This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
As Minister of National Defence, I am honoured to present to Parliament the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities.
This year’s report should be viewed as transitional. Since the last reporting period, Treasury Board has approved a Program Activity Architecture that established three clearly defined and measurable strategic outcomes for National Defence:
However, National Defence has been under significant pressure for a number of years and achieving all three strategic outcomes will take time. In addition to new equipment, the Canadian Forces need more trained effective personnel, stable funding and a coherent defence plan that balances and integrates the previous government’s 2005 Defence Policy Statement with this government’s Canada First strategy.
The government has already demonstrated its intent to rebuild the Canadian Forces. Budget 2006, combined with the commitments of Budget 2005 is expected to provide National Defence with approximately $20 billion in additional expenditure authority for the five-year period ending 2010/11. Moreover, in its first 120 days in office, the government has taken tangible action to address critical sea, land and air capability requirements, and announced plans to acquire:
Taken together, these announcements represent the most significant investment in the Canadian Forces in three decades and demonstrate the government’s resolve to follow through on its commitments.
This new equipment will enhance the Forces’ ability to deliver success on operations in three critical roles, beginning with the protection of Canadians – our military’s overarching priority. In this capacity, the Forces will perform essential national responsibilities, such as the surveillance and the protection of our territory and approaches. They will stand ready to assist civilian authorities in responding to natural disasters and major emergencies, including terrorist attacks, as well as maintain their ability to conduct search and rescue operations.
Furthermore, the Canadian Forces will continue to defend North America in cooperation with the United States, our principal defence and security partner. We will pursue a number of initiatives on this front, including the full implementation of the renewed and expanded NORAD Agreement.
Finally, the Forces will defend Canadian interests abroad. Indeed, events in New York, Washington, Bali, Madrid and London demonstrate that the world remains dangerous and unpredictable. It is in Canada’s national interest to address threats to our sovereignty and security before they reach our shores. As part of this effort, at the request of the Afghanistan government, and under a United Nations mandate, Canada is leading NATO’s expansion into southern Afghanistan. Our 2,300 Canadian troops in theatre continue to shoulder a great responsibility, but they are well-led, well-trained and well-equipped. Even as they help the people of Afghanistan rebuild their country, they are playing a leadership role on the world stage and protecting Canada from terror.
In the coming months, the Government will finalize the development of a Defence Capabilities Plan that will provide a road-map for the revitalization of the CF. This plan will include:
This document will also provide guidance on the roles and missions of the Forces and their equipment priorities. While moving forward with this plan will involve difficult decisions, it will ultimately produce a navy capable of operating along Canada’s three coasts and internationally, a robust army and a revitalized air force that can work as an integrated and effective team anywhere in the world.
To protect our country, the Canadian Forces rely on the dedication and commitment of all members of the Defence team – military and civilian. I am proud to be
leading this vital national institution. I also look forward to working with Canadians and Parliamentarians to strengthen the Forces and support our courageous men and
women in uniform as they perform their essential mission.
The Honourable Gordon J. O’Connor, PC, MP
Minister of National Defence
I submit for tabling in Parliament, the 2006–2007 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Department of National Defence.
This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2006–2007 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports:
W.P.D. Elcock
Deputy Minister
The Defence1 mission is to defend Canada and Canadian interests and values while contributing to international peace and security. The Canadian Forces2 (CF) are called upon to fill three major roles: protect Canada; defend North America in co-operation with the United States; and contribute to international peace and security.
The Department of National Defence (DND), the Canadian Forces and a group of related organizations and agencies, including the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) carry out the Defence mission.
The CF also maintain the following:
Defence also includes the following organizations that report directly to the Minister of National Defence:
The National Defence Act establishes DND and the CF as separate entities operating in close co-operation under the authority of the Minister of National Defence. The Minister of National Defence has specific responsibilities under the Act, as well as responsibilities for the administration of other statutes, regulations and orders listed in Appendix A. The Act also designates that the CF are headed by the Chief of the Defence Staff, who is Canada’s senior serving officer “and who shall, subject to the regulations and under the direction of the Minister, be charged with the control and administration of the Canadian Forces.”
Two organizations, the CF Grievance Board and the Military Police Complaints Commission do report to the Minister of National Defence but are not part of the Department of National Defence. This reporting and organizational arrangement and status is designed to ensure accountability while maintaining an ‘arms length’ relationship.
Specific accountability for results and associated performance measurement areas at the level of the Assistant Deputy Ministers and the Environmental Chiefs of Staff are detailed in the Defence Plan On-Line. The National Defence Headquarters organization chart is found in Appendix C.
The Defence mission is to protect Canada and Canadian interests. In the years to come, Defence will be better able to conduct its fundamental roles to meet the evolving security environment. The Chief of the Defence Staff is responsible for transforming the CF to better defend Canadian security, protect Canadian interests and values, and enhance Canada’s role in the world. The ability to respond to the needs of Canadians is at the centre of the transformation process.
As part of the transformation strategy, the CF will better integrate maritime, air, land and special operations forces to allow units to work as one unified team. On July 1, 2005, Canada Command (Canada COM) was created as a cornerstone of transformation. As an integrated national operational command headquarters, Canada COM allows the CF to deploy the best military assets to meet any emergency, anywhere in Canada. When a domestic crisis occurs—whether it is a natural disaster or a terrorist attack—the combined response will be immediate, co-ordinated and sustained. The defence of Canada is the CF’s first priority. In addition, Canada COM is also responsible for North American operations. Working in cooperation with the US, Canada COM’s responsibilities include the protection and security of North America.
The Government is also committed to multilateral co-operation as the foundation for a safer and more secure world. To this end, the CF are increasing their capacity to conduct international operations, especially in failed and failing states where many current threats, including terrorism, originate. While Canada COM forms the centrepiece of operations at home, the CF established the Canadian Expeditionary Force Command (CEFCOM) on February 1, 2006, to bring under one command maritime, land and air force assets to conduct humanitarian, peace support or combat operations wherever they are required internationally.
Since April 2005, over 4,700 CF personnel have been deployed on various missions. Currently, Canada has over 2,900 personnel deployed across the globe to defend Canadian values and interests while contributing to international peace and security.
As the Canadian Forces undergo extensive transformation, there are changes that need to be implemented to accompany this transformation. In addition, there are changes that need to be made to keep in line with ongoing departmental reforms and with changes that are currently happening within the Government as a whole. As it is crucial that the overall Defence Institution remains coherent and aligned, the Deputy Minister has stood-up a division to oversee the three broad thrusts of Institutional Alignment: coherence between a transformed CF and the Department; ongoing departmental initiatives; and alignment with broader Government of Canada priorities.
An example in support of the Canadian Forces transformation would be the consolidation of elements in the departmental Materiel Division that are primarily focused on the delivery of operational support into a single division and its subsequent transfer to the newly established Canadian Forces Operational Support Command (CANOSCOM) on February 1, 2006.
An example where the three thrusts are interrelated is an existing initiative that has implications for both how the Department supports the Canadian Forces transformation as well as how it responds to the Government's overall agenda is a new departmental procurement strategy that reduces time, cost and risk. The following are key components of this strategy: 1) develop high-level outcome/capability-based statements of requirement (SORs); 2) use performance-based specifications in RFPs; 3) maximize use of military/commercial off-the-shelf solutions (MOTS/COTS); and 4) minimize customization/Canadianization.
At home, Defence will benefit Canadian society in a number of other ways. As National Defence is Canada’s largest public sector employer, defence spending and investment brings prosperity to Canadian communities, businesses and industries. Through research and development initiatives, Defence provides leadership in technological innovation and scientific research. In addition, Defence assists health care agencies in major emergencies and helps protect the environment by participating in the clean up of contaminated sites.
The ultimate goal for Defence in fiscal year 2006–2007 is to ensure the CF can defend Canada, protect Canadian interests and values, and enhance Canada’s role in the world by maintaining multi-role, combat capable defence forces able to operate in the dangerous and complex 21st century.
Financial Resources
($ Thousands) | Actual Spending 2005–2006 | Planned Spending 2006–2007 | Planned Spending 2007–2008 | Planned Spending 2008–2009 |
Departmental Spending | $14,682,343 | $15,463,816 | $17,355,422 | $19,317,790 |
Capital Spending1 | $2,237,401 | $2,499,609 | $3,573,764 | $4,501,797 |
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services) |
Note:
1. Included in Departmental Spending
Human Resources – Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
(FTEs) | Actual 2005–2006 | Planned2006–2007 | Planned 2007–2008 | Planned 2008–2009 |
Military (Regular Force) | 61,740 | 63,461 | 64,519 | 65,372 |
Civilian | 23,018 | 24,169 | 25,378 | 26,646 |
Total | 84,758 | 87,630 | 89,897 | 92,018 |
Source: Chief Military Personnel (Formerly Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Military)) and Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian) |
The Expenditure Review Committee (ERC) target for fiscal year 2006–2007 is $88M. This is the second year of scheduled reductions as the Department works toward the $203M steady-state reduction in demand from fiscal year 2009–2010 onward. Approximately 19 percent of the fiscal year 2006–2007 total is to be achieved through a combination of a reduction in the cost of contractors ($8.3M) and the savings resulting from the conversion of a number of contractors to civilian employees within DND ($8.3M). The remainder will be achieved through a wide range of program and corporate efficiencies, including a $5.6M reduction to funding for National Capital Region (NCR) personnel and services. With the exception of the ongoing study by the Assistant Deputy Minister (Information Management) to identify $20M savings in Information Technology (IT) infrastructure support by fiscal year 2009–2010, all ERC targets have been assigned and internal supplies reduced accordingly.
Defence works with many Canadian and international partners that help support its mission, programs and activities. The broad scope of the Defence mandate is reflected in the complexity and diversity of its partners and stakeholders, listed in Appendix B.
Treasury Board approved Defence’s new Management, Resources and Results Structure (MRRS) on August 30, 2005. In accordance with Treasury Board policy, Defence’s MRRS consists of three elements: a Program Activity Architecture (PAA); clearly defined and measurable strategic outcomes; and a description of the current governance structure, which outlines the decision-making mechanisms, responsibilities and accountabilities of the Department. These are described below.
The three strategic outcomes for Defence are as follows:
Each program profiles three levels of activity (labelled program activity, program sub-activity and program sub-sub-activity). Each program’s set of activities is causally linked to produce a predominant output for the program, and each program output contributes or leads to a strategic outcome.
An added construct, Executive and Corporate Services, provides a place to list all organizational entities that are not directly related to programs, with the associated resources redistributed across the three programs on a pro-rated formula.
Defence’s PAA structure sits above and is separate from the organizational and financial structure as represented by the Level One (Assistant Deputy Minister-level) organizations. An electronic interface links the organization identification numbers and the associated financial tracking system consisting of fund centres and cost centres, plus the separately tracked Work Breakdown System accounts, for each Level One organization with the PAA at the sub-sub-activity level.
The governance structure outlines the decision-making mechanisms, responsibilities and accountabilities of the Department. It consists of the following:
Defence will use the MRRS to underpin departmental planning, Defence Plan management, resource planning and management, and performance monitoring and reporting, especially external reporting. Initial implementation has commenced with the beginning of fiscal year
2006–2007. Section 2 provides an analysis of planned program activities by strategic outcome.
Two crosswalk tables can be found in Section 3 comparing the Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA) to the approved Program Activity Architecture (PAA) and the Planning, Reporting and Accountability Structure (PRAS) to the PAA, including a redistribution of financial resources.
The following chart summarizes the PAA structure for National Defence.
Each year, Defence establishes priorities to guide its initiatives in response to the government’s agenda. The following priorities are aligned to the program activities identified above and set the tone for the transformation challenges facing the Department in the years ahead.
Protect Canadians—Through the “Conduct Operations” program activity, Defence will:
Transform and Modernize the CF— Through the “Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive, Effective, Combat-Capable, Integrated Forces” program activity, Defence will:
Foster Management Excellence in the Defence Institution—Through the “Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive, Effective, Combat-Capable, Integrated Forces” program activity, Defence will:
Contribute to the International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values—Through the “Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and the International Community in Accordance with Canadian interests and Values” program activity, Defence will:
Relationship Between Corporate Priorities for Defence and Program Activities
The following “crosswalk” table was developed to show the relationship between Defence’s corporate priorities and program activities. This link ensures that high-level performance measurement and resource information for corporate priorities and related initiatives is reported through the program activities.
Conceive and Shape the Force
The new security environment requires that the CF maintain multi-role, combat-capable defence forces while integrating and increasing their interoperability with Defence partners. This approach will become more important in the future, as the CF operate increasingly within the context of failed and failing states, including complex urban areas. The CF must also strike a balance between the capabilities required for domestic defence and those required to support international operations. To achieve this vision, the CF will transform their command structure and introduce new groups of capabilities.
Build the Force
Present and future policy decisions will guide the CF through this period of transformation. Paramount to this transformation is the requirement to improve Defence’s domestic Command and Control (C2) presence and to better meet its international obligations. To achieve this, the CF established a new national command structure. In doing this Defence made a clear delineation between the strategic and operational levels of command by creating a dedicated Strategic Joint Staff and four operational-level command structures. The transformation is continuously being monitored, with the first operational readiness objective – the stand-up of commands having been achieved on February 1, 2006. The result will be a more efficient and responsive Canadian Forces C2 structure. The new command structures are described below.
jointly with the US military in North America either directly or through the CFACC who will continue to function as the Canadian North American Aerospace Defence (NORAD) region commander. It also serves as the point of contact and liaison with NORAD and US Northern Command (US NORTHCOM).
The Canadian Expeditionary Force Command (CEFCOM) is a key element of the new vision of the CF. Understanding that security in Canada ultimately begins with stability abroad, CEFCOM will ensure the CF are able to address threats to Canadian security beyond Canada’s borders.
Co-located with Canada COM in Ottawa, CEFCOM is the sole operational authority for the conduct of all international operations, with the exception of operations conducted solely by elements of Canadian Special Operations Forces Command (CANSOFCOM) and for those continental operations under the command of Canada COM. CEFCOM establishes national and operational-level command and support structures, in theatre, for CF units deployed overseas, while ensuring that the maritime, land and air assets needed to conduct humanitarian, peace support or combat operations remain under national command.
CEFCOM sets the standards for integrated training and final certification of assigned forces, ensuring that all units and personnel selected to conduct overseas duties are fully trained and ready to do so.
The Canadian Special Operations Forces Command (CANSOFCOM) is composed of Joint Task Force 2 (JTF2), the Canadian Forces’ special operations and counter-terrorism unit, the Joint Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence Company, the Canadian Special Operations Regiment, and 427 Special Operations Aviation Squadron. CANSOFCOM provides the CDS and operational commanders with agile, high readiness Special Operations Forces capable of conducting special operations across the spectrum of conflict at home and abroad and of responding to terrorism and threats to Canadians and Canadian interests around the world.
