This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
On behalf of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) and the Canadian Polar Commission, I am pleased to present the 2009–2010 Departmental Performance Report.
This past year, the Government has focused on ensuring that Canada returns to economic growth. In this broader context, as the Speech from the Throne and Budget 2010 reinforced, our Government remains committed to building a stronger, healthier relationship with Aboriginal people and to realizing the vast potential of Canada’s North. A special acceleration of these efforts came as a result of Canada’s Economic Action Plan as the Government invested an additional $1.9 billion over two years in Aboriginal skills and training, economic development, housing and infrastructure, as well as in support of the Northern Strategy. This year’s report speaks to the results these investments are achieving.
Over the past year, we have been busy working collaboratively with Aboriginal communities, the provinces and territories to put in place the necessary legislative foundation to make tangible progress in such priority areas as safe drinking water in First Nation communities, commercial real estate development on reserve land, matrimonial rights, gender discrimination in the Indian Act and modern treaties in British Columbia.
This report also speaks to how we are moving forward with the implementation of the Northern Strategy, including the progress in creating a world-class High Arctic Research Station and the improved science and research facilities thanks to the Arctic Research Infrastructure Fund. Furthermore, you will read about how we are actively reforming the northern regulatory regime to ensure the region’s resource potential can be developed while protecting the environment. One key innovation this past year was the creation of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor), the first ever regional development agency for the North and the only federal agency headquartered in the North.
Our efforts and results over the last year demonstrate that we are committed to ensuring that Aboriginal people and people living in the North fully share in emerging opportunities as Canada’s economy strengthens.
The Honourable John Duncan
Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), including the Office of the Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians (OFI), is the federal department primarily responsible for meeting the Government of Canada’s obligations and commitments to Aboriginal peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis), and fulfilling the government’s constitutionally mandated role in the North. To this end, INAC helps Canada’s Aboriginal and northern peoples foster healthy and sustainable communities, and pursue economic and social development. More specifically, INAC works with 33 other federal departments and agencies in:
These diverse and complex responsibilities flow from the department’s central mandates: Indian and Inuit Affairs, the Office of the Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians, and Northern Development. [Note 1]
INAC’s overall mandate derives from the Canadian Constitution, the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Act, other legislation and numerous regulations under the responsibility of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, and treaties. Evolving jurisprudence continues to shape the department’s mandate, policy decisions and program development.
INAC’s responsibilities for Indian and Inuit Affairs include:
INAC’s Office of the Federal Interlocutor is the point of contact within the Government of Canada for Métis, Non-Status Indians and urban Aboriginal people. [Note 2] Its responsibilities include delivering improved federal services to Aboriginal people who do not live on reserves. Through the Office, the department maintains and strengthens government relations with organizations representing these groups.
INAC has a direct role in the political and economic development of the territories, as well as significant resource, land and environmental management obligations. [Note 3]
INAC’s responsibilities for Northern Development include:
INAC is the lead federal organization for the Government of Canada’s integrated Northern Strategy. The Strategy is founded on four equally important and mutually reinforcing priorities: exercising Canada’s Arctic sovereignty; promoting social and economic development; protecting Canada’s environmental heritage; and improving and devolving northern governance. In close partnership with other federal departments and agencies, INAC works to develop new initiatives for the North. With its well-established northern presence, INAC also provides ongoing oversight of the approved initiatives that it leads, as well as of initiatives led by its partners. The department is supporting implementation of the comprehensive Northern Strategy through such INAC-led initiatives as the Canadian High Arctic Research Station, which will contribute to Canada’s capacity for sound decision-making for the Arctic.
On August 18, 2009, the Government of Canada created the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) as a regional economic development agency for the North. As a result, programs under INAC’s Northern Economy Program Activity were transferred to the new agency (see Program Activity Architecture below). CanNor is a partner in implementing the Northern Strategy and its performance information for 2009–2010 can be found under the Northern Economy Program Activity.
The Canadian Polar Commission, for which the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development is also responsible, supports polar research and strengthens Canada’s international reputation as a leader among circumpolar nations. In addition to promoting knowledge of Canada’s polar regions and their importance to the country, the Commission provides polar science policy direction to government. [Note 4]
The Program Activity Architecture shown below provides an overview of the department’s strategic outcomes and supporting program activities.
