This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Program Activity: Enterprise Development; Community Development; and Policy, Advocacy and Coordination
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Business Development Program – Voted
Start date: July 25, 1995
End date: March 31, 2010 (Approval for continuation of the program will be sought.)
Description: The Agency plays a prominent role in economic development in Atlantic Canada, and has the broad mandate of increasing employment and earned incomes of Atlantic Canadians. The objectives of the Business Development Program (BDP) are in support of this mandate, and include the following:
The program is designed to help set up, expand or modernize businesses, and focuses on SMEs, offering access to capital in the form of interest-free, unsecured, repayable contributions. In addition to capital investment, funding is also available for business studies, training, marketing and quality assurance, to help in bidding for and acquiring public and private procurement contracts or to develop an innovative product or service. Non-profit organizations providing support to the business community, and not-for-profit activities that support economic development in the region, are eligible for funding under the program.
Eligible commercial recipients include individuals, sole proprietorships, partnerships, co-operatives, a body corporate, or a Crown corporation that carries on, or is about to carry on, legitimate profit-driven business activities in Atlantic Canada. This does not include a government or individual municipality.
Non-commercial eligible recipients include not-for-profit incorporated entities, and may include a Crown corporation, a provincial government, a municipal government, a not-for-profit organization owned or controlled by a provincial or municipal government, local economic development associations, an institute, or a university.
The BDP is one of the transfer payment programs, along with the Innovative Communities Fund (ICF), being used for the delivery of the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) announced in Budget 2009. CAF is being delivered as a sub-component of the BDP. Objectives for funding under CAF include:
CAF is designed to address the short-term economic impacts of the global economic downturn on communities across the Atlantic region. This funding sunsets on March 31, 2011.
Delivery of the BDP-CAF is guided by the following principles and considerations when assessing eligible projects and activities:
For the purposes of BDP-CAF, a community is eligible under this program if its population is 250,000 or lower and it meets the following criteria:
(A)
OR
(B)
Priority in the selection of projects in eligible communities is given to rural, single-industry communities.
Expected results: Whereas new employment is the direct result of business growth, particularly among SMEs, the Agency seeks to provide people with encouragement, advice and information, and the capital they need to start and expand their own businesses. Emphasis on improving SME productivity through innovation, skills development and export development is also at the core of ACOA's activities.
The BDP is strongly linked to the Agency, but places its greatest focus on improving the growth and competitiveness of Atlantic SMEs, leading to increased productivity, earned incomes and job creation.
Immediate results (one to three years) expected to be generated by the BDP include, among other things, an increase in the number of SMEs that have modernized or expanded, an increase in the number of SME start-ups, increased adoption of SME business management practices, increased SME investment, and the development of new products, services and processes.
In the longer term (three to five years), it is expected that results tied to transfer payments investments will be in the form of increased employment within the SMEs, increased wages and salaries of their employees, increased domestic and export sales, increased productivity and profitability, increased number of exporters or export markets, increased firm survival rates, and the commercialization of new products, services and processes.
For the BDP-CAF, performance measurement is primarily focused on economic opportunities in the short term, for the duration of the project, and other short-term stimulus measurements.
For the BDP-CAF, the results will be measured by the following indicators:
Forecast Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total grants | 0.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total contributions | 135.4 | 114.7 | 113.7 | 111.7 |
Total Transfer payments | 136.0 | 116.7 | 115.7 | 113.7 |
Link to Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/publications/ParliamentaryReports/Pages/RPP_2010-2011_1.aspx
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy
Program Activity: Community Development
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Innovative Communities Fund – Voted
Start date: April 1, 2005
End date: March 31, 2010 (Approval for continuation of the program will be sought.)
Description: Working with communities at various stages of economic development, this program supports non-commercial/non-profit strategic initiatives that target the economic development needs of communities and stimulate economic development. Working in collaboration with Atlantic communities and stakeholders, the Innovative Communities Fund (ICF) builds on the strengths of communities and provides the tools needed to identify opportunities available for their sustainable economic growth.