The Canadian Operational Support Command (CANOSCOM) provides an operational-level command capable of supporting all CF operations, domestic and international. With selected core resources assigned on a full time basis and authority to force generate additional resources as necessary, CANOSCOM provides the CF with a full range of command support, communications and information systems, and services such as health care, military engineering, logistics, land equipment maintenance, and military police.
Completing this command structure is the Strategic Joint Staff, located in NDHQ. Maintaining an around the clock capability, the Strategic Joint Staff provides timely advice to the Chief of the Defence Staff in his role as the Government’s principal military advisor, enabling him to exercise effective command at the highest level.
From a more force structure perspective, the CF will place a premium on lighter, more mobile forces, capable of deploying rapidly and sustaining operations for extended periods. These forces will include the Canadian Special Operations Forces Regiment, the Rapid Reaction Battalions and other mission-specific task forces.
The Canadian Special Operations Regiment (Cdn Spec Ops Regt) will be a high-readiness, agile and robust special operations force capable of supporting and conducting a broad range of special operations missions. Defence will enlarge Joint Task Force 2 to enhance its ability to carry out missions at home and abroad, either alone or with other elements of CANSOFCOM.
As part of the overall CF expansion, four new Rapid Reaction Battalions will also be created. The military will locate these units strategically across the country, in Comox, Trenton, Bagotville and Goose Bay to provide a Regular Force presence and to help ensure an effective response to natural disasters and terrorist attacks. The Forces will organize these units around key capacities that can be used locally, or transported rapidly to support Canadian Forces operations. Implementation will begin in 2006.
To better respond to domestic emergencies, the Land Force will also create a territorial response capability in centers such as Vancouver, Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg, Niagara-Windsor, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec City, Saint John, Halifax and St John’s. In addition, the Land Force, in conjunction with Canada COM, will identify other key capabilities in each region that could be used in a domestic emergency.
The territorial response capability that will eventually be formed will include full-time and part-time personnel in each location. To achieve this capability in an efficient and effective manner, the Land Force will review the current Reserve unit structure in each named location with a view to grouping and/or amalgamating units, as necessary. Where circumstances allow, the territorial battalions may also be supported by other Reserve components, as directed by Canada COM.
Mission-Specific Task Forces (MSTFs) will be deployed as required. These task forces, which will be drawn from forces maintained at different states of readiness and structured for longer deployments, will carry out combat and peace support operations. They will be made up of maritime, land, air and special operations elements. They could be deployed as follow-on forces to CANSOFCOM or the Rapid Reaction Force, or as stand-alone contributors to other operations. The MSTF will also be capable of lead-nation status in multinational peace support operations for limited periods.
Transformation will help ensure the CF can:
Plan the Force
The CF will develop and institutionalize a coherent, centrally driven, long-range Capability-Based Planning (CBP) methodology to identify future CF capabilities within the government’s policy and financial framework. CBP is the CF’s core capability planning methodology and helps Defence prioritize and manage evolving CF operational capabilities. With this approach, the CF joined their key allies in supporting a more holistic approach to developing force structure.
CBP itself is an alternative to threat-based planning and represents an attempt to break down traditional stovepipes while providing for transparency and coherence in defence decision-making. This planning method also provides a more rational basis for making decisions regarding future acquisitions and makes planning more responsive to uncertainty, economic constraints and risk. CBP focuses on goals and end-states and encourages innovation. It starts by asking “What do we need to do?” rather than “What equipment are we replacing?” CBP also uses the PRICIE construct (Personnel; Research and development; Infrastructure and organization; Concepts, doctrine and collective training; Information management; Equipment, supplies and services) to break down capabilities into areas of functional responsibility. This process allows the Department to better identify, prioritize and manage evolving operational capabilities within DND and the CF.
Developing defence capabilities is a complex, multi-dimensional task. When planning for and eventually acquiring capabilities, Defence needs to identify the strategic circumstances in which Canada is likely to find itself in the next several decades. Then it must determine the potential and plausible military situations, or scenarios, for which Canada might need to mount a military response. In a departure from past practice, the centrally controlled force-planning scenarios used for capability-based planning in the CF will be based on real-world threats. Defence will use them to assess risk; describe operational considerations, resource requirements and other influencing factors; and rationalize capability requirements.
CBP will also allow for resource prioritization, better business planning, in-year corporate management, performance measurement and transparent reports to the Government. The Joint Capability Requirement Board, which the Vice Chief of the Defence Staff (VCDS) chairs, will be responsible for overall long-term capability planning and top-down guidance to shape the CF. To control the planning and programming activities, Defence created the position of Chief of Programme in June 2006.
Deliver a Future, Multi-role and Combat-Capable Integrated Force
Transformation entails its own risks, as making the CF more relevant also means making difficult choices between obtaining new capabilities, retiring legacy systems and bridging gaps throughout the CF. To control all force development activities, Defence created the position of Chief Force Development (CFD) in April 2006. The CFD will serve as the primary point of contact for, and will co-ordinate the CF response to all international and interagency force development activities, except those initiatives clearly specific to a single environment.
The CFD will ensure that Defence fields all components of the future force structure (people, equipment, training and infrastructure). Key to all force development activities will be CBP. Co-ordinated through the CFD, this methodology will result in clear and unambiguous criteria for the development, integrated employment and performance of all developed capabilities, including their interoperability with the capabilities of Canada’s international, continental and domestic security partners. This centralized process will ensure that the CF fulfill their vision of multi-role, combat-capable, defence forces.
While the corporate priority to transform and modernize the CF is discussed here in detail, the other corporate priorities will be discussed further throughout the document.
The Department’s Program Activity Architecture (PAA), described in Section 1, supports the Government of Canada (GoC) outcomes of sustaining Canada’s economy, ensuring safe and secure communities and contributing to a safe and secure world. Further details on Defence’s role in achieving the GoC outcomes can be found in Treasury Board Secretariat’s annual report on Canada’s Performance. The purpose of this section is to provide detailed information on the National Defence program activities that will contribute to the achievement of the GoC outcomes.
Defence identified three Strategic Outcomes to fulfill the Defence mission and achieve results for Canadians. These are:
Three Program Activities were identified to align to these strategic outcomes. These form the core of this report.
Strategic Outcome: Canadians’ confidence that DND and the CF have relevant and credible capacity to meet defence and security commitments.
Program Activity: Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces — Total Spending Net of Revenues
Resources | Actual Spending 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Departmental Spending ($ Thousands) | $12,005,268 | $12,561,091 | $14,575,584 | $16,465,633 |
Capital Spending ($ Thousands)(included in departmental spending) | $2,070,255 | $2,290,763 | $3,353,375 | $4,278,419 |
Human Resources - Military FTEs1 | 55,202 | 56,890 | 57,948 | 58,801 |
Human Resources - Civilian FTEs1 | 19,399 | 20,370 | 21,388 | 22,458 |
1. These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and
programs. Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services), Chief Military Personnel (formerly Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Military) and Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian) |
The focus of the first program activity is to measure the ability of Defence’s high-readiness forces to meet defence and security commitments. Its scope encompasses all aspects from creating a responsive organizational structure, recruiting, equipping forces, and training forces for operations. It supports the corporate priority to transform and modernize the CF.
This program activity comprises four program sub-activities that will sustain the anticipated operational tempo for both planned and contingency operations at appropriate readiness levels and generate surge forces to meet unexpected demands. The four program sub-activities supporting the “Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive, Effective Combat-Capable, Integrated Forces” are described below.
The navy will continue to advance the development and implementation of maritime security capabilities.
It will continue to deliver on currently assigned capabilities, missions and tasks in accordance with the Defence Plan. Fleet deployments, sustainment and joint interagency interoperability will be primary objectives in the execution of the plan.
An ageing fleet of warships pose significant challenges for generating and sustaining combat-capable integrated naval forces, but the first steps have already been taken in reshaping the navy, not only to meet evolving defence and maritime security challenges in a highly uncertain future, but also to provide Canada with a navy capable of operating off the East and West coasts as well as in the Arctic, an area of increasing importance.
Starting in 2012 the first Joint Support Ship (JSS) will be delivered as a replacement to the Protecteur class replenishment vessels. Furthermore, as the Halifax class ships near their mid-life in the next few years, work is being advanced to ensure that the surface fleet remains effective and combat capable until it is eventually replaced.
Land Force Command (LFC)’s mission is to generate and maintain combat capable, multi-purpose land forces to meet Canada’s defence objectives. The Army Strategy: Advancing with Purpose remains the authoritative reference for all LFC strategic plans. The direction included in the Army Strategy and the Five Year Plan, the Strategic Operations and Resource Direction (SORD) will provide the framework for strategic decision-making upon which the demands of each of the army’s lines of operations are to be rationalized.
The LFC Programme will ensure disciplined training and the validation of soldiers for domestic and international operations. Additionally, LFC will adhere to the army Managed Readiness Plan (MRP), which will continue to be refined as lessons are learned and efficiencies revealed, to ensure predictability of employment and maximum efficiency in the conduct of training, personnel employment, and resource expenditure.
The 5K/3K Force Expansion Program, announced in Budget 2005, will continue with the arrival of significant numbers of new soldiers to reinforce the field force as early as fiscal year
2007–2008. Budget 2006 announced the plan to accelerate the recruitment of 13,000 Regular Force and 10,000 Reserve Force 4. The challenge for the Chief of Land Staff (CLS) will be to train and validate its allocation of this increase.
Treasury Board further approved on June 22, 2006, two major projects that will contribute to CLS transformation. The Medium Support Vehicle System project will modernize the aging Medium Logistics Vehicle Wheeled fleet. It will provide the platform for embedded unit logistics; provide mobile support facilities, such as field kitchens, workshops and medical facilities; and effect re-supply operations to deliver reinforcements and supplies. The Medium-to-Heavy-Lift Helicopter project will provide safe and effective movement of CF troops and equipment in hostile environments, both domestically and internationally and in support of land forces and special operations forces.
Sustainability will be achieved by maintaining the balance between the elements of the institutional army (command and control, field forces, training and support). Although past investments in infrastructure, garrison support, environmental oversight and other factors have resulted in improvements, the resources necessary to sustain both the field force and the institutional army have increased. As a result, a sizeable gap remains, which will require difficult choices.
During this fiscal year, the LFC will maintain a high tempo of force generation and operational employment that may need to be sustained indefinitely. At the same time, the army will pursue and conform to CF Transformation while integrating and remaining sustainable. Achieving and maintaining a balance between operations, transformation and sustainment will not be easy, however, it is critical to the success of CF Transformation. Several years of transformational activities have enhanced LFC’s ability to simultaneously expand the army and generate forces for operations.
The air force will continue to participate in operations contributing to the defence of Canada and North America and the promotion of security and Canadian values around the world. The air force is fully integrated with other components of the CF, NATO and NORAD, and works in combination with allied and coalition forces, or with partners in Canadian government organizations and other agencies. The air force is reinvesting in overall fleet management, resulting in an improvement in support of existing fleets. Resolutions to the significant challenges associated with the air mobility fleet are being championed this year. The air force will ensure that all airmen and airwomen are trained, educated, equipped, fully engaged and prepared to meet the demands of the future, while continuing to generate forces for domestic operations in support of Canada Command and NORAD.
Over the next 15 years, the air force will leverage new technologies to deal with asymmetric threats and will increasingly use space-based technology, such as satellites for beyond-line-of-sight communications and domain awareness. High priority will be given to the posturing of the air force to receive and operate the new strategic and tactical airlift capabilities, Fixed Wing Search and Rescue capabilities, and Medium to Heavy Lift Helicopters. The air force will work closely with the project management staff to mitigate process challenges to enable the rapid integration of these new capabilities into CF operations.
The Canadian Forces Aerospace Warfare Centre (CFAWC), established to enable rapid capability development, will serve as the engine of air force transformation and will work closely with other centres of excellence to develop aerospace power doctrine, explore new concepts and make best use of lessons learned from CF deployed forces to improve the effective evolution of aerospace power.
Significant challenges remain with regard to equipment and personnel. By the end of this fiscal year, it is expected that the air force will be strengthened and reinvigorated with newly trained personnel, new capabilities and a more robust CFAWC.
Additional information on these and other major projects can be found at: http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/MCP-eng.pdf
Key initiatives under this program sub-activity will include the following major transformation initiatives already underway in Defence. The CF will:
Canada COM will ensure Defence is prepared to do the following:
One of the CF’s roles is to contribute to international peace and security. CEFCOM's contribution to this role is the conduct of fully integrated global operations, across the spectrum from humanitarian assistance to combat, in concert with national and international partners to achieve timely and decisive effects in support of Canada’s national interests.
CEFCOM's focus is on making a difference wherever it employs Canadian Forces personnel. As such, it is evolving its operational-level capabilities to command international operations involving up to 5,000 deployed military personnel.
With respect to special operations capabilities, the CF will do the following:
CANOSCOM serves as the link between strategic support provided from Canada and the Environmental Chiefs of Staff-specific support provided to the component command of a CF task force in line with their mission specific requirements. Its creation enables the projection of national support across a single line of communication into, and within, a given theatre of operations whether domestic or international.
In addition to the coordination of force generation of integrated Operational Support Component Command/Groups, CANOSCOM is also responsible for the non-deployable support function, critical to routine support to operations. Drawing on its available national support capabilities or from support resources held by Environmental Chiefs of Staff/Senior Management, CANOSCOM provides routine support to CF contingency operations. Composite in nature, CANOSCOM comprises the full range of command support/communication and information system, health services, general support military engineering, logistics, land equipment maintenance support, and military police.
Defence will continue to develop a CF integrated managed readiness system to enhance the Department’s ability to generate and deploy integrated forces. The navy, the army and the air force will each contribute to the CF’s readiness and sustainment efforts through the following:
Defence requires the necessary support capability to successfully accomplish the Program Activity — “Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive, Effective and Combat-Capable Integrated Forces” described above.
The current security environment calls for professional, highly trained armed forces capable of using new technologies effectively in joint, interagency and multinational operations. New technologies offer fast, flexible solutions to such operational problems as delivering force precisely in a war zone or monitoring the flow of refugees in a humanitarian crisis. The CF have embraced these new technologies, and will continue to invest in training and equipping Regular and Reserve personnel to ensure they remain among the best trained, technologically adept sailors, soldiers and air force personnel in the world. DND will also ensure that civilian personnel remain motivated, qualified and professional people capable of meeting Defence’s transformation needs.