When the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) was established in August 2009, INAC transferred all programs under its Northern Economy Program Activity to CanNor. The Program Activity Architecture has not been modified to reflect this change for 2009–2010 but will be for 2010-2011. CanNor’s performance information for 2009–2010 can be found under the Northern Economy Program Activity of this report.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada | ||
7,336.8 | 7,915.1 | 7,439.5 |
Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency a | ||
n/a | 47.7 | 39.6 |
Canadian Polar Commission | ||
1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada | ||
4,805.4 | 5,186.5 | 381.1 |
Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency a | ||
n/a | 106 | n/a |
Canadian Polar Commission | ||
5.0 | 5.0 | 0 |
a Order in Council P.C. 2009-1423 transferred from the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development to the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency the control and supervision of the portion of the federal public administration in the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development known as the Northern Economic Development Branch, effective August 18, 2009. Actual spending of $39.6 million reflects expenditures for the period from August 18, 2009, to March 31, 2010. A reprofile request for the variance between Actual Spending and Total Authorities is pending.
The increase of 381.1 full-time equivalents (FTEs), from 4,805.4 planned to 5,186.5 actual FTEs, is partly due to new funding under the Supplementary Estimates for extra programming that was not part of the original planned amount.
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada
Variances between Main Estimates, Planned Spending, Total Authorities and Actual Spending are largely attributable to the timing of key elements of the fiscal cycle. The Main Estimates as approved by Parliament in the initial appropriations are the first step in the fiscal cycle.
The Planned Spending column includes Main Estimates ($6,934 million), plus the planned spending on those initiatives known when the Report on Plans and Priorities was prepared in the January/February timeframe of the preceding fiscal year. Specifically, the difference between Main Estimates and Planned Spending for 2009–2010 (approximately $403 million) largely consists of funding earmarked for the following initiatives:
The Total Authorities represent Main Estimates plus Supplementary Estimates, plus adjustments to authorities approved by Treasury Board, such as the operating budget carry-forward. Specifically, the difference between Planned Spending and Total Authorities for 2009–2010 (an increase of $578.3 million) is largely due to:
These increases were partially offset by the transfer of funding to the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, as well as the deferral of some initiatives originally planned for (notably for water and wastewater projects, and projects under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan). The deferred funds will be made available for their intended purposes in future years.
Actual Spending reflects spending activity during the fiscal year as per the Public Accounts of Canada. A number of factors contributed to the difference between Total Authorities and Actual Spending (a decrease of $475.6 million), including:
Section II provides additional details by program activity.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2009-10 Performance |
---|---|---|
Scores on the income and labour force components of the Community Well-Being (CWB) Index a for First Nations and Inuit | Departmental target to be determined |
CWB income scores in First Nation communities improved significantly from 1981 to 2001 before levelling off in the 2001–2006 period. Income scores in Inuit communities increased significantly in both the 1981–1991 and 2001–2006 periods. Moderate increases were observed over the two five-year periods in between. Although a one-point drop from 1981 to 1991 was observed in First Nation communities, CWB average scores for labour force activity have not changed much, particularly over the 1996–2006 period. Meanwhile, the average scores in Inuit communities improved steadily over the 1981–1996 period before levelling off from 1996 to 2006. b |
Note: Due to rounding, figures
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending c |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes d | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Governance and Institutions of Government | 619.1 | 632.7 | 641.2 | 656.7 | 654.8 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion |
Co‑operative Relationships | 210.7 | 267.5 | 270.5 | 228.2 | 207.6 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion |
Claims Settlements | 627.8 | 815.6 | 828.0 | 1,068.1 | 754.5 | Strong economic growth |
Total | 1,457.6 | 1,715.8 | 1,739.7 | 1,953.0 | 1,617.0 |
may not add to totals shown.
a The labour force and income components of the CWB were selected as the performance indicator for the Government strategic outcome after the 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities was published.
b Trend analysis of CWB scores for 1981 to 2006 is available at www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/rs/pubs/cwb/index-eng.asp. For more information on the CWB index, please see www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/rs/pubs/cwb/cwbdck-eng.asp.
c Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities. They are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
d For an explanation of the Government of Canada outcomes, please see www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2009-10 Performance |
---|---|---|
Scores on Community Well-Being (CWB) Index for First Nations and Inuit a | Departmental target to be determined b | First Nation and Inuit communities made significant progress in CWB from 1981 to 1996, reducing the gap in well-being relative to other Canadian communities. In the 2001–2006 period, however, there was little progress of the CWB of First Nation and Inuit communities. c |
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending d |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes e | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Education | 1,666.1 | 1,705.6 | 1,705.2 | 1,741.1 | 1,738.5 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion |
Social Development | 1,483.8 | 1,451.8 | 1,458.3 | 1,558.6 | 1,557.1 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion |
Managing Individual Affairs | 22.1 | 30.2 | 30.2 | 27.9 | 27.7 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion |
Total | 3,172.0 | 3,187.6 | 3,193.7 | 3,327.6 | 3,323.3 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
a INAC decided to adopt CWB index as an indicator for the People strategic outcome and to drop the Aboriginal Human Development Index scores as a performance indicator after the 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) was published.
