This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Agency has one strategic outcome: "Environmental assessment is an integral part of program and policy decision-making." This strategic outcome is accomplished through one program activity as noted below.
This section provides details on the Agency's program activity and its three key programs: coordination and cooperation, guidance and operations, and continuous improvement.
Funds for corporate services are included in the numbers and detailed information on those services is provided in Section IV.
Key Program: Coordination and Cooperation | ||
Description: Achieving timely, streamlined, effective environmental assessments through strong coordination and cooperation within the federal government, with provinces and in the context of land claims agreements. | ||
Expected Results: Environmental assessment processes are well coordinated across the federal government and with other jurisdictions. | ||
Plan: |
Action Item: |
Action Item Indicators: |
Reduce costs and delays in the federal assessment review process for individual projects by avoiding duplication, increasing certainty and resolving issues. Supports Priorities 1 & 2 |
|
|
Maximize predictability, increase efficiency and minimize conflicts, while strengthening effectiveness and accountability by establishing a cooperative policy framework for environmental assessment processes across jurisdictions. Supports Priority 1 |
|
|
Establish, as part of land claims and self-government agreements, environmental assessment regimes that meet or exceed the requirements of the Act. Supports Priorities 2 & 3 |
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Evaluation to measure Agency performance as federal environmental assessment coordinator and to review self-government and land claim agreements to ensure they contain principles of environmental assessment at the federal level. |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | |
Financial Resources ($ thousands) Human Resources (FTE) |
6,164 60 |
5,747 61 |
5,747 61 |
The activities identified in the above table will support stakeholders and decision makers by providing informed advice, guidance and support for the environmental assessment of projects and policies. Establishment of bilateral agreements will strengthen jurisdictional relationships through coordinated assessment processes. Providing guidance on environmental assessment provisions in self-government and land claim agreements will engage Aboriginal stakeholders and support federal negotiators.
Key Program: Guidance and Operations | ||
Description: The development of environmental assessment operations, advice, guidance and support for public participation. | ||
Expected Results: Environmental assessment expertise and operational capacity is maintained and enhanced, and the role of stakeholders and decision makers is supported. | ||
Plan: |
Action Item: |
Action Item Indicators: |
Ensure integration of environmental factors into the decision-making process for a specific project or class of projects through the review panel, comprehensive study and class screenings. Supports Priority 2 |
|
|
Promote the integration of environmental considerations at the earliest stage of the decision-making process using strategic environmental assessments. Supports Priority 2 |
|
|
Encourage and improve public participation in the conduct of comprehensive study and panel review processes. Supports Priority 2 |
|
|
Provide tools and mechanisms that support an improved environmental assessment process. Supports Priorities 1, 2 & 3 |
|
|
Provide timely, reliable and meaningful information about environmental assessments to facilitate public involvement in the environmental assessment process. Supports Priorities 1, 2 & 3 |
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Stakeholder and client satisfaction measured through selected surveys and data on public use of Registry and feedback from public and stakeholders. |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | |
Financial Resources ($ thousands) Human Resources (FTE) |
7,590 52 |
6,389 48 |
6,389 48 |
By providing guidance on the environmental assessment process, assisting federal government departments in meeting their obligations under the Act, and maintaining the CEAR Internet site, the Agency will strengthen its role as a centre of expertise on environmental assessment. Through the development and use of a more timely and efficient environmental process (in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on Implementing the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act) the Agency will demonstrate continued effective leadership in the environmental assessment process.
Key Program: Continuous Improvement | ||
Description: Activities which support improved environmental assessment practices and/or outcomes. | ||
Expected Results: Environmental assessment practices are improved, and increasingly effective mitigation measures are implemented. | ||
Plan: | Action Item: | Action Item Indicators: |
Maintain an ongoing quality assurance program. Supports Priority 1 & 2 |
|
|
Promote develop and improve environmental assessment practices. Supports Priority 2 |
|
|
Development and review of, and consultation and communication on, the legislative and policy basis for the federal practice of environmental assessment. Supports Priorities 1 & 2 |
|
|
Performance Measurement Strategy: Number of regulations and policies developed, reviewed and updated and feedback from stakeholders on level of satisfaction with consultation on proposals. |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | |
Financial Resources ($ thousands) Human Resources (FTE) |
4,279 37 |
3,918 37 |
3,918 37 |
The key policy and legislative activities will centre on the integration of federal environmental assessment. Other regulatory and policy activities, such as amendments to the Exclusion List Regulations and the Federal Coordination Regulations, will support integration while continuing to implement the directions resulting from Bill C-9.