In fiscal year 2006–2007, Defence will accomplish this through a number of projects and initiatives that will do the following:
a. Develop and Sustain an Effective Professional Defence Team
The CF are developing a strategy to modernize their compensation and benefits framework that will include the proposed delegation of certain authorities to the CDS with respect to human resource and compensation policies. This modernization activity is a critical component of the CF's ability to recruit, train, deploy and retain members and is necessary for it to execute the Government of Canada's direction.
Similarly, the CF is examining options to utilize an external committee structure to complement its negotiation process with Treasury Board with respect to compensation matters.
Reserve Planning Strength | |||||
Actual 2005-2006 | Planned 2006-2007 | Planned 2007-2008 | Planned 2008-2009 | Planned 2009-2010 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Reserve1, 2 & 3 | 23,902 | 25,140 | 26,378 | 27,585 | 28,7924 |
Suppl Res 5 | 40,000 | 32,376 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
CIC 6 | 7,050 | 7,482 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 |
CA Rangers 6 & 7 | 4,179 | 4,205 | 4,365 | 4,525 | 4,6858 |
Total | 76,862 | 69,668 | 38,999 | 39,187 | 39,327 |
Source: DFPPC, CMP, and C Res Cdts |
b. Modernize and Transform the CF through capital acquisitions
c. Optimize Resource Utilization
Several new initiatives have been undertaken to optimize resource utilization. These will be pursued during the reporting year.
Defence supports a balanced, effective and efficient use of resources based on its strategic capability requirements and consistent with the Government of Canada standards. In fiscal year 2006–2007, Defence will continue to optimize its resource utilization by:
Procurement and Contract Management and Project Management
Defence is establishing new, and reinforcing existing departmental standards for financial procedures and management, including procurement and contracting processes. The Defence Oversight Committee on Contracting (DOCC) will oversee DND’s contractual framework and associated financial controls and practices and will ensure that a sound risk management framework is in place and functioning well.
For example, to improve its procurement process and practices, Defence is working very closely with Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) on its Procurement Reform/Way Forward initiative and is also adopting best practices as standard practices.
In fiscal year 2006–2007, DND will implement or continue the following procurement initiatives by:
Information and IT Management Processes
Significant strides have been made in the DND/CF information management/information technology (IM/IT) domain since Defence’s last report to Parliament. The Defence Management Committee has endorsed an IM Strategy, an IM Strategic Plan and a number of key management measures to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the DND/CF information environment. These measures extend the institutional commitment to taking an enterprise approach, under the strong and responsive leadership of the Information Management Group.
The following key features describe the recent and ongoing activities in the IM/IT domain.
Strategic Outcome: Success in assigned missions in contributing to domestic and international peace, security and stability.
Program Activity: Conduct Operations — Total Spending Net of Revenues | ||||
Resources | Actual Spending 2005-2006 | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Departmental Spending ($ Thousands) | $1,784,654 | $1,974,706 | $1,833,616 | $1,868,973 |
Capital Spending ($ Thousands)(included in departmental spending) | $143,159 | $181,778 | $194,770 | $197,725 |
Human Resources - Military FTEs1 | 5,600 | 5,600 | 5,600 | 5,600 |
Human Resources - Civilian FTEs1 | 2,243 | 2,355 | 2,473 | 2,596 |
1. These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services), Chief Military Personnel and Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian)
The capability to conduct operations effectively at home and abroad is provided by efficient, professional maritime, land, air and special operations forces, supported by many partners and agencies. It comprises a variety of activities, including international operations in conjunction with NATO and the UN, continental NORAD operations, and domestic operations, such as surveillance and control of Canadian territory.
The CF will form a unified national command structure and system that includes a common information and intelligence network, along with common standards and procedures, and will expand and enhance information and intelligence fusion capability to better assess large amounts of intelligence in support of military and government decision-making. Without such a structure and system, the CF’s ability to successfully command operations from the strategic level to the tactical level will be jeopardized.
The Communications Security Establishment (CSE) plays a key role in adapting to the evolving security environment, promoting and enhancing strategic security
relationships, promoting the defence intelligence capability, and supporting the command and control capability program by doing the following:
Canada Command (Canada COM) will conduct domestic and continental operations to detect, deter, prevent, pre-empt and defeat threats and aggression aimed at Canada within Canada COM’s area of operational responsibility.
Such operations will span the spectrum of military activity, from simple provision of manpower and equipment, through complex consequence management situations, to the commitment of combat-capable forces to support the civil power in the defence of Canada. Domestic operations can involve forces from the army, navy and air force, working singly or together, which may be routine or contingency in nature.
In particular, under Canada COM, the navy will maintain a “ready duty” warship on each coast, and a Joint Interagency Operations Center operating 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Similarly, the army will provide an appropriate way to conduct land-based operations. In addition, the Canadian Rangers will increase their northern patrols. The air force will continue to monitor and control Canada’s airspace and maritime approaches by participating in combined Canada-US operations conducted under NORAD.
The CF will continue to maintain primary fixed wing and rotary wing search and rescue (SAR) resources at appropriate levels of readiness. The Fixed Wing SAR project will procure new aircraft to replace the CC-115 Buffalo fleet, and that portion of the CC-130 Hercules fleet presently utilized for SAR.
The CF will also continue to assist other government departments and agencies (such as the RCMP and Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada), and other levels of government, in support of efforts such as ground searches, drug interdiction operations, disaster relief, law enforcement operations, fisheries and environmental protection, and official events.
Regarding continental defence, Maritime Command (MARCOM) will continue to establish the Joint Interagency Operations Centre and co-ordinate the maritime response to counter-terrorism threats. Specifically MARCOM, in support of Canada COM, will do the following:
Canadian Forces Joint Task Force North (JTFN)
A number of arctic security issues have emerged in recent years. The on-going interest in the oil and gas reserves of the Beaufort Sea and Mackenzie Delta, the increase in diamond and other mineral exploration, and the view of the Canadian Arctic as a pristine wilderness have all contributed to an increased awareness of the commercial possibilities of the North. With this increased interest and awareness have come increased traffic in the North – much of it from foreign nations. To assist in dealing with some of these challenges and assert Canadian sovereignty in the North, Defence must maintain surveillance, presence and response capabilities in the region.
Security in Canada ultimately begins with stability abroad and the CF have an important role to play internationally.
Reporting directly to the Chief of the Defence Staff, the Commander of CEFCOM is responsible for the conduct of all overseas operations, including humanitarian, peace support and combat operations.
Through CEFCOM, the CF will support a range of international operations and will be prepared to do the following:
The deployable organizations under command of CEFCOM will include the following.
The Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) will continue to provide humanitarian support and disaster relief to domestic and overseas missions, as directed. The core DART consists of four elements: primary medical care, water purification, Command and Control (C2) and integral support capable of expanding to include additional existing Canadian Forces capabilities. The DART Enhancement Project, expected to be completed in fiscal year 2007–2008, aims to enhance the DART concept as it relates to its flexibility by adding equipment to better serve disaster response needs. The lessons learned from the deployments to Sri Lanka and Pakistan will be used to guide equipment requirements.
Maritime Command (MARCOM) will continue to deploy ships for international operations, specifically the Standing NATO Reaction Force Maritime Group 1 (SNMG 1), at a sustainable pace, while continuing to move forward on interoperability and pursue integration opportunities with the United States Navy. Maritime Forces Atlantic (MARLANT) will fulfill Canada’s commitment to NATO with HMCS Athabaskan and HMCS Iroquois Command SNMG 1 deployments in 2006. MARLANT will also prepare for the standby phase of SNMG 1 deployment in July 2007.
The Land Force Command will continue to generate and maintain combat capable, multi-purpose land forces to meet Canada’s defence objectives. At the request of the Afghan government, and under a United Nations mandate, Canada is leading NATO’s expansion into southern Afghanistan with 2,300 Canadian troops in theatre. Even as they help the people of Afghanistan rebuild their country, they are playing a leadership role on the world stage and protecting Canada from terrorism.
It is the Chief of Land Staff’s intent to aggressively pursue expansion activities to improve the force generation base. LFC composition will remain based on the types of people and organizations that are adaptive to changing environments, interoperable with other CF elements, and capable of leading integrated land effects.
The Air Command will continue to deliver accurate combat firepower and act as a deterrent by using its modernized CF-18 Hornet fighter aircraft armed with satellite-guided precision munitions. The air force will conduct Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) through the co-ordinated employment of Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and modernized CP-140 Aurora long-range patrol aircraft. The air force will provide tactical mobility through the use of CC-130 Hercules transport aircraft, the CH-146 Griffon helicopter and new medium- or heavy-lift helicopters, which Canada plans to acquire over the next few years. The Aurora long-range patrol aircraft and ship-borne CH-124 Sea King helicopters will continue to support maritime operations until the CH-124 Sea King helicopters are replaced by the new CH-148 Cyclone helicopters, beginning in 2008.
Building on experience gained in 2004 through the operational employment of tactical UAVs in Afghanistan, the air force will increase their use and expand their roles. New technologies have improved UAVs to a point where Defence can use their capabilities to complement existing surveillance platforms to provide improved ISR. Automated target recognition software will assist UAV operators as they cue other platforms, such as the modernized Aurora long-range patrol aircraft. The air force will continue to investigate other surveillance technologies, including enhancements to the North Warning System and the replacement of the obsolete Tactical Control Radars.
The estimated costs associated with the CF International Operations can be found in Section 3, Table 8.
For detailed information on activities related to operations in which the CF are currently involved, see http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/operations/current_ops-eng.asp
Strategic Outcome: Good governance, Canadian identity and influence in a global community.
Program Activity: Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interest and Values — Total Spending Net of Revenues | ||||
Resources | Actual Spending 2005-2006 | PlannedSpending 2006-2007 | Planned Spending 2007-2008 | Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Departmental Spending ($ Thousands) | $892,421 | $928,019 | $946,222 | $983,184 |
Capital Spending ($ Thousands)(included in departmental spending) | $23,987 | $27,069 | $25,619 | $25,653 |
Human Resources - Military FTEs1 | 938 | 971 | 971 | 971 |
Human Resources - Civilian FTEs1 | 1,376 | 1,444 | 1,517 | 1,592 |
1. These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services), Chief Military Personnel and Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian)
This third program activity supports the Government of Canada’s outcome to provide good governance and to enhance Canada’s identity and influence in the global community. It comprises the following three program sub-activities:
DND will continue to provide defence and security advice to the Government of Canada as well as public information on defence policy and activities. In particular, DND will provide advice on the transformation of the CF, including the acquisition of new equipment and changes to the force structure.
Defence and Security Policy Advice
Defence cannot work in a vacuum. Fostering multi-agency co-operation is both a strategy to achieve greater results and policy coherence across the Government and a process by which those results are achieved.
National Defence will continue to work closely with other departments, particularly the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada (PSEPC) and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), to enhance day-to-day links at the staff and executive levels and to craft strategic-level recommendations to government on responses to domestic and international crises. Co-operation at the strategic level will help to ensure greater policy and operational cohesion and effectiveness.
Domestically, Canada COM will establish and maintain operational-level liaisons with other federal government departments. Regional Joint Task Force Commanders, responsible for executing the Canada COM mission within their assigned Areas of Operational Responsibility (AORs), will establish and maintain liaisons with local federal agencies, provincial departments and provincial police forces.
Internationally, an integrated approach combining diplomacy, defence and development is the best strategy for supporting states, including failed and failing states, that are dealing with a broad range of interconnected problems. Defence will co-operate closely with other government departments, non-government organizations and other organizations on the developing situations in Haiti, Sudan and the Middle East, while maintaining its efforts on Afghanistan. Defence will work closely with DFAIT and CIDA representatives when they are in theatre, thereby increasing co-operation at the tactical and operational levels by using the “Whole of Government Approach”. This includes sharing information as required with the Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force established in DFAIT.
Defence will continue to work with its US counterparts to enhance North American security. NORAD remains a key element of the Canada–US defence relationship. In co-operation with DFAIT, Defence will implement the enhanced NORAD Agreement with the US.
The Permanent Joint Board on Defence has expanded to include representation from NORAD, PSEPC and the US Department of Homeland Security and Mexican officials. This expanded membership will provide a more comprehensive approach to North American security and defence issues.
Defence will continue to make meaningful contributions to the North American defence industrial base. It will also continue to participate in other continental security initiatives, including the Canada–US Security and Prosperity Partnership, where it will, among other activities, support continental maritime domain awareness initiatives.
DND will continue to lead Canada’s involvement in the Operational Experts Group of the American-led Proliferation Security Initiative. It will also remain engaged as a North American security partner through bilateral work with the US and Mexico.
More broadly, Canada will continue to participate at the Conference of Defence Ministers of the Americas; maintain its support for the Inter-American Defence Board and College; and continue with its bilateral maritime, land and air activities with other hemispheric partners.
Through the Security and Defence Forum, Defence will continue to develop and support a strong Canadian competence in contemporary security and defence issues; to foster informed public discussion and commentary; and to enhance communication between DND, the CF and the academic community.
Defence and Security Military Advice
DRDC, a DND agency, supports military operations by developing and assessing defence-related technologies and equipment that can contribute to Canada’s current and future defence capabilities. DRDC scientists analyze emerging defence trends, concepts and technologies for potential application in DND/CF tasks. Through its contracted research program, DRDC engages industry and academia in a variety of programs that enable DND to tap Canada’s entire defence and security science and technology (S&T) capability. DRDC also pursues key research and development (R&D) activities with Canadian industry and its allies. This assists the CF to be smart buyers and fosters Canadian industrial capabilities to potentially support acquisitions.
DRDC is a leader in Canada’s Innovation Strategy and facilitates co-operation among other government departments, agencies and councils. It leads or participates in horizontal S&T initiatives under the public security and anti-terrorism umbrella. The Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Research and Technology Initiative (CRTI), led by DRDC, is one of the federal science community’s responses to these issues.
DRDC is developing an integrated “system of systems” to protect Defence personnel from chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) agents, while optimizing their ability to work in the face of such hazards in international and domestic operations. DRDC feeds the outputs of its R&D initiatives into a number of capital and non-capital projects to give Canada a CBRN defensive capability in areas of detection and identification, decontamination, warning and reporting, individual and collective protection, hazard management; and medical counter-measures. DRDC will continue to work with both military and civilian first responders, who are likely to be called upon to handle chemical, biological or radiological (CBR) threats, at the Counter-Terrorism Technology Centre (CTTC) in Suffield, Alberta. The CTTC also serves as a forensic reference centre, validates CBR equipment and materials, and provides advice and training to the first-responder community.
