This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Canadian Group on Earth Observations
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Environment Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Canadians are informed of, and respond appropriately to, current and predicted environmental conditions
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: July 2003
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Ongoing
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): No new funds; annual multi-departmental contributions
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): Interdepartmental secretariat established to coordinate Canada's participation in the international intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations and advance coordinated, comprehensive and sustained Earth observations in Canada. The Canadian Group on Earth Observations is funded through annual interdepartmental transfers and in-kind contributions.
8. Shared Outcome(s)
9. Governance Structure(s)
10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2008-09 |
15. Actual Spending for 2008-09 |
16. Expected Results for 2008-09 |
17. Results Achieved in 2008-09 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | N/A | a) Weather and Environmental Monitoring | Not available | Salary: $230,000 O&M: G&C: $25,000 |
Salary: $230,000 O&M: G&C: $25,000 |
a) Federal Earth Observation Strategy initiated; b) CGEO Working Committees (Soil Moisture, Arctic, and Data Policy) making active progress; c) CGEO engaged in GEOSS in the Americas initiatives; d) bilateral activities with U.S.A. initiated |
a) Consultations and drafts of the Federal Earth Observation Strategy
produced; b) CGEO Working Committees (Soil Moisture, Arctic and Data Policy) continued to be engaged, and concrete outcomes are being achieved; c) CGEO engaged in GEOSS in the Americas initiatives, including organizing symposium in Panama; d) bilateral activities with U.S.A., including bilateral workshop on ice and water |
Canadian Space Agency | N/A | a) Earth Observations | Not available | $40,000 + in-kind |
$40,000 in-kind not available |
As above | As above |
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | N/A | a) Science and Technology | Not available | $20,000 + in-kind |
$20,000 in-kind not available |
As above | As above |
b) Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration and Environment | Not available | $20,000 + in-kind |
$20,000 in-kind not available |
As above | As above | ||
Natural Resources Canada | N/A | a) Earth Sciences Sector | Not available | Not available | Not available | As above | As above |
b) Canadian Forest Service
|
Not available | Not available | Not available | As above | As above | ||
Fisheries and Oceans Canada | N/A | a) Science and Technology | Not available | Not available | Not available | As above | As above |
Health Canada | N/A | a) Radiation | Not available | Not available | Not available | As above | As above |
Statistics Canada | N/A | a) Agriculture | Not available | Not available | Not available | As above | As above |
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada | N/A | a) Environment | Not available | Not available | Not available | As above | As above |
Total | Not available | Not available | Not available |
18. Comments on Variances: N/A
19. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): N/A
20. Contact Information: Kenneth Korporal, Coordinator, Canadian Group on Earth Observations Secretariat, 373 Sussex Dr., Ottawa ON K1A 0H3, 613-995-2466, kenneth.korporal@ec.gc.ca
For more information: www.cgeo.gc.ca
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Environment Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: April 1, 2005 (Great Lakes Action Plan [GLAP] IV resources)
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2010 (expiry of the Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem [COA] and GLAP IV resources)
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $40 million over five years (GLAP IV resources), plus departmental A-base
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): Through the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative, Environment Canada coordinates efforts to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem and ensures delivery of federal commitments as expressed in the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Environment Canada uses the COA to engage other federal departments and Ontario in delivering Canada's Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement commitments.
Environment Canada's Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative reflects Budget 2005 investments targeted at continuing the work under GLAP to improve the ecological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem. A total of $40 million over five years was allocated in GLAP IV to continue the environmental restoration of key aquatic Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Federal departments also use A-base resources to support their efforts towards achieving COA results.
8. Shared Outcome(s): The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement establishes broad, long-term objectives for Canada and the Unites States in restoring and protecting the Great Lakes. The COA provides a short-term plan for achieving Canada's Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement commitments. Through the COA, federal and provincial agencies are guided by a shared vision of a healthy, prosperous and sustainable Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem for current and future generations. The COA also establishes a common purpose and shared goals, results and commitments in four priority areas: restoration of Areas of Concern, reduction of harmful pollutants, achievement of lake and basin sustainability, and coordination of monitoring, research and information.
9. Governance Structure(s): Eight federal organizations are engaged in delivering Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative results under the COA: Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Parks Canada, Transport Canada, Infrastructure Canada and Health Canada.
The COA Management Committee is the senior federal-provincial management body responsible for setting priorities, establishing strategies to ensure delivery of the COA, and developing common positions and joint action plans for representing Canadian interests, and engaging in cooperative initiatives with American agencies and the International Joint Commission.
Planning, prioritization and allocation of GLAP IV monies is managed through the federal Great Lakes Executive Committee, which involves the eight federal signatories to COA. The Committee approves strategic directions and priorities for GLAP IV work activities and coordinates federal positions, strategies and initiatives in support of binational activities and discussions.
10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2008-2009 |
15. Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
16. Expected Results for 2008-2009 (Please see Appendix for COA Results Statements) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | Sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes | COA | $37.5 million GLAPIV plus departmental A-base. | $8.0 million (GLAPIV) plus departmental A-base | $4.6 million (GLAPIV) plus $2.4 million departmental A-base |
All COA results, except Ann. 2-3.2 |
Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Healthy and productive aquatic ecosystems | COA | $2.4 million GLAPIV, plus departmental A-base | $585 000 (GLAPIV) plus $4.8 million departmental A-base |
$585 000 (GLAPIV) |
Ann. 1-2.4; Ann. 1-2.6; Ann. 3-1.2; Ann. 3-1.3; Ann. 3-1.4; Ann. 3-3.1; Ann. 3-3.2; Ann. 3-4.1; Ann. 3-4.2; Ann. 3-5.1; Ann. 4-1.1; Ann. 4-2.2. |
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | Health of the environment | Agriculture Policy Framework and Growing Forward Policy Framework | $80 million under these frameworks from 2005 to 2009-2010 | $16 million | $14 million from Growing Forward | Ann. 1-1.2; Ann.1-2.2; Ann. 2-2.3; Ann. 3-1.2; Ann. 3-1.4; Ann. 3-2.2; Ann. 4-1.1; Ann. 4-2.2 |
Natural Resources Canada | Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development
and use of natural resources Ecosystem risk management: Canada understands and mitigates risks to natural resource ecosystems and human health |
Port Hope Long-term Low-level Radioactive Waste Mgmt. Project ESS: Environment and Health Program CFS Forest Harvesting in Riparian Zones ESS: Groundwater Mapping Program CFS Pesticides Program ESS: Enhancing Resilience to Climate Change Program |
Departmental A-base | $1.2 million | $1,292,302.00
|
Ann. 1-2.3; Ann. 2-3.1; Ann. 3-1.4; Ann. 3-2.4; Ann. 3-5.1; Ann. 4-2.1 |
Parks Canada | Heritage resources conservation Public appreciation and understanding Visitor experience |
National Parks National Marine Conservation Areas |
Departmental A-base | Figures not available (see note under Variances, below) |
Figures not available (see note under Variances, below) |
Ann. 3-1.1; Ann. 3-1.2; Ann. 3-1.3; Ann. 3-2.2; Ann. 3-3.2; Ann. 3-3.3; Ann. 4-1.1; Ann. 4-2.2. |
Transport Canada | Environmental protection and remediation Canadian Ballast Water Program |
COA | Departmental A-base and C-base |
$709,000 (A-base and C-base) |
$709,000 (A-base and C-base) |
Ann. 3-1.3; Ann. 3-2.1; Ann. 3-4.1; Ann. 3-4.2 |
Infrastructure Canada | Infrastructure funding programs | The Building Canada plan (Building Canada Fund, Provincial-Territorial Base Fund, Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, Green Infrastructure Fund and Gas Tax Fund) | Departmental A-base | Figures not available (see note under Variances, below) |
Figures not available (see note under Variances, below) |
Infrastructure Canada supports the objectives of the COA with particular
emphasis on Ann. 1-1.1 and Ann. 1-2.1. Infrastrucgture Canada has a project selection process in place to ensure that projects selected for funding meet specific eligibility criteria. Projects that are to be funded may be determined through a competitive merit-based process, through joint federal-provincial discussions, or the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities may accept an Annual Capital Plan than could include water and wastewater projects. |
Health Canada | Healthy environments and consumer safety | COA | Departmental A-base | Figures not available (see note under Variances, below) |
Figures not available (see not under, Variances below) |
Ann. 2-3.2 |
TOTAL GLAPIV (plus departmental funding) |
$8.6 million GLAPIV (plus departmental funding) |
$5.2 million GLAPIV (plus departmental funding) |
17. Results Achieved in 2008-2009
Environment Canada
Work continued to achieve progress in restoration of Great Lakes Areas of Concern, including the following:
Work continued to achieve a better understanding of the state and trends in the Great Lakes Ecosystem. Environment Canada worked with universities and other government agencies on many water and wildlife research projects, including the following:
Work continued to reduce the release of harmful substances. Environment Canada worked with the Great Lakes community on projects, including the following:
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Work continued to conduct science, enhance fish habitats and control the negative impacts of established invasive species.
Projects included the following:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Work continued to improve beneficial agriculture management practices, with involvement of the Great Lakes farming community
in numerous projects, including the following:
Natural Resources Canada
Work continued towards the achievement of the sustainable development of Canada's energy, forestry and mineral metals
resources within the Great Lakes Basin, including the following:
Parks Canada
Delivers the National Parks and National Marine Conservation Areas programs, and works to develop and maintain a viable
protected areas network in the Great Lakes Basin that is relevant to Canadians. Projects included the following:
Transport Canada
Work continued to ensure compliance with Canada Shipping Act regulations related to the ecosystem health of
the Great Lakes. Transport Canada undertook a wide variety of inspection, monitoring and training programs, including
the following:
Infrastructure Canada
Work continued towards providing funding to eligible infrastructure projects in support of a cleaner environment, including
improved wastewater treatment, among other objectives. Under the Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund,
as well as through the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, federal funding has been announced for numerous wastewater infrastructure
projects located in communities surrounding the Great Lakes.
Although not approved during the period covered in this report, wastewater infrastructure projects located in the following communities near the Great Lakes were announced in June 2009 as priorities for funding under the Major Infrastructure Component of the Building Canada Fund: Timmins, Owen Sound, Red Rock, Nipigon, Cornwall, South Dundas and Halton Region.
Health Canada
Work continued to enhance environmental health knowledge within the Great Lakes Basin that can be integrated into policies
to address risks to human health by all levels of government. Projects included the following:
18. Comments on Variances
Environment Canada: Dedicated Great Lakes funding (GLAP IV) is received only by Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, who also each contribute departmental A-base towards achieving results under COA. All other partners (federal and provincial) achieve COA results via departmental funding. Reported spending by Environment Canada of GLAP IV resources was less than expected in 2008-2009 due to changes in departmental resource allocations following a restructuring exercise. As mentioned above, Environment Canada also spends A-base funding to achieve COA results; however, exact figures are not available.
Parks Canada: Figures for planned and actual spending are not available, since Parks Canada financial coding systems are not designed to separate out Great Lakes-specific activities.
Health Canada: Health Canada supports work for the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative through the joint Environment Canada-Health Canada Chemicals Management Plan. Specific resource figures are not available, since this spending is not tracked separately in Health Canada's financial system.
Infrastructure Canada: Exact figures are not available for total approved, and planned and actual spending for 2008-2009.
19. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): N/A
20. Contact Information: Alison Kennedy, A/Manager, 416-739-5913
For more information: www.on.ec.gc.ca/greatlakes/default.asp
Appendix: COA Results Statements
PRIORITY 1: AREAS OF CONCERN
Result 1.1 Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from industrial or municipal wastewater to
achieve delisting targets in Nipigon Bay and St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) Areas of Concern (AOC)
Result 1.2 Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from rural non-point sources to meet delisting
criteria in the St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOC
Result 1.3 Contaminated sediment management strategies developed for the Wheatley Harbour AOC and implemented in the
St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOC
Result 1.4 Plans in place and being implemented to rehabilitate fish and wildlife habitats and populations to meet delisting
targets in the Wheatley Harbour and St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOCs
Result 1.5 Informed, effective collaboration among governments, communities and individuals to prioritize and complete
actions required for delisting and confirming environmental recovery in Nipigon Bay, Jackfish Bay, Wheatley Harbour
and St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOCs
Result 1.6 Environmental monitoring and reporting to document improvements and track environmental recovery
Result 2.1 Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from municipal sewage treatment plants, combined
sewer overflows, urban stormwater and industrial wastewater towards delisting targets in St. Marys River, St. Clair
River, Detroit River, Niagara River, Hamilton Harbour, Toronto and Region, and Bay of Quinte AOCs
Result 2.2 Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from rural non-point sources towards achieving
the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) delisting criteria in St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, Hamilton Harbour,
and Toronto and Region AOCs
Result 2.3 Progress made in developing sediment management strategies to reduce ecological and human health risk from
contaminated sediments in Thunder Bay, Peninsula Harbour, St. Marys River, St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River,
Hamilton Harbour, Port Hope and Bay of Quinte AOCs
Result 2.4 Long-term management plans being developed and priority actions for delisting being implemented for rehabilitation
and protection of fish and wildlife habitats and populations in St. Marys River, St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara
River, Hamilton Harbour, Toronto and Region, and Bay of Quinte AOCs
Result 2.5 Informed, effective collaboration among governments, communities and individuals to prioritize and complete
actions required for delisting and confirming environmental recovery in AOCs
Result 2.6 Identify monitoring needs, undertake required studies and evaluate results to assess environmental recovery
and support remediation strategies in AOCs
PRIORITY 2: HARMFUL POLLUTANTS
Result 1.1 Reduction in releases of Tier 1 substances beyond the 2005 achievements towards the goal of virtual elimination
Result 2.1 Reduction in releases of Criteria Air Pollutants
Result 2.2 Coordinated activities to reduce releases from municipal wastewater
Result 2.3 Develop and initiate a program for the Sound Management of Chemical Substances in the Great Lakes Basin
Result 3.1 Improved understanding of the sources, fate and impacts of harmful pollutants in the Great Lakes Basin
Result 3.2 Human health risks from harmful pollutants are understood and addressed in the Great Lakes Basin
PRIORITY 3: LAKE AND BASIN SUSTAINABILITY
Result 1.1 Increased awareness and appreciation of the Great Lakes and their contributions to social, economic and environmental
well-being
Result 1.2 Increased stewardship actions that work towards a balance between human well-being and prosperity, and healthy
aquatic ecosystems
Result 1.3 Sustainable use of land, water and other natural resources to provide benefits from the Great Lakes now and
in the future
Result 1.4 Enhanced knowledge about beneficial and harmful impacts of human activities on Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems
and resources
Result 2.1 Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from industrial and municipal wastewater,
combined sewer overflows and urban stormwater sources, consistent with actions specified in binational Lakewide Management
Plans and binational lake action plans
Result 2.2 Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from rural sources by undertaking actions
specified in the binational Lakewide Management Plans and binational lake action plans
Result 2.3 Identification of contaminated sediment and development of sediment management plans to reduce the release
and impact of sediment-bound contaminants on the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem
Result 2.4 Enhanced knowledge about beneficial and harmful impacts of human activities on Great Lakes water quality
Result 3.1 Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems and habitats are protected, restored and sustained consistent with binational
Great Lakes planning
Result 3.2 Progress on rehabilitation of Great Lakes native species to restore the health of aquatic ecosystems, consistent
with binational Great Lakes planning
Result 3.3 Enhanced knowledge about beneficial and harmful impacts of human activities on Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems,
habitats and species
Result 4.1 Implementation of the National Action Plan to Address the Threat of Aquatic Invasive Species in the Great
Lakes
Result 4.2 Enhanced knowledge about the harmful impacts of aquatic invasive species on Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems,
food webs and species
Result 5.1 The impacts of climate change on the Great Lakes ecosystem composition, structure and function, including
biodiversity (organisms and their habitat), water quality and quantity, human health and safety (including access to
clean drinking water), social well-being and economic prosperity, are understood by governments and the Great Lakes
community
Result 6.1 The potential risks to Great Lakes drinking water intakes are identified and assessed, and early actions
to address risks are undertaken
Result 6.2 Develop knowledge and understanding of water quality and quantity issues of concern to the Great Lakes as
drinking water sources
PRIORITY 4: COORDINATION OF MONITORING, RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
Result 1.1 Responsive and comprehensive monitoring and research programs
Result 2.1 Improved reporting on environmental conditions, changes and progress
Result 2.2 Increased sharing of data and information among governments, organizations and Basin residents
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Implementation of the Species at Risk Act
2. Name of Lead Department: Environment Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Biodiversity is conserved and protected
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2000
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Ongoing (Current approval of sunsetting resources portion ends in 2011-2012)
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $713 million
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): This horizontal initiative supports the development and implementation of the National Strategy for the Protection of Species at Risk and the Species at Risk Act (SARA) that came fully into force in June 2004. Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Parks Canada are the departments and agency responsible for the protection of species at risk under federal jurisdiction. The three departments received funds from Treasury Board in 2000 for the "Implementation of the National Strategy for the Protection of Species at Risk and their Critical Habitat", in 2003 for the "Implementation of the Act respecting the protection of wildlife species at risk in Canada" and in 2007 for "Delivering results under the Species at Risk Act".
8. Shared Outcome(s):
9. Governance Structure(s):
10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2008-2009 | 15. Estimated Actual Spending for 2008-2009 | 16. Expected Results for 2008-2009 | 17. Results Achieved in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | Wildlife is conserved and protected | Environment Canada Species at Risk Program | $424,000,000 | $50,970,500 | $46,454,968 |
|
|
Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Fisheries Management | Fisheries and Oceans Canada Species at Risk Program | $176,500,000 | $24,806,000 | $24,193,700 | ||
Parks Canada | Heritage Resources Conservation |
Parks Canada Species at Risk Program | $102,500,000 | $14,100,000 | $9,287,000 | ||
Total | $713,000,000 | $89,257,500 | $79,935,668 |
18. Comments on Variances:
19. Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable):
20. Contact information:
Mary Taylor
Director
Conservation Service Delivery and Permitting Division
Canadian Wildlife Service
Environment Canada
819-953-6283
Mary.Taylor@ec.gc.ca
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: The Federal Contaminated Sites Accelerated Action Plan (FCSAAP, which was succeeded by the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan [FCSAP], approved March 2005)
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Environment Canada and Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are reduced (Environment Canada); Management Policy Development and Oversight (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat)
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: FCSAAP commenced on April 1, 2003; FCSAP has been in effect since April 2005
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: FCSAAP funding to March 31, 2008. Replaced by FCSAP in April 2005, and this funding is expected to continue for 15 years. Currently, funding has been approved until March 31, 2011.
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date): $1,709.6 million
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): FCSAAP and its successor, FCSAP, are long-term mechanisms in place to address federal contaminated sites having the highest risks for human health and the environment. At the end of March 2004, federal contaminated sites represented a financial liability of approximately $3.5 billion. Although responsibility for the management and remediation of federal contaminated sites rests with the responsible custodial departments, the overall program is administered jointly by Environment Canada and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
8. Shared Outcome(s): Reduce federal financial liability and risks to human health and the environment, including fish habitat. Increase public confidence in the overall management of federal real property through the effective risk management or remediation of individual federal contaminated sites.
9. Governance Structure(s): Federal Contaminated Sites Assistant Deputy Ministers' Steering Committee is supported by the Director Generals' Committee, the Contaminated Sites Management Working Group and the FCSAP Secretariat at Environment Canada, which provides overall program coordination.