b The target published in the 2009–2010 RPP to “reduce the difference between the CWB scores of Aboriginal communities and those of the general Canadian population” needs to be reviewed based on the latest CWB index trend analysis.
c Trend analysis of CWB scores for 1981 to 2006 is available at www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/rs/pubs/cwb/index-eng.asp. For more information on the CWB index, please see www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/rs/pubs/cwb/cwbdck-eng.asp.
d Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
e For an explanation of the Government of Canada outcomes, please see www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2009-10 Performance |
---|---|---|
Percentage of First Nation communities that apply sustainable land-use strategies | Conduct a review to identify baseline data on number of communities developing sustainable land management strategies. a | A review is currently underway; the baseline data will not be available until its completion. To date, 141 of Canada’s 584 First Nation communities with a land base have been identified as having developed or being in the process of developing tools to support sustainable land-use strategies. |
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending b |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Clarity of Title to Land and Resources | 10.4 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 11.4 | 11.1 | Strong economic growth |
Responsible Federal Stewardship | 105.6 | 57.9 | 76.0 | 135.7 | 126.9 | A clean and healthy environment |
First Nations Governance over Land, Resources and the Environment | 14.2 | 25.5 | 25.2 | 15.7 | 15.7 | Strong economic growth |
Total | 130.2 | 94.4 | 112.2 | 162.9 | 153.7 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
a For improved clarity, this performance indicator has been reworded slightly compared with the 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities.
b Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
c For an explanation of the Government of Canada outcomes, please see www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2009-10 Performance |
---|---|---|
Employment, income, education and housing components of the Community Well-Being (CWB) Index for First Nations and Inuit | Departmental target to be determined a |
First Nation and Inuit communities made significant progress in CWB from 1981 to 1996, reducing the gap in well-being relative to other Canadian communities. In the 2001–2006 period, however, there was little progress of the CWB of First Nation and Inuit communities. b Targets for Aboriginal business development and community investments were met in 2009–2010. Targets for infrastructure improvements have been set for 2010–2011 and a review of economic development programming is under way. |
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending c |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes d | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Individual and Community Business Development | 189.8 | 45.6 | 45.6 | 59.5 | 58.4 | Strong economic growth |
Community Investment | 122.2 | 172.2 | 170.1 | 88.9 |
Strong economic growth |
|
Community Infrastructure | 1,087.7 | 1,075.5 | 1,327.6 | 1,299.9 | 1,294.7 | Strong economic growth |
Total | 1,277.5 | 1,243.4 | 1,545.4 | 1,529.5 | 1,442.0 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
a The target of “a 25-percent decrease in the overall Well-Being Index gap between members of First Nation communities, Inuit and Métis peoples, and other Canadians” needs to be reviewed based on the latest CWB index trend analysis.
b Trend analysis of CWB scores for 1981 to 2006 is available at www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/rs/pubs/cwb/index-eng.asp. For more information on the CWB index, please see www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/rs/pubs/cwb/cwbdck-eng.asp.
c Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
d For an explanation of the Government of Canada outcomes, please see www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2009-10 Performance |
---|---|---|
Employment rates for Aboriginal people and Northerners in Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut |
Yukon — from 70.7% in 2007–2008 to 71% by 2010–2011 Northwest Territories — from 72.7% in 2007–2008 to 70% by 2010–2011 Nunavut — 60.3% in 2007–2008 to 58% by 2010–2011 * The targets were set based on forecasted slow down of economic factors (e.g. slow down in mining activity in N.W.T.). |
Employment rates in 2009-10 are lower than average when compared to 2007-08 for all three territories. This is mainly due to the combined effects of the global economic downturn and the previously forecasted slow down of economic factors. 2009-10: |
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending b |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Northern Governance | 7.6 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 17.1 | 16.8 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion |
Healthy Northern Communities | 120.0 | 94.1 | 133.2 | 129.2 | 121.0 | Healthy Canadians |
Northern Land and Resources | 158.7 | 176.0 | 169.8 | 224.9 | 222.0 | A clean and healthy environment |
Northern Economy d | 23.8 | 1.9 | 22.0 | 15.1 | 1.9 | Strong economic growth |
Total | 310.1 | 294.1 | 347.0 | 386.2 | 361.7 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
a Performance results are based on a calculation of the monthly employment rates from Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey conducted in Yukon and the Northwest Territories to reflect the average employment rates from April 2009 to March 2010. Nunavut data come from the Nunavut Bureau of Statistics. Before 2008, data was based on three-month moving averages of the 10 largest communities in Nunavut, while data from 2008 forward is the monthly employment rates for Nunavut as a whole.
b Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
c For an explanation of the Government of Canada outcomes, please see www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx.
d Performance results for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency are discussed in Section II under the Northern Economy Program Activity. Spending figures for the Agency are available.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2009-10 Performance |
---|---|---|
Socio-economic conditions of Métis, Non-Status Indians and urban Aboriginal people | Between 2001 and 2011, increase of 2 percentage points for high school attainment, employment and average total income for urban Aboriginal people in Urban Aboriginal Strategy (UAS) designated cities a | OFI programs are progressing well with the majority of programs on target. OFI anticipates meeting the 2-percent increase by 2010-2011. |
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending b |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Urban Aboriginal Strategy | 40.3 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 16.6 | 16.6 | Income security and employment for Canadians |
Métis and Non-Status Indian Organizational Capacity Development | 14.6 | 14.6 | 17.6 | 16.2 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion | |
Métis Rights Management | 11.9 | 12.1 | 8.5 | 8.0 | A diverse society that promotes linguistic duality and social inclusion | |
Total | 40.3 | 39.8 | 40.0 | 42.8 | 40.8 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
a OFI is reviewing all of its performance indicators and they may be revised when the new Performance Measurement Framework is completed later this fiscal year. The UAS performance measurement areas — education, employment, income — remain valid and appropriate, but OFI may adopt more robust indicators, if they are available.
b Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
Internal Services Program Activity: An effective and responsibly managed and operated department positioned to achieve its strategic outcomes
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending a |
2009-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Internal Services | 604.9 | 358.9 | 358.8 | 513.1 | 501.1 |
Total | 604.9 | 358.9 | 358.8 | 513.1 | 501.1 |
a Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
Strategic Outcome: Developed and diversified territorial economies that support prosperity for all Northerners
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes b | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Business Development | n/a | n/a | n/a | 2.2 | 1.3 | Strong economic growth |
Community Development | n/a | n/a | n/a | 35.3 | 33.1 | Strong economic growth |
Policy, Advocacy and Co‑ordination | n/a | n/a | n/a | 3.6 | 2.4 | Strong economic growth c |
Total | n/a | n/a | n/a | 41.2 | 36.8 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
a Order in Council P.C. 2009-1423 transferred from the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development to the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency the control and supervision of the portion of the federal public administration in the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development known as the Northern Economic Development Branch, effective August 18, 2009. Actual spending of $39.6 million reflects expenditures for the period from August 18, 2009, to March 31, 2010. CanNor was created on August 18, 2009 and received a combination of funding from both INAC and CEAP. Because CanNor was created late in the second quarter of the year and had only 7 months to deliver 12 months of programming, there are no planned spending figures to report for the Agency. A reprofile request for the variance between the Total Authorities and Actual Spending is pending.
b For an explanation of the Government of Canada outcomes, please see www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ppg-cpr/frame-cadre-eng.aspx.
c CanNor did not have a Program Activity Architecture (PAA) nor alignment to Government of Canada outcomes for 2009–2010. Therefore, the 2009–2010 program activities have been aligned to the same Government of Canada outcomes as the Northern Economy Program Activity for INAC’s 2009–2010 PAA.
Performance results for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency are discussed in Section II under the Northern Economy Program Activity.
CanNor Internal Services Program Activity
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Internal Services | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.6 | 2.8 |
Total | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.6 | 2.8 |
Strategic Outcome: Increased canadian polar knowledge
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending a |
2009-10 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
Research Facilitation and Communication | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | A clean and healthy environment |
Total | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
a Starting in the 2009–2010 Estimates cycle, the resources for the Internal Services program activity are displayed separately from other program activities; they are no longer distributed among the remaining program activities, as was the case in previous Main Estimates. This has affected the comparability of spending and FTE information by program activity between one fiscal year and another. For this table, the 2008–2009 actuals have been adjusted from what was published in the Departmental Performance Report to show Internal Services as a separate program activity to provide comparable figures for the 2009–2010 financial information.