Defence remains committed to achieving Canada’s arms and proliferation control objectives in close cooperation with DFAIT. Defence will seek to advance Canada’s efforts to prevent, contain and roll back the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by participating in the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) and by continuing its support for the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, as well as the G8 Global Partnership Program. Defence will play its part in UN Small Arms and Light Weapons regulatory activities, and will work to advance ratification of Protocol V (Explosive Remnants of War) to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. As well, Defence will continue to provide advice and guidance to Canada’s Permanent Delegation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe during Canada’s chairmanship of the Forum for Security Co-operation in the fall of 2006.
The CF will continue to participate in arms control and verification operations in support of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty, the Vienna Document 1999 on Confidence and Security Building Measures, the Dayton Peace Accords, the Treaty on Open Skies, Small Arms and Light Weapons programs, and other treaties, conventions, agreements and arrangements. CF activities will include on-site and area inspections, reconnaissance and evaluation missions, escort and assistance to foreign inspections, as well as a range of observation and monitoring functions. The CF will also contribute to interdepartmental initiatives in new areas of verification and conflict prevention to advance Canada’s efforts with respect to proliferation security. These are key avenues through which Canada will seek to reduce and control various categories of weapons, limit and lower the threshold of conflict, and increase trust and security among states.
Further information regarding arms control and proliferation security is available at: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/arms/menu-en.asp.
Defence contributes to this program sub-activity through its many outreach and public awareness campaigns, its participation on committees and in defence fora, and the contributions of its multidisciplinary and knowledgeable staff to the development of regulations and policies. The following are a few examples of Defence’s contribution to this outcome.
Support to Government of Canada Programs
The National Search and Rescue Secretariat (NSS) was established in 1986 to provide leadership to the National Search and Rescue Program through the Interdepartmental Committee on Search and Rescue (ICSAR). ICSAR includes representatives from the federal departments and agencies providing Search and Rescue (SAR) services, and central agencies. The NSS reports directly to the Lead Minister for Search and Rescue (LMSAR), the Minister of National Defence.
The NSS is accountable to LMSAR for the development, coordination, analysis and review of federal SAR program policies and plans, and for specific activities. In addition, the NSS provides leadership in enhancing coordination between provincial, territorial and federal SAR programs, and advises LMSAR on program issues.
The National SAR Program management framework is designed to meet key Government of Canada objectives in the areas of integrated performance information, collective risk management and appropriate control mechanisms. The framework is documented in the Strategic Directions Paper, the Program Plan and the Annual Report.
The six key National Search and Rescue Program challenges identified are: Changing government priorities; Horizontal program management; Interoperability; Sustainability of volunteer SAR organizations; SAR events that go wrong; and, Physical environment.
National SAR Secretariat Activities
To support the National SAR Program priorities, the NSS has the following priority activities for fiscal year 2006–2007:
National SAR Program Plan Priorities
The 2006 National SAR Program Plan identifies a number of priorities for the National SAR Program. The following have been identified as the top priorities that will influence the SAR plans and activities of the partners in the National SAR Program:
National SAR Program Partner Activities
The 2006 National SAR Program Plan identifies a number of new or ongoing initiatives to be carried out by SAR organizations during the coming year (lead organization indicated) that will have significant long-term impacts on the delivery of SAR services in Canada:
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY GROUP R | EPRESENTATION AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2004 R | EPRESENTATION GOAL FOR 2007–2008* |
Women | 7,951 | 8,220 |
Persons with disabilities | 1,172 | 816 |
Aboriginal people | 433 | 464 |
Visible minorities | 1,025 | 1,245 |
Source: ADM (HR-Civ) Employment Equity Database, 1 November 2004
Note: * Labour Market Availability (LMA) figures derived from the 2001 Canada Census
Contribute to the Canadian Economy and Innovations
Contribute to Canadian Identity
Defence proudly supports numerous projects that highlight the history and military heritage of the CF— a history that attests to the proficiency of the CF.
Contribute to Youth and Education
Defence will provide financial contributions and personnel assignments to multilateral organizations (principally NATO and the UN) and contribute to multilateral development of good governance in regions and countries at risk. The CF will establish military activities with friendly nations, including exchanges, training and joint exercises.
Meeting Commitments to International Organizations/Exchange
Advisory and Training Support to Other Nations
This section is not part of the three program activities and is often referred to as corporate “overhead.” It comprises the activities carried out by directorates that provide corporate governance and strategic management activities. The intent is to phase out this category as the PAA structure matures.
The General Safety Program is one of several active safety programs within DND and the CF. These programs and their associated offices of primary interest are enumerated in Defence Administrative Order and Directive 2007-0, Safety.
DND will employ a revised, strengthened safety governance structure to enhance synergy among its safety programs, thereby reducing duplication and inefficiencies.
Fiscal year 2006–2007 will see continued and improved compliance with the Canadian Labour Code, Part II, in a number of areas, including hazard analysis and risk management.
The Minister is responsible for establishing and monitoring an effective, credible and efficient self-regulatory regime for the control and safe use of ionizing radiation sources in DND and the CF. The Risk-Based Control (RBC) Regime will ensure that DND/CF activities are undertaken and managed with due consideration for risk versus adequate control, safety measures and effort. For additional information, see the annual reports on nuclear safety.
Defence supports intelligent, forward-looking, effective and efficient management practices consistent with Government of Canada standards. It is currently tracking performance in this area using the following five indicators.
a. Governance and Strategic Direction
Using the DND/CF Performance Management Framework, which includes the Management, Resources and Results Structure (MRRS), the Program Activity Architecture (PAA) and the Balanced Scorecard, ensures that there is an end-to-end governance structure that links the DND/CF mission, strategic direction, decision-making, plans and priorities to the strategic results and outcomes. This Performance Management Framework is being cascaded throughout the organization and Defence is seeing early successes in a variety of Senior Management organizations, such as the following.
b. Risk Management
Integrated Risk Management (IRM) within Defence is progressing. The Vice Chief of the Defence Staff (VCDS) approved the DND/CF IRM Policy and Guidelines for release in October 2005. The Assistant Deputy Minister (Public Affairs) also released an Internal Communications Approach document addressing IRM implementation. A draft IRM Implementation Plan for Defence is also nearing completion.
In 2005, Defence conducted an environmental study of strategic risks, including Senior Management interviews. The document Strategic Risk Areas in National Defence outlined the results. Defence will further refine this document after reviewing the Senior Management strategic assessments completed in November 2005, using as references the IRM documents previously described. Defence is also integrating IRM into the Performance Management Framework (PMF), which will be the main portal for reporting risk information. Further efforts to integrate IRM into other strategic processes within Defence will continue throughout fiscal year 2006–2007. These efforts will include long-term work to develop and implement an effective IRM framework across all DND/CF Materiel Acquisition and Support (MA&S) activities.
IRM training is continuing across Defence. In addition, it is developing an online RiskSmart course, scheduled for implementation in the winter of 2006. Additional IRM orientation training will be offered at DND/CF management schools.
The next crucial milestone for IRM in Defence is the development of an Operational Risk Profile (ORP) by the end of fiscal year 2006–2007. Once completed, the ORP will help decision-makers consider risk factors from an organizational perspective.
Each year, Defence will continue to apply risk management techniques that reflect historical DND funding trends. Continued application of a prudent risk management strategy that incorporates reasonable levels of over-programming in combination with identified off-ramps is essential to its ultimate success in achieving the mandate.
c. Stewardship and Comptrollership
he empowering aspect of the modern comptrollership agenda for commanders is that it demands that comptrollers and financial support tools be results oriented with defined performance measurement metrics to aid in the decision making process through the integration of performance measurement and financial information systems. Modern comptrollership will provide managers with integrated financial and non-financial performance information, a sound approach to risk management, appropriate control systems and a shared set of values and ethics. Key to progressing modern comptrollership in Defence is having the right personnel in the right jobs with the right skills set.
In response to the Government Action Plan on strengthening public sector management, the directive on “Strengthening Accountability and Comptrollership in the Department of National Defence” provided clear guidance and direction to managers and leaders at all levels on management practices and controls, stewardship of resources, probity and fiduciary responsibilities. There are many initiatives that are underway to strengthen accountability and comptrollership. Some of these include:
Over the fiscal year 2006–2007 planning period, Defence expects to implement the remaining recommendations using strategies focused on the enhancement of training programs, organizational changes, resource re-alignment and enhanced policy direction.
d. Accountability
A key objective for Defence is to enhance management excellence by implementing Strengthening Accountability and Comptrollership in National Defence and TBS’s Management Accountability Framework (MAF) and by focusing on strengthening accountability and controls in the areas of financial management and contracting.
The Assistant Deputy Minister (Materiel) is accountable for DND’s Materiel Acquisition and Support (MA&S) process. While many organizations across the country execute the process, the Materiel Group develops and promulgates MA&S policies and procedures, provides functional guidance and support, and provides the appropriate level of oversight to ensure process integrity. The Materiel Group will again issue functional planning guidance to all senior management organizations to ensure that DND executes its MA&S process in the most efficient and effective manner.
Furthermore, Defence is increasing its efforts to ensure compliance at all levels with the Financial Administration Act. It is upgrading financial accounting and reporting systems to improve visibility and control. It will also improve the effectiveness of information sharing by implementing the new information management strategy and governance, and enhance internal communications.
e. Results and Performance
Performance management is a key component of the overall business planning cycle. Defence will ensure that the DND/CF Performance Management Framework (PMF) provides relevant information on internal, service and program results; that the information is available for decision-making and public reporting; and that the information is balanced and factual. The PMF system has matured well in DND and senior managers routinely discuss issues raised through the PMF system, in structured Balanced Scorecard discussions. The semi-annual internal performance management report continues to be a cornerstone for communication within the senior leadership. Defence is cascading this structure and format down to other levels within DND and the CF. Senior Management organizations are reporting successes in using this framework, such as the following.
Effective performance measurement will provide information for planning and control in the organization, and will ensure that the direction, efforts and results of the organization are aligned.
f. Audits and Evaluations
Internal audit
Internal audit, which is provided within the DND/CF by the Chief Review Services (CRS) organization, is principally charged with providing sufficient and timely assurance and advisory services on key DND/CF management systems, projects, processes and practices. Assurance services are scoped to address risk management strategies, management control frameworks and information for decision-making, reporting and accountability.
Key internal audits expected to be completed in 2006–2007 include: Audit of Military Moves, Audit of Transportation Management, Audit of Inventory Management – Stocktaking, as well as several audits related to selected services contracts. In addition, CRS anticipates initiating additional audits related to the Financial Information Strategy, as well as the capital equipment program.
A key goal of CRS during 2006–2007 will be to move forward with the expansion of internal audit through the recruitment of additional internal auditors.
Program Evaluation
The evaluation function in DND and the CF will continue to focus on conducting evaluations of key operational programs. These evaluations will provide information on value for money, program rationale and effectiveness. In addition, evaluations are a key tool of accountability, providing information on program governance and results.
In 2006–2007, Defence will conduct evaluations to support transformation of the CF and focus on people, technology, ways of conducting operations and ways of thinking. Given that it is an iterative and continuous process, evaluation can play an important role in ensuring that it is achieving the desired results.
A list of Audit and Evaluation work planned for fiscal year 2006–2007 can be found in Section 3:
http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/j-document-eng.asp
Completed reports can be found on the CRS website at the following link: http://www.forces.ca/crs/rpt/reports-eng.asp.
The Labour Relations Program develops labour relations policies, programs and tools to enhance positive labour-management relations; oversees and monitors the implementation of these policies and programs; and provides expert advice, guidance and interpretation concerning labour relations matters, such as collective agreements, discipline, consultation, DND policies and programs, grievances, harassment prevention and resolution, and human rights.
In addition, it manages and monitors civilian grievances, human rights complaints, and collective bargaining and strike management. Key activities for the planning period include the following:
a. Civilian Recourse Registry
DND will establish the Civilian Recourse Registry to manage, administer and monitor labour relations and classification grievances and staffing complaints in an integrated fashion. Key activities for the planning period include the following:
b. Concurrent Jurisdiction
The Office of the Judge Advocate General is working together with the Provost Marshal to develop policy guidance for military police investigators and prosecutors addressing issues of concurrent jurisdiction between CF and civilian investigative and prosecutorial authorities. This project is directly linked to the passage of Bill C-15A, which amends the National Defence Act to permit input of service offender information into the Canadian Police Information Centre database. The completion date for this project is October 2006.
c. Office of the Ombudsman for DND and the CF
The Ombudsman’s Office is a direct source of information, referral and education for the men and women of DND and the CF. Its role is to help individuals use existing channels of assistance or redress when they have complaints or concerns. In addition, the Ombudsman may investigate and report publicly on matters affecting the welfare of members and employees of DND and the CF, and other people falling within his jurisdiction. Complainants will also be given easier access to the Office’s services by improving web sites and conducting outreach to troops on bases and overseas.
The ultimate goal is to contribute to substantial and long-lasting improvements to the overall quality of life of military members and their families by:
National Defence Public Affairs will continue to provide strategic direction and guidance for DND/CF communications, including the DND/CF Strategic Communications Plan, communications planning for corporate documents and memorandum to Cabinet, internal and external communications of contingency planning for domestic crisis and natural disasters. Defence Public Affairs will work closely with other government departments and agencies in its day-to-day operations, to manage specific issues and crises to ensure the Canadian public receives comprehensive and timely information on CF operations at home and abroad.
Note: These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.