10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)* | 14. Planned Spending for 2008-2009 | 15. Estimated Actual Spending for 2008-2009** | 16. Expected Results for 2008-2009*** | 17. Results Achieved in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | Enterprise Activities | Asset Management | $5,465,649 | $666,320 | $621,866 Variance: |
Remediation and risk management for three projects (three sites) Assessment of approximately 12 sites |
On-going remediation of one site Assessment of eight sites |
Canada Border Services Agency | Corporate Management and Direction | Infrastructure and Environment | $1,620,212 | $211,785 | $211,785 | Remediation and risk management for one project (one site) | In-situ remediation continued at one site. Human health and environmental risks were actively managed and monitored. |
Canadian Food Inspection Agency | N/A | N/A | $183,783 | $0 | $0 | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Correctional Service of Canada | Internal Services | Facilities and Asset Management Services | $10,368,094 | $1,534,331 | $1,605,755 Variance: +$71,424 (additional funds spent were carried forward from previous years) |
Remediation and risk management for three projects (three sites) | Three remediations and seven assessments were completed in 2008-2009. |
Environment Canada (includes Projects, Expert Support, and FCSAP Secretariat) |
Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are reduced | Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are assessed | $ 93,775,119 | 12,689,636 | $9,589,766 Variance: |
Projects Remediation and risk management for eight projects (89 sites) Assessment of approximately 26 projects (125 sites) |
Projects Remediation projects: eight projects (for 47 sites) Assessment projects: 32 projects (for 172 sites). |
Risks to Canadians and impacts on the environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are managed | Expert Support Provision of scientific and technical advice to custodial departments with respect to the ecological risk
evaluation of federal contaminated sites Secretariat |
Expert Support Provided guidance and expert advice to 16 custodial departments for the management of their sites so that
risk to the environment is eliminated or minimized |
|||||
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (includes Projects and Expert Support) |
Internal Services | Contaminated Sites: FCSAP projects | $100,102,485 | $17,130,722 | $16,430,322 Variance: |
Projects Assessment of approximately 732 sites Remediation and risk management for 153 sites |
Assessment activities were performed at 778 sites, of which 69 sites
require no further action and have been closed. Remediation and/or risk management activities were performed at 164 sites, of which 32 sites require no further action and have been closed. Based on a review of historical information, the Department identified an additional 742 sites that require no further action. The Department closed a total of 843 sites in the 2008-2009 fiscal year (742+69+32). |
FCSAP: Expert Support | Expert Support Provision of scientific and technical advice to custodial departments with respect to the risk management of federal contaminated sites Participation in the project submission process, including review of information provided by departments and provision of fish habitat portion of ecological risk evaluation score |
Expert Support Provided scientifically sound guidance and expert advice to custodial departments for the management of federally owned and/or managed contaminated sites so that impacts to fish and fish habitat are eliminated or minimized Reviewed project eligibility requirement documents and provided input into ecological risk evaluation scores to ensure that remediation and risk management projects are eligible for funding |
|||||
Health Canada (includes Projects and Expert Support) |
First Nations and Inuit Health | First Nations and Inuit Health Protection | $51,167,054 | $7,355,638 | $7,353,158 Variance: |
Projects Remediation and risk management for eight projects (eight sites) |
Completed two of seven projects; remediation ongoing with five of seven remaining projects |
Contaminated Sites | Healthy Environments, Consumer Safety Branch | Expert Support Provision of scientific and technical advice to custodial departments with respect to the human health risk
management of federal contaminated sites |
1. PQRAs were peer-reviewed and scored for 51 federal sites, in
support of the FCSAP funding process. Guidance Development: |
||||
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada | Responsible Federal Stewardship | Contaminated Sites Remediation | $833,790,704 | $111,753,358 | $ 90,830,503 Variances: |
Indian and Inuit Affairs Remediation and risk management at 43 projects (81 sites) Assessment of approximately 2745 sites |
Remediation and risk management at 43 projects (80 sites) Assessment of approximately 2794 sites |
Northern Land and Resources | Contaminated Sites | Northern Affairs Remediation and risk management for 26 projects (29 sites) Assessment of approximately 113 sites |
Northern Affairs Remediation and risk management work carried out on 22 projects (25 sites) Assessment work undertaken at 152 sites, including 114 new sites assessed |
||||
Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated | Management of federal bridge, highway and tunnel infrastructure, and properties in the Montr�al area | N/A | $795,672 | $109,734 | $59,734 Variance: |
Remediation and risk management for one project (one site) | Ongoing remediation and risk management for one project (one site) |
Marine Atlantic Inc. | Corporate Management | FCSAP (projects) | $120,000 | $0 | $0 | Not applicable; joined program in 2009 | Not applicable; joined program in 2009 |
National Defence | Contribute to Canada and the international community | Contribute to the international community in accordance with Canadian interests and values | $380,070,345 | $65,358,805 | $64,720,715 Variance: |
Remediation and risk management for 77 projects (144 sites) Assessment of approximately 219 sites |
Remediation and risk management for 68 projects (125 sites). Work completed
on 13 sites. Assessment for 50 projects (136 sites). Assessment completed on 53 sites. |
National Capital Commission | Real Asset Management | Land and real asset management | $8,410,400 | $1,619,433 | $1,469,600 Variance: |
Remediation and risk management for three projects (three sites) Assessment of approximately 54 sites |
Remediation and risk management for three projects (three sites) Assessment of 69 sites |
National Research Council | Internal Services | Environmental Operations | $4,835,000 | $0 | $0 | Not applicable; joined program in 2009 | Not applicable; joined program in 2009 |
Natural Resources Canada | Corporate Management | The provision of relevant and timely policy analysis and advice for decision-making on government priorities and departmental responsibilities | $27,915,806 | $474,000 | $466,806 Variance: |
Remediation of one project (one site) Assessment of approximately 16 sites |
Remediation for one project (one site) Assessment of 10 sites |
Parks Canada | Conserve Heritage Resources | Active Management and Restoration | $38,814,369 | $4,531,933 | $2,885,904 Variance: |
Remediation and risk management for 20 projects (26 sites) Assessment of approximately 38 sites |
Remediation and/or risk management for 14 projects (11 sites) Assessment of approximately 19 sites |
Public Works and Government Services Canada (includes Projects and Expert Support) |
Federal Accommodation and Holdings | FCSAP (projects) | $31,810,173 | $4,893,181 | $4,822,181 Variance: |
Projects Remediation and risk management at 13 projects (17 sites) Assessment of approximately 41 sites |
Projects Remediation and risk management at 14 projects (18 sites) Assessment of approximately 41 sites |
FCSAP (expert services) | Expert Support Development of project management tools, dissemination of information on innovative technologies and technologies used at individual projects |
Expert Support Developed project management tools, disseminated information on innovative technologies, and technologies used at individual projects |
|||||
Royal Canadian Mounted Police | Corporate Infrastructure and Internal Services | $23,100,214 | $6,453,020 | $2,262,579 Variance: |
Remediation and risk management for 14 projects (15 sites) Assessment of approximately 647 sites |
Remediation and risk management for 14 projects (15 sites) Assessment of approximately 661 sites |
|
Transport Canada | Sustainable Transportation Development and the Environment | Environmental Programs | $150,768,926 | $14,475,720 | $12,736,200 Variance:
|
Remediation and risk management for 17 projects (17 sites) Assessment of eight sites |
Remediation and risk management for 14 projects (14 sites) Assessment of five sites |
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat | Management Policy Development and Oversight | Assets and Acquired Services | $2,747,200 | $480,804 | $480,804 | Ensures consistency with Treasury Board policies on management of federal contaminated sites, reviews financial aspects of proposals, administers fund and advises Environment Canada on monitoring of government-wide progress | Advice on the management of federal contaminated sites to custodian departments and to the Environment Canada Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan Secretariat; maintenance of the Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory; chaired and coordinated planning for the 2008 Federal Contaminated Sites National Workshop, held in Vancouver, British Columbia, from April 28 to May 1, 2008 |
Unallocated program management resources | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||
Accommodation charges | $9,046,626 | $1,430,446 | $1,430,446 | ||||
Total | $1,774,907,831 | $251,168,866 | $217,978,144 Variances: $33,190,722 ($4,712,356 carried forward; $20,762,618 reprofiled; $6,580,363 lapsed; $1,206,809 reallocated internally; -$71,424 funds brought forward from previous years) |
||||
Notes: * Treasury Board approved as of June 11, 2009 ** Based on information provided by custodians in June 2009; does not include custodian cost share. Program reporting for 2008-2009 will not be finalized before the fall of 2009. *** Note that custodians have flexibility with respect to activities undertaken and often the number of sites actually worked on will vary from what was planned due to unforeseen delays (weather, difficult access to remote locations, etc.) or changes in custodian priorities. |
18. Comments on Variances: See comments in column 15.
19. Results to be Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): N/A
20. Contact Information: FCSAP.PASCF@ec.gc.ca
For more information: www.federalcontaminatedsites.gc.ca/
Lead Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Lead Department Program Activity |
3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Federal Theme Partners | Natural Resources Canada, Transport Canada, Health Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada, National Research Council, Industry Canada |
Start Date |
April 1, 2007 |
End Date | March 31, 2011 |
The Clean Air Agenda is a fundamental component of the Government of Canada's broader efforts to address the challenges of climate change and air pollution, with a view to building a clean and healthy environment for all Canadians. These challenges are being addressed through:
The 2008-2009 marked the second year of the Clean Air Agenda's four year mandate. This horizontal Agenda involves nine federal partners who deliver on 44 programs aimed at:
Environment Canada provides federal leadership for the Clean Air Agenda through the coordination of the efforts made by its CAA federal partners, including the responsibility to collectively report to Canadians on the framework.
For consolidated Agenda-level results, please refer to Canada's Performance Report 2008-2009 on the TBS website: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/reports-rapports/cp-rc/2008-2009/cp-rc03-eng.asp#clean
For more detailed information on Clean Air Agenda results achieved in 2008-2009, the following tables detail results achieved at the Theme and Program Level.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending |
Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$ 2.2 B | $ 549.7 M | $ 463.4 M |
Lead Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Transport Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Health Canada |
CARA is an integrated, nationally consistent approach to reduce emissions of both air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs), intended to protect the health and environment of Canadians, and to avoid falling further behind our trading partners. The regulations and targets to be pursued under CARA are designed to:
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the Theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
In support of the reduction of air emissions:
Progress was made in developing and implementing the Regulatory Framework for Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions, including the complementary offset system, and the infrastructure to support the system. The plan to reduce emissions by 20% in 2020 from 2006 levels is on track, however, the economic downturn and the renewed engagement by the new US Administration has required that we fine-tune our approach.
Environment Canada worked intensively, with affected sectors, provinces and non-government organizations, on development of a comprehensive air management system, including an approach to national regulations of industrial emissions of air pollutants consistent with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEPA).
The support of science was very successful as illustrated by the timely delivery of science describing the air quality co-benefits on human and environmental health from proposed GHG emission regulations; assessing the impact of marine emissions in support of the North American application to the International Maritime Organization to establish an emissions control area, and; science to support the development of on- and off-road transportation regulations. Ongoing refinement and use of the Air Quality Benefit Assessment Tool continued in order to estimate health benefits of proposed air pollution reductions: such as the development of methodologies for the analysis of life expectancy and quality-of-life impacts of ozone and particulate matter.
In support of a more efficient and cleaner transportation sector:
The Government increased the efficiency and stringency of its regulations and regulatory approaches by:
In support of safer and energy efficient consumer products:
The Government published three regulations for 1) architectural paints, 2) auto refinish products and 3) certain consumer products to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds which contribute to the formation of smog.
The Government amended the Energy Efficiency Regulations to include new performance standards for 7 products previously unregulated and increased the stringency of 4 existing standards. Notable standards included those for general service light bulbs and gas furnaces. The amendment also prescribed labelling requirements for the three most commonly used light bulbs. In addition 3 new Energy Star specifications have been introduced in Canada and 14 existing specifications made more stringent to increase energy efficiency.
Numerous initiatives were also conducted to address the issue of residential wood combustion, especially in urban areas, to better scope and design regulatory and non-regulatory instruments such as a collaboration with the Municipality of Whitehorse, Yukon Environment and Yukon Health in the development and implementation of an ambient air quality monitoring study of wood smoke emissions within the city of Whitehorse.
In support of improving air quality in Canadian households and buildings:
The priority list of indoor air contaminants was finalized in consultation with federal, provincial, non-governmental and industry stakeholders, and work on assessments of the first priority substances was initiated. These assessments will form the basis of new Canadian Residential Indoor Air Quality guidelines, which will be used to reduce Canadians' exposure to these substances.
Residential Indoor Air Quality Guidelines for carbon monoxide and ozone were finalized for publication in Canada Gazette, Part I, for public consultation.
Draft indoor air assessments were completed for particulate matter and NO2; guidelines will be developed and published in Canada Gazette, Part I, for public consultation, in 2009-2010. These guidelines will provide the scientific foundation for developing measures to reduce Canadians' exposure to these two substances.
More than 40 companies across Canada are now certified for radon testing service, providing a better service to the Canadian public; there were none in 2007-2008.
A pilot radon/thoron testing survey was conducted in Winnipeg to assess health risks from exposure to thoron.
In support of more accurate reporting, as well as easier compliance on air emissions:
Instruments were developed to secure effective management of air emissions, such as:
Analysis of the energy, emissions and economic consequences of achieving the Government's proposed
greenhouse gas emission reduction target were also conducted, supporting the development of effective regulatory measures.
Click here for CARA program-level details.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$347,300,000 |
$76,006,683 |
$62,634,047 |
Lead Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
Energy production and use is responsible for the majority of Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollution emissions.
The Government's Clean Air Agenda combines a regulatory agenda for major energy-related sources of emissions with complementary
program measures, which encourage action in key areas that cannot be effectively addressed through regulation.
As part of the Clean Air Agenda, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) are
delivering the ecoENERGY Initiatives - a set of measures to promote smarter energy use, increase clean energy supply,
and support the development and deployment of clean energy technologies.
The suite of Clean Energy initiatives has been designed to complement the regulatory aspects of the Clean Air Agenda
by highlighting existing government work and introducing new measures that immediately address important sources of
emissions and that will facilitate the transition to major emissions reductions that will be required by regulation
over the longer term.
As the lead department for the Clean Energy theme, NRCan is responsible for collecting, collating and reporting information
on the progress of Clean Energy programming.
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
All reporting is for 2008-09 unless otherwise stated.
Immediate Outcomes
Partnerships and collaborative agreements with stakeholders to promote clean energy activities that result in lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Involvement by industry in developing and using energy efficiency products, services, and processes that result in lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Transfer and/or use of clean energy technologies and practices leading to lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Awareness and understanding among stakeholders of the potential for, and methods of, reducing GHGs and CACs through energy production and use.
Policy and monitoring that supports GHG and CAC reductions.
