This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
To provide the best decision-making environment for the Supreme Court.
2009-10 Financial Resources ($ millions) |
2009-10 Human Resources (FTEs) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
28.6 | 31.2 | 29.3 | 201 | 201 | 0 |
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
Targets |
Performance Status |
Performance Summary |
Cases processed without delay |
Number of months between filing of application for leave and decision on application for leave | 14 weeks | Met all | Leave applications were decided, on average, fourteen weeks after filing. |
Number of months between hearing and judgment
|
6 months |
Mostly met |
Appeal judgments were rendered, on average, seven months after hearing. |
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
Targets |
Performance Status |
Performance Summary |
Sub-Activity 1: Management of Court Cases |
||||
Access to Court services and information |
% of lawyers and unrepresented litigants that were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with Registry services |
95% |
Met all |
Lawyers and unrepresented litigants expressed satisfaction with Court services. |
Courtroom systems reliability |
Number of hearing disruptions for technical reasons per year |
0 |
Met all |
No disruptions to hearings for technical reasons. |
Expected Results |
Performance |
Targets |
Performance Status |
Performance Summary |
Sub-Activity 2: Library Services |
||||
Access to reference information
|
% of factual/ bibliographic requests for reference assistance responded to within service standard of 1 working day | 95% |
Met all
|
A December 2009 survey of Library users who had submitted extensive and substantive research requests indicated that the Library exceeded its target of 95% satisfaction, and that 100% of the respondents got their answers in time. A June 2009 facilitated consultation with outgoing Law Clerks showed that satisfaction for the Library’s targeted products and services
remains extremely high, while recommendations were received to improve training and client communications.
|
% of complex/ substantive requests for reference assistance responded to by date required by client | 95% | |||
% of users that were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with library services |
95% |
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
|
Performance Status |
Performance Summary |
Sub-Activity 3: Process Payments to the Supreme Court Pursuant to the Judges Act |
||||
Timely and accurate processing of payments pursuant to the Judges Act
|
% of payments processed within service standards |
95% |
Mostly Met |
The SCC achieved a level of 83% for the processing of such payments pursuant to the Judges Act within the service standard of 5 days. This represents an improvement from 77% in the prior year. Although there is always room for improvement, we have to take in consideration other factors that can slow down this process. Efforts will continue to achieve our target of 95%. |
% of errors on payments |
2% |
Mostly met |
An independent file review revealed that 6.45% of claims contained errors. The value of errors represented only 1.7% of total value sampled. |
Performance status:
Exceeded: More than 100 per cent of the expected level of performance
Met all: 100 per cent of the expected level of performance
Mostly Met: 80 to 99 per cent of the expected level of performance
Somewhat Met: 60 to 79 per cent of the expected level of performance
Not Met: Less than 60 per cent of the expected level of performance
The Supreme Court of Canada is Canada’s highest court of law. It is Canada’s final general court of appeal whether for individuals or governments. The Supreme Court of Canada stands at the apex of the Canadian judicial system, and as such is a fundamental component of the Canadian structure of government. Because of this position, the strategic outcome of the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada, namely “to provide the best decision-making environment for the Supreme Court”, contributes to the federal government’s Government Affairs outcome area.
The Office of the Registrar maintains monthly statistics on the Court's caseload, backlog and average time lapses between key events in a case's history. It also produces a public annual statistical report which can be found at http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/stat/index-eng.asp.
Average Time Lapses (in months) | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between filing of application for leave and decision on application for leave | 5.2 | 5.4 | 4.3 | 5.7 | 3.9 |
Between date leave granted (or date notice of appeal as of right filed) and hearing | 11.1 | 12.5 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 10.5 |
Between hearing and judgment | 5.4 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.1 |
Average Time Lapses (in months) | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between filing of application for leave and decision on application for leave | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Between date leave granted (or date notice of appeal as of right filed) and hearing | 9.4 | 9.1 | 7.7 | 9 | 8.9 | 7.6 |
Between hearing and judgment | 4 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 6.6 | 4.8 | 7.4 |
In 2009, the Court maintained the average time lapse for deciding leave applications and improved the time lapse between the date leave was granted (or a notice of appeal as of right was filed) and the hearing of a case to seven and a half months. There was an increase in the time lapses between hearing and judgment, with some judgments being rendered over seven months after the hearing of the appeal. The increase in this time lapse is attributed to the growing complexity of many of the appeals in reserve. The overall impact of the increase was mitigated by a reduction in pre-hearing delays. In 2009, cases were disposed of eighteen months after filing, compared to seventeen months in 2008.
Litigants, the public and the media access Court services through the Registry or the Court website. The public face of the Supreme Court of Canada is its Registry. Clients attending the Registry are encouraged to fill out a comment card in regard to their satisfaction level relating to various services offered and with respect to staff. Some clients attend to pick up judgments or review a case file, but most will come to the Registry to file documents or obtain information about bringing a proceeding before the Supreme Court of Canada. Registry staff must provide timely, accurate and easily understood information, and the comments received reflect positively on Registry performance in areas such as timely service, staff professionalism and overall level of satisfaction. Additional comments emphasize staff friendliness and helpful assistance.
General enquiries and requests for Court information by the public are increasing, resulting from a better-informed and more demanding public, as well as from the captivating issues debated in Court cases. In 2009, the Court Records staff continued to respond to requests for information or documents from Court files in both electronic and paper format. To make the processing of requests more efficient, a form for access to court records was developed and made available on the Court’s website. This streamlines the process of requesting access to Court case records, photographs, videos and webcasts by members of the public.
Leave applications filed by self represented litigants increased in 2009. All self represented litigants who contact the Court were provided with an information and instruction guide that includes samples of fill-in-the-blank applications for leave, response and reply books that a self represented litigant can complete and file with the Court. If a self represented litigant has access to the internet, he/she is referred to the Supreme Court of Canada website where they can access an information portal that allows them to download PDF versions of the sample books.
Percentage of leave applications filed by self represented litigants
Years |
Leave applications filed by all litigants |
Leave applications filed by self represented litigants |
% filed by self represented litigants |
---|---|---|---|
2000 | 642 | 117 | 18% |
2001 | 621 | 117 | 19% |
2002 | 523 | 106 | 20% |
2003 | 550 | 92 | 17% |
2004 | 568 | 114 | 20% |
2005 | 544 | 103 | 19% |
2006 | 506 | 115 | 23% |
2007 | 602 | 149 | 25% |
2008 | 529 | 128 | 24% |
2009 | 545 | 143 | 26% |
During the comprehensive review of its Collection Development Policy in 2008-09, the Library focussed on eliminating duplication between several print and electronic journal titles in the collection, as well as the cancellation of material which will now only be collected in electronic format, because the print version is not mandatory for long term access. When print journals were available in a stable licensed electronic collection, had not circulated in print, and had also not been cited in the Supreme Court Reports, cancellation was recommended. The objective of the exercise was to streamline the collection, reduce duplication between print and electronic, and liberate funds to enable the purchase of additional documents and texts.
The effect of close to $82,000 in such cancellations has been a short-term alleviation of the space issues facing the physical collection, and a shift in our ability to meet the Court’s research needs from the print collection to the electronic collection. Based on a citation analysis of the references cited in the Supreme Court of Canada decisions released in 2009, the number of citations available in our print collection decreased slightly; however, when we factor in the combined access to internet, database subscriptions and interlibrary loans, overall access to cited materials increased slightly. The Library collection is able to meet the information needs of the court over 98% of the time.
In 2009-10, the Library awarded a contract for software to manage its electronic resource collection, pursuant to a Request for Proposal. The implementation of the software will enable the staff to collect usage statistics, manage license terms and conditions and administer password control, trials and user feedback related to electronic resources.
The deployment of the Court’s electronic document management system and the continuing transition to the use of electronic documents, records and publications has brought to light the growing need to put in place a supportive Information Management framework and governance structure. With a re-aligned governance framework, work on the Court’s IM strategy, policy standards and applications will proceed more smoothly.
Gaps and vulnerabilities identified in recent reviews and assessments heightened the need to enhance the Court’s security program. As an institution of the Continuity of Constitutional Government, it is imperative that the Court’s Business Continuity Program be fully developed and maintained at an acceptable level of readiness. The level of effort required to implement a comprehensive BCMP was underestimated. A lack of resources and turnover in the security services branch also contributed to the delay in implementing the program. As a result, the Office of the Registrar has committed to enhancing its overall security program to better meet the needs of the Court and align it with the new Policy on Government Security.