Table 1: Departmental Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents
($ Thousands) | Actual Spending 2005-2006 |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces |
11,397,356
|
12,282,381
|
12,968,782
|
13,928,358
|
Conduct Operations |
1,339,937
|
1,731,310
|
1,388,535
|
1,380,227
|
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values |
1,088,727
|
1,144,233
|
1,160,705
|
1,197,573
|
Budgetary Main Estimates (gross) |
$13,826,020
|
$15,157,925
|
$15,518,022
|
$16,506,157
|
Less: Respendable revenue |
(400,989)
|
(368,703)
|
(373,886)
|
(375,531)
|
Total Main Estimates |
$13,425,031
|
$14,789,222
|
$15,144,136
|
$16,130,626
|
Adjustments | ||||
To 2005-06 Through Governor General Special Warrants |
1,246,468
|
|||
To 2005-06 For Actual Statutory Expenditures |
35,737
|
|||
To 2005-06 From Treasury Board Vote 5 Contingency Funding |
793
|
|||
To 2005-06 For Funding Lapsed at Year-End |
(25,686)
|
|||
Adjustments: | ||||
To Planned Spending Levels | ||||
Extended mission deployment in Afghanistan |
91,000
|
440,000
|
484,000
|
|
Civilian Pay Raises |
17,441
|
13,315
|
9,499
|
|
Earthquake disaster relief in Pakistan - Op PLATEAU |
9,631
|
|||
Obtaining Secure Radios for On-Water Response Teams - Marine Security |
7,700
|
|||
Recruitment Advertising |
7,500
|
|||
Hurricane disaster relief in the United Sates of America - Op UNISON |
6,678
|
|||
Military Pay Raises |
6,463
|
6,463
|
6,463
|
|
Reinvestment of the proceeds from the sale of real property |
3,589
|
|||
Marine Information Management Data Exchange (MIMDEX) |
2,500
|
1,500
|
||
Public Security Technical Program (PSTP) |
2,870
|
3,337
|
3,337
|
|
Pension Administration |
1,774
|
1,691
|
||
Strengthening High Frequency Surface Wave Radar - Marine Security |
600
|
600
|
1,400
|
|
Reinvestment of the royalties from intellectual property |
9
|
|||
CRTI - Investment - Security - Budget 2001 |
34,920
|
34,920
|
||
Modifying Canadian Patrol Frigates - Marine Security |
5,600
|
|||
Marine Security - Budget 2001 |
1,100
|
|||
Transfers to Other Government Departments |
(4,163)
|
|||
Planned Procurement Savings |
(62,310)
|
|||
Budget 2005 Announcement | ||||
Strategic Capital Investments |
25,747
|
366,300
|
1,063,796
|
|
Budget 2005 Announcement | ||||
Canada First -Non Capital Investments |
399,660
|
602,301
|
937,357
|
|
- Strategic Capital Investments |
156,905
|
735,259
|
645,292
|
|
Royal Canadian Air Force Memorial Museum |
1,000
|
|||
Total Adjustments |
1,257,312
|
674,594
|
2,211,286
|
3,187,164
|
Net Planned Spending1 |
$14,682,343
|
$15,463,816
|
$17,355,422
|
$19,317,790
|
Less: Non-Respendable revenue |
(12,782)
|
(875)
|
(25,899)
|
(905)
|
Plus: Cost of services without charge |
569,074
|
544,349
|
550,463
|
555,991
|
Net Cost of Program* |
$15,238,635
|
$16,007,291
|
$17,879,986
|
$19,872,876
|
Full Time Equivalents |
84,758
|
87,630
|
89,897
|
92,018
|
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.
Notes:
1. This decrease in revenue is due mostly to a planned decrease in recoveries for foreign military training in Canada.
2. The FY 2007-08 estimates include $25 million in non-respendable revenue pertaining to the negotiated payment due from Germany related to its share of the costs of any future cleanup of the training area at CFB Shilo of unexploded ordinance.
Table 1a: Crosswalk of Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA) to Program Activity Architecture (PAA)
This table is presented for information only in the interest of continuity and comparability to previous years.
Crosswalk of Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA) to Program Activity Architecture (PAA)for fiscal year 2006-2007
|
||||
($ Thousands) |
Generate and sustain relevant, responsive and effective combat capable, integrated forces
|
Conduct operations |
Contribute to Canadian government, society and international community in accordance with Canadian interests and values
|
Totals |
Maritime Command |
671,482
|
20,421
|
45,840
|
737,743
|
Land Force Command |
1,116,663
|
13,232
|
109,800
|
1,239,696
|
Air Command |
654,121
|
57,817
|
187,486
|
899,424
|
Operations |
104,358
|
813,608
|
6,980
|
924,946
|
Communications Security |
5,964
|
225,051
|
-
|
231,014
|
Research & Development |
260,281
|
1,840
|
27,797
|
289,918
|
Information Management |
273,196
|
79,042
|
13,222
|
365,461
|
Human Resources |
5,387,242
|
488,275
|
191,073
|
6,066,590
|
Infrastructure & Environment Programs |
205,957
|
8,088
|
107,509
|
321,554
|
Material Acquisition & Support |
3,869,317
|
267,330
|
57,625
|
4,194,272
|
Grants & Contributions not Specifically Allocated |
12,511
|
-
|
180,688
|
193,199
|
Total* |
$12,561,091
|
$1,974,706
|
$928,019
|
$15,463,816
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.
Note: Treasury Board has released the Management, Resources and Results Structure Policy (MRRS) requiring departments to define how they plan and manage diverse programs and related activities, allocate resources and achieve and report on results, effective April 1, 2005. A departmental MRRS is to have three elements: a Program Activity Architecture (PAA); clearly defined and measurable Strategic Outcomes; and a description of the current Governance Structure, which outlines the decision-making mechanisms, responsibilities and accountabilities of the department. An Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA) for the Department of National Defence was submitted pending development of a preferred architecture. The long-term solution for the PAA has been developed and will be in place for 2006-2007 onward. The crosswalk table above is illustrative of how the planned spending for 2006-2007 would have been allocated under the Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA).
Table 1b: Crosswalk of Planning Reporting Accountability Structure (PRAS) to Program Activity Architecture (PAA)
This table is presented for information only in the interest of continuity and comparability to previous years.
Crosswalk of Planning Reporting Accountability Structure (PRAS) to Program Activity Architecture (PAA)for fiscal year 2006-2007
|
||||
($ Thousands) |
Generate and sustain relevant, responsive and effective combat capable, integrated forces
|
Conduct operations |
Contribute to Canadian government, society and international community in accordance with Canadian interests and values
|
Total |
Command and Control |
1,132,661
|
428,032
|
42,7544
|
1,603,447
|
Conduct Operations |
3,884,289
|
603,417
|
167,036
|
4,654,742
|
Sustain Forces |
5,154,427
|
656,772
|
430,367
|
6,241,566
|
Generate Forces |
2,096,109
|
229,354
|
102,657
|
2,428,120
|
Corporate Policy and Strategy |
293,606
|
57,129
|
185,205
|
535,941
|
Total* |
$12,561,091
|
$1,974,706
|
928,019
|
$15,463,816
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.
Note: The Treasury Board has rescinded the Planning, Reporting, and Accountability Structure (PRAS) policy that determined the format under which departments reported to Parliament. The PRAS has been replaced with a new policy that will strengthen accountability and reporting by aligning and integrating information with how departments manage resources and how these resources are linked to strategic outcomes. The crosswalk table above is illustrative of how the planned spending for 2006-2007 would have been allocated under the PRAS.
Table 2: Program by Activity
2006 - 2007
|
|||||||||
Program Activity($ Thousands)
|
Budgetary
|
Total Main Estimates
|
Adjustments (Planned Spending Not in Main Estimates)
|
Total Planned Spending
|
|||||
Operating
|
Capital
|
Grants
|
Contributions
|
Gross
|
Revenue
|
||||
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces |
10,164,571
|
2,097,281
|
148
|
20,381
|
12,282,381
|
(154,125)
|
12,128,256
|
432,835
|
12,561,091
|
Conduct Operations |
1,586,045
|
145,265
|
-
|
-
|
1,731,310
|
(3,229)
|
1,728,081
|
246,625
|
1,974,706
|
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values |
936,761
|
25,285
|
5,335
|
176,852
|
1,144,233
|
(211,348)
|
(4,866)
|
932,885
|
928,019
|
Total* |
$12,687,377
|
$2,267,832
|
$5,483
|
$197,233
|
$15,157,925
|
($368,703)
|
$14,789,222
|
$674,594
|
$15,463,816
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.
Table 3: Voted and Statutory Items Listed in Main Estimates
Vote or Statutory Item ($ Thousands)
|
2006-2007 Main Estimates
|
2005-2006 Main Estimates
|
|
1
|
Operating expenditures
|
11,155,813
|
9,861,479
|
5
|
Capital expenditures
|
2,267,832
|
2,247,930
|
10
|
Grants and contributions
|
191,721
|
187,819
|
(S)
|
Minister of National Defence salary and motor car allowance
|
73
|
70
|
(S)
|
Payments under the Supplementary Retirement Benefits Acts
|
9,000
|
9,500
|
(S)
|
Payments under Parts I-IV of the Defence Services Pension Continuation Act (R.S., 1970 c. D-3)
|
1,900
|
2,100
|
(S)
|
Payments to dependants of certain members of the Royal Canadian Air Force killed while serving as instructors under the British Commonwealth Air Training
Plan (Appropriation Act No. 4, 1968)
|
95
|
95
|
(S)
|
Contributions to employee benefit plans - Members of the Military
|
903,931
|
875,102
|
(S)
|
Contributions to employee benefit plans
|
258,857
|
240,936
|
Total Department
|
$14,789,222
|
$13,425,031
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
Note: The Main Estimates of 2006-2007 are $1,364.2 million higher than the Main Estimates of 2005-2006. This increase can be explained by the following: $500 million to address the shortfall in operating budgets (Sustainability), $497.7 million for Pay and Allowance increases for Military and Civilian personnel, $231 million to fund operations in Afghanistan, $169 million to partially offset the loss of purchasing power due to price increases, $100 million to fund the expansion of the Canadian Forces, $37.7 million to fund the clean-up of contaminated sites, offset by a $128 million reduction to fund the Department's share of the Expenditure Review Committee reallocations and $43.2 million in reductions for transfers and technical adjustments.
Table 4: Services Received Without Charge
($ Thousands) | ||
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)
|
72,407
|
|
Contributions covering employer's share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (excluding revolving
funds) Employer's contribution to employees' insured benefits plans and expenditures paid by TBS 459,741 Workers compensation coverage provided by Social
Development Canada
|
459,741
|
|
Workers compensation coverage provided by Social Development Canada
|
9,391
|
|
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada
|
2,810
|
|
2006-2007 Services received without charge*
|
$544,349
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
Table 5: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity
($ Thousands)
|
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|||
Defence Services Program
|
|||||||
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces
|
2,070,255
|
2,290,763
|
3,353,375
|
4,278,419
|
|||
Conduct Operations
|
143,159
|
181,778
|
194,770
|
197,725
|
|||
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values
|
23,987
|
27,069
|
25,619
|
25,653
|
|||
Total *
|
$2,237,401
|
$2,499,6091
|
$3,573,764
|
$4,501,797
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
Note 1: The Total Capital Spending of $2,267,832 thousand reported on Table 2 Program by Activity equals the capital portion of the Main Estimates for fiscal year 2006-07. This capital table is showing $2,499,609 thousand for fiscal year 2006-07. The increase of $231,777 thousand is the adjustment from the Main Estimates to the Planned Spending figure for the extended mission deployment in Afghanistan, Marine Security Initiatives, Budget 2005 and 2006 Announcements items net of other various technical adjustments.
Table 6: Loans, Investments and Advances (Non-Budgetary)
($ Thousands)
|
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|||
Defence Services Program
|
|||||||
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces
|
|||||||
Imprest Accounts, Standing Advances and Authorized Loans2
|
3,130
|
(2,274)
|
2,325
|
(2,325)
|
|||
Canadian Forces Housing Projects3
|
(48)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Conduct Operations
|
|||||||
Imprest Accounts, Standing Advances and Authorized Loans2
|
321
|
(390)
|
339
|
(339)
|
|||
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values
|
|||||||
Imprest Accounts, Standing Advances and Authorized Loans2
|
280
|
(336)
|
336
|
(336)
|
|||
NATO Damage Claims1
|
29
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|||
Total *
|
$3,712
|
($2,994)
|
$3,006
|
($2,994)
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
Note:
1. Article VIII of the NATO Status of Forces Agreement signed April 4, 1949, as amended, deals with claims for damages to third parties arising from accidents in which a member of a visiting force involved. This account is charged with the amount recoverable from other states, for claims for damages amount recoverable from other states, for claims for damages that took place in Canada, and is credited with recoveries.
2. This account was established for the purpose of financing: (a) public funds imprest and public funds advance accounts; (b) standing advances; (c) authorized loans and advances to employees posted abroad; and (d) authorized recoverable advances to establish military messes and canteens. The total amount authorized to be outstanding at any time is $120,000,000 as last amended by National Defence Vote L11b, Appropriation Act No. 4, 2001–2002.
3. Advances have been made to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in respect of loans arranged by the Corporation for housing projects for occupancy by members of the Canadian Forces. The remaining loan was repaid in full during the fiscal year 2005–2006.
Table 7: Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue
($ Thousands)
|
Actual Revenue
2005-2006 |
Planned Revenue
2006-2007 |
Planned Revenue
2007-2008 |
Planned Revenue
2008-2009 |
|||
Respendable Revenue
|
|||||||
Defence Services Program
|
|||||||
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces
|
|||||||
Recoveries from Members
|
128,602
|
119,842
|
120,944
|
122,589
|
|||
Recoveries from OGDs
|
4,382
|
3,979
|
4,015
|
4,070
|
|||
Recoveries from Other Governments/UN/NATO
|
1,109
|
828
|
835
|
847
|
|||
Other Recoveries
|
48,301
|
29,476
|
29,747
|
30,151
|
|||
Subtotal
|
182,394
|
154,125
|
155,541
|
157,657
|
|||
Conduct Operations
|
|||||||
Recoveries from Members
|
379
|
353
|
315
|
304
|
|||
Recoveries from OGDs
|
43
|
39
|
35
|
34
|
|||
Recoveries from Other Governments/UN/NATO
|
3,661
|
2,732
|
2,437
|
2,357
|
|||
Other Recoveries
|
172
|
105
|
94
|
91
|
|||
Subtotal
|
4,255
|
3,229
|
2,881
|
2,786
|
|||
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values
|
|||||||
Recoveries from Members
|
660
|
615
|
627
|
626
|
|||
Recoveries from OGDs
|
13,791
|
12,524
|
12,768
|
12,745
|
|||
Recoveries from Other Governments/UN/NATO
|
261,880
|
195,4541
|
199,260
|
198,913
|
|||
Other Recoveries
|
4,515
|
2,755
|
2,809
|
2,804
|
|||
Subtotal
|
280,846
|
211,348
|
215,464
|
215,088
|
|||
Total Respendable Revenue
|
$467,494
|
$368,703
|
$373,886
|
$375,531
|
|||
Non-Respendable Revenue
|
|||||||
Defence Services Program
|
|||||||
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interests and Values
|
12,782
|
875
|
25,899
|
905
|
|||
Total Non-Respendable Revenue
|
$12,782
|
$875
|
$25,8992
|
$905
|
|||
Total Respendable Revenue and Non-respendable Revenue*
|
$480,276
|
$369,578
|
$399,785
|
$376,436
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.
Notes:
1. This decrease in revenue is due mostly to a planned decrease in recoveries for foreign military training in Canada.
2. The FY 2007-08 estimates include $25 million in non-respendable revenue pertaining to the negotiated payment due from Germany related to its share of the costs of any future cleanup of the training area at CFB Shilo of unexploded ordinance.