Intermediate Outcomes
Adoption of energy efficiency products and services that result in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Adoption of renewable energy products and services, and strengthened infrastructure, resulting in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Availability of innovative, market-ready energy processes, products and services that result in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Final Outcomes
Reduced emissions of GHGs and CACs from clean energy activities.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$1,177,040,000 |
$206,877,000 | $202,535,424 |
Lead Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Natural Resources Canada, Environment Canada |
The Clean Transportation Theme program measures will work towards: improved management of sustainable transportation infrastructure in communities; improved efficiency and reduced emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHG) from the movement of goods; and improved fuel efficiency and reduced emissions from the personal vehicle fleet.
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
In 2008-2009, the twelve programs under the Clean Transportation Theme were in their second year of operation, building upon the organizational groundwork established during the first year. Performance under this theme should still be considered at this point in time in terms of outputs, rather than outcomes, however there are some promising outcomes being achieved in terms of the uptake of new technologies and best practices. Recent changes in general economic conditions may affect the reach of these programs: the moderation of fuel prices reduced consumers' incentives to purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles and to drive less; the decline in economic activity reduced investments in new equipment and technologies in the freight industries; and there was a sharp decline in purchases of new vehicles of all types.
Financial incentives and assistance was provided to members of the transport sector to increase uptake of emission-reducing technologies. In 2008-2009, over 117,000 ecoAuto Rebate applications were processed, and almost $120 million was distributed to eligible applicants. $6.9 million was spent during the year to retire 17,000 older vehicles under the National Vehicle Scrappage Program. Six projects, which will receive funding of about $2 million, continue to be implemented under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund, and an additional nine projects for $3.5 million in funding were selected in January, 2009 and are underway. The two rounds of funding under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund have allowed an uptake of 1254 pieces of emerging technology equipment across four modes of transportation. Similarly, fifteen projects with funding of $3.7 million are underway under the Freight Technology Incentives Program, and an additional 17 projects, with funding of $3.8 million, were selected in February, 2009. The two rounds of funding under the Freight Technology Incentives Program have allowed an uptake of 1654 pieces of proven technology equipment.
Under the ecoMobility Program, 14 projects worth $3 million were selected, of which three contribution agreements were signed in 2008-2009 and the remainder are under negotiation; proposals for a second round of funding were received on May 1, 2009. Following a competitive process, the Port Metro Vancouver was awarded $3 million in funding (including $2M under the Marine Shore Power Program and $1M under the Western Economic Diversification) to implement marine shore power at Canada Place - the first such initiative in Canada and the third in the world.
Ensuring that businesses and consumers have access to good information about fuel saving technologies and best practices is an important objective of the Clean Transportation theme, as this builds knowledge, awareness and capacity to adopt these strategies. In 2008-2009, a wide range of information services (including guidelines, toolkits, reports, workshops, conferences, awards, webinars, and website presentations) were made available by the transportation programs. There were over 461,000 visits to the ecoAuto Rebate Program website. The ecoTechnology for Vehicles Program provided information to over 50,000 people via its website and outreach activities.
Through training and education efforts, Clean Transportation Programs seek to change people's behaviour in favour of more sustainable transportation options. For example, under the ecoMobility Program, several transportation demand management (TDM) learning events took place over the year to foster implementation and measurement of TDM policies and programs at the municipal level. Almost 112,000 new drivers applied fuel efficient driving practices that they learned from the training materials provided under the ecoEnergy for Personal Vehicles Program. Under the ecoEnergy for Fleets program, the capacity of transportation professionals to reduce emissions was enhanced through training and through the provision of decision-support tools and information materials, including workshops. There were over 35,000 such knowledge transfer opportunities.
The completion and dissemination of research studies is essential to inform government, industry and consumers on matters ranging from program design to the availability and cost-effectiveness of emission-reducing technologies. In 2008-2009, the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry completed a number of studies to examine the feasibility of mandating heavy truck speed limiters. These included traffic modeling to better understand the safety effects from differential car-truck speeds on highways, quantifying the environmental benefits from fuel savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), and an assessment of the trade and competitiveness impacts of a speed limiter mandate. The ecoTechnology for Vehicles Program evaluated the fuel efficiency, emissions and safety performance of 14 advanced vehicle technologies (including full electric, plug hybrid, clean diesel, hydrogen fuel cell, hydrogen internal combustion engine and advanced gasoline vehicles), and initiated several studies of the market and regulatory barriers to the introduction of these new technologies. Four research studies and technical reviews (idling, eco-driving, driver training retention, and consumer buying habits) were completed under the ecoEnergy for Personal Vehicles Program and were used to update driver behaviour programs. The National Vehicle Scrappage Program conducted a baseline survey of owners of older vehicles to measure awareness of vehicle scrappage programs and impacts of older vehicles on the environment.
Continuing improvements are being made to the measurement of program outputs and outcomes, so as to ensure that tangible
outcomes will be measured as the programs complete their mandates.
Click here for Clean Transportation program-level details.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$461,716,953 |
$219,357,630 | $160,359,768 |
Lead Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | National Research Council of Canada |
Health Canada and National Research Council of Canada are responsible for implementation of the Indoor Air Quality Theme as an integral element of the government's broader Clean Air Agenda (CAA). This CAA Theme consists of two elements; the Indoor Air Research and Development initiative (National Research Council Canada) and the Radon Program (Health Canada). Together these initiatives will contribute to Theme results by supporting the research, development and dissemination of knowledge of indoor air quality risks and ways by which these risks can be managed. By generating and sharing knowledge about indoor air pollutants and how they can be managed, the Indoor Air Quality Theme elements will support informed decision-making by governments, industry and consumers on cost-effective means to reduce harmful exposures and, in so doing, reduce health risks. While the findings from these two research-based initiatives can provide useful input to potential regulatory initiatives under the Clean Air Agenda, their utility extends well beyond that, most notably by helping to identify and target non-regulatory measures that address indoor air concerns.
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the Theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Radon Strategy
Immediate Outcomes
Improved awareness by public, property managers, and governments of health risks and causes of reduced indoor air quality and strategies to improve it:
Development and support of technological solutions for improved indoor air quality:
Increased knowledge of health impacts and mitigation strategies related to indoor air pollution:
Indoor Air Research and Development Initiative
Immediate Outcomes
Increased knowledge of health impacts and mitigation strategies related to indoor air pollutants
Increased knowledge and support for the development of technological solutions for improved indoor air quality
Radon Strategy
Indoor Air Research and Development Initiative
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$23,000,000 | $6,417,000 | $6,417,000 |
Lead Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Health Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada |
The six Adaptation programs will begin to help Canadians build their capacity to adapt, by developing knowledge, information, tools and/or collaborative arrangements that they need to take action to successfully reduce their risks. These initiatives differ from many of the programs within the Clean Air Agenda as they do not contribute to reductions of greenhouse gases, but rather support the critical complementary activity of adaptation to climate change impacts.
About half of the total funding will build capacity to respond to diverse risks across the country and remain relevant to many economic sectors and regions. The other half will be targeted to address three urgent risks: (i) the North , where impacts of a changing climate are already very visible, vulnerability of communities and infrastructure is high, and the federal government has unique constitutional and land claims obligations toward Aboriginal people and northerners; (ii) human health , which faces particular risks through changing climate conditions and extremes, and the spread of infectious diseases; and (iii) infrastructure , in which governments and firms will invest hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade, which must be designed to endure climate conditions that will differ from those of the past.
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the Theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
While it is early days for the adaptation theme programs, progress is evident, especially with respect to increasing the availability of adaptation and air quality information and products. For example, the Improved Climate Change Scenarios Program completed development of the new Canadian global climate model and began testing the new regional climate model. Model output was disseminated via the Canadian Centre for Modeling and Analysis website and climate scenarios delivery was expanded with the addition of a server at name Yukon type College. The atmospheric hazards network also expanded to include all five regions of Canada.
The Climate Change and Health Adaptation in Northern/Inuit Communities Program developed a climate change application guide that resulted in 14 of 15 project applications for FY 2009-2010 meeting the application criteria. Also in the north, ten aboriginal and northern communities identified key risks and vulnerabilities to climate change impacts through the Program Assist Northerners in Assessing Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities. In addition, 12 adaptation action plans identifying concrete community priorities and the action to manage risks were developed and 9 adaptation tools produced. Finally, eight communities completed climate change risk management strategies.
The Regional Adaptation Collaboratives Program solicited letters of interest from across the country and selected five to develop full proposals. The Innovative Risk Management Tools Program initiated development of adaptation tools in the areas of infrastructure, planning, energy, and risk management.
The national Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) and Forecast Program delivered AQHI forecasts on the Weather Office website for 26 locations across Canada. Memoranda of Agreement with provincial and municipal partners were developed to support outreach to Canadians. Enhancements, including improved accessibility, were made to the national AQHI portal web site. Development of an e-learning course for health professionals on the AQHI was begun. As the Index becomes more available across the country and is reported regularly by the media, the final outcomes indicating behaviour change and reduced incidence of air quality related mortality and morbidity will be measurable.
As part of the Climate and Infectious Disease Alert and Response System Program, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) produced tick distribution risk maps. Five proposals for contribution funding from academic institutions were approved. Under the Heat Alert and Response System project, Health Canada developed heat health information products and a heat monitoring system framework. An assessment of the scientific information and methodologies available on heat and human health was conducted. Memoranda of Agreement were signed with three communities to pilot a heat alert and response system and discussions were initiated with a fourth pilot community.
To effectively develop and implement adaptation measures to cope with a changing climate, the adaptation theme programs enhanced collaboration with a variety of partners. The Assist Northerners in Assessing Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities program strengthened existing partnerships that were based on years of collaboration with aboriginal organizations, territorial governments, and federal government departments. New partnerships were established with engineers, planners, and the financial sector, as well as with national and international climate change experts in developing adaptation tools.
Progress was also made in the area of increasing capacity to conduct and apply adaptation and air quality science. For example, the program, Assist Northerners in Assessing Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities, funded 21 projects that supported aboriginal and northern capacity building and training initiatives. The Improved Climate Change Scenarios Program regional training sessions on the use of scenarios were well-attended all across Canada. Several adaptation theme programs hosted workshops with their targeted stakeholders.
For more details on the theme results, please refer to the individual program results.
Click here for Adaptation program-level details.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$115,900,000 |
$26,045,025 |
$20,348,100 |
Lead Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Natural Resources Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Industry Canada |
This theme aims to advance Canada's international action, improve Canadian air quality and reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. Funding in the amount of $50M is required to implement the following:
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the Theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Canadian leaders and senior officials are well-prepared to advance Canada's strategic interests related to climate change and air pollution in multilateral and bilateral fora.
Canada's domestic and international climate change and air pollution policies & negotiating positions are aligned and reflective of national circumstances.
Canada's profile as a provider of climate-friendly technologies is enhanced.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$50,000,000 |
$10,700,838 | $9,741,268 |
Lead Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | -- |
This program was proposed by the federal government in support of Turning the Corner: A Plan to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollution but has not been launched. The main objective is to improve capacity of communities and individuals to take action on clear air and climate change by stimulating the trial of new actions and purchases, which may have lasting benefits and result in significant reductions over the longer-term, which will lead Canadians to take positive environmental actions at home, school and workplace.