Budget 2009 recognized that communities across Canada were suffering
as a result of an economic downturn, and therefore provided $1 billion
over two years to establish the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF). It
provides economic stimulus mitigating the short-term impacts of the
economic downturn by creating economic opportunities and addressing
transitional and adjustment challenges in restructuring communities. The
ICF is one of two TPPs, along with the BDP, that is being used to
deliver CAF. CAF is being delivered as a sub-element of the ICF.
Expected results: The ICF targets both developmental and
long-term program outcomes.
Short-term outcomes aimed at the economic development needs of rural
communities are:
In the longer term, the expected results are:
Forecast Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total contributions | 86.6 | 87.7 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Total Transfer payments | 86.6 | 87.7 | 40. | 40.0 |
Link to Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/publications/ParliamentaryReports/Pages/RPP_2010-2011_1.aspx
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic
Canadian economy
Program Activity: Community Development
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Community Futures Program
– Voted
Start date: May 18, 1995
End date: October 2, 2010 (Approval for continuation of the
program will be sought)
Description: The purpose of this national program is to help
communities develop and implement local solutions to local problems. The
program provides financial support to CF organizations (CFOs) that, in
collaboration with other partners and stakeholders, can assess a
community's situation and develop strategies to meet its needs, provide
support to SMEs and social enterprise, and undertake community economic
development initiatives. The objective of the program is to further the
ultimate objective of helping communities to successfully pursue (a)
economic stability, growth and job creation; (b) diversified and
competitive local rural economies; and (c) sustainable communities. In
Atlantic Canada, the program provides funding to 41 CFOs, known in the
region as Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs), which
provide financial and technical assistance to SMEs in rural areas. More
information on these services provided through the CBDCs can be found on
ACOA's website at:
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/IWantTo/StartABusiness/Pages/GetHelpFinancing.aspx.
Expected results: Assisting selected communities in the development of their economies and supporting the growth of small businesses, the Community Futures Program's short-term results are:
In Atlantic Canada, the short-term expected results of the program, based on the role and responsibility of the CBDCs, are to ensure that Atlantic Canadian businesses have access to capital, and business information and counselling.
Forecast Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total contributions | 13.1 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 |
Total Transfer payments | 13.1 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 |
Link to Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/publications/ParliamentaryReports/Pages/RPP_2010-2011_1.aspx
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic
Canadian economy
Program Activity: Enterprise Development
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Atlantic
Innovation Fund – Voted
Start date: May 10, 2001
End date: March 31, 2010 (Approval for continuation
of the program will be sought)
Description:
The objectives of the program are:
Eligible recipients include commercial and non-commercial entities
such as, but not limited to, universities, colleges, other
post-secondary educational institutions, business associations, research
institutions and private sector firms.
Federal departments, including federal research laboratories and
institutes, and provincial government departments, are not eligible
recipients.
Expected results:
Immediate results (one to three years) expected to be generated by the
AIF include:
Forecast Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total contributions | 61.4 | 38.1 | 38.1 | 38.1 |
Total Transfer payments | 61.4 | 38.1 | 38.1 | 38.1 |
Link to Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/publications/ParliamentaryReports/Pages/RPP_2010-2011_1.aspxStrategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic
Canadian economy
Program Activity: Community Development
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Recreational
Infrastructure Canada – Voted
Start date: April 1, 2009
End date: March 31, 2011
Description: The Recreational Infrastructure
Canada (RInC) program provides $500 million nationally for projects to
rehabilitate recreational facilities across Canada, which must be
completed by March 31, 2011.
Through RInC, the Government of Canada has committed, over two years, to
support upgrades and repairs of existing recreational assets, including
new construction that adds to or replaces existing recreational
infrastructure assets or capacity.
The program is designed to provide a timely, targeted stimulus to the
economy, and to help mitigate the impacts of the current global economic
recession by increasing the total volume of construction activity
related to recreational infrastructure. Through the rehabilitation of
recreational infrastructure, this program also encourages participation
in physical activity and community building.
Expected results: This national initiative is expected to provide a timely, targeted, and temporary stimulus to the Canadian economy, and help mitigate the impacts of the global economic recession, by increasing the total amount of construction activity related to recreational infrastructure.