Table 8: Cost Estimates for CF International Operations
|
FY 2005-2006
($MILLIONS)Actuals |
FY 2006-2007
($MILLIONS)Estimates |
|||||
Operations
|
Full DND Cost
|
Incremental DND Cost
|
Full DND Cost
|
Incremental DND Cost
|
|||
Africa
|
|||||||
UNAMSIL – OP REPTILE (Sierra Leone)
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
IMATT – OP SCULPTURE (Sierra Leone)
|
1.6
|
0.5
|
1.6
|
0.5
|
|||
MONUC – OP CROCODILE (DRC)
|
1.2
|
0.4
|
1.2
|
0.4
|
|||
UNAMIS – OP SAFARI (Khartoum, Sudan)
|
4.9
|
2.0
|
2.6
|
1.0
|
|||
AMIS – OP AUGURAL (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)
|
50.2
|
49.0
|
18.6
|
17.4
|
|||
Sub-Total
|
58.1
|
52.0
|
24.0
|
19.3
|
|||
Arabian Gulf Region and South West Asia
|
|||||||
OP ALTAIR (South-west Asia)
|
23.5
|
10.5
|
25.5
|
11.4
|
|||
OP APOLLO (Afghanistan and Persian Gulf)
|
9.4
|
9.4
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
OP ATHENA – ISAF NATO (Afghanistan) 316.4 87.5 1,017.0 426.7
|
316.4
|
87.5
|
1,017.0
|
426.7
|
|||
OP PLATEAU (Pakistan)
|
25.0
|
9.6
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
UNAMI – OP IOLAUS (Iraq)
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
|||
Sub-Total
|
1,123.7
|
431.3
|
1,442.2
|
605.5
|
|||
Americas and the Caribbean
|
|||||||
OP FOUNDATION (US CENTCOM Tampa)
|
0.8
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
0.5
|
|||
OP UNISON (USA)
|
17.4
|
6.7
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
TF HAITI – OP HALO
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
MINUSTAH – OP HAMLET (Haiti)
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
|||
Sub-Total
|
20.1
|
9.0
|
1.1
|
0.5
|
|||
Europe
|
|||||||
OP PALLADIUM – SFOR NATO (Bosnia)
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
OP BRONZE – SFOR NATO (Bosnia)
|
1.3
|
0.5
|
1.3
|
0.5
|
|||
OP BOREAS – EUFOR (Bosnia)
|
5.2
|
2.2
|
1.5
|
0.5
|
|||
OP SEXTANT – NATO (HMCS ATHABASKAN)
|
15.4
|
7.3
|
33.8
|
16.0
|
|||
OP SIRIUS (Sigonella)
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
Closed
|
Closed
|
|||
Sub-Total
|
34.8
|
22.9
|
36.6
|
17.0
|
|||
Middle East
|
|||||||
UNDOF – OP DANACA (Golan Heights)
|
16.0
|
3.2
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|||
MFO (Multinational Force & Observers) – OP CALUMET (Sinai) non-UN
|
3.3
|
0.4
|
3.4
|
0.5
|
|||
UNTSO – OP JADE (Middle East)
|
0.9
|
0.1
|
0.9
|
0.1
|
|||
OP PROTEUS (Jerusalem)
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
2.8
|
0.2
|
|||
UNFICYP – OP SNOWGOOSE (Cyprus)
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
|||
Sub-Total
|
20.6
|
3.9
|
8.3
|
1.9
|
|||
Common Costs
|
|||||||
Others (expenses related to more than one mission)
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|||
Sub-Total
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|||
Total: Operations
|
$1259.5
|
$521.3
|
$1512.2
|
$644.2
|
|||
UN Revenue to CRF
|
MFO Revenue to DND
|
Est UN revenue to CRF
|
Est UN/MFO revenue to DND
|
||||
Revenues/Recoveries
|
$3.3
|
$2.6
|
$1.2
|
$2.6
|
Table 9a: Details on Project Spending — Capital Equipment Program
Projects listed in Table 9a have been identified as either: (1) projects in which the estimated expenditure exceeds the delegated approval authority granted to DND by the Treasury Board ($30 million with substantive cost estimates), or (2) projects in which the risk is particularly high, regardless of the estimated amounts. All major capital equipment projects fall under the Generate and Sustain Integrated Forces program activity.
PROJECT NUMBER | PROJECT TITLE GENERATE AND SUSTAIN INTEGRATED FORCES($Thousands) | PHASE | CURRENT ESTIMATED TOTAL COST | ActualSPENDING TO MARCH 31, 2006 | PLANNED SPENDING 2006-2007 | PLANNED SPENDING 2007-2008 | PLANNED SPENDING 2008-2009 | Future YEARS REQUIRE-MENTS |
MARITIME EFFECTS | ||||||||
1495 | Canadian Patrol Frigate | Close out |
8,931,400
|
8,928,600
|
2,800
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1700 | Tribal Class Update and Modernization Program | Close out |
1,381,800
|
1,381,800
|
500
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2549 | Canadian Submarine Capability Life Extension | Implementation |
896,772
|
701,700
|
68,000
|
68,000
|
40,000
|
19,072
|
2573 | Maritime Environmental Protection Project | Implementation |
54,266
|
43,636
|
2,726
|
710
|
896
|
6,298
|
2586 | Frigate Life Extension | Definition |
26,354
|
2,415
|
10,200
|
9,606
|
0
|
4,133
|
2640 | Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles | Implementation |
503,209
|
421,653
|
61,822
|
6,700
|
3,000
|
10,034
|
2664 | Advanced Electro-optic Sensor | Implementation |
241,274
|
33,105
|
36,040
|
41,578
|
48,889
|
81,662
|
2673 | Joint Support Ship | Definition |
49,300
|
7,242
|
12,991
|
20,951
|
8,116
|
0 |
2680 | Maritime Helicopters | Implementation |
3,160,349
|
427,900
|
385,000
|
364,029
|
687,674
|
1,295,746
|
2796 | YAG 300 Training Vessel Replacement | Implementation |
70,310
|
26,455
|
23,741
|
13,870
|
1,781
|
4,463
|
TOTAL MARITIME EFFECTS |
$15,315,034
|
$11,974,006
|
$603,820
|
$525,444
|
$790,356
|
$1,421,408
|
PROJECT NUMBER | PROJECT TITLE GENERATE AND SUSTAIN INTEGRATED FORCES($Thousands) | PHASE | CURRENT ESTIMATED TOTAL COST | ActualSPENDING TO MARCH 31, 2006 | PLANNED SPENDING 2006-2007 | PLANNED SPENDING 2007-2008 | PLANNED SPENDING 2008-2009 | Future YEARS REQUIRE-MENTS |
LAND EFFECTS | ||||||||
58 | Wheeled Light Armoured Vehicle Life Extension | Implementation |
160,521
|
67,296
|
45,034
|
20,752
|
13,648
|
13,791
|
84 | Army GPS Equipment Replacement | Implementation |
50,210
|
12,119
|
22,105
|
12,641
|
3,345
|
0
|
276 | Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition & Reconnaissance | Definition |
134,715
|
74,400
|
37,900
|
22,415
|
0
|
0
|
731 | Mobile Gun System (MGS) | Definition |
157,713
|
10,600
|
35,100
|
112,013
|
0
|
0
|
1070 | Armoured Patrol Vehicle | Implementation |
83,361
|
27,361
|
43,452
|
0
|
0
|
12,548
|
1436 | Low Level Air Defence Modernization | Implementation |
1,090,678
|
1,069,831
|
16,777
|
2,388
|
0
|
1,682
|
2058 | Weapons Effect Simulator | Implementation |
126,022
|
73,805
|
45,795
|
6,098
|
324
|
0
|
2346 | Medium Support Vehicle System | Definition |
25,798
|
0
|
11,986
|
13,812
|
0
|
0
|
2349 | Light Utility Vehicle Wheeled | Implementation |
297,400
|
242,400
|
53,800
|
1,200
|
0
|
0
|
2536 | Role Three Health Support | Implementation |
40,007
|
39,562
|
445
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2637 | Armoured Personnel Carriers | Implementation |
2,321,350
|
2,027,200
|
129,800
|
84,415
|
61,168
|
18,767
|
2652 | Multi Mission Effects Vehicle | Definition |
93,990
|
710
|
26,890
|
66,390
|
0
|
0
|
2684 | Improved Landmine Detection System | Close out |
33,749
|
31,160
|
2,589
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2731 | Armoured Personnel Carriers Life Extension | Implementation |
345,460
|
309,507
|
35,953
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
TOTAL LAND EFFECTS |
$4,960,974
|
$3,985,951
|
$507,626
|
$342,124
|
$78,485
|
$46,788
|
PROJECT NUMBER | PROJECT TITLE GENERATE AND SUSTAIN INTEGRATED FORCES($Thousands) | PHASE | CURRENT ESTIMATED TOTAL COST | ActualSPENDING TO MARCH 31, 2006 | PLANNED SPENDING 2006-2007 | PLANNED SPENDING 2007-2008 | PLANNED SPENDING 2008-2009 | Future YEARS REQUIRE-MENTS |
AIR EFFECTS | ||||||||
86 | Operational Flight Program | Implementation |
111,521
|
30,234
|
16,424
|
23,679
|
12,122
|
29,062
|
113 | Advanced Distributed Combat Training System | Implementation |
187,742
|
136,175
|
24,160
|
18,032
|
8,688
|
687
|
180 | CF-18 Multi-purpose Display Group Project | Implementation |
98,750
|
61,617
|
91
|
37,042
|
0
|
0
|
273 | CF-18 Advanced Multi-role Infrared Sensor | Implementation |
186,059
|
243
|
44,650
|
85,112
|
37,131
|
18,924
|
295 | Aurora Communication Management System Replacement | Implementation |
89,745
|
54,586
|
13,183
|
12,718
|
7,716
|
1,542
|
317 | Aurora Electro-optical System Replacement | Close out |
50,207
|
44,141
|
4,124
|
1,942
|
0
|
0
|
410 | Aurora - Flight Deck Simulator | Close out |
40,566
|
30,090
|
8,477
|
1,999
|
0
|
0
|
423 | Aurora - Electronic Support Measures Replacements | Implementation |
177,208
|
90,483
|
28,555
|
23,562
|
23,296
|
11,312
|
428 | Aurora - Imaging Radar Acquisition | Implementation |
255,120
|
107,764
|
28,867
|
46,497
|
37,480
|
34,512
|
451 | Primrose Lake Evaluation Range TSPI System | Implementation |
42,333
|
13,676
|
14,010
|
6,482
|
8,165
|
0
|
536 | Aurora - Operator Mission Simulator | Implementation |
44,633
|
5,921
|
1,292
|
3,450
|
9,592
|
24,378
|
583 | CF18 - Engineering Change Proposal 583 | Implementation |
987,309
|
798,534
|
31,657
|
93,540
|
32,634
|
30,944
|
609 | Fixed Wing Search and Rescue Project | Pre-definition |
8,200
|
5,900
|
2,300
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1007 | Medium-to-Heavy Lift Helicopters | Definition |
8,489
|
0
|
8,489
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1117 | Airlift Capability Project - Strategic | Implementation |
1,807,355
|
0
|
132,336
|
731,804
|
645,292
|
297,923
|
1036 | Airlift Capability Project (Tactical) | Definition |
11,834
|
0
|
5,272
|
6,562
|
0v
|
0
|
1686 | CF18 - Advanced Air to Air Weapon - Short Range | Implementation |
36,200
|
20,784
|
88
|
6,794v
|
8,534
|
0
|
2320 | Military Automated Air Traffic System | Implementation |
168,600
|
145,704
|
8,433
|
4,118
|
5,578
|
4,767
|
2371 | Advanced Navigation and Precision Approach | Implementation |
97,737
|
58,328
|
18,809
|
14,509
|
6,091
|
0
|
2517 | Canadian Forces Utility Tactical Transport Helicopters | Implementation |
1,093,152
|
1,070,543
|
11,523
|
11,086
|
0
|
0
|
2526 | Region/Sector Air Operation Centre | Implementation |
134,478
|
122,032
|
7,374
|
5,072
|
0
|
0
|
2619 | Air Combat Manoeuvring Instrumentation System | Implementation |
33,237
|
30,867
|
1,296
|
1,074
|
0
|
0
|
2657 | CC150 Strategic Air-to-Air refuelling (SAAR) | Implementation |
132,112
|
93,002
|
39,110
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2676 | Canadian Search and Rescue Helicopter | Close out |
774,422
|
760,536
|
13,886
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2754 | CF-18 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile | Implementation |
138,489
|
66,632
|
6,854
|
10,909
|
9,124
|
44,970
|
5832 | CF18 - Engineering Change Proposal - Phase 2 | Implementation |
423,281
|
52,610
|
83,444
|
107,858
|
73,636
|
105,733
|
TOTAL AIR EFFECTS |
$7,138,779
|
$3,800,402
|
$554,704
|
$1,253,841
|
$925,079
|
$604,754
|
PROJECT NUMBER | PROJECT TITLE GENERATE AND SUSTAIN INTEGRATED FORCES($Thousands) | PHASE | CURRENT ESTIMATED TOTAL COST | ActualSPENDING TO MARCH 31, 2006 | PLANNED SPENDING 2006-2007 | PLANNED SPENDING 2007-2008 | PLANNED SPENDING 2008-2009 | Future YEARS REQUIRE-MENTS |
JOINT UNIFIED AND SPECIAL OPERATIONS | ||||||||
224 | Defence Information Broker | Implementation |
37,430
|
7,975
|
29,455
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
283 | National Military Support Capability | Implementation |
567,889
|
3,143
|
3,362
|
26,180
|
9,900
|
525,304
|
402 | Canadian Forces Joint Experimentation | Implementation |
31,591
|
4,625
|
500
|
18,778
|
7,688
|
0
|
439 | Allied Vaccine Development Project | Implementation |
31,684
|
19,567
|
0
|
666
|
673
|
10,778
|
625 | Polar Epsilon Joint Space-Based Wide Area Surveillance and Support | Implementation |
49,252
|
1,534
|
12,036
|
14,022
|
16,184
|
5,476
|
2272 | Materiel Acquisition and Support Information System | Implementation |
182,300
|
176,800
|
5,500
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2400 | Defence Integrated Human Resource System | Implementation |
94,565
|
70,612
|
10,500
|
13,453
|
0
|
0
|
2469 | Canadian Forces Command System I (CFCS) | Close out |
65,947
|
57,911
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8,036
|
2475 | Defence Message Handling System | Implementation |
135,239
|
122,393
|
820
|
0
|
0
|
12,026
|
2783 | Identification Friend or Foe Mode S/5 | Implementation |
38,176
|
39
1
|
740
|
6,085
|
6,331
|
24,629
|
2800 | Canadian Forces Health Information System | Implementation |
51,606
|
15,145
|
14,276
|
0
|
0
|
22,185
|
2803 | Protected Military Satellite Communication | Implementation |
551,972
|
307,400
|
55,700
|
52,858
|
34,720
|
101,294
|
XXXX | Clothe The Soldier Omnibus Project | Implementation |
246,254
|
166,149
|
61,828
|
16,510
|
0
|
1,767
|
TOTAL JOINT UNIFIED AND SPECIAL OPERATIONS |
$2,083,905
|
$953,645
|
$194,717
|
$148,552
|
$75,496
|
$711,495
|
||
TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES |
$29,498,691
|
$20,714,003
|
$1,860,867
|
$2,269,961
|
$1,869,416
|
$2,784,444
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister - Materiel
Table 9b: Capital Construction Program – Spending over $60 million
Projects listed below have been identified as either: (1) projects in which the estimated expenditure exceeds the delegated approval authority granted to DND by the Treasury Board ($60 million), or (2) projects in which the risk is particularly high, regardless of the estimated amounts. All major capital construction projects fall under the Generate and Sustain Integrated Forces program activity. For fiscal year 2006-2007, planned spending on major capital construction projects (>$60M) represents 18 % of total planned capital spending on construction.
