This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
(in thousands of dollars)
Name of Transfer Payment Program: General Class Contribution Program (GCCP)
Start date: 2006–2007
End date: March 31, 2011
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: The GCCP is atypical in that it is not a program within itself; rather, it is a funding authority available to Agency managers. From time to time, Agency managers with programming responsibilities may determine that, given their priorities, available resources, other program delivery mechanisms already in place, and the players and environment in which they deliver their programs, use of a contribution agreement is the most effective means of achieving program objectives.
Expected Results: More Canadians recognizing, appreciating and being engaged in the values of natural and cultural conservation. Stakeholders being further engaged in terms of interest and involvement of common objectives towards ecological and cultural integrity. Access to a better knowledge base on commercial, ecological or aboriginal issues of mutual interest for informed decision-making and dialogue for Parks Canada managers and stakeholders. Heritage assets are protected, secured and researched. Targeted audiences are educated in such areas as ecology, safety and other issues.
Expected Outcomes: The expected outcomes mirror the Parks Canada mandate of engaging Canadians in preserving and presenting Canada’s rich diversity of cultural and natural heritage.
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
Planned Spending 2014–15 |
Planned Spending 2015–16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heritage Places Establishment | 1,013 | 1,013 | 1,013 | 1,013 | 1,013 | 1,013 |
Heritage Resources Conservation | 1,632 | 1,632 | 1,632 | 1,632 | 1,632 | 1,632 |
Public Appreciation and Understanding | 1,362 | 5,862 | 5,362 | 862 | 862 | 862 |
Visitor Experience | 846 | 846 | 846 | 846 | 846 | 846 |
Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | 147 | 147 | 147 | 147 | 147 | 147 |
Total Contributions | 5,000 | 9,500 | 9,000 | 4,500 | 4,500 | 4,500 |
Note: In 2010–11 an adjustment was made to GCCP's planned spending to better reflect reality. This adjustment is represented in the table above; however, it has not yet been reflected in the Agency's reference levels. The Agency is seeking approval from Treasury Board to renew the GCCP.
Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Historic Sites Cost Sharing Class Contribution Program (NHSCCSP)
Start date: 2008–2009
End date: March 31, 2013
Purpose of Transfer Payment Program: The NHSCCSP assists recipients in conducting activities aimed at ensuring the commemorative integrity of non-federally owned or administered national historic sites and, thereby, to support Parks Canada Agency in fulfilling its mandate to protect and present nationally significant examples of Canada’s natural and cultural heritage, and foster public understanding, appreciation and enjoyment in ways that ensure the ecological and commemorative integrity of these places for present and future generations. Specifically, the program provides financial contributions to eligible recipients to share the costs of eligible works deemed by Parks Canada as necessary to ensure the physical health of a national historic site and to ensure Canadians understand the importance of the site and its role in the history of Canada.
Expected Results/Expected Outcomes:
Reach | Strategic (End) Outcomes |
---|---|
Canadians (indirect influence) |
|
Reach | Intermediate Outcomes |
---|---|
|
|
Reach | Immediate Outcomes |
---|---|
|
|
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
Planned Spending 2014–15 |
Planned Spending 2015–16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heritage Resources Conservation | 9,700 | 3,400 | 1,300 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Contributions | 9,700 | 3,400 | 1,300 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note: In 2010–11 an adjustment was made to the National Historic Sites of Canada Cost Sharing Class Contribution Program’s planned spending to better reflect reality. This adjustment is represented in the table above; however, it has not yet been reflected in the Agency’s reference levels.
Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.
Plan for Transfer Payment Programs:
Name of Transfer Payment Program | Fiscal Year of the Transfer Payment Program | Forecast Spending for the Current Fiscal Year (thousands of dollars) | Fiscal Year of Last Completed Evaluation | Approved Decision as a Result of Last Evaluation (Continuation, Amendment, Termination, Pending or N/A) | Fiscal Year of Planned Completion of Next Evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Historic Sites of Canada Cost Sharing Program | 2008–09 | 9,700.0 | 2007–08 | C | 2011–12 |
General Class Contribution Program | 2010–11 | 5,000.0 | 2010–11 | C | 2015–16 |
Grant to the International Peace Garden | 2010–11 | 22.7 | 2010–11 | C | 2015–16 |
The GGO supplementary table applies to departments and agencies bound by the Federal Sustainable Development Act, the Policy on Green Procurement, or the Policy Framework for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Major International Events.
