Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
www.tbs-sct.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Breadcrumb Trail
ARCHIVED - Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission - Supplementary Tables
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
User Fees Reporting
Template A: User Fees
User Fee 1: Confidential business information exemption fees
Fee Type 2: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority 3: Hazardous Materials Information Review Act
Date Last Modified 4: June 2002
Performance Standards 5: Complete pre-registration check and register claims within seven days of receipt, provided all necessary information is included.
Performance Results 6: 100%
| 2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast Revenue 7 | Actual Revenue 8 | Full Cost 9 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue 10 | Estimated Full Cost 11 |
| 570 | 562 | 713 | 2010-11 | 570 | 713 |
| 2011-12 | 570 | 713 | |||
| 2012-13 | 570 | 713 | |||
Other Information: Departments may use this area to describe any significant factors or events that have affected user fee activities, e.g. how performance results may have been affected by external factors or what measures, beyond strict legal requirements, are being taken to address performance gaps.
User Fee 1: Fees charged for processing of access requested filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type 2: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority 3: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified 4: 1992
Performance Standards 5: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request
Performance Results 6: 100%
| 2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast Revenue 7 | Actual Revenue 8 | Full Cost 9 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue 10 | Estimated Full Cost 11 |
| - | 1 | 1 | 2010-11 | - | - |
| 2011-12 | - | - | |||
| 2012-13 | - | - | |||
Other Information: Departments may use this area to describe any significant factors or events that have affected user fee activities, e.g. how performance results may have been affected by external factors or what measures, beyond strict legal requirements, are being taken to address performance gaps.
Please note that according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
- the performance standard, if provided, may not have received parliamentary review; and
- the performance standard, if provided, may not respect all establishment requirements under the UFA (e.g. international comparison; independent complaint address).
- the performance result, if provided, is not legally subject to section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.
| 2009-10 | Planning Years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast Revenue 7 | Actual Revenue 8 | Full Cost 9 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue 10 | Estimated Full Cost 11 | |
| Sub-Total (R) | 570 | 562 | 713 | 2010-11 | 570 | 713 |
| 2011-12 | 570 | 713 | ||||
| 2012-13 | 570 | 713 | ||||
| Sub-Total (O) | - | 1 | 1 | 2010-11 | - | - |
| 2011-12 | - | - | ||||
| 2012-13 | - | - | ||||
| Total | 570 | 563 | 714 | 2010-11 | 570 | 713 |
| 2011-12 | 570 | 713 | ||||
| 2012-13 | 570 | 713 | ||||
1 User fee: Indicate the name of each user fee as defined by the User Fees Act. All User fees must be identified whether introduced or modified during 2009-10 or not including ATIP fee.
2 Fee Type: Identify the fee type as Regulatory (R) or Other Products and Services (O). A regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing, testing, or approving the actions of external parties. No other fee type category, other than the ones provided above
3 Fee-setting Authority: Identify the authority used to set or amend the fee, e.g. Financial Administration Act, Oceans Act, User Fees Act.
4 Date Last Modified: Indicate the date on which the fee was introduced or most recently amended. Where the introduction of or most recent amendment to a user fee occurred in 2009-10, briefly describe the rationale, consultation, and circumstances surrounding the fee change, including summary information on complaints raised during consultation, the establishment of an independent advisory panel, and the way that body dealt with complaints.
5 Performance standards: Express as a specific statement of quantity or quality of service provided. Performance standards must be measurable, e.g. processing time of 60 days per transaction or 80 per cent satisfaction rate, as measured through a survey of every service recipient.
6 Performance Results: Express as a specific measurement of results achieved against a pre-established performance standard, e.g. 60-day processing standard met 87 per cent of the time or 94 per cent of clients indicated "good" or "very good" satisfaction with service provided.
7 Forecast Revenue: Indicate the projected revenue for 2009-10 in $000.
8 Actual Revenue: Indicate actual revenue in $000.
9 Full Cost: Indicate the full (estimated) cost. Identify costs incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity when such costs are identifiable and material.
10 Forecast Revenue: Provide forecast revenues for each planning year
11 Estimated Full Cost: Provide the estimated full cost for each planning year. Identify costs incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity.