Strategic Outcome: Canadian Polar Commission Internal Services Program Activity
Program Activity | 2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
Internal Services | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Total | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
The following methodology has been used to determine the status of each priority, based on INAC’s progress against plans set out in the 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities:
In its 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities, [Note 6] INAC identified five priority areas:
A sixth operational priority was added when the Northern Strategy priority was formally announced in July 2009. INAC also committed to a management priority to improve its management practices. Progress made in 2009–2010 on these seven priorities is detailed in the following table.
Operational Priorities | Type | Status | Progress Made and Linkage to Strategic Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Education Improving education outcomes |
Ongoing |
Somewhat met |
The People Strategic Outcome (Education Program Activity) INAC remains committed to improving education outcomes for Aboriginal learners through partnerships. These partnerships are important because they are helping partners share expertise, develop joint plans, and ensure that students can move between band-operated and public schools without academic penalty. Action on this priority is building the foundation for structural reform to improve First Nation students’ educational outcomes. In 2009–2010, INAC:
|
Reconciliation, governance and self-government Strengthening Canada’s Relationship with Aboriginal peoples |
Ongoing |
Overall: Somewhat met Strengthening Canada’s Relationship with Aboriginal peoples: Mostly met |
The Government Strategic Outcome INAC remains committed to a new relationship with Aboriginal peoples based on respectful partnerships, reconciliation and healing. Examples of this new relationship in 2009–2010 include:
|
Strengthening Aboriginal governance and self-government: Mostly met |
The Government Strategic Outcome INAC remains committed to strengthening Aboriginal governance and self-government by advancing negotiations and reaching settlement agreements (please see the Government strategic outcome for related accomplishments.) |
||
Northern Governance: Somewhat met |
The North Strategic Outcome In the North, INAC continued its efforts related to devolution of typically provincial responsibilities (e.g., land, natural resources), including:
|
||
Economic Development Improve economic well-being, prosperity and self-reliance |
Ongoing | Mostly met |
The Economy Strategic Outcome INAC is committed to fostering the conditions and developing the tools required to help Aboriginal people and their communities attain economic well-being, prosperity and self-reliance. In June 2009, INAC announced the launch of the new Federal Framework for Aboriginal Economic Development, the government’s new results-oriented approach to enable Aboriginal people in Canada to enjoy the same opportunities for employment, income and wealth creation as other Canadians. [Note 7] The department began developing a new suite of programs to align with the framework’s priorities. Under Canada’s Economic Action Plan, INAC spent $301.2 million. Investments amounting to $225.6 million supported the creation of Aboriginal jobs and procurement opportunities for Aboriginal business. These investments dovetailed with other priorities. For example, First Nation workers devoted 64,280 hours to water and wastewater projects in 2009–2010. |
Empowering citizens and protecting the vulnerable Contributing to better health outcomes and safer communities |
Ongoing | Somewhat met |
The People Strategic Outcome The Economy Strategic Outcome Internal Services |
Resolution of land claims Addressing, resolving and implementing claims |
Ongoing | Mostly Met |
The Government Strategic Outcome Resolving land claims creates certainty, clarity and predictability over the ownership and use of land and resources within a settlement region. INAC made some progress in addressing 141 land claims in 2009–2010 and marked some notable successes, including:
|
Northern Development (new priority) Including ongoing leadership of the government’s integrated Northern Strategy, formally announced in July 2009 |
Ongoing | Exceeded |
The North Strategic Outcome INAC works to balance support for the North’s economic potential with sustainable development and environmental protection. During 2009–2010, INAC moved forward on legislation, including:
To further strengthen and diversify the economies of the three territories, the government renewed the Strategic Investments in Northern Economic Development program. Each territory established investment plans for the renewed program and are now implementing them. INAC assisted the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) to set up the Northern Project Management Office. The office acts as a hub for stakeholders in northern development, a direct response to recommendation 18 of Neil McCrank’s report, Road to Improvement, which proposed a project office for the North as a single point of entry. [Note 9] |
Management Priority | Type | Status | Links to Strategic Outcome(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Improvement of INAC’s management practices and organizational capacity |
Ongoing | Met |
Internal Services The following commitments are reported on under the Internal Services program activity in Section II:
|
For more effective partnerships, INAC continued to work closely with Inuit organizations to ensure their key concerns and priorities are considered in the development of federal policies. Successes in 2009–2010 included:
Aboriginal people and Northerners have a fundamental relationship with the land and its resources. INAC’s efforts in protecting and preserving Canada’s natural heritage included:
INAC faces many challenges and opportunities as it strives to deliver on its mandate and contribute to the Government of Canada’s strategic outcomes. The department’s legal and operating environments are complex and continually evolving. It delivers or funds programs and services to diverse groups of people (First Nations, Inuit, Métis and Northerners) who have varied and distinct priorities and needs, and who live in a vast range of communities throughout the country — from remote settlements with extreme climates to metropolitan urban areas. Most of INAC’s services are delivered through partnerships with Aboriginal communities, the provinces and territories, Aboriginal organizations, and organizations in the North. INAC’s success is therefore highly dependent on strong and productive relationships and partnerships.