Please note:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of completed new construction, build-to-lease and major renovation projects in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Number of completed new construction, build-to-lease and major renovation projects that have achieved an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | No |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of buildings over 1000m2, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Percentage of buildings over 1000m2 that have been assessed using an industry-recognized assessment tool, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | No |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of completed lease and lease renewal projects over 1000m2 in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Number of completed lease and lease renewal projects over 1000m2 that were assessed using an industry-recognized assessment tool in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | N/A |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of completed fit-up and refit projects in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Number of completed fit-up and refit projects that have achieved an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011–12) | N/A | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | No |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Departmental GHG reduction target: Percentage of absolute reduction in GHG emissions by fiscal year 2020–21, relative to fiscal year 2005–06. | 10.1% | ||
Departmental GHG emissions in fiscal year 2005–06, in kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent. | 37.9 | ||
Departmental GHG emissions in the given fiscal year, in kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent. | FY 2011–12 | 37.5 | |
FY 2012–13 | 37.1 | ||
FY 2013–14 | 36.7 | ||
FY 2014–15 | |||
FY 2015–16 | |||
FY 2016–17 | |||
FY 2017–18 | |||
FY 2018–19 | |||
FY 2019–20 | |||
FY 2020–21 | |||
Percent change in departmental GHG emissions from fiscal year 2005–2006 to the end of the given fiscal year. | FY 2011–12 | 1.1% reduction |
|
FY 2012–13 | 2.1% reduction |
||
FY 2013–14 | 3.1% reduction |
||
FY 2014–15 | |||
FY 2015–16 | |||
FY 2016–17 | |||
FY 2017–18 | |||
FY 2018–19 | |||
FY 2019–20 | |||
FY 2020–21 |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Existence of implementation plan for the disposal of all departmentally-generated EEE. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | No | ||
Total number of departmental locations with EEE implementation plan fully implemented, expressed as a percentage of all locations, by the end of the given fiscal year. | FY 2011–12 | 0% | |
FY 2012–13 | 50% | ||
FY 2013–14 | 100% |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Ratio of departmental office employees to printing units in fiscal year 2010–11, where building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration allow. (Optional) | N/A | ||
Ratio of departmental office employees to printing units at the end of the given fiscal year, where building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration allow. | FY 2011–12 | 5:1 | |
FY 2012–13 | |||
FY 2013–14 |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Number of sheets of internal office paper purchased or consumed per office employee in the baseline year selected, as per departmental scope. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | N/A | ||
Cumulative reduction (or increase) in paper consumption, expressed as a percentage, relative to baseline year selected. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | FY 2011–12 | N/A | |
FY 2012–13 | |||
FY 2013–14 |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Presence of a green meeting guide. (Optional in RPP 2011–12) | N/A |
Strategies / Comments
8.10 As of April 1, 2011, each department will establish at least 3 SMART green procurement targets to reduce environmental impacts.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Percentage of vehicles purchased that were on the Parks Canada Preauthorized Vehicle List. | 67%* | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | 70% |
Strategies / Comments
Why this self selected target is SMART:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of printers, photocopiers and multifunctional devices purchased or leased that has an environmental feature relative to total number purchased. | N/A | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | 80% |
Strategies / Comments
Why this self selected target is SMART:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Average service life of office computers. | N/A | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | 3 year average service life |
Strategies / Comments
Why this self selected target is SMART:
8.11 As of April 1, 2011, each department will establish SMART targets for training, employee performance evaluations, and management processes and controls, as they pertain to procurement decision-making.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of procurement and contracting personnel with formal green procurement training, relative to total number of procurement and contracting personnel. | N/A | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | 75% |
Strategies / Comments
Other reporting considerations:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of performance evaluations of managers and functional leads of procurement and contracting that incorporate environmental considerations, relative to the total number of performance evaluations of managers and functional leads. | N/A | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | 100% |
Strategies / Comments
Other reporting considerations:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of departmental procurement and contracting processes and controls that incorporate environmental considerations, relative to total number of departmental procurement and contracting processes and controls that should address environmental considerations. | N/A | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | 40% |
Strategies / Comments
Other reporting considerations:
Notes:
1 This would be demonstrated by achieving LEED NC Silver, Green Globes Design 3 Globes, or equivalent.
2 Assessment tools include: BOMA BESt, Green Globes or equivalent.
3 Assessment tools include: BOMA BESt, an appropriately tailored BOMA International Green Lease Standard, or equivalent.
4 This would be demonstrated by achieving LEED CI Silver, Green Globes Fit-Up 3 Globes, or equivalent.
Name of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Law Enforcement Program | Assurance | On-going | May 2011 |
Revenue Management (leases and concessions & other revenue) | Assurance | On-going | May 2011 |
Revenue Management (canals) | Assurance | Planned | December 2011 |
Geographical Information System (GIS) – system under development | Assurance | Planned | June 2011 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Newfoundland West and Labrador Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | May 2011 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Eastern Ontario Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | May 2011 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Southwest NWT Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | June 2011 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Newfoundland East Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Trans-Canada Highway Twinning | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Sustainable HR policies and HR Planning | Description and survey | Planned | March 2012 |
Collaborative arrangements and managing with others | Description and survey | Planned | March 2012 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Central Ontario | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Gwaii Haanas | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Saskatchewan South Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Hot Springs Enterprise | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Cultural Resources and Artifacts Information | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Transfer Payments | Assurance | Planned | March 2012 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Cape Breton Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | March 2013 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – New Brunswick North Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | March 2013 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Gaspésie Field Unit | Assurance | Planned | March 2013 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Ontario Service Centre | Assurance | Planned | March 2013 |
Management and Administration of HR controls – Office of DG Eastern Canada | Assurance | Planned | March 2013 |
Electronic Link to Internal Audit Plan: http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/iap-2010-2011_e.asp
Name of Evaluation and Link to Report | Program Activity | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Through Waterways Management | PA 5 Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | In progress | May 2011 |
National Park Establishment and Expansion | PA 1 Heritage Places Establishment | Planned | September 2011 |
National Parks Conservation | PA 2 Heritage Resources Conservation | Planned | March 2012 |
National Historic Sites Cost-Sharing | PA 2 Heritage Resources Conservation | Planned | March 2012 |
Visitor Experience: Interpretation Programming | PA 4 Visitor Experience | Planned | March 2013 |
Public Safety | PA 4 Visitor Experience | Planned | March 2013 |
Law Enforcement | Horizontal program covering more than one program activity | Planned | March 2014 |
Public Appreciation and Understanding | PA 3 Public Appreciation and Understanding | Planned | March 2014 |
Trans-Canada Highway Twinning Project | PA 5 Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | Planned | March 2014 |
National Marine Conservation Area Establishment | PA 1 Heritage Places Establishment | Planned | March 2015 |
National Marine Conservation Area Sustainability | PA 2 Heritage Resources Conservation | Planned | March 2015 |
National Historic Sites Conservation | PA 2 Heritage Resources Conservation | Planned | September 2015 |
Prevention | Horizontal program covering more than one program activity | Planned | September 2015 |
Electronic link to evaluation plan: http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/rve-par/ep-2010-2011_e.asp
Program Activity | Forecast Revenue 2010–11 |
Planned Revenue 2011–12 |
Planned Revenue 2012–13 |
Planned Revenue 2013–14 |
Planned Revenue 2014–15 |
Planned Revenue 2015–16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visitor Experience | ||||||
Entrance Fees | 52,500 | 52,500 | 52,500 | 52,500 | 52,500 | 52,500 |
Camping Fees | 16,500 | 16,500 | 16,500 | 16,500 | 16,500 | 16,500 |
Lockage and Mooring Fees | 2,410 | 2,410 | 2,410 | 2,410 | 2,410 | 2,410 |
Heritage Presentation Programs | 730 | 730 | 730 | 730 | 730 | 730 |
Pools | 3,810 | 3,810 | 3,810 | 3,810 | 3,810 | 3,810 |
Other Recreational Fees | 3,050 | 3,050 | 3,050 | 3,050 | 3,050 | 3,050 |
Subtotal | 79,000 | 79,000 | 79,000 | 79,000 | 79,000 | 79,000 |
Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | ||||||
Municipal Service Fees | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 |
Subtotal | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 | 3,100 |
Other Revenue | ||||||
Real Property and Business Fees | 20,900 | 20,900 | 20,900 | 20,900 | 20,900 | 20,900 |
Miscellaneous | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 8,000 |
Subtotal | 28,900 | 28,900 | 28,900 | 28,900 | 28,900 | 28,900 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 | 111,000 |
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
Planned Spending 2014–15 |
Planned Spending 2015–16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heritage Places Establishment | 865 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 |
Heritage Resources Conservation | 73,921 | 30,412 | 30,412 | 30,412 | 30,412 | 30,412 |
Public Appreciation and Understanding | 4,596 | 4,846 | 4,696 | 4,576 | 4,576 | 4,576 |
Visitor Experience | 125,199 | 64,383 | 64,383 | 64,349 | 64,349 | 64,349 |
Townsite and Throughway Infrastructure | 144,043 | 94,018 | 49,258 | 34,360 | 29,360 | 29,360 |
Internal Services | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 | 3,290 |
Total | 351,913 | 197,625 | 152,715 | 137,662 | 132,662 | 132,662 |
Name of User Fee | Fee Type | Fee-setting Authority | Reason for Planned Introduction of or Amendment to Fee | Effective Date of Planned Change | Consultation and Review Process Planned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Park and National Historic Site Entry Fees Proposed amendments |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | Adjustments to national pricing to keep pace with inflationary pressures on costs and to realign entry fees with the level of service being offered. | 2012/2013 2013/2014 |
In 2010, Parks Canada announced a one year extension to the previously announced fee freeze due to the slow economic recovery. As such, all fees for entry, camping, canal lockage, recreation fees, fishing licenses, hot pools and business licenses will be frozen at 2008 rates until March 2012. Commercial fees will be frozen at 2009 rates until March 2013. For the proposed 2012/13 and 2013/14 adjustments, Parks Canada will consult on two levels in 2011. National consultations will occur for all user fees that are to be applied nationally. The Agency will hold meetings with commercial group tour operators at travel trade shows, consult directly with national stakeholders and tourism interest groups and use social media such as Twitter and Facebook. For user fees of a unique local nature, to a national park, national historic site and national marine conservation area, Parks Canada will consult locally with the affected public, business operators, tourism partners and stakeholders through meetings with advisory and client groups and through direct mailings and posted notices. In both instances notice will be provided on the Parks Canada website on the proposals for price increases. A comparison of Parks Canada’s proposed fees with those charged by parks organizations in Canada and other countries will be conducted. Pursuant to the User Fees Act, a national fee proposal will be tabled in January 2012 prior to being submitted to the Minister responsible for Parks Canada for enactment. To respect our commitment to provide 18 months advance notice, implementation of the proposed new business fees and commercial rates will be 2013/14. |
National Park Camping Proposed amended fees |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | Adjustments to national pricing to keep pace with inflationary pressures on costs. | 2012/2013 2013/2014 |
|
Historic Canal Lockage Fees Proposed amended fees |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | As above | 2012/2013 2013/2014 |
|
National Park and National Historic Site Recreation Fees Proposed amended fees |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | As above | 2012/2013 2013/2014 |
|
Hot Pool Fees Proposed amended fees |
Service | Parks Canada Agency Act | As above | 2012/2013 2013/2014 |
|
Fishing License Fees Proposed amended fees |
Rights and Privileges | Parks Canada Agency Act | To earn a fair return for the use of publicly owned resources. |
2012/2013 |
|
Business Licenses Proposed new fees and proposed amended fees |
Rights and Privileges | Parks Canada Agency Act |
To earn a fair return for the commercial use of publicly owned resources. The fees were previously increased in 1994. |
2013/2014 |