Forecast Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total contributions | 11.5 | 22.4 | ||
Total Transfer
payments |
11.5 | 22.4 |
Link to Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/publications/ParliamentaryReports/Pages/RPP_2010-2011_1.aspx
Strategic Outcome: A competitive Atlantic
Canadian economy
Program Activity: Enterprise Development
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Saint John
Shipyard Adjustment Initiative – Voted
Start date: May 29, 2003
End date: May 31, 2011 (On July 23, 2009,
ministerial approval was obtained to extend the duration of this
initiative by one year to May 31, 2011.)
Description: Aims to address the impact of the lack
of manufacturing activities at the site (the former Saint John
shipbuilding yard) and its economic impact on the province of New
Brunswick.
Expected results: The objectives of the program are
to ensure the closure of the shipyard operations located at the site and
the redevelopment of the site for other economic development use. The
program includes all activities related to the development of the site
for other industrial uses, such as an industrial park facility. It also
has supported Irving Shipbuilding Inc. (or its affiliates) in taking
advantage of industrial opportunities by assisting in the financing of
qualified projects within the province of New Brunswick.
Forecast Spending 2009-10 |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Planned Spending 2011-12 |
Planned Spending 2012-13 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total contributions | 0.0 | 10.0 | ||
Total Transfer
payments |
0.0 | 10.0 |
Link to Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/publications/ParliamentaryReports/Pages/RPP_2010-2011_1.aspx
Part A: Green Procurement Capacity Building
Performance Measures For Part A:
1a. Number of procurement and materiel management staff with formal green procurement training (e.g., C215 or tailored in-house alternative) relative to total number of procurement and materiel management staff.
1b. Number of acquisition cardholders with formal green procurement training (e.g., C215 or tailored in-house alternative) relative to total number of acquisition cardholders.
2. Number of performance evaluations of managers and functional heads of procurement and materiel management that incorporate environmental considerations, relative to total number of performance evaluations of managers and functional heads of procurement and materiel management.
3. Number of departmental procurement processes and controls that incorporate environmental considerations, relative to total number of departmental procurement processes and controls that should address environmental considerations. Alternatively, departments can report on progress and plans to improve the integration of environmental considerations in management processes and controls relative to procurement.
Activity | 2008-09 Level as % |
2010-11 Level as % |
Description/Comments |
---|---|---|---|
1a. Training for Procurement and Materiel Management Staff | 40% | 75% | This will be achieved by means of an online
course offered through the Government of Canada's training
website, Campus Direct. All new and existing functional specialist staff will be asked to take the training within a specified time frame. |
1b. Training for Acquisition Cardholders | 11% | 75% | This will be achieved by means of an online
course offered through the Government of Canada's training
website, Campus Direct. All new cardholders will be required to take the course before receiving a card. Existing cardholders will be asked to take the course in order to continue using their card. |
2. Performance Evaluations | 1% | 100% | Each functional specialist will have an objective included in his/her appraisal to ensure environmental considerations are taken into account in all procurement activities. |
3. Procurement Processes and Controls |
Contracting documents will be reviewed to include a clause addressing environmental considerations in the performance of the work required. Internal policies on procurement and materiel management will be reviewed and updated to integrate environmental considerations in decision making, from the procurement through to the disposal process Financial coding system will be reviewed and updated to improve the tracking and monitoring process. |
Part B: Use of Green Consolidated Procurement Instruments
Performance Measures For Part B:
Dollar value of purchases against green consolidated procurement instruments (as designated by PWGSC) for a specified good or service relative to total dollar value of purchases for that good or service. Departments should include a minimum of two goods or services (e.g. IT hardware, imaging devices, and paper).
When a green consolidated procurement instrument (as designated by PWGSC) is not used or is unavailable for the specified good or service, this performance measure should be used: Dollar value of purchases that incorporate environmental considerations for a good or service relative to total dollar value of purchases for that good or service. Departments should indicate when a green consolidated procurement instrument for a good or service (as designated by PWGSC) is not used.