The goal would be to ensure that funded projects have measurable results and can be replicated by other groups or organizations. CACP would fund programs in the following areas: Home and outdoor energy efficiency - Encourage energy and water efficiency, waste reduction and the replacement or purchase of more energy-efficient products or technologies, including energy-efficient home appliances, lighting, lawn mowers and the purchase of energy from renewable sources; School-based sustainability - Improve the energy efficiency of school operations and facility management by engaging custodians, principals, teachers, students and parents. The program includes an educational component to engage teachers and students in learning about energy efficiency, water efficiency and waste reduction; and Greening the workplace - Inspire employees to adopt environmentally friendly behaviours at work and to encourage business owners and managers to implement measures to reduce energy consumption and associated emissions in their daily operations.
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the Theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes (If launched)
Final Outcomes (If launched)
In preparation for possible launch, program materials and tools, including application forms, proposal evaluation
tools, and greenhouse gas / criteria air contaminants valuation tools were developed.
Click here for Partnerships program-level details.
Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming | Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$12,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $345,217 |
Lead Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Natural Resources Canada, Transport Canada, Health Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada, National Research Council, Industry Canada |
The Management and Accountability Theme sets the path for the Clean Air Agenda, Horizontal Management, Accountability and Reporting Framework (CAA-HMARF) which facilitates management and reporting of financial and non-financial performance information at the program level within 8 themes on a consolidated basis (at the theme and agenda levels) across participating departments and agencies. This then ensures that ongoing monitoring and assessment of progress in achieving objectives and expected outcomes against financial investments is made; and facilitates the setting of priorities and reallocating of resources, as appropriate ensuring engagement of the governance structure within the CAA-HMARF.
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the Theme level; please refer to program expected results.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The Management and Accountability Theme continued to implement the horizontal management, accountability and reporting framework for the 44 programs and 8 Themes of the Clean Air Agenda (CAA), with focus on meeting targeted short term results and ensuring accountability for progress toward longer term CAA outcomes. While the first year of implementation (2007-2008) involved building the institutional context in which federal partners could work collectively, this second year of the four year mandate (2007-2011) saw progress towards more engagement on horizontal issues.
Over 2008-2009, foundational management components were implemented (e.g., CAA Program Activity Architecture, a performance logic model). These provided the basis for an organized, cohesive and methodical approach for the ongoing collection and analysis of performance information and reporting of results. This also supported the development of a database of comprehensive and consistent performance information for use in developing future programming while ensuring continued transparent approaches to horizontal management and accountability were supported and detailed integrated information was made available to Parliament on investments made within the context of the Clean Air Agenda. With respect to the CAA program architecture, there was ongoing support for the overall logic model for the CAA. This was reinforced by additional investments made to the CAA as part of the 2009 Budget Economic Action Plan.Total Approved Spending over the 2007-2011 period for Theme | Total 2008-2009 Planned Spending for Theme programming
(as adjusted mid-year) |
Actual Spending for 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$5,000,000 |
$1,250,000 | $1,029,395 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Since May 2008, the government worked intensively with affected sectors, provinces and non-government organizations on development of a comprehensive air management system, including an approach to national regulations of industrial emissions of air pollutants consistent with the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).
Although substantial elements of the GHG regulations were drafted, the economic downturn and the renewed engagement by the new US Administration has required that we fine-tune our approach.
Consultations with stakeholders were continued through 2008-2009, initially to get feedback on the proposed framework.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$60,500,000 |
$10,272,000 | $10,153,620 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Marine Spark-Ignition Engine and Off-road Recreational Vehicle Emission Regulations: Progress has been made on the development of the final regulations. Publication of final regulations in Canada Gazette Part II is anticipated in 2009-2010
Amendments to the Off-Road Compression-Ignition Engine Emission Regulations: Development of the proposed amendments to incorporate more stringent U.S. Tier 4 standards is on-going with an anticipated publication in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in 2009-2010.
Amendments to the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations: Development of the proposed amendments to incorporate On-Board Diagnostic System requirements for heavy-duty vehicles is on-going with an anticipated publication in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in 2009-2010.
On-going administration of vehicle and engine emission regulations including registering and tracking Notices of Defect; registering and tracking temporary import declarations; and responding to technical inquiries from regulatees seeking clarification regarding elements of the regulations.
National marine emissions inventory and forecast, air quality modelling and ecosystems effects analyses were completed. These analyses supported the decision to proceed jointly with the U.S. to apply for an Emission Control Area designation on March 27, 2009. Additional analyses such as cost effects, traffic assessments were also conducted.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$24,200,000 |
$4,380,000 |
$3,088,395 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | C00 - Sustainable Transportation Development and the Environment |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Motor Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations
Emission Reductions from Rail
Emission Reductions from Ships
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$22,500,000 |
$4,684,500 |
$2,152,280 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 - Clean Energy |
Provision of support for regulations implemented for model year 2011 and published in the Canada Gazette by December 2008
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Immediate Outcome: Canada's motor vehicles and engines fleet becomes increasingly more fuel efficient and cleaner as a result of new vehicle regulations to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gases beginning in 2011 and new emission control standards applied to regulated modes of transportation and engines used and sold in Canada.
Results: Ongoing analysis and support has been provided to advance the development of light-duty vehicle fuel efficiency regulations. However, publication in the Canada Gazette has been delayed primarily because of a shift in approach in Canada. Delays were also incurred while waiting for US regulations to be finalized and amendments to the Motor Vehicle Fuel Consumption Standards Act to be finalized and tabled.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$3,200,000 | $1,628,783 |
$576,109 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The three VOC Concentration Regulations for certain consumer products, architectural paints and auto refinish products were published in Canada Gazette part I on April 26, 2008.These three regulatory initiatives will reduce emissions of VOCs which contribute to the formation of smog.
Initiated and completed two research studies: Residential Wood Combustion industry socio-economic study; Emissions factor study of certified residential wood appliances. These studies will enhance capacity to conduct cost-benefit analysis and to enhance departmental emissions inventory in support of a future regulation to reduce emissions from residential wood burning appliance products.
Enhanced an understanding of the importance of emissions from residential wood combustion appliances to local air quality which, in turn, will support the rationale for future management action, as well as provide a basis from which to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention, such as a product regulation, by:
Initiated research study to assess the prevalence of outdoor wood boiler use across Canada (ongoing) in order to inform the effective design and use of management instruments to address this product.
Continued review Canadian Standards Association (CSA) B415.1 Performance Testing of Solid-Fuel-Burning Heating Appliances standard. Final publication of the revised standard is anticipated by March 2010. As input for CSA B415.1, a verification testing program of 4 central residential wood heating appliances was completed by March 2009. Participated in review and development of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards for solid-fuel burning standards in collaboration with US partners. The CSA and ASTM standards detail product emission limit requirements and testing protocols.
Collaborated with other jurisdictions in order to exchange research and policy expertise in the development and implementation of management instruments to improve residential wood combustion products. Participated in discussions regarding US EPA review of their wood burning appliance regulation; maintained engagement with other Canadian jurisdictions through the Intergovernmental Working Group for Residential Wood Combustion (IGWGRWC)
Initiated drafting of discussion documents detailing regulatory and non-regulatory instruments scope and design of residential wood combustion products.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$12,000,000 |
$2,875,000 |
$2,120,372 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The 10th amendment to the Energy Efficiency Regulations was published December 24, 2008 and contained new performance standards for 7 products previously unregulated and increased the stringency of 4 existing standards. The standards will result in GHG emissions reductions of 9.69 MT per year in 2020 from what would otherwise be the case. Notable standards included those for general service light bulbs and gas furnaces. The amendment also prescribed labelling requirements for the three most commonly used light bulbs. In addition 3 new Energy Star specifications have been introduced in Canada and 14 existing specifications made more stringent.
Amendments to the Energy Efficiency Act were approved by the Senate on March 12, 2009.Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$32,000,000 | $7,774,000 | $6,507,457 |
Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.1 - Healthy Environments and Consumer safety |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$17,500,000 |
$4,000,000 |
$3,282,887 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Program 5 Output 1: Air quality objectives and guidelines are based on sound scientific information.
Program 5 Output 2: Measurements intended to "set-the-baseline" for tracking the benefits of regulations on the health and environmental effects of air pollutants across Canada.
Program 5 Output 3: Results from an improved air quality model describing future air quality conditions resulting from the implementation of air pollutant regulations.
Program 5 Output 4: Scientific information to support the development of air quality regulations, targets, objectives and guidelines; scientific support for Canadian positions and strategies during international negotiations.
Program 5 Output 5: Domestic scientific assessments of smog, acid deposition, mercury and other air pollutants describing emission sources, trends and the forecasted benefits of regulatory actions under CARA on air quality, human health and the environment.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$40,100,000 |
$9,685,000 |
$9,060,100 |
Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.1 - Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The air quality exposure and assessment studies undertaken will assist in the development of regulations and air
quality objectives with a goal of reducing population exposures to air pollutants and improving human health. Science
support for the development of the regulatory framework for air emissions is now underway.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$71,300,000 | $15,517,400 | $10,679,748 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$39,000,000 | $8,950,000 |
$9,478,437 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
National Registry
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$10,000,000 |
$2,480,000 | $2,714,133 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
This program pursued the development and the improvements of the information sources fundamental to reporting on the state of the air by:
Enforcement advices have been provided in support of the development of regulatory approaches.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$7,000,000 | $1,760,000 |
$405,130 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
An updated energy, emissions and economy outlook was developed which served as the baseline for assessing the energy, emissions and economic consequences of the Government's industrial regulatory agenda. This baseline serves as the basic building block for the analytical work.
The energy, emissions and economic consequences of achieving the Government's Turning the Corner greenhouse gas emission reduction target were analyzed. The results served to shape the overall industrial regulatory greenhouse gas emission targets.
Since Government decided to review the GHG regulatory approach set out in Turning the Corner in light of economic circumstances and the opportunity to work with the U.S. Administration, the work in the latter part of 2008/ early part of 2009 focused on further policy analysis of options for aligning with the U.S. approach, and recognizing the current economic circumstances. Consultations with stakeholders were continued through 2008-2009, initially to get feedback on technical elements of the regulations, and later to get feedback on the overall regulatory approach in light of the Minister's commitment to work with the U.S.
In May 2008, the federal government agreed to take more time to finalize the air pollutant regulatory framework, and to work in cooperation with provinces and stakeholders to develop an alternative framework to Turning the Corner. Extensive consultations were held with affected sectors, provinces and non-government organizations on the key elements of the alternative framework. The goals were to develop an alternative framework that was broadly acceptable, achieved the Governments environmental and health goals, and maintained a strong regulatory role for the federal government.Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$8,000,000 |
$2,000,000 | $2,415,380 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Immediate Outcomes
As part of the ecoENERGY for Buildings and Houses program, NRCan currently maintains 50 agreements at both the provincial and territorial level with a variety of partners (figure represents both the Buildings and Houses subcomponents).
Formation of partnerships in all provinces/territories to reduce energy use; Greater understanding of opportunities and benefits by jurisdictions to adopt more stringent building and housing energy codes and/or other regulatory instruments (Buildings and Houses)
Awareness and understanding among stakeholders of the potential for, and methods of, reducing GHGs and CACs through energy production and use.
Intermediate Outcomes
Adoption of energy efficiency products and services that result in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Final Outcomes
Reduced emissions of GHGs and CACs from clean energy activities.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$61,000,000 |
$17,420,000 |
$14,805,030 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
For homeowners:
For small and medium-sized organizations:
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Immediate Outcomes
Partnerships and collaborative agreements with stakeholders to promote clean energy activities that result in lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Awareness and understanding among stakeholders of the potential for, and methods of, reducing GHGs and CACs through energy production and use.