The reporting structure to the Minister of the Environment is shown in the figure below. Planned Spending: $18,033K with 149 FTEs.
($ thousands) | Forecast Spending 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Efficient and Effective Environmental Assessment |
21,071 |
20,884 | 19,555 | 19,555 |
Less Respendable revenue | (3,501) | (3,501) | (3,501) | (3,501) |
Total Main Estimates | 17,570 | 17,383 | 16,054 | 16,054 |
Adjustments: |
||||
Governor General Warrants |
||||
Northern Gas Pipeline Project |
570 |
|||
Carry Forward of 2004-2005 Eligible Lapsing Funds |
374 |
|||
Smart Regulations |
81 |
|||
Compensation for collective bargaining |
351 | |||
Severance and Parental Benefits (paylist shortfall) |
397 | |||
Expenditure Review Exercise |
(50) | |||
Miscellaneous adjustments (including employee benefit plans) |
166 | |||
Reprofile to 2006-2007 (Northern Gas Pipeline Project) |
650 | |||
Total Adjustments |
1,889 | 650 | 0 | 0 |
Total Planned Spending (note) | 19,459 | 18,033 | 16,054 | 16,054 |
Total Planned Spending |
19,459 | 18,033 | 16,054 | 16,054 |
Plus: Cost of services received without charge |
3,031 | 3,276 | 3,276 | 3,276 |
Net cost of Program | 22,490 | 21,309 | 19,330 | 19,330 |
Full-Time Equivalents | 145 | 149 | 146 | 146 |
Note: The funding decrease in Total Planned Spending over the planning horizon is mainly explained by reduced funding for several initiatives such as the Implementation of the renewed Act, Sydney Tar Ponds and Northern Gas Pipeline Project.
For fiscal year 2005-2006, the actual spending was $17,578K which resulted in an Agency lapse of $1,880K. This lapse mainly consists of an approved reprofile of $650K to 2006-2007 for the Northern Gas Pipeline Project and resources to cover legal services of $656K received from Justice Canada.
2006-2007 | ||||||||||
($ thousands) | Budgetary | Non-Budgetary | Total Main Estimates | Adjustments (planned spending not in Main Estimates) | Total Planned Spending | |||||
Program Activity | Operating | Capital | Grants and Contri-butions | Gross | Respen-dable Revenue | Net | Loans, Investments and Advances | |||
Effective and Efficient Environmental Assessment | 18,941 | - | 1,943 | 20,884 | (3,501) | 17,383 | - | 17,383 | 650 | 18,033 |
Total | 18,941 | - | 1,943 | 20,884 | (3,501) | 17,383 | - | 17,383 | 650 | 18,033 |
2006-2007 | |||
Vote or Statutory Item | Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording |
Current Main Estimates |
Previous Main Estimates ($ thousands) |
20 | Program expenditures |
15,609 |
15,744 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 1,774 | 1,826 |
Total Agency | 17,383 | 17,570 |
($ thousands) | 2006-2007 |
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) | 1,549 |
Contributions covering employers' share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (excluding revolving funds); Employer's contribution to employees' insured benefits plans and expenditures paid by TBS | 700 |
Worker's compensation coverage provided by HumanResources and Skills Development Canada | - |
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by Justice Canada | 1,027 |
2006-2007 Services Received Without Charge | 3,276 |
Note: The Agency obtains certain financial, material management, informatics as well as compensation and benefits services under a shared services agreement with Environment Canada.