Good/Service | 2008-09 Level as |
2010-11 Target as % |
Description/Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|
$ | % | |||
Printers | $315,000 is ACOA's estimated value, based on current inventory. | 95% | 95% | Continued usage of “green consolidated
procurement instruments” as designated by PWGSC. |
Photocopiers | These are multi-year lease contracts with varying start and end dates in different regions. | 100% | 100% | All of ACOA's units were leased through
green consolidated procurement instruments. Multifunctional units will be considered when renewing leases, thereby eliminating the need for additional office equipment (such as scanners and fax machines). |
Part C: Reduction Initiatives for Specific Goods (Optional/Where Applicable)
Performance Measure For Part C:
Total quantity of a consumable purchased (e.g., paper) or an asset owned/leased (e.g., printing devices) relative to total number of full-time employees (FTEs).
Consumable/Asset | 2008-09 Level as Ratio # per FTE |
2010-11 Target |
Description/Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Printers | The ratio was one printer per five employees. | *To decrease ACOA's existing ratio, wherever operationally applicable |
*The geographical location of ACOA's offices and the requirements of ACOA teleworkers are factors in determining the required number of printers. ACOA will review the requirement when printers are being replaced, and will redirect printing to multifunctional units wherever applicable, therefore reducing the number of printers on site. The use of multifunctional devices will also reduce the procurement of new scanners and fax machines. |
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Atlantic Canada Tourism Partnership
Name of lead department(s): Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Lead department program activity: Community Development
Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: April 1, 2009
End date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2012
Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): $9,975,000
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The Atlantic Canada Tourism Partnership (ACTP) is a nine-member, pan-Atlantic marketing consortium comprised of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, the four provincial tourism industry associations, and the provincial departments responsible for tourism in Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. ACTP is dedicated to promoting Atlantic Canada as a leading vacation destination in key American and European Pacific markets.
The 2009-2012 ACTP is a $19.95-million agreement that supports:
Additional information on the Atlantic Canada Tourism Partnership can be found at: http://www.actp-ptca.ca/index.html.
A memorandum of understanding for the renewal of the Atlantic Canada Tourism Partnership was signed on April 1, 2009. This initiative directly supports the Agency's long-term strategic outcome.
Shared outcome(s): The 2009-2012 ACTP is expected to generate $10 in incremental economic activity for every $1 invested in marketing. The three-year revenue target is $190 million in incremental revenues for tourism SMEs in Atlantic Canada.
Governance structure(s): The activities of the ACTP are managed by a ten-person management committee, consisting of the ACOA vice-president responsible for tourism and the director general of Tourism Atlantic; the four provincial deputy ministers responsible for tourism; and the four tourism industry association presidents (or their permanent designates). Decisions of this management committee are by consensus. Six members constitute a quorum, provided all four provinces are represented, with both government and industry present, as well as ACOA. A Canadian Tourism Commission representative sits as an ex-officio member of the management committee.
The management committee is responsible for the administration and management of the agreement, allocation of annual budgets on a per market basis, approval of annual program work plans and budgets, and evaluations of program activities. It oversees the work of a marketing committee, develops and oversees a communications policy, and provides program interpretation and dispute resolution.
Planning highlights: Each year (including 2010-2011) the marketing committee researches and prepares fully integrated consumer advertising, and travel trade and media relations marketing strategies, all for the management committee's approval. These strategies will be implemented by program managers, who report directly to the marketing committee.
Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2010-11 |
Expected Results for 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Community Development | Atlantic Canada Tourism Partnership | $9,975,000 | $3,325,000 | $55.2 million in export revenues |
Total | $9,975,000 | $3,325,000 | $55.2 million in export revenues |
Expected Results:
$55.2 million in export revenues in each year of the
partnership
$165.6 million in export revenues during the life of the partnership
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2010–11 |
---|---|
$9,975,000 | $3,325,000 |
Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable):
$10 in tourism revenues for every $1 investment in marketing.