Intermediate Outcomes
Adoption of energy efficiency products and services that result in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Adoptions of renewable energy products and services, and strengthened infrastructure, resulting in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Final Outcomes
Reduced emissions of GHGs and CACs from clean energy activities.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$520,000,000* | $93,706,000 |
$99,774,175 |
*The ecoENERGY Retrofit: Homes Program was allocated $300 million of additional funding in the 2009 federal budget.
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes
Involvements by industry in developing and using energy efficiency products, services, and processes that result in lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Awareness and understanding among stakeholders of the potential for, and methods of, reducing GHGs and CACs through energy production and use.
Intermediate Outcomes
Adoption of energy efficiency products and services that result in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Final Outcomes
Reduced emissions of GHGs and CACs from clean energy activities.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$18,000,000 |
$4,300,000 |
$4,217,508 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes
Production of clean electricity from renewable sources such as wind, biomass, hydro and solar energy leading to lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Intermediate Outcomes
Increased production of clean electricity from renewable sources resulting in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Final Outcomes
Reduced emissions of GHGs and CACs from clean electricity production.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$276,000,000 |
$39,786,000 |
$32,417,368 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Renewable Heat Outcomes
The systems installed under the program in 2007-2008 are expected to result in energy savings of 52,236 JG/year and achieve 3.3 kilotonnes of GHG reductions per year. The systems installed in 2008-2009 are expected to result in annual savings of 91,018 GJ of energy and 5.5 kilotonnes of GHGs.
Increased deployment of solar water technology in residential sector market (Renewable Heat).
Increased renewable energy industry capacity to meet growing deployment demand (Renewable Heat).
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$36,000,000 | $8,262,000 | $8,695,344 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes
Partnerships and collaborative agreements with stakeholders to promote clean energy activities that result in lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Transfer and/or use of clean energy technologies and practices leading to lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$226,440,000 | $32,749,000 | $33,631,748 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes
Policy and monitoring that supports GHG and CAC reductions.
Transfer and/or use of clean energy technologies and practices leading to lower emissions of GHGs and CACs.
Awareness and understanding among stakeholders of the potential for, and methods of, reducing GHGs and CACs through energy production and use.
Intermediate Outcomes
Availability of innovative, market-ready energy processes, products and services that result in reduced GHGs and CACs.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$24,560,000 | $6,904,000 | $4,938,002 |
Department | Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.4 Community Infrastructure |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
The ecoENERGY for Aboriginal and Northern Communities program, delivered by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), contributes to Government of Canada's commitment of greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions under the Clean Air Agenda (CAA). It equips Aboriginal and northern communities with the knowledge and tools to increase the energy efficiency of community infrastructure, to access renewable energy opportunities and to implement cost effective renewable energy projects. Not only does the Program promote environmentally sustainable communities, but it provides the funding to allow Aboriginal and northern communities to be able to access economic development opportunities that will directly benefit their communities.
In 2008-2009, INAC provided $2.69 million in contributions to 25 renewable energy and energy efficiency projects within 24 of the approximately 650 Aboriginal and northern communities within Canada. Funding contributions were provided for a range of renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. Examples of projects receiving funding include the installation of photovoltaic systems, wind energy evaluations, small hydro installations, and hydro generation feasibility studies.
The following provides a breakdown of work achieved in 2008-2009:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$15,000,000 | $3,750,000 |
$4,056,249 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing capacity by target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption or GHG or CAC or release of toxic substances and increased awareness, knowledge and acceptance of energy efficient transportation technologies and best practices.
The contribution component of the program is intended to support the implementation and performance measurement of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects that aim to increase the use of sustainable transportation options such as transit, carpools, cycling and walking and reduced travel through telework. Through the program, the government is helping find ways to meet transportation needs while protecting the environment.
In January 2009, fourteen projects were announced for funding under ecoMOBILITY's first round of contribution agreements. To date, three have been signed and the others are currently being negotiated. The second funding round was announced in March 2009 with a May deadline. First round recipients attended an ecoMOBILITY workshop in February 2009 where they presented their projects, shared information with other recipients and were provided guidance on topics such as performance measurement. During the workshop, recipients were also informed that they would be invited to be part of a new ecoMOBILITY Advisory Committee (EAC) that is being formed to ensure relevance of program to the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) stakeholders and to maximize stakeholders' program inputs.
The ecoMobility Program developed a number of tools to support project implementation of the TDM community. Tools included Standard TDM Impact Measurement Guideline; Sustainable Transportation Options Guide for Small and Rural Communities; Compendium of Canadian Survey Research on Consumer Attitudes and Behavioural Influences Affecting Sustainable Transportation Options; and International Walk to School Week Implementation Kit.
A marketing strategy has being initiated to widely disseminate these tools to the TDM community through the EcoMobility Stakeholder Database, the TDM learning events; the ecoMobility web site; and through the electronic ecoMobility newsletter under development.
Various learning events were organized or sponsored by the ecoMobility program to foster ongoing implementation and measurement of TDM practitioners' activities. Such events included:
EcoMobility also sponsored the Association du transport et des routes (AQTR) 2008 conference � Innover pour mieux financer les transports urbains �.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$9,300,000 | $1,778,700 | $1,260,893 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing capacity by target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption or GHG or CAC or release of toxic substances and increased awareness, knowledge and acceptance of energy efficient transportation technologies and best practices.
eTV acquired 14 advanced vehicle technologies in 2008-2009, including full-electric, plug-in hybrid, clean diesel,
hydrogen fuel cell, hydrogen internal combustion engine and advanced gasoline vehicles. eTV evaluated the fuel efficiency,
emissions and safety performance of these vehicles and disseminated the results to over 50,000 Canadians by attending
19 public-outreach events throughout 2008-2009; by providing in-depth information via its web site; by producing 5 videos
with 15 multimedia animations; by publishing 50 technology articles and 18 technical bulletins and; by releasing its
annual report. eTV has also initiated a number of barrier studies in partnership with stakeholders and auto industry
to identify market trends, consumer and regulatory barriers in addressing the penetration of emerging advanced technologies.
For example, eTV has initiated a study with the Vancouver Fuel Cell Vehicle Program (VFCVP) to examine the barriers
related to parking hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in underground facilities. The study will focus on the potential risks
associated with hydrogen leakage in an enclosed environment, and whether vehicle standards and/or building codes are
sufficient to mitigate any potential for ignition in this event. Similarly, eTV is fine-tuning plans for a study with
the Canadian Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association. The study is a broader examination of potential barriers to the early
introduction of hydrogen vehicle fleets, and the mitigation strategies that could be adopted. The focus will be on wider
vehicle standards, refuelling standards, and some discussion of the hydrogen refuelling infrastructure required to encourage
the deployment of these vehicles in Canada.
eTV staff participated in various industry consultations, work groups, conferences and seminars to share knowledge and
best practices with regards to advanced technology vehicles.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$14,100,000 | $4,214,230 | $2,347,650 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing participation by target audience in emission
reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities and increased awareness, knowledge and acceptance
of energy efficient transportation technologies and best practices.
On behalf of the provinces and territories, Transport Canada completed 6 studies initiated in 2007-2008 to examine the
feasibility of mandating heavy truck speed limiters. This included traffic modelling to better understand the safety
impact from differential car-truck speeds on highways, quantifying the environmental benefits from fuel savings and
reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and an assessment of the trade and competitiveness impacts of a speed limiter
mandate in both the Canadian and North American context. In 2008-2009 the results from these studies confirmed the 2007-2008
preliminary estimates that a national mandate for heavy truck speed limiters would result in estimated annual diesel
fuel savings of 228.6 million litres (1.4% of the total diesel fuel consumed by road vehicles in Canada in 2006) and
annual GHG savings of 0.64 megatonnes. The studies' reports can be viewed on the following TC web site:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/safevehicles/motorcarriers/speedlimiter/index.htm
Two provinces, Ontario and Quebec, have implemented heavy truck speed limiter regulations and one other province (NB)
is examining the merits of harmonizing with their regulations. The National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking
Industry (NHITI) is available to applicants to offer co-funding to assist with the development of enforcement capacity
for these new requirements. As Transport Canada supports the implementation of heavy truck speed limiters, the NHITI
may also assist other provinces investigate the feasibility of speed limiter legislation.
TC continued its involvement in the Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Policy working group to improve uniformity
in regulations governing the weights and dimensions of commercial vehicles operating between provinces and territories.
The working group has made progress toward weight and dimensional thresholds that could better accommodate environmental
technologies such as wide-base single tires and rear-mounted aerodynamic devices.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$5,400,000 | $643,180 | $389,025 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The Freight Technology Demonstration Fund provides funding for demonstration to test and measure the emissions impact
of new and underutilized freight transportation technologies in real world conditions.
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing the uptake technologies that reduce energy
consumption, GHG and CAC.
Of the 8 projects selected in 2007-2008 for $2.4M in funding as part of the first round of the demonstration program,
6 are underway with contribution agreements in place and final reports expected in 2009-2010.
In January 2009, Transport Canada selected an additional 9 projects for $3.5M in funding as part of the second round
of demonstration funding. One contribution agreement was finalized in 2008-2009 and negotiations were well underway
for the remaining eight.
The selected portfolio of the above projects for both rounds of funding supports a mix of technologies that include:
innovative port crane technologies, ultra low emitting Genset locomotives technology, route and mode optimization software,
hybrid electric and advanced electric delivery vehicles, bundled advanced truck technologies (i.e. aerodynamic truck
technologies, advanced auxiliary power technologies for trucks, single tire technologies and long combination vehicle
options for trucks). Every Canadian region is represented in the selected portfolio.
A majority of the selected projects have started to install and utilize the technology thus beginning to achieve GHG
and CAC emission reduction. Those reductions will be quantified and reported in the final report provided by the recipient
at the end of the project starting in 2009-2010.
Each recipient will collect and analyze data such as fuel use, time of operation, workload and distance traveled in
a predefined methodology. This will allow an accurate calculation of GHG and CAC emissions reduction.
The Demonstration Fund was well subscribed as it received almost 50 applications requesting funding in the second round.
The high volume and quality of applications has necessitated the commitment of the remaining contribution funding envelope.
The two rounds of funding have allowed an uptake in technology of 1254 pieces of equipment (see above mix of technology)
across four modes of transportation.
24 case studies from previous technology projects supported by TC were published on Transport Canada's ecoFREIGHT website
detailing results.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$9,300,000 | $2,967,047 | $3,020,220 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
The Freight Technology Incentive Program provides incentives for companies to purchase and install underutilized
freight transportation technologies that reduce greenhouse gas and/or criteria contaminants.
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing the uptake technologies that reduce energy
consumption, GHG and CAC.
The 15 projects selected in 2007-2008 for $3.7M in funding as part of the first round of the incentives program are
underway with contribution agreements in place and final reports expected in 2009-2010.
In February 2009, Transport Canada selected an additional 17 projects for $3.8M in funding as part of the second round
of the incentives program. At the end of 2008-2009, negotiations were underway for all the 17 projects.
The selected portfolio of projects for both rounds of funding supports a mix of technologies that include: ultra low
emitting Genset locomotives technology, alternative fuel for baggage tractors, refurbishing marine engine with latest
fuel efficient technology, bundled advanced truck technologies (i.e. aerodynamic truck technologies, advanced auxiliary
power technologies for trucks, single tire technologies and long combination vehicle options for trucks). Every Canadian
region is represented in the selected portfolio.
The Incentives Program was well subscribed as it received over 180 applications requesting funding in the second round
representing almost a three fold increase of the first round. The high volume and quality of applications has necessitated
the commitment of the remaining contribution funding envelope.