In the North, INAC’s operating environment is marked by rapidly increasing opportunity. Past achievements in the areas of comprehensive claims, resource development, devolution and scientific advances have opened the way for exceptional new growth. It is in this context that the Government of Canada announced its Northern Strategy, with four primary objectives: exercising Canada’s Arctic sovereignty; promoting economic and social development; protecting Canada’s environmental heritage; and improving and devolving northern governance.
INAC’s responsibilities are shaped not just by unique demographic and geographic challenges, [Note 13] but also by centuries of Canadian history. At the same time, the nation’s changing social, economic and political landscape strongly influences INAC’s priorities, performance and delivery of services. A major factor in Canada’s changing demographic landscape is the increasing Aboriginal population, which is young and growing at twice the rate of the Canadian population overall. While this growth brings the challenge of ever-increasing demands for services — Aboriginal people in Canada continue to have lower levels of education, poorer health and quality of life, and higher levels of unemployment than Canadians overall — it also presents an unprecedented opportunity for capable, educated Aboriginal youth to fill crucial labour shortages in the future. In addition, the department requires an integrated set of plans, policies and programs in order to foster and build on the economic advances resulting from the increasing employment opportunities and wealth being created by Aboriginal businesses and communities.
Supreme Court and other court rulings on Aboriginal and treaty rights also continue to have a major impact on INAC’s mandate and the way the department works to fulfil the Crown’s legal obligations. Canada’s historical relationship with Aboriginal peoples and the ongoing refinement of constitutional concepts and questions adds to the complexity of litigation and exposes the Government of Canada to landmark court decisions and significant financial liabilities.
To achieve its expected results, the department must effectively manage these risks. Since 2006, INAC has been focusing on management practices that foster and reinforce a culture of accountable decision-making. As a priority, the department is putting in place a program to integrate comprehensive and consistent risk analysis into decision-making and oversight at all levels of the department. With senior management’s guidance, the program will establish a unified approach to risk mitigation and monitoring that facilitates the sharing of risk information.
Over the past two years, the personal involvement of the Deputy Minister, Associate Deputy Minister, Risk Champion (Senior ADM — Regional Operations) and Chief Risk Officer has helped the entire department rapidly adopt integrated risk management. The INAC Risk Management Framework and Corporate Risk Profile are up to date. After the Departmental Operations Committee and Senior Executive Committee reviewed the framework and profile, the Deputy Minister approved them in September 2009. For 2009–2010, INAC integrated risk into the corporate priority setting, operational plans, and numerous decision-making processes. Major projects now have an increased emphasis on using risk information.
Given the varied nature of INAC’s programming and services, the department must also maintain many unique skill-sets and expertise and a representative and culturally sensitive workforce. More than 60 percent of the department’s spending is committed to giving First Nations access to provincial-type services, including education, social services and community infrastructure. As a result, one of INAC’s most significant challenges and risks relates to effective recruitment, development and retention of qualified, experienced, representative employees. The department has developed and is implementing an Integrated Human Resources Management Strategy and Plan to address human resources challenges proactively. To complement these efforts, the regions and sectors develop and implement their respective human resources plans, monitor results and report quarterly to senior management.
Another challenge relates to service delivery. Many of INAC’s services are delivered by independent, community-based service providers that have differing levels of capacity to carry out the department’s mandate effectively. The third-party nature of this service delivery presents inherent challenges for results reporting and performance measurement. INAC relies on access to timely, pertinent and accurate information to support planning, resource allocation and programming decisions, as well as to fulfil its accountability obligations. To mitigate the risk of inadequate information being available for decision-making, INAC is better defining the expected results of its programs and is improving data collection processes and systems.
Of the eight corporate risks identified in the 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities, the information for decision-making, program alignment, legal and implementation risks materialized. The first two risks require continuous vigilance by the department, but some legal and implementation risks required specific action on their mitigation. For example:
Three-Year Spending Trend
INAC’s Actual Spending for 2009–2010 was $7.4 billion. Overall, departmental spending has increased by about $0.1 billion or 2 percent over the past two years. This net increase is primarily due to the following major items:
These increases were partly offset by spending reductions arising from:
The following spending trend graph illustrates the department’s Main Estimates, Planned Spending, Total Authorities and Actual Spending for the last three years of actuals, as well as spending for Canada’s Economic Action Plan.