Contact information:
Rob McCloskey
Director General, Tourism Atlantic
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
P.O. Box 40
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island
C1A 7K2
Telephone: 902-626-2479
E-mail:
Rob.McCloskey@acoa-apeca.gc.ca
Name of Horizontal Initiative:
International Business
Development Agreement (IBDA)
Name of lead department(s):
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Lead department program activity:
Enterprise Development (program
sub-activity: Trade)
Start date of the Horizontal Initiative:
April 11, 2005
End date of the Horizontal Initiative:
March 31, 2011
Total federal funding allocation (start to end date):
$8.4 million
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding
agreement):
In May 1994, ACOA entered into an agreement (Canada/Atlantic
Provinces Agreement on International Business Development, also known as
IBDA) with the four Atlantic provinces, Foreign Affairs and
International Trade Canada, and Industry Canada to “undertake specific
measures to optimize regional coordination on a pan-Atlantic scale and
combine limited resources to coordinate trade-related activities”. With
an initial investment in 1994 of $3 million for three years, the
agreement was extended in 1997 for an additional three years and $2
million, and in 2000 for $8 million and an additional four years.
Funding was cost-shared 70/30 by the federal (through ACOA's IBDP) and
the provincial governments.
In 2005 with $7 million from its IBDP, ACOA entered into a new IBDA with
its federal and provincial partners to continue the work done in
previous years. The commitment to this IBDA, with the increased funding
allocation, attests to both the IBDA's positive results and its
significance for the future of the region's international business
development.
More information can be found on the IBDA home page:
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/English/ibda/Pages/HomePage.aspx
Shared outcome(s):
The shared outcomes for the IBDA partners support ACOA's priorities for
trade, and are (1) increased number of new exporters; (2) existing
exporters reporting sales to new markets; and (3) existing exporters
reporting increased sales to existing markets.
Since the original IBDA commenced in 1994, the Agency and its partners
have administered over 230 projects involving some 4,000 Atlantic
Canadian companies. The IBDA assisted 192 companies to begin exporting,
405 exporters to increase their export sales, and 278 exporters to
expand into new markets.
Governance structure(s):
ACOA is the lead organization for this
initiative and houses the secretariat responsible for administering the
agreement. A management committee, comprising a representative from each
of the partners, is responsible for the planning and management of the
agreement's programs and the evaluation of projects.
Partners:
Federal departments and agencies (70% funding):
ACOA (lead department)
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (non-funding partner)
Industry Canada (non-funding partner)
Provincial governments (30% funding):
Business New Brunswick
Nova Scotia Business Inc.
Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Innovation
Trade and Rural Development
Prince Edward Island Business Development Inc.
Planning highlights: The IBDA will continue to build upon its accomplishments to date, its extensive experience, and lessons learned to further contribute to sustained growth in international business for the Atlantic region. Through its four key elements, the IBDA will (1) expose sectors and companies to export market opportunities and ensure that they are well prepared with the capability, knowledge and information required for developing international business; (2) develop longer-term strategies and implementation plans for international business development and undertake supporting research on companies' needs and best practices; (3) assist sectors and companies by obtaining market intelligence and contacts, identifying international market opportunities and applying this knowledge to trade development activities; and (4) undertake business activities that support sector export development strategies and contribute to contacts, alliances and ultimately sales for both existing and new exporters.
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2010-11 |
Expected Results for 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise Development | International Business Development Agreement (IBDA) | $8,400,000 | $1,400,000 | 8 new exporters 20 existing exporters reporting sales to new markets 30 companies reporting increased sales to existing markets |
Total | $8,400,000 | $1,400,000 |
Expected results:
The expected results will be an increase
the number of new exporters, an increase in sales for existing exporters
in their existing markets, and an increase in sales for existing
exporters in new markets. These targets will be achieved by involving
Atlantic companies in training and awareness activities (just-in-time,
one-on-one and sector-specific training seminars and workshops),
planning and research (development of sector export strategies), market
information and intelligence (market studies and in-market consultants)
and international business development activities (trade shows, incoming
and outgoing missions, etc.). To measure success, progress surveys will
demonstrate:
(1) Training and Awareness: the number of companies that have an
increased knowledge of their target markets, that are reporting that the
training contributed to establishing new alliances, partners brokers or
distributors, that are committing more time and money to initiate/expand
export activities, etc.;
(2) Planning and Research: the extent to which industries are bringing
better thought out and longer-term projects, the degree to which results
of studies are reflected in program planning and project proposals,
etc.;
(3) Market Information and Intelligence: the number of companies that
report first time sales to targeted markets, report new alliances, etc.;
and
(4) International Business Development Activities: the number of
companies reporting increased sales, investment in time and money in
targeted markets, new alliances, pursuing leads, developing new market
strategies, etc.