($ thousands) | Actual Revenue 2005-2006 | Planned Revenue 2006-2007 | Planned Revenue 2007-2008 | Planned Revenue 2008-2009 |
Effective and Efficient Environmental Assessment | ||||
Cost recovery for environmental assessment services | 4,168 | 3,351 | 3,351 | 3,351 |
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (federal) | 86 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (external) | 153 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 4,407 | 3,501 | 3,501 | 3,501 |
Note: The revenue derived from recovery of environmental assessments review panel costs is dependant on the level of panel activity that is eligible for cost recovery and may therefore fluctuate.
The following table outlines the Agency's major and significant regulatory initiatives scheduled for implementation during the planning period.
Regulatory Initiatives |
Expected Results |
---|---|
Development of Crown Corporation Regulations: Crown corporations came under the Act in June 2006. The Agency will help these organizations meet their new obligations. New regulations will vary the assessment process for Crown corporations involved in the provision of commercial loans. The Exclusion List Regulations will be reviewed and amended to ensure that it takes into account the needs of Crown corporations. |
The Agency will assist Crown corporations in implementing their new obligations under the Act. Regulations will be developed to address the unique business activities of Crown corporations involved in the provision of commercial loans. Changes to the Exclusion List Regulations will allow for more efficient use of environmental assessment resources. |
Amendments to the Exclusion List Regulations: New entries will be added to these regulations to prescribe new classes of projects to be excluded from environmental assessment and to modify thresholds of certain existing entries. |
|
Amendments to Federal Coordination Regulations: Federal Coordination Regulations will be amended to take into account changes brought about in 2003 by the renewed Act. |
|
Amendments to Canada Port Authority Environmental Assessment Regulations: In accordance with changes brought about by the renewed Act in 2003, amendments to these regulations are needed to ensure the comprehensiveness, consistency, transparency and overall quality of port authorities' environmental assessment processes. |
|
Airport Authority Regulations: In accordance with changes brought about by the renewed Act, these regulations will close a gap in the Act by requiring airport authorities to conduct an assessment of the environmental effects of projects located on the federal land over which those authorities have administration, management or other specified rights or interests. |
|
Review of Four Key Regulations Under the Act: In accordance with changes brought about in 2003 by the renewed Act, the Inclusion List Regulations, Law List Regulations, Comprehensive Study List Regulations and Exclusion List Regulations will be reviewed to ensure that they remain relevant to government programs and priorities. |
|
Internal Audits and Evaluations | |
Principles | The Agency's mandate is to provide Canadians with high-quality environmental assessments that contribute to informed decision making in support of sustainable development. The Agency's Sustainable Development Strategy is embodied in this Report on Planning and Priorities. |
Objectives |
The three strategic objectives of the Agency's Sustainable Development Strategy are:
|
Tools | Environmental Assessments are the major tools that the Agency develops, promotes, and undertakes to ensure sustainable development. |
Internal Audits and Evaluations |
Audit of the Participant Funding Program. |
Estimated start and end dates January 2006 – May 2006. |
Corporate Services support the operating programs and activities of the Agency and include many administrative activities normally performed outside program areas and cannot otherwise be allocated as program support overhead.
The objective of the Agency's Corporate Services is to support the core program activities by providing modern, timely and responsive services that are effective and efficient.
The major elements of Corporate Services are:
Finance and Administration | Corporate finance and administrative functions, including senior management functions not directly attributable to any specific element of the operations program activity. |
Legal Services | Legal services provided by Justice Canada. |
Human Resources | Resources associated with the provision of human resources management services and products. This includes functions and costs associated with training and professional development. |
Communications | Corporate communication resources associated with the provision of internal and external communications services and products, including translation costs. |
Information Management/ Information Technology | Corporate resources associated with the provision of general information management/information technology infrastructure and services. |
The Agency has a total complement of 41 FTEs within corporate services (which, for the purpose of this section, includes legal services), exclusively for internal use. The total budget for the corporate services function is $5,420K. These amounts are included in previous tables.
Director of Communications
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
160 Elgin Street, 22nd floor
Ottawa ON K1A 0H3
Telephone: 613-957-0712
Fax: 613-957-0946
E-mail: info@ceaa-acee.gc.ca