, Trade and Investment, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency Telephone: (506) 851-6240 E-mail:serge.langis@acoa-apeca.gc.ca |
Janice Goguen, A/Director General, Trade and Investment |
January 20, 2006 |