IN SUPPORT OF GENERATE AND SUSTAIN INTEGRATED FORCES($ Thousands) | CURRENT ESTIMATED COST | CUMULATIVE SPENDING TO MARCH 31, 2006 | PLANNED SPENDING 2006-2007 | PLANNED SPENDING 2007-2008 | PLANNED SPENDING 2008-2009 | FUTURE YEARS REQUIRE-MENTS |
Alberta | ||||||
Upgrade Roads/Utilities (Cold Lake) |
60,627 (I)
|
0
|
2296 (S)
|
7,885 (I)
|
13,439 (I)
|
37,007 (I)
|
British Columbia | ||||||
Replace "A and B" Jetty (PD) |
199,760 (I)
|
480
|
0 (S)
|
1,000 (I)
|
1,400 (I)
|
196,880 (I)
|
FMF Cape Breton (EPA) (PI) |
136,300 (I)
|
92,940
|
13,330 (S)
|
16,900 (I)
|
12,800 (I)
|
330 (I)
|
Colwood Refueling Upgrade (EPA) (PI) |
69,930 (S)
|
64,630
|
5,300 (S)
|
0
|
||
New Brunswick | ||||||
RTA Sedimentation Remediation (Gagetown) (PPA) |
72,680 (I)
|
0
|
3,270 (S)
|
3,810 (I)
|
6,400 (I)
|
59,200 (I)
|
Utilities Upgrade Gagetown (PPA) |
80,400 (I)
|
4,593
|
13,565 (S)
|
21,720 (I)
|
12,839 (I)
|
27,683 (I)
|
Newfoundland | ||||||
Pleasantville Consolidation(PPA) |
88,454 (I)
|
0
|
1,515 (S)
|
4,835 (I)
|
17,732 (I)
|
64,372 (I)
|
Ontario | ||||||
RMC Dormatories (EPA) (PI) |
63,870 (S)
|
20,330
|
19,490 (S)
|
10,180 (S)
|
13,870 (S)
|
0
|
Joint Experimentation Centre Ottawa (EPA) (PI) |
67,327 (S)
|
5,733
|
3,233 (S)
|
24,894 (S)
|
20,928 (S)
|
12,539 (S)
|
Totals |
$839,348
|
$188,706
|
$61,999
|
$91,224
|
$100,408
|
$398,011
|
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Infrastructure and Environment)
* Based on data available as at May 1, 2006. All figures are exclusive of GST/HST
Legend:
I = Indicative Estimate
S = Substantive Estimate
PPA = Preliminary Project Approval
EPA = Effective Project Approval
PD = Project Definition
PI = Project Implementation
HST = Harmonized Sales Tax
For additional information on Federal Real Property and Federal Immovables Act visit: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/F-8.4/index.html
Table 10: Status Report on Major Crown Projects
Status report on Major Crown Projects (Equipment) can be found at:
http://www.vcds.forces.gc.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/MCP-eng.pdf
Table 11: Summary of Transfer Payments Programs
Over the next three years, National Defence will manage the following transfer payment programs in excess of $5 million.
TABLE 11 DETAILS ON TRANSFER PAYMENT PROGRAMS | |||||
Description | Type | Actual Spending 05/06 | Planned Spending 06/07 | Planned Spending 07/08 | Planned Spending 08/09 |
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces | |||||
Supplementary Retirement Benefit Act (SRBA) Payments | STATUTORIES | $7,391,510 | $9,000,000 | $9,000,000 | $9,000,000 |
CONTRIBUTIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CAP) | CONTRIBUTIONS | $0 | $5,450,000 | $5,450,000 | $5,450,0000 |
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interest and Values | |||||
CONTRIBUTION PROGRAM FOR THE PROMOTION OF THE DEFENCE DIPLOMACY OBJECTIVES IMPLEMENTED BY THE MILITARY TRAINING ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME | CONTRIBUTIONS | $9,304,733 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 |
NATO Airborne Early Warning Mid Term Modernization Programme | CONTRIBUTIONS | $68,893,152 | $62,388,000 | $59,285,000 | $52,299,000 |
NATO Military Budget | CONTRIBUTIONS | $47,295,946 | $44,698,000 | $49,375,000 | $54,804,000 |
NATO Security Investment Program | CONTRIBUTIONS | $43,166,460 | $52,110,000 | $56,110,000 | $60,110,000 |
Subtotal Transfer Payments | $176,051,800 | $183,646,000 | $189,220,000 | $191,663,000 | |
Total Transfer Payment | $197,457,613 | $183,646,000 | $189,220,000 | $191,663,000 | |
Percentage of Transfer Payment over $5 million | 89.2% | 90.6% | 89.7% | 89.8% | |
Total Spending per PAA | Actual Spending per PAA 05/06 | Planned Spending per PAA 06/07 | Planned Spending per PAA 07/08 | Planned Spending per PAA 08/09 | |
Generate and Sustain Relevant, Responsive and Effective Combat-Capable Integrated Forces | 15,120,274 | 20,528,530 | 23,104,450 | 23,182,650 | |
Contribute to Canadian Government, Society and International Community in Accordance with Canadian Interest and Values | 182,337,339 | 182,187,682 | 187,826,824 | 190,265,019 | |
Total | $197,457,613 | $202,716,212 | $210,931,274 | $213,447,669 |
Further information on these projects can be found at:
http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/transpay-eng.pdf
Table 12: Alternative Service Delivery
Over the next three years, National Defence will use new and proposed ASD initiatives for the following programs and /or services.
Further information on these ASD initiatives can be found at:
http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/asd-fra.pdf
Table 13: Audits and Evaluations
A list of upcoming internal audits and /or evaluations can be found at:
http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/aud-eng.pdf
Table 14: Sustainable Development Strategies
The following table includes some commitments made by National Defence to green its operations. At a government-wide level, these activities are co-ordinated by the Office of Greening Government Operations (OGGO) at PWGSC, which includes work toward common governance, measurement, and reporting methods across departments.
National Defence | |
Points to Address | Departmental Input |
1. How does your department / agency plan to incorporate Sustainable Development (SD) principles and values into your mission, vision, policy and day-to-day operations? | Defence has integrated sustainable development principles and values into its mission, vision, policy and day-to-day operations through an environmental protection and stewardship policy, through awareness briefings at all levels, through a network of environmental specialists working throughout the department and through specialised Unit Environmental Officer training that is provided to military personnel that work in Canada and overseas on deployed operations. Defence also has an advanced environmental assessment capability integrated throughout the department |
2. What Goals, Objectives and Targets from your most recent Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) will you be focusing on this coming year? How will you measure your success? | Defence focuses on all the Goals, Objectives and Targets in its SDS. Success is measured against detailed target reporting criteria and templates that were provided when the SDS was created.The key goals are to: · protect the health of ecosystems through the sustainable use of training areas;· protect human health and the environment through responsible management of hazardous materials by: o reducing the quantity of disposable waste fuel;o reducing the impact of releases of select National Pollutant Release Inventory substances;o reducing contaminated sites liability; ando reducing the liability associated with petroleum fuel storage infrastructure and distribution assets, in general, and aviation fuel in particular; · protect the atmosphere through reduction in the Ozone Depleting Potential of in-service systems and equipment using halocarbons and reduce Green House Gas emissions; and· integrate environmental considerations fully into Defence management processes, systems and activities through integration of sustainable buildings concepts into the design process, and promulgate a Defence Green Procurement policy. |
3. Identify any SD tools, such as Strategic Environmental Assessments or Environmental Management Systems that will be applied over the next year. | Defence updates its SDS on a three-year cycle and so tends to use a three-year planning timeframe rather than an annual one. Defence uses Environmental Assessments, Environmental Management Systems, integrated land use planning for Defence training areas, and is developing a toolbox of physical and remote sensing indicators for sustainability in Defence training areas. In addition, Defence uses a series of training courses to develop awareness and the necessary skill sets to implement sustainable development concepts. |
Table 15: Personnel Requirements – Military (Regular Force) by PAA1
PROGRAM ACTIVITY | ACTUAL FTE 2005-2006 | PLANNED FTE 2006-2007 | PLANNED FTE 2007-2008 | PLANNED FTE 2008-2009 |
Generate and sustain relevant, responsive and effective combat capable, integrated forces 2 | 55,202 | 56,890 | 57,948 | 58,801 |
Conduct Operations 2 | 5,600 | 5,600 | 5,600 | 5,600 |
Contribute to Canadian government, society and international community in accordance with Canadian interests and values 2 | 938 | 971 | 971 | 971 |
Total | 61,740 | 63,461 | 64,519 | 65,372 |
Source: Chief Military Personnel (CMP)(formerly Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Military)
1 Planned FTEs reflect the Regular Force Expansion of 5,000 announced in Budget 2005 and include Class C Reserves. The table above does not factor in the
additional personnel announced in Budget 2006 since planning details for this additional expansion have not been fnialized.
2 These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.
Table 16: Personnel Requirements – Civilian by PAA1
PROGRAM ACTIVITY | ACTUAL FTE 2005-2006 | PLANNED FTE 2006-2007 | PLANNED FTE 2007-2008 | PLANNED FTE 2008-2009 |
Generate and sustain relevant, responsive and effective combat capable, integrated forces 2 | 19,399 | 20,370 | 21,388 | 22,458 |
Conduct Operations 2 | 2,243 | 2,355 | 2,473 | 2,596 |
Contribute to Canadian government, society and international community in accordance with Canadian interests and values 2 | 1,376 | 1,444 | 1,517 | 1,592 |
Total | 23,018 | 24,169 | 25,378 | 26,646 |
Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian) - extracted from incumbent files from the PWGSC On-Line pay system.
1 Includes interim Communications Security Establishment (CSE) FTE's pending review by CSE. Interim CSE FTE's are based on RPP 2005-2006 planned FTE for
fiscal year 2005-2006, and increased by 5% for every subsequent year.
2 These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.
Table 17: Personnel Requirements – Combined Military and Civilian by PAA
PROGRAM ACTIVITY | ACTUAL FTE 2005-2006 | PLANNED FTE 2006-2007 | PLANNED FTE 2007-2008 | PLANNED FTE 2008-2009 |
Generate and sustain relevant, responsive and effective combat capable, integrated forces | 74,601 | 77,260 | 79,336 | 81,259 |
Conduct Operations | 7,843 | 7,955 | 8,073 | 8,196 |
Contribute to Canadian government, society and international community in accordance with Canadian interests and values | 2,314 | 2,415 | 2,4885 | 2,563 |
Total | 84,758 | 87,630 | 89,897 | 92,018 |
Source: Chief Military Personnel and Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian)
1 These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.
Table 1: Reserve Force
Primary Reserve Full Cost Estimate
The Primary Reserve accounts for 7.4% of the total Defence Services Program. The expenditures are divided into four categories: direct, indirect, attributed and capital costs. This method of reporting is intended to provide greater clarity on the makeup of the total costs of the Primary Reserve.
Direct expenditures include funds specifically budgeted for the Primary Reserve such as pay, travel and goods and services which are locally procured.
Indirect expenditures reflect the Primary Reserve share of departmental resources, which are controlled centrally. Included are ammunition, equipment operating costs, clothing and the cost of maintaining facilities such as armouries.
Indirect expenditures reflect the Primary Reserve share of departmental resources, which are controlled centrally. Included are ammunition, equipment operating costs, clothing and the cost of maintaining facilities such as armouries.
Attributed expenditures are departmental overhead costs, which are allocated for reporting purposes to all activities including the Primary Reserve. In reality, these costs do not vary directly as a function of activity and would largely be incurred whether the Primary Reserve existed or not.
Capital expenditures are shown for the year in which payments have been made, and do not reflect an amortization of cost over the life of the asset. The capital expenditures can vary significantly from one year to the next, depending on priorities established within the capital equipment plan and the cash flow requirements of individual projects.
Primary Reserve Planned Expenditures
Type of Expenditure ($Thousands) |
Actual Expenditures 2005-2006
|
Planned Expenditures 2006-2007
|
Direct Expenditures | ||
Pay 1 | 538,570 | 529,572 |
Regular Support Staff | 138,140 | 137,296 |
Operating | 82,757 | 79,118 |
Subtotal | 759,467 | 745,986 |
Indirect Expenditures | ||
Ammunition | 17,277 | 29,848 |
Equipment Usage | 64,799 | 66,973 |
Clothing | 12,625 | 12,561 |
Facility Operating | 29,166 | 29,497 |
Subtotal | 123,867 | 138,879 |
Attributed Expenditures | ||
Base Support | 191,294 | 193,876 |
Training | 7,853 | 8,112 |
Subtotal | 199,147 | 201,988 |
Subtotal Primary Reserve | ||
Operating Costs | 1,082,481 | 1,086,852 |
Capital Expenditures | ||
Dedicated Capital | 18,408 | 21,942 |
Shared Capital | 58,094 | 36,975 |
Subtotal | 76,502 | 58,917 |
Total Primary Reserve Costs | $1,158,983 | $1,145,769 |
Source: Vice Chief of the Defence Staff and Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance - Corporate Services)
1Planned expenditures for pay in 2006-07 does not include anticipated requirements for support to deploy
operations. These expenditures totalled approximately $3.5 million in 2005-06. Planned spending for pay in 2006-07 may increase as the expansion of the Reserve
Force progresses and the number of Reserve Force personnel required to backfill Regular Force positions on a temporary basis is confirmed.
2Direct pay and operating amounts do not reflect forecasted/planned spending involving members of the Canadian
Rangers, the Cadet Instructors Cadre or the Supplementary Reserve sub-components. They do however include the cost of employing Primary Reservists in positions
that would normally be occupied be occupied by the Regular Force.