The two rounds of funding have allowed an uptake in technology of 1654 pieces of equipment (see above mix of technology)
across four modes of transportation. 7 case studies on a range of technologies implemented in Canada were published
on Transport Canada's ecoFREIGHT website detailing results of its projects.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$9,350,000 | $3,153,563 | $2,721,684 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing participation by target audience in emission
reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities and increased awareness, knowledge and acceptance
of energy efficient transportation technologies and best practices.
As required under the Terms and Conditions of the Railway Association of Canada Memorandum of Understanding, the 2007
Annual Report for rail emissions was released in early 2009 by the Railway Association of Canada. The 2008 Annual Report
for air emissions is expected to be released in the 2009-2010 fiscal year.
In addition, the Duty Cycle Project and the Emissions Factors Update Project were funded under the Railway Association
of Canada Memorandum of Understanding. The purpose of the Duty Cycle and the Emissions Factors Update Project was to
consolidate locomotive emissions data from a variety of reports available in the public domain into a uniform dataset,
and then to update the emissions factors pertinent to diesel locomotives types in service on Canadian railways. Using
this dataset, average emissions factor values for both individual locomotive types and locomotive mixed-fleet operations
were calculated. Updated Emission Factors were used to produce the 2007 Annual Report on Locomotive Emissions Monitoring
published according to the Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Railway Association of Canada, Environment
Canada and Transport Canada concerning railway diesel locomotives operating in Canada.
Progress was made on the release of the 2007 Annual Emissions Report for the Air Memorandum of Understanding. The 2007
report was released in spring 2009. The 2008 annual report is expected to be released in fall 2009.
Preliminary discussion has taken place with the marine industry on the development of an approach for a voluntary
Memorandum of Understanding to reduce air emissions.
The ecoFREIGHT Partnerships organized a rail conference in May 2008. The conference attracted 115 senior industry delegates
from Canada and the United States, including federal and provincial Government representatives, suppliers, manufacturers,
as well as many railway operators. The conference participants provided positive feedback on the quality of panellists,
the format and the topics covered, and suggested that similar event should be organized every 2 years.
The ecoFREIGHT Partnerships also supported the Research and Development conference as part of the Railway Association
of Canada Annual General Meeting in September 2008. This conference was also an opportunity for the industry to learn
more about technology and the environment. The ecoFREIGHT Partnerships sponsored "Greening the Supply Chain" event organized
by the Trade and Transport Logistics in November 2008.
The ecoFREIGHT Partnerships program sponsored the SCL Green Supply Chain Award. Recipients of this annual award are
selected on the basis of strong environmental leadership and their firm commitment to promoting green transportation
standards. The Award was presented in May 2008 to XTL Transport Inc.
The program sponsored the environmental section of the Canadian Industrial Transportation Association's (CITA) 2008
survey. CITA submitted a summary report in November 2008. ecoFREIGHT Partnerships have been supporting the environmental
section of that survey since 2005. The continuous support provides the department with basic trend information. The
2008 survey indicated an increase in key elements such as the consideration by shippers of environmental issue when
selecting a transportation service provider as well as their knowledge of GHG and CAC effects also increased.
Transport Canada is exploring options for the development of relevant tools for shippers and forwarders, including
a potential emissions calculator. Some preliminary discussions have been held with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency on an emissions calculator model.
Transport Canada officials represented the Government of Canada at the following international events:
The ecoFREIGHT Partnerships information is provided through the ecoFREIGHT Web site, which is updated regularly.
The website was enhanced by the posting of 24 case studies that provide information on results and lessons learned for
previously funded projects.
Official departmental presentations were provided at the Pollution Probe conference in March 2008, Globe 2008 and the
Association of Canadian Port Authorities in February 2009. Those conferences were an opportunity to inform the industry
of strategies and technologies that reduce emissions.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$6,550,000 | $1,856,510 | $1,224,726 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing the uptake technologies that reduce energy
consumption, GHG and CAC.
The Marine Shore Power Program held a first funding Round on August 25, 2008. The program received three applications
and selected the application from the Port Metro Vancouver for the Canada Place project. The project was announced on
December 17, 2008 and the contribution agreement was signed on February 5, 2009.
The Canada Place cruise ship shore power project is the third cruise ship shore power project in the world and the first
of its kind in Canada. The Port Metro Vancouver installed shore power infrastructure at the east and west berths of
the Canada Place Cruise Ship Terminal in Vancouver harbour, in time of the 2009 cruise ship season. The total cost of
this project is $9 million with $2M provided by Marine Shore Power program. Port Metro Vancouver has partnered with
Holland America, Princess Cruises and BC Hydro for this endeavour. Transport Canada, Western Diversification Canada
and British Columbia Ministry of Transportation are financial contributors to this major initiative. The project is
proceeding according to schedule.
Several other port authorities throughout the country have shown interest in the technology and are exploring its potential
for their facility.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$6,000,000 | $2,302,510 | $1,502,547 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
The following activities will position TC favourably to provide recommendations and advice on policies and programs
that influence transportation technologies and practices as well as increasing the uptake of technologies that reduce
fuel consumption and GHG emissions and as such support the Program's immediate, intermediate and final outcomes.
Policy advice was provided to Minister(s) and senior management on sustainable transportation issues in relation to
Cabinet meetings and for the Minister's participation at the 2008 International Transport Forum.
Information collected and analyzed and analytical frameworks, strategies and policies developed that support sustainable
transportation such as:
Federal and stakeholder coordination on issues related to sustainable transportation such as:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$4,000,000 | $1,222,890 | $712,822 |
Department | Transport Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Air from Transportation |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
The purpose of this program was to encourage the purchase of new fuel-efficient vehicles by offering rebates to eligible
recipients that buy or enter into leases of 12 months or more for an eligible vehicle registered for use in Canada.
New 2006, 2007 and 2008 model year vehicles with a Combined Fuel Consumption Rating (CFCR) of 6.5 L/100km or less for
new automobiles, 8.3 L/100km or less for new minivans, sport utility vehicles and other light trucks and an E85 rating
of 13.0L/100km for new Flex-Fuel vehicles were eligible for a rebate.
The Program was delivered in partnership with Service Canada. SC's responsibilities included processing of mail/applications,
responding to client enquiries and making recommendations for payment to Transport Canada (TC). TC has the overall responsibility
for the direction of the Program, including overall program design, policy direction and issuing grant payments.
To be eligible under the program applications must have been received before March 31, 2009 and eligible vehicles must
have been purchased between March 20, 2007 and December 31, 2008.
In 2008-2009, the program results listed below contributed to increasing the uptake technologies that reduce energy
consumption, GHG and CAC and Increased participation by target audience in emission reducing activities.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$252,700,000 | $170,415,000 | $121,884,296 |
Department | Human Resources and Skills Development Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | -- |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Service Canada has received:
Service Canada has conducted 129,837 vehicles identification and has validated 128,326 registrations.
The program is a joint responsibility between Transport Canada (TC) and Service Canada. TC will report the result of
the other performance criteria.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$11,300,000 | $6,000,000 | $7,717,322 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 - Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes
Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices:
Increased participation by target audience in emission reducing activities through partnerships and other program
activities:
Increased capacity by target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption or GHG or CAC or release
of toxic substances:
Intermediate Outcome
Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption or GHG or CAC:
Final Outcome
Reductions in energy consumption or GHG or CAC from transportation:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$21,000,000 | $5,311,143 | $5,643,241 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 - Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Immediate Outcomes
Increased capacity to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants
or release of toxic substances:
Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices:
Increased participation by target audience in emission reducing activities through partnerships and other program
activities:
Intermediate Outcome
Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption or GHG or CAC:
Final Outcome
Reductions in energy consumption or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$22,000,000 | $6,338,862 | $5,019,058 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcomes
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$92,000,000 | $13,154,000 | $6,916,284 |
Department | National Research Council |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 1.1 Research and development |
Immediate Outcomes
Field Study on Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and Ventilation (Activity 1)
Evaluation of Indoor Air Quality Technologies and Solutions (Activity 2)
Canadian (formerly 'National') Committee on Indoor Air Quality and Building (CCIAQB; Activity 3).
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$8,000,000 | $2,717,000 | $2,717,000 |
Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.1 Healthy Environments and Consumer safety |
Immediate Outcomes
Radon levels assessed in a designated group of Government of Canada buildings; results are shared and risk mitigation
measures are discussed:
Ongoing engagement of key stakeholders, sustaining messages and targeting education and awareness activities:
Knowledge related to radon increased:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$15,000,000 | $3,700,000 | $3,700,000 |
Department | Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | Northern Land and Resources |
Pending
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (see
below)
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
The Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) program funded a total of 21 projects. The range of projects funded
include climate change risk assessments, climate change information needs and gaps analysis, community/regional adaptation
planning, building capacity for adaptation planning, as well as support toward development of scenarios and strategies.
The following provides a breakdown of work achieved as a result of the funded projects:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$14,000,000 |
$2,550,000 | $2,236,842 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.2 - Weather and Environmental Prediction Program |
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (see
below).
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$21,300,000 | $5,200,000 | $5,033,173 |
Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.1 Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety |
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (sse
below).
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$8,700,000 | $2,800,000 | $1,741,160 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 - Weather and Environmental Prediction Program |
Pending
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (see
below).
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
Subcomponent 1
Development of the new Canadian global climate model (CanCM4) is complete, and includes a sophisticated representation
of the sulphur cycle, improved radiative transfer, cloud physics, and ocean processes. An extension of this model to
include the carbon cycle is also complete and a wide range of historical and future simulations have been conducted.
An improved version of the carbon cycle version is nearing completion. A new Canadian regional climate model, based
on the atmospheric physics package in CanCM4, has been constructed and initial testing is well underway. Global and
regional climate model output continues to be disseminated to users via the CCCma web site (www.cccma.ec.gc.ca). These models will be used to provide updated climate change information,
based on the latest scientific developments, contributing to the awareness and understanding of the risks of climate
change.
Subcomponent 2
Expansion of the Canadian Climate Change Scenarios Network (www.cccsn.ca) to regional server
nodes was commenced with the addition of a server at Yukon College. The CCCSN is a public access website for global
climate change models. A series of regional training sessions on the use of scenarios were held across Canada with over
100 users from other government departments, provinces, territories, municipalities and the private sector. Ongoing
technical support for the network was provided, as well as model verification and targeted downscaling in vulnerable
areas (e.g. selected Arctic communities).
Subcomponent 3A
The atmospheric hazards web tool (www.hazards.ca) was expanded nationally to all 5 Regions
of Canada. A gap analysis was completed on information needs for specific regional nodes. Research was commenced nationally
to address gaps identified. An assessment study of how atmospheric hazards are being incorporated into existing community
emergency response plans was initiated this year and will be completed in 2009-2010.
Subcomponent 3B
A team of researchers Identified selected key atmospheric hazards for further assessment of the impact of future climate
extremes (e.g. wind, rain on snow, snow loads) for codes and standards, as well as inclusion under Subcomponent 3A.
Key stakeholder consultations were completed with codes and standards agencies (e.g. Building Code Commission, Canadian
Standards Association, Transportation Associations of Canada, Engineers Canada) to investigate incorporation of selected
climate change parameters into existing design criteria). Work was commenced on targeted climatic design criteria for
inclusion of values in National codes and standards.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$15,000,000 |
$5,210,730 | $3,567,788 |
Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 4.1 First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services |
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities 2008-2009 at the
Theme level; please refer to the program expected results.