Spending Trend
Note: Actual Spending of $7.4 billion in 2009–2010 includes Canada’s Economic Action Plan spending of $0.3 billion.
See Performance Summary section for an explanation of variances between Main Estimates, Planned Spending, Total Authorities and Actual Spending
Percentage of Actual Spending by Strategic Outcome for 2009–2010
2009–2010 |
2009–2010 |
|
---|---|---|
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada a |
||
Water and Wastewater Systems |
82.5 |
68.6 b |
Housing |
75.0 |
75.0 |
Schools |
95.0 |
81.8 c |
Arctic Research Infrastructure |
35.0 |
30.1 |
High Arctic Research Station Feasibility |
1.0 |
1.1 |
First Nations Child and Family Services |
7.0 |
4.0 d |
Accelerating Action on Contaminated Sites — South of 60th Parallel |
n/a |
15.8 |
Accelerating Action on Contaminated Sites — North of 60th Parallel |
n/a |
11.1 |
Promoting Energy Development in the North |
n/a |
13.7 |
Sub-Total (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada) |
295.5 |
301.2 |
Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) |
||
Recreational Infrastructure Canada Program |
n/a |
0.4 |
Community Adjustment Fund |
n/a |
14.0 |
Strengthening Economic Development in the North e |
n/a |
3.4 |
Strategic Investments in Northern Economic Development e |
n/a |
7.9 |
Sub-Total (CanNor) |
n/a |
25.7 |
Total |
295.5 |
326.9 |
a Reflects Planned Spending in INAC’s 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities, excluding $20 million set aside for CanNor. Moreover, Planned Spending in the Report on Plans and Priorities did not include funding for contaminated sites or energy development in the North as INAC did not have these details at the departmental level when the report was being prepared. CanNor was created on August 18, 2009 and received CEAP funding through the Budget Implementation Act, resulting in funding transfers from INAC and new funding authorities. These CEAP authorities included funding for contributions, statutory amounts, and activities for establishing CanNor and its offices. CanNor was created late in the second quarter of the year. Consequently, there are no planned spending figures to report for the Agency. CEAP authorities for 2009-10 amount to $35.4 million. CanNor had only seven months to deliver 12 months of programming, so actual expenditures amount to $25.7million. The reprofile request for the outstanding variance of $9.7million is pending approval.
b $13.5 million was reprofiled to 2010–2011. A further request to reprofile $0.4 million to 2010–2011 is pending approval. All CEAP targets for 2009–2010 were met. (For more details)
c The remaining $13.2 million was re-profiled to water and wastewater projects in 2010–2011. All CEAP targets for 2009–2010 were met. (For more details)
d Funding provided through CEAP for the Information System is not available until Treasury Board approves the Preliminary Project Approval (PPA). The PPA process did not allow for INAC to go before Treasury Board in 2009–2010, which resulted in the department requesting and receiving approval to reprofile $3.0 million to future years. INAC will be seeking approval from the Treasury Board on the PPA in September 2010.
e CEAP funding of $20.0 million ($10.0 million for Strengthening Economic Development in the North and $10.0 million for Strategic Investments in Northern Economic Development) was included in Planned Spending in INAC’s 2009-2010 Report on Plans and Priorities as CanNor did not exist when the report was being prepared.
Funding was included in Planned Spending in INAC’s 2009–2010 Report on Plans and Priorities as CanNor did not exist when the report was being prepared.
Canada’s Economic Action Plan is a $62-billion initiative to create and maintain jobs, and stimulate the economy. The majority of the Plan’s investments are designated for 2009–2010 and 2010–2011, including $1.9 billion in investments for programming specifically for Aboriginal people. These investments support the Prime Minister’s commitment to promote greater participation by Aboriginal men and women in the economy and to address specific opportunities and the challenges they face. Programs include skills and training, health, child and family services, housing, education, police facilities, and water and wastewater systems. (For further details by initiative)
INAC is responsible for a number of initiatives under Canada’s Economic Action Plan, including funding the construction and renovation of First Nation schools and water and wastewater facilities on reserves; the remediation of contaminated sites both on reserves and across the North; and the upgrade and development of research infrastructure through the Arctic Research Infrastructure Fund and the feasibility study for the Canadian High Arctic Research Station. The department is also working alongside Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, undertaking complementary housing activities such as lot servicing, creating new high-density developments, renovating existing housing units and assisting in the transition of band-owned units to market-based units.
CanNor delivered two key programs this year under Canada’s Economic Action Plan. The first is the Recreational Infrastructure Canada Program (RInC), which aims to mitigate the impacts of the economic downturn on communities by supporting the development and improvement of recreational infrastructure. The second is the Community Adjustment Fund (CAF), a stimulus program focusing on short-term job creation in communities. The government allocated $31.0 million to CanNor for CAF and $1.7 million for RInC — both over two years. CanNor supported 19 RInC projects and 25 CAF projects in the North.
In 2009–2010, in collaboration with several other departments, INAC produced four consecutive progress reports to provide an overview of Aboriginal and northern projects under Canada’s Economic Action Plan. They are available to all Canadians online. [Note 16]
Vote # or Statutory Item (S) | Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording | 2007-08 Actual Spending |
2008-09 Actual Spending |
2009-10 Main Estimates |
2009-10 Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada ($ millions) | |||||
1 | Operating expenditures | 671.4 | 1,108.4 | 937.7 | 1,225.4 |
5 | Capital expenditures | 0.8 | 0.8 | 44.4 | 0.3 |
10 | Grants and contributions | 6,330.8 | 5,571.8 | 5,657.9 | 5,802.3 |
15 | Payments to Canada Post Corporation | 44.0 | 56.1 | 27.6 | 58.3 |
20 | Office of the Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians — Operating expenditures | 7.5 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 8.4 |
25 | Office of the Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians — Contributions | 27.1 | 30.3 | 29.9 | 31.4 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 52.1 | 55.7 | 61.1 | 70.0 |
(S) | Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development — Salary and motorcar allowance | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
(S) | Grassy Narrows and Islington Bands Mercury Disability Board | — | — | — | — |
(S) | Liabilities in respect of loan guarantees made to Indians for Housing and Economic Development | 0.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
(S) | Indian Annuities Treaty payments | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.2 |
(S) | Transfer payments in connection with First Nations infrastructure for on-reserve housing (Budget Implementation Act, 2009) | — | — | — | 75.0 |
(S) | Grants to Aboriginal organizations designated to receive claim settlement payments pursuant to Comprehensive Land Claims Settlement Acts | 89.0 | 54.0 | 65.5 | 60.6 |
(S) | Grant to the Nunatsiavut Government for the implementation of the Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement pursuant to the Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement Act | 39.0 | 39.0 | 18.0 | 36.8 |
(S) | Payments to comprehensive claim beneficiaries in compensation for resource royalties | 3.3 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 6.0 |
(S) | Payment from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of guaranteed loans issued out of the Indian economic development account | — | — | — | — |
(S) | Court awards | 0.3 | 2.3 | — | 1.0 |
(S) | Refunds of amounts credited to revenues in previous years | 0.4 | 0.6 | — | 1.1 |
(S) | Spending of proceeds from the disposal of surplus Crown assets | 1.3 | 0.2 | — | 0.1 |
Total budgetary | 7,268.7 | 6,938.9 | 6,856.1 | 7,380.7 | |
L20 | Loans and guarantees of loans through the Indian economic development account | — | — | — | — |
L30 | Loans to native claimants | 27.1 | 26.1 | 47.4 | 32.7 |
L35 | Loans to First Nations in British Columbia for supporting their participation in the British Columbia Treaty Commission Process | 26.0 | 27.7 | 30.4 | 26.1 |
Total non-budgetary | 53.1 | 53.8 | 77.8 | 58.8 | |
Total Department | 7,321.8 | 6,992.7 | 6,933.9 | 7,439.5 | |
Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency | |||||
37 | Operating expenditures | n/a | n/a | n/a | 7.1 |
39 | Contributions | n/a | n/a | n/a | 17.9 |
(S) | Community Adjustment Fund | n/a | n/a | n/a | 14.0 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0.7 |
Total Agency | n/a | n/a | n/a | 39.6 | |
Canadian Polar Commission | |||||
40 | Program expenditures | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total Agency | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada
The net increase of approximately $447 million in actual spending from 2008–2009 to 2009–2010 primarily reflects:
Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency
Order in Council P.C. 2009-1423 transferred from the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development to the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency the control and supervision of the portion of the federal public administration in the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development known as the Northern Economic Development Branch, effective August 18, 2009. Actual spending of $39.6 million reflects expenditures for the period from August 18, 2009, to March 31, 2010.