Table 2: Communications Security Establishment
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|
Vote 1 - Salary and Personnel | 117,824 | 114,378 | 114,193 | 114,193 |
Vote 1 - Operating and Maintenance | 62,973 | 71,381 | 58,136 | 58,520 |
Sub-total Vote 1 | $180,797 | $185,759 | $172,329 | $172,713 |
Vote 5 - Capital | 29,963 | 39,977 | 37,958 | 38,527 |
Grand total1 | $210,760 | $225,736 | $210,287 | $211,240 |
Source: Communications Security Establishment and Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
Note:
1Variation of the Grand total between 05-06 and 06-07 is explained by a carry forward of $7.7M for activities
related to Support for Lawful Access. Also, renewal of Public Security and Anti-Terrorism-Critical Infrastructure Program (PSAT-CIP) starting in 07-08 for
$8.2M is pending approval by Treasury Board.
Table 3: Office of the Judge Advocate General
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|
Vote 1 - Salary and Personnel 1 |
4,494
|
5,516
|
5,523
|
5,530
|
Vote 1 - Operating and Maintenance1 |
2,475
|
2,946
|
2,951
|
3,138
|
Sub-total Vote 1 |
$6,969
|
$8,462
|
$8,474
|
$8,668
|
Vote 5 - Capital |
-
|
153
|
153
|
|
Grand total |
$6,969
|
$8,615
|
$8,627
|
$8,821
|
Corporate Account | ||||
Vote 1 - Crown Liabilities |
215
|
222
|
225
|
229
|
Grand Total |
$7,184
|
$8,837
|
$8,852
|
$9,050
|
Source: Office of the Judge Advocate General and Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
Note:
1 Vote 1 - Salary and Personnel & Vote 1 - Operating and Maintenance: Actual Spending is lower than Planned
Spending as a result of vacant positions during FY 2005/2006. Planned Spending are based on operating with positions being fully staffed
Table 4: Office of the Ombudsman for the Department of National Defence and the CF
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|
Vote 1 - Salary and Personnel |
3,388
|
3,765
|
3,765
|
3,765
|
Vote 1 - Operating and Maintenance |
1,998
|
2,565
|
2,603
|
2,643
|
Sub-total Vote 1 |
$5,386
|
$6,330
|
$6,368
|
$6,408
|
Vote 5 - Capital |
54
|
187
|
190
|
192
|
Grand total |
$5,440
|
$6,517
|
$6,558
|
$6,600
|
Source: Office of the Ombudsman for National Defence and the Canadian Forces and Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
Table 5: Defence Research and Development Canada
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|
Vote 1 - Salary and Personnel |
102,139
|
96,869
|
95,998
|
96,998
|
Sub-total Vote 1 Salary and Personnel |
102,139
|
96,869
|
95,998
|
96,998
|
Vote 1 - Operating and Maintenance |
35,306
|
36,344
|
36,670
|
36,670
|
Vote 1 - Research & Development Contracts |
90,964
|
92,245
|
83,705
|
86,094
|
Vote 1 - Environment |
1,488
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
Vote 1 - Canadian Centre for Mine Action Technologies (CCMAT) |
2,399
|
1,000
|
||
Vote 1 - Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Research and Technology Initiative (CRTI) 1 |
29,158
|
35,180
|
10,500
|
7,000
|
Vote 1 - Revenue |
(4,687)
|
(3,500)
|
(3,500)
|
(3,500)
|
Sub-total Vote 1 Operating and Maintenance |
154,628
|
163,269
|
129,375
|
128,264
|
Total Vote 1 2. |
$ 256,767
|
$ 260,138
|
$ 225,373
|
$ 225,262
|
Vote 5 - Capital |
13,216
|
6,981
|
7,490
|
7,650
|
Vote 5 - Counter-Terrorism Technology Centre (CTTC) |
5,300
|
2,500
|
||
Vote 5 - Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Research and Technology Initiative (CRTI) |
2,501
|
3,000
|
||
Total Vote 5 |
21,017
|
12,481
|
7,490
|
7,650
|
Grand total |
$277,784
|
$272,619
|
$232,863
|
$232,912
|
Source: Defence Research and Development Canada and Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown
Notes:
1 Vote 1 - CRTI starting fiscal year 2007-2008 are reprofiled amounts as Treasury Board Submission for new CRTI
funding from fiscal year 2007-2008 onwards is in progress.
2 Vote 1 - Overall decrease starting in fiscal year 2007-2008 and on-going is largely the result of Expenditure
Review Committee reductions.
Table 6: National Search and Rescue Secretariat
Resource Overview
The following tables reflect the federal partners' forecasts of the financial and personnel resources allocated to the National SAR Program. These resources are included in individual departmental RPPs and are presented here as collective resource information for the horizontal National SAR Program.
Table 6a: Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
($ Thousands) |
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
Vote 1 - Salary and Personnel |
1,227
|
1,567
|
1,567
|
1,567
|
Vote 1 - Operating and Maintenance |
876
|
1,052
|
1,058
|
1,101
|
Sub-total Vote 1 |
$2,103
|
$2,619
|
$2,625
|
$2,668
|
Vote 5 - Capital 1 |
104
|
993
|
2,348
|
3,360
|
Vote 10 - Grants and Contributions 2 |
3,665
|
3,518
|
4,215
|
4,215
|
Grand total |
$5,872
|
$7,130
|
$9,188
|
$10,243
|
Source: National Search and Rescue Secretariat and Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)
Notes:
1. Vote 5 includes $95K for National Search and Rescue Secretariat (NSS) Minor Capital plus funding for Search and Rescue New Initiatives Fund (SAR NIF)
projects.
The above figures are net of transfers to other government departments and to other Department of National Defence organizations for SAR NIF projects: $7,048K
for FY 2006-07, $1,847K for FY 2007-08 and $836K for FY 2008-09.
2. Vote 10 includes $215K contribution as Canada’s share of the costs for the COSPAS-SARSAT (Cosmicheskaya Sistyema Poiska Avariynich Sudov –
Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking) Secretariat plus SAR NIF projects.
Table 6b: Search and Rescue (SAR) Personnel Requirements (FTEs)
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
|
National Search and Rescue Secretariat |
20
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
Environment Canada - Meteorological Service of Canada |
17
|
17
|
17
|
17
|
Parks Canada |
64
|
64
|
64
|
64
|
Department of Fisheries and Oceans - Canadian Coast Guard 1 |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Department of National Defence - Canadian Forces |
699
|
706
|
706
|
706
|
RCMP 2 |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Transport Canada 3 |
U/R
|
U/R
|
U/R
|
U/R
|
Source: National Search and Rescue Secretariat
Notes:
1FTE figures for the Canadian Coast Guard were not available because CCG operations involve multi-tasking.
2The RCMP is unable to provide exact costs as it relates to personnel requirements due to the fact that personnel are tasked with a wide variety of duties one of which is SAR. The SAR expenditures nationally would be substantial.
3TC has no mandate for primary SAR response and does not identify or dedicate resources to these activities. The level of personnel commitment to SAR prevention work is under review.
Table 6c: Costs by participating department/organization
Resources - Financial ($ 000's) by Fiscal Year | ||||
($ Thousands) |
Actual Spending 2005-2006
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007
|
Planned Spending 2007-2008
|
Planned Spending 2008-2009
|
National Search and Rescue Secretariat |
5,872
|
9,478
|
10,188
|
10,870
|
Environment Canada - Meteorological Service of Canada |
2,100
|
2,100
|
2,100
|
2,100
|
Parks Canada |
5,959
|
4,929
|
4,929
|
4,929
|
Department of Fisheries and Oceans - Canadian Coast Guard |
104,131
|
93,460
|
93,460
|
U/R
|
Department of National Defence - Canadian Forces 1 |
110,876
|
87,931
|
105,269
|
U/R
|
RCMP 2 |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Transport Canada 3 |
U/R
|
U/R
|
U/R
|
U/R
|
Total |
$228,938
|
$197,898
|
$215,946
|
$17,899
|
Source: National Search and Rescue Secretariat
Notes:
1FThe decrease in the estimate from 2005-06 to 2006-07 is mainly due to the SARSAT Project and the Canadian Search and Rescue Helicopter (CSH) Project being closed. Increases in the estimates in 2007-08 are due to the Fixed Wing Search and Rescue Aircraft (FWSAR) project.
2FAs the resource allocations for SAR are provided under provincial auspices no figures are available for RCMP federal SAR activity. The RCMP supports other departments with multi-tasked assets when required.
3FTC has no mandate for primary SAR response and does not identify or dedicate resources to these activities. The level of financial commitment to SAR prevention work is under review. (U/R).
The Minister of National Defence is responsible to Parliament for many statutes, and is assigned relevant responsibilities in the administration of many laws and regulations. The comprehensive list is available at:
http:// www.vcds.forces.gc.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/appA-eng.pdf
DND and the CF work with many partners in Canada and abroad that help support the Defence mission, programs and activities. The broad scope of the Defence mandate is reflected in the complexity and diversity of its partners and stakeholders. To view the comprehensive list of Defence partners and stakeholders, visit:
http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/appB-eng.pdf
Plans and Priorities Information
LGen W.J. Natynczyk Vice Chief of the Defence Staff National Defence Headquarters 101 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K2 |
Telephone: (613) 992-6052 Facsimile: (613) 992-3945 |
Financial Information
Mr. R.G. Monette Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services) National Defence Headquarters 101 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K2 |
Telephone: (613) 992-5669 Facsimile: (613) 992-9693 |
General Inquiries
Public Inquiries Office Mr. Ken Ready Assistant Deputy Minister(Public Affairs) National Defence Headquarters 101 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K2 |
Telephone: (613) 996-0562 Facsimile: (613) 995-2610 Email: Ready.KF@forces.gc.ca |
Internet sites on the World Wide Web
Department of National Defence | http://www.forces.gc.ca |
Office of the Judge Advocate General | http://www.forces.gc.ca/jag/main-eng.asp |
Office of the Ombudsman for National Defence and the Canadian Forces | www.ombudsman.forces.gc.ca/ |
National Search and Rescue Secretaritat | http://www.nss.gc.ca/ |
Defence Research & Development Canada | http://www.drdc-rddc.gc.ca |
Communications Security Establishment | http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca |
Defence Planning and Management | http://www.vcds.forces.gc.ca/DPOnline/main-eng.asp |
Defence Plan On-Line | http://www.vcds.dnd.ca/dgsp/pubs/dp_m/management-eng.asp |
A
|
|
ADR | Alternative Dispute Resolution |
AOR | Area of Operational Responsibility |
ASD | Alternative Service Delivery |
ASR | Army Support Restructure |
AWACS | Airborne Early Warning System (NATO |
C
|
|
C2 | Command and Control |
C4ISR | Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance |
CANOSCOM | Canadian Operational Support Command |
CANSOFCOM | Canadian Special Operations Forces Command |
CBP | Capability-Based Planning |
CBRN | Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear |
CDS | Chief of the Defence Staff |
CEFCOM | Canadian Expeditionary Force Command |
CF | Canadian Forces |
CF H Svcs Gp | CF Health Services Group |
CFSS | Canadian Forces Supply System |
CIDA | Canadian International Development Agency |
CIS | Communication and Information System |
CMTC | Canadian Manoeuvre Training Centre |
COSPAS-SARSAT | Cosmicheskaya Sistyema Poiska Avariynich Sudov - Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking> |
CRSs | Chief Review Service |
CSEt | Communications Security Establishmen |
CTTC | Counter-Terrorism Technology Centre |
D
|
|
DCP | Defence Capabilities Plan |
DEP | Defence Ethics Program |
DFAIT | Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
DM | Deputy Minister |
DND | Department of National Defence |
DRDC | Defence Research and Development Canada |
E
|
|
EE | Employment Equity |
EPA | Effective Project Approval |
ERP | Enterprise Resource Planning |
F
|
|
FMF | Fleet maintenance Facility |
FOC | Full Operational Capability |
FTE | Full Time Equivalent |
G
|
|
GL | General Labour and Trades Group |
GSAR | Ground Search and Rescue |
H
|
|
HMCS | Her Majesty's Canadian Ship |
HR | Human Resources |
I
|
|
ICSAR | Interdepartmental Committee on Search and Rescue |
IM | Information Management |
IOC | Initial Operational Capability |
IRM | Integrated Risk Management |
IS | Information System |
ISR | Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance |
IT | Information Technology |
IT | IT Infrastructure |
J
|
|
JAG | Judge Advocate General |
JFC | Joint Fusion Capability |
JTF2 | Joint Task Force 2 |
L
|
|
LFC | Land Force Command |
LFRR | Land Force Reserve Restructure |
M
|
|
M | Million |
MARCOM | Maritime Command |
MASIS | Material Acquisition and Support Information Management System |
MH | Maritime Helicopter |
MRP | Managed Readiness Plan |
MRRS | Management, Resources and Results Structure |
N
|
|
NATO | North Atlantic Treaty Organization |
NBCD | Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence |
NDHQ | National Defence Headquarters |
NORAD | North American Aerospace Defence Command |
NSS | National Search and Rescue Secretariat |
O
|
|
OGD | Other Government Department |
P
|
|
PAA | Program Activity Architecture |
PPA | Preliminary Project Approval |
PWGSC | Public Works and Government Services Canada |
Q
|
|
QR&O | Queen's Regulations and Orders |
R
|
|
R&D | Research and Development |
RCMP | Royal Canadian Mounted Police |
RPP | Report on Plans and Priorities |
RRF | Rapid Reaction Force |
S
|
|
SAR | Search and Rescue |
SARSAT | Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking |
SDS | Sustainable Development Strategy |
Supp Res | Supplementary Reserve |
T
|
|
TBS | Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat |
U
|
|
UAV | Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle |
UK | United Kingdom |
UN | United Nations |
US | United States |
V
|
|
VCDS | Vice Chief of the Defence Staff |
1 The Department of National Defence (DND), the Canadian Forces (CF) and the organizations and agencies that make up
the full Defence portfolio are collectively referred to as Defence.
2 The Canadian Forces (CF) comprise four integrated operational commands: Canada Command, Canadian Expeditionary Force
Command, Canadian Special Operations Forces Command and Canadian Operational Support Command as well as three environmental commands: the Navy, Army and Air
Force.
3 National Defence Act, Article 18(1).
4 Includes the initial 5K/3K Force Expansion Program announced in Budget 2005.
5 The Composite Contingency Task Group (CCTG) consists of ships from both Atlantic and Pacific coasts. The CCTG is
required by the navy to deliver on assigned defence tasks. Both Atlantic and Pacific coasts continue to have respective National Task Groups.
6 Communication Security Establishment/Canadian Forces Information Operations Group (CSE/CFIOG)
7 Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States (AUSCANZUKUS) working group.