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (see
below).
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
Immediate Outcomes
#10 Increased availability/access to adaptation information and products
We developed a climate change application guide in consultation with federal partners and Aboriginal organizations,
which is available in print form and electronically on the Assembly of First Nations website and the Arctic Health Research
Network website. The application guide was designed to assist communities in developing community-based research projects,
writing proposals and budgets. The guide was distributed to northern First Nations and Inuit communities and resulted
in 15 project applications for FY 2009-2010, 14 of which met the application criteria. This is the first year for the
guide.
#11 Increased capacity (additional resources, tools, knowledge base) to conduct and apply adaptation science
We funded 10 community-based projects across the North (two in the Yukon, three in the Northwest Territories, four in
Nunavut and one in Nunatsiavut) that actively hired and trained community members as well as youth and elders. The funding
has assisted in the development of a number of resource tools including the development of a publication on the relationship
of sea ice to Inuit, on sea ice changes and ice safety from an Inuit perspective.
#12 Greater collaboration to address climate change and health related impacts
The Program has worked closely with our federal partners (Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch of Health
Canada, Northern Region of Health Canada, the Public Health Agency, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, and Natural
Resources Canada) as well as First Nations and Inuit organizations (Assembly of First Nations, Council of Yukon First
Nations, Arctic Health Research Network, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Pauktuutit, and Nunavut Research Institute). We delivered
over 10 presentations on the program to these partners. The presentations were designed to disseminated information
about the links between climate change and health effects, to give examples of these links and ideas on research projects
important for northern communities to enable them to think about appropriate research proposals. The audiences includes
medical officers of health, health practitioners, environmental experts, community planners and community representatives
to ensure we disseminated information to the various players involved in climate change adaptation measures. The presentations
and guide resulted in 14 successful community proposals for 2009-2010 being submitted, and many more showing interest.
Intermediate Outcomes
#6 Increased use of adaptation information and products
We produced an application guide tailored for northern communities as well as two posters used at the Health Canada
Science forum and the annual ArcticNet conference - Arctic Change. The presentations and guide resulted in 14 successful
community proposals for 2009-2010 being submitted, and many more showing interest.
#7 Increased awareness of climate change risks
The Climate Change and Health Adaptation Program has presented at numerous national and international conferences, created
posters, visited communities to discuss the many health issues around climate change in the North. We also conducted
three community-centered climate change and health workshops to increase awareness around the issues, the funding program
and to help community representatives write a proposal. The workshops provided clarity on links between climate change
and health, elements of an acceptable research proposal and adequate budgets.
#8 Increased capacity to act on climate change issues among target populations.
The 2008-2009 funding has allowed the 10 northern communities to conduct their own research, learn from this research
and disseminate findings on climate change and health to their communities. An example is data to provide valuable information
to residents regarding the conditions and safety level of local sea and lake ice, with the potential for reducing accidents,
injuries and anxiety relating to the changing ice environment.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$7,000,000 |
$2,405,000 | $1,823,420 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.1 Adapting to a Changing Climate and Hazard Risk Management |
Pending
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008.
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
Two phases of Regional Adaptation Action Partnerships program were carried out in 2008-2009:
In the area of Innovative Risk Management Tools, progress was made in the following sectors:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$35,000,000 |
$3,955,400 | $2,858,592 |
Department | Health Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.1 Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety |
No expected results for 2008-2009 were defined in the Horizontal Report on Plans and Priorities.
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (see
below).
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
Heat Alert and Response Systems Project
Health Canada worked to raise awareness of the nature of heat as a health risk in communities among key stakeholders,
with the aim of identifying local "heat champions." This awareness-raising process resulted in the identification of
three communities interested in participating in the pilot heat alert and response systems (HARS) project (Fredericton,
Windsor, Winnipeg). One additional community will be identified for the pilot in FY 2009-2010.
Two Advisory Groups have been established and membership includes leading national experts in relevant fields including
epidemiology, emergency management, public health, and human physiology. The mandate of the Heat Alert and Response
Systems Advisory Group is to provide advice and guidance on the implementation of Health Canada's "Developing Heat Resilient
Communities and Individuals in Canada" project. The mandate of the Health Professional Information and Training Advisory
Group is to provide advice and guidance on the design, development and distribution of training tools for health care
professionals.
A baseline inventory and assessment were conducted of current science in the field of heat and human health, in order
to guide future scientific work. Research activities were carried out, including surveys to assess the Canadian public's
existing awareness and understanding of the health risks of climate change.
In 2008-2009 (Year 1 of the program), Health Canada assessed existing international state-of-the-art heat monitoring
and surveillance techniques and developed an environmental heat monitoring system framework for Canadian communities.
A heat monitoring framework has been designed to allow communities to measure four variables impacting heat-related
health impacts (temperature, humidity, wind, and solar load) to provide a more accurate assessment of heat as a health
risk in communities in Canada. The framework will be piloted in the summer of 2009.
Work conducted this year lays the groundwork for the development of management committees in each community, which will
support local collaboration among interested parties in the development, implementation and evaluation of a HARS pilot
in each community in subsequent years. Heat-health information products were developed for public distribution during
implementation of the pilot studies. A project management framework was developed and approved to guide implementation.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$7,900,000 |
$2,450,000 | $1,848,023 |
Department | Public Health Agency of Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 1.2 Disease Prevention and Control |
Pending
The Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecasting Program of the Adaptation theme received TB approval in
2007-2008, while other programs were not approved until early April 2008 - some results were reported in 2007-2008 (see
below).
Immediate Outcome
Intermediate Outcome
Final Outcome
The Pilot Infectious Disease Impact and Response System (PIDIRS) program has completed a directed solicitation process
with five academic institutions for contribution funding. The proposals received have all been approved by internal
and external review processes. The contributions will fund just less than 2 years of research that will provide public
health stakeholders with the knowledge and tools necessary for decision making on surveillance, intervention and control
of key infectious diseases with an environmental origin (particularly vector-borne and waterborne infectious diseases).
Four pilot regions across Canada have agreed to participate in the community-based approach to assessing infectious
disease risk associated with climate change. Memoranda of agreement have been finalized and pilot community work will
commence in June and July 2009 and last for approximately 15 months. When complete, the work of these pilot communities
will serve as a template for other jurisdictions across the country to development and implement adaptation strategies
relative to the surveillance, intervention and control of key infectious diseases with an environmental origin (particularly
vector-borne and waterborne infectious diseases).
Eight national (3) and international (5) professionals with knowledge of climate change, infectious diseases and adaptation
have committed to participation as members of the program advisory committee (AC). The AC's mandate is to, via its subject
matter knowledge, provide the PIDIRS program with on-going guidance and advice on scientific priority setting, direction
and facilitation of strategic linkages.
Data gathering for scientific studies on tick-borne disease distribution data has occurred and risk maps have been published.
This initial academic research has directly supported theme outcomes by providing surveillance knowledge to further
development of intervention and control of vector-borne diseases.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$7,000,000 |
$1,473,895 | $1,239,102 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 4.2 Relations with other governments and partners are managed in support of environmental priorities |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Canada met its international funding obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC) for 2008-2009 which allows Canada to continue participating in international dialogue on climate change. Canada
also made voluntary contributions to the UNFCCC.
Canada continued to provide financial support to non-UN agencies including the OECD, with the goal of enhancing understanding
of the international policy options for the development of a future climate change agreement.
Canada participated in bilateral activities including: The Canada-Mexico Partnership (hosted by Canada), the Canada
China Working Group on Climate Change (hosted by China) and bilateral meeting in Poznan on the margins of the UNFCCC
conference of the parties.
Canada participated in technology-related international partnerships that complemented the UN climate change process
in order to promote and support the development of clean technologies needed to reduce GHG emissions and address climate
change. These partnerships included the Asia Pacific Partnership, the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership
and the Methane to Markets Partnership.
Canada established a National Registry to account for its transactions of Kyoto units as required by each Annex I Party
in order to facilitate the assessment of compliance and the operation of the Kyoto mechanisms.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$2,892,000 | $623,000 | $841,250 |
Department | Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 1.3 Global Issues |
Canada's financial obligations to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat respected.
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The provision of these funds is required as part of our Treaty obligations, and has allowed us to remain a participant
in good standing. These funds, combined with the contributions of other countries, have enabled the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change to conduct four negotiations sessions in 2008-2009 and allowed the secretariat to undertake
necessary preparatory work and outreach activities. These efforts are designed to progress towards a successful outcome
on an international climate change agreement for the post-2012 period in December 2009.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$1,908,000 | $477,000 | $477,000 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 4.2.3 Long term global climate change regime |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Canada's interests internationally were supported by the following activities:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$11,400,000 | $2,900,000 | $4,182,016 |
Department | Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 1.3 Global Issues |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) continues to provide substantive analytical and
policy input for the formulation and presentation of Canadian views for the negotiations under the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol. Provision of timely and substantial input to senior officials
has enabled informed participation and engagement in international processes. DFAIT participates actively in the UN
process, leads negotiations on adaptation and coordinates negotiations on aspects related to the Kyoto Protocol. In
addition, DFAIT advocates Canada's positions within other multilateral processes, e.g., the G8, the Major Economies
Forum process, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Arctic Council, Commonwealth, other UN events, and through
bilateral channels through DFAIT's network of Embassies and other Missions abroad. DFAIT also participates actively
in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) deliberations.
Of particular note, DFAIT:
In 2008-2009, DFAIT provided contributions to support activities within several organizations (including supplementary
funding to the UNFCCC Least Developed Countries Expert Group and inventory development programme; the Organization of
American States; the Global Climate Observing System Secretariat and the Center for Clean Air Policy) through which
Canada can advance its interests with regard to adaptation in the most vulnerable countries, tracking of greenhouse
gas reductions, and climate change policy development.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$6,400,000 | $1,650,000 | $1,420,060 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$5,200,000 | $1,514,000 | $1,356,403 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 4.2.3 Long-term global climate change regime |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Canada has been an active participant in the APP since joining the Partnership, but did not fund any APP projects
during 2008-09.
Internal organization
Project Participation
Canadian Leadership
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$18,882,000 | $2,738,166 | $818,629 |
Department | Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$878,000 | $198,672 | $198,672 |
Department | Industry Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 2.1 Clean Energy |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Canada participated in the work of all but one of the APP Task Forces and facilitated the involvement of the Canadian
private sector in the work of the APP.
In this context, consultations with key domestic industrial sectors were held.
Relevant departments provided advice and input to the APP Secretariat and inter-departmental working group in developing
Canada's governance structure and operational guidelines. Input and advice on potential project selection criteria were
also provided.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$240,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$2,200,000 | $550,000 | $397,238 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 - Clean Air Program |
In preparation for possible launch, program materials and tools, including application forms, proposal evaluation
tools, and greenhouse gas / criteria air contaminants valuation tools were developed.
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$12,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $345,217 |
Department | Environment Canada |
---|---|
Departmental Program Activity | 3.3 Clean Air Program |
Immediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
Final Outcome
The Management and Accountability Theme implemented the horizontal management, accountability and reporting framework to support accountability for and transparency about progress made on the Clean Air Agenda (CAA) and effective use of federal investments. This work built on the foundation created in 2007-2008 for supporting the CAA for the balance of its mandate.
The activities lead by the Management and Accountability Theme over 2008-2009 included:
Program's approved spending over the 2007-2011 period | Program's planned spending in 2008-2009 | Program's actual spending in 2008-2009 |
---|---|---|
$5,000,000 | $1,250,000 | $1,029,395 |