Federal partner:
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2010-11 |
Expected Results for 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
International Commerce | IBDA | $0 | $0 | Same as ACOA |
Total | $0 | $0 |
Expected results: Same as ACOA
Federal Partner: Industry Canada
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2010-11 |
Expected Results for 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Internal Services | IBDA | $0 | $0 | Same as ACOA |
Total | $0 | $0 |
Expected results: Same as ACOA.
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2010–11 |
---|---|
$8,400,000 | $1,400,000 |
Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): Same as for federal partners.
Contact information:
Michel TĂȘtu
Director General, Trade and Investment
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
P.O. Box 6051
Moncton, New Brunswick
E1C 9J8
Tel: 506-851-6496
E-mail:
Michel.Tetu@acoa-apeca.gc.ca
Name of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Risk Management Framework – Effectiveness of Corporate Risk Management | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
People Management – Employment and Workplace Practices and Labour Relations | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Ethical Leadership – Agency-wide Integrity and Ethics | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Financial Management Control – Monitoring | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Information Technology – Leadership and Accountability for Organizational Outcomes | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Policy and Programs – Quality of Analysis | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Information Technology – Integration into Organizational Governance | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Corporate Performance Framework | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Due Diligence – Atlantic Innovation Fund | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Follow-up Audits – BDP and CED – Community Investment | Follow-up | Planned | 2010-2011 |
Financial Management Control – Non-Commercial Projects | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Information Technology – Planning and Added Value | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Planning – Effectiveness of Asset Management | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Governance – Corporate Business Planning | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Governance – Organizational Alignment and Accountability | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Financial Management Control – Compliance with the FAA in Operations | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Governance – Effectiveness of Project Management | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Financial Management Control – Stewardship of Receivables | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Portfolio Coordination – External Portfolio Management | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2012 |
Financial Management Control – Adequacy of Financial Reporting | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
People Management – Performance and Productivity | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
People Management – Occupational Health and Safety | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
People Management – Diversity | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
Citizen-focused Service – Communications and Marketing | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
Citizen-focused Service – Meeting Service Standards | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
Change Planning – Learning and Change Management | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
Governance – Effectiveness of Procurement | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
Security Program – Adequacy of Security and Business Continuity Management | Assurance | Planned | 2010-2013 |
Electronic Link to Internal Audit Plan: The electronic link to the internal audit plan is not available at this time. The annual audit planning process is completed during the fourth quarter, and the audit plan for 2010-2013 will be available following the President's approval.
Name of Evaluation | Program Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
FY 2010-2011 | |||
Financing Continuum Evaluation | Program sub-activity including components of the Business Development Program and Tourism commercial | Ongoing | June 2010 |
Trade and Investment Evaluation | Program sub-activity including components of the Business Development Program, Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, and the International Business Development Program | Ongoing | June 2010 |
Entrepreneurship and Business Skills Development Evaluation | Program sub-activity including components of the Business Development Program, the Women in Business Initiative and the Young Entrepreneur Development Initiative | Ongoing | June 2010 |
Policy, Advocacy and Coordination Evaluation | Program sub-activity including components of the Business Development Program | Planned | June 2011 |
Public Service Renewal Initiative Evaluation | Internal services | Planned | March 2011 |
FY 2011-2012 | |||
Business Skills Development Meta Evaluation | Components of the Business Development Program | Planned | TBD |
Tourism Meta Evaluation | Components of the Business Development Program | Planned | TBD |
FY 2012-2013 | |||
Community Investment and Community Mobilization Evaluation | Program sub-activity including components of the Business Development Program and the Innovation Community Fund | Planned | TBD |
Community-based Business Development Evaluation | Program sub-activity including components of the Business Development Program and the Community Futures Program | Planned | TBD |
Electronic link to evaluation plan:
Program Activity | Forecast Revenue 2009-10 |
Planned Revenue 2010-11 |
Planned Revenue 2011-12 |
Planned Revenue 2012-13 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise Development | ||||
Repayable contributions | 45 | 48 | 46 | 47 |
All other | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Total Non-respendable Revenue | 47 | 50 | 48 | 49 |