This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
These tables provide details on the results of TPPs, or the progress made to date for each TPP where total transfer payments exceed $5 million for 2006-2007.
Contributions to support environmental and sustainable development initiatives | ||||||
Start Date: August 1999 | End DateMarch 31, 2009 | |||||
Purpose of TPP:
|
||||||
Objectives:
|
||||||
Achieved results or progress made: The results achieved and progresses made are reflected through the program delivery. This class contribution facilitates access, on a national level, to existing knowledge, tools and methods for making good policy decisions on the environment and health, and that are appropriate given the social, cultural and economic contexts. | ||||||
Total Contributions | Actual Spending 2004-2005 (1) | Actual Spending 2005-2006 (1) | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Total Authorities 2006-2007 | Actual Spending 2006-2007 | Variances between Planned and Actual Spending |
Biodiversity is conserved and protected | ||||||
Total Contributions | 8.7 | 6.8 | 9.3 | 7.4 | 7.3 | (2.0) |
Water is clean, safe and secure | ||||||
Total Contributions | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | (0.3) |
Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes | ||||||
Total Contributions | 4.6 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 2.1 |
Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influences decision-making | ||||||
Total Contributions | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Canadians are informed of, and respond appropriately to, current and predicted environmental conditions | ||||||
Total Contributions | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
Risks posed by pollutants or other harmful or dangerous substances in the environment are reduced | ||||||
Total Contributions | 4.2 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.5 |
Canadians adopt sustainable consumption and production approaches | ||||||
Total Contributions | 0.5 | 0.7 | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Net emissions of greenhouse gases are reduced | ||||||
Total Contributions | 3.1 | 9.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.5) |
Canadians understand the impacts of climate change and adapt to its effects | ||||||
Total Contributions | 0.0 | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 22.9 | 27.9 | 17.5 | 18.3 | 18.2 | 0.7 |
Comments on Variances: N/A | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to last evaluation: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/database/NewDeptView_e.asp | ||||||
In 2005, a follow-up was conducted to assess the implementation of corrective measures recommended in two previous assignments. Specifically, it was undertaken to determine the adequacy, effectiveness and timeliness of management actions taken in response to the recommendations of the initial audits and evaluation. The follow-up found that solid progress has been achieved with respect to the management of grants and contributions; however, there is room for further improvement in the following areas: formalized program training covering various areas of the Grants and Contributions management process; the number of recipient audits conducted; risk assessment; approaches to payment authorization; reporting obligations; and comprehensiveness of the Grants and Contributions Management Framework. | ||||||
Habitat Stewardship Contribution Program | ||||||
Start Date : August 20, 2000 | End Date : March 31, 2008 | |||||
Purpose of TPP:
|
||||||
Objectives:
Expected results and outcomes:
|
||||||
Achieved results or progress made: From April 2006 to March 2007, the Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) contributed $8.9 million to 152 projects addressing terrestrial and aquatic species at risk issues in all provinces as well as in Yukon and in Nunavut. The HSP directed 39 millions (HSP + matching funds) to projects addressing both habitat conservation and threat mitigation issues. These stewardship activities benefited over 250 species at risk designated by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Building activities such as monitoring, surveys and inventory work as well as collection of traditional ecological knowledge, outreach, education and extension, and program planning and development activities reached over 2 millions of people. Conserving activities, including habitat protection, habitat improvement, and direct threat mitigation activities protected 906 ha of habitat through legally binding protection measures, protected an additional 232,631 ha of habitat through non-binding protection measures, improved 16,908 ha of habitat, and assisted 47,791 individual plants and animal under immediate threats. |
||||||
Total Contributions | Actual Spending 2004-2005 (1) | Actual Spending 2005-2006 (1) | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Total Authorities 2006-2007 | Actual Spending 2006-2007 | Variances between Planned and Actual Spending |
Biodiversity is conserved and protected | ||||||
Total Contributions | 10.2 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 8.9 | (0.6) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 10.2 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 8.9 | (0.6) |
Comments on Variances:Not Available | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to last evaluation: Not Available | ||||||
An independent evaluation was carried out just before the 2004-2005 funding year. It concluded that the program's mandate, goals, objectives and delivery method are relevant for addressing Canada's species at risk objectives and for demonstrating appropriate management and accountability mechanisms over the federal funds provided. Given the proclamation of Species At Risk Act, the evaluation suggested that program priorities be refined to focus on species at risk. These recommendations were addressed in the 2004-2005 period. | ||||||
Contribution to EcoAction - Community Funding Initiative | ||||||
Start Date: 1998 | End DateMarch 31, 2009 | |||||
Purpose of Transfer Program Payment: To provide financial support to non-profit organizations to undertake environmental projects that have positive, measurable results at the community level. | ||||||
Objectives:
Expected results and outcomes:
|
||||||
Achieved results or progress made: The Eco-Action Community Funding Program remains the only national EC program dedicated to supporting air pollution, climate change and water quality projects at the community level. Eco-Action also complements existing Environment Canada programs focused on species at risk issues, habitat conservation and invasive species eradication in both rural and urban areas. In 2006-07, the program funding led to the effective leveraging of $2.76 of partner contributions for every $1.00 of program funds. This funding supports part-time and permanent employment growth in the recipient communities. It also supports energy use reduction strategies that save consumers and businesses money, and it reduces the need for costly cleanup of harmful and hazardous substances and preserves Canada's natural resources. In 2006–2007, Eco-Action funded 223 community-based projects. |
||||||
Total Contributions | Actual Spending 2004-2005 (1) | Actual Spending 2005-2006 (1) | Planned Spending 2006-2007 | Total Authorities 2006-2007 | Actual Spending 2006-2007 | Variances between Planned and Actual Spending |
Canadians are informed of, and respond appropriately to, current and predicted environmental conditions | ||||||
Total Contributions | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.6 | (0.4) |
Total Transfer Payment Program | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.6 | (0.4) |
Comments on Variances: Not Available | ||||||
Significant Evaluation Findings and URL to last evaluation: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/database/1det_e.asp?id=10429 |
||||||
The follow-up evaluation found that EcoAction has addressed all of the concerns and recommendations identified in the original review report. The program has also either satisfied or is in the process of addressing the suggestions made in the report. |
Totals may differ between and within tables due to rounding of figures.
(1) Due to the change in reporting structure, the amounts by Program Activity were calculated based on Environment Canada's departmental crosswalk. Refer to Environment Canada's previous Departmental Performance Reports for detailed financial information.