This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Name of Horizontal Initiative:
Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan (the Action Plan)
Name of Lead Department(s):
The lead is shared between Health Canada (HC), the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
Lead Department Program Activity:
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
Fiscal Year 2008-2009
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
Fiscal Year 2012-2013 (and ongoing)
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date):
$489.4 million over five years ending in Fiscal Year 2012-2013 (and $126.7 million ongoing)
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The federal government is responsible for promoting the health and safety of Canadians. A key part of this role is ensuring that the products used by Canadians are safe. Adverse consequences associated with unsafe products impact not only the Canadian public, but also the Canadian economy. The Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan (Action Plan) is a horizontal initiative aimed at modernizing and strengthening Canada's safety system for food, health and consumer products. A number of recent high-profile incidents, such as lead and ingestible magnets in children's toys, contaminants in imported food products, and the global withdrawal of some prescription medicines, have underscored the need for government action.
The Action Plan modernizes Canada's regulatory system to enable it to better protect Canadians from unsafe consumer products in the face of current realities and future pressures. The Action Plan bolsters Canada's regulatory system by amending or replacing outdated health and safety legislation with new legislative regimes that respond to modern realities, and by enhancing safety programs in areas where modern legislative tools already exist. The Action Plan ensures that Canadians have the information they need to assess the risks and benefits associated with the consumer and health products they choose to use, and to minimize risks associated with food safety.
The Action Plan is an integrated, risk-based plan and includes a series of initiatives that are premised on three key pillars: active prevention, targeted oversight and rapid response. We focus on active prevention to avoid as many incidents as possible and work closely with industry to promote awareness, provide regulatory guidance, and help identify safety concerns at an early stage. Targeted oversight provides for early detection of safety problems and further safety verification at the appropriate stage in a product's life cycle. To improve rapid response capabilities and ensure the government has the ability to act quickly and effectively when needed we work to enhance health risk assessments, strengthen recall capacity, and increase the efficiency in responding and communicating clearly with consumers and stakeholders.
In addition to addressing the concerns outlined above, the Action Plan provides a platform for Canada to actively participate in the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), in particular by supporting commitments to increase the safety of imported products within North America. It also enables Canada to better align with US standards, which will have a positive impact on consumer confidence and the business climate.
Shared Outcome(s):
Governance Structure(s):
The Minister of Health and the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada have joint responsibility and accountability for results, and for providing information on progress achieved by the Action Plan.
A Governance Framework has been established and endorsed by all of the partner departments/agencies. To facilitate horizontal coordination, the following Director General (DG)/Executive Director (ED) level Task Forces have been established: Health Products Task Force, Consumer Products Task Force, Food Task Force, Communications Task Force, and the Legislative and Regulatory Task Force. The Task Forces report to a DG/ED level Coordinating Committee. An Assistant Deputy Minister (ADM)/Vice President (VP) level Steering Committee provides direction to the Coordinating Committee. An Oversight Committee of Deputy Heads facilitates the provision of high level guidance to the Steering Committee.
Health Canada's Strategic Policy Branch (SPB) provides the Secretariat function for the Action Plan and plays an integral role in supporting the ongoing operation and decision-making of the governance committees, oversight and integration of performance against commitments, and advice to senior management. SPB is also the lead for coordinating the implementation of the legislative and regulatory initiatives.
Health Canada's Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB) and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA), along with the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), work together to implement Action Plan activities related to consumer products.
Health Canada's Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) has primary responsibility for implementing Action Plan activities related to health products with support from Health Canada's Strategic Policy Branch (SPB) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) on one initiative (increased knowledge of post-market drug safety and effectiveness).
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Health Canada's Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) work together to implement Action Plan activities related to food safety.
The Public Affairs, Consultation and Communications Branch (PACCB) provides communications support for all of the above activities and will coordinate or lead many of the horizontal Departmental activities under the Consumer Information Strategy.
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2009-10 |
Actual Spending for 2009-10 |
Expected Results for 2009-10 |
Results Achieved in 2009-10 |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health Canada | Health Products | Active Prevention | 57.6 | 10.80 | 10.88 | Increased industry awareness and knowledge of regulatory requirements |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced knowledge of post-market health product safety risks to inform decisions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased oversight of the risk management and risk mitigation strategies for health products |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased safety of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) through industry compliance with the FDA and its regulations |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved timeliness of pre-market reviews |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased awareness and understanding of the safe use of health products by consumers and health care professionals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Health Products | Targeted Oversight | 34.6 | 3.90 | 2.07 | Enhanced capacity of HC and industry to identify and respond to risk issues |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Increased capacity to identify safety issues with health products on the market |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased knowledge of post-market drug safety and effectiveness to inform decisions Increased capacity in Canada to address priority research on post-market drug safety and effectiveness |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved ability to monitor and control importation of health products |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Health Products | Rapid Response | Existing Resources | 0.00 | 0.00 | Improved ability to respond with better tools when safety incidents occur | New tools on hold due to delay in new legislation. | ||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Consumer Products | Active Prevention | 41.0 | 4.16 | 2.47 | Increased awareness and understanding of product safety obligations by consumer products industry |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Increased awareness and understanding of standards by consumer products industry |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased awareness and understanding of consumer product safety issues by consumers |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Consumer Products | Targeted Oversight | 15.7 | 2.10 | 1.15 | Improved timeliness and quality of information on consumer product safety |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Improved Cosmetic Regulations under the FDA |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased sharing of information with international regulators |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Consumer Products | Rapid Response | 17.9 | 3.40 | 3.95 | Improved legislative authority and regulatory tools for consumer products |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Improved legislative authority and regulatory tools for radiation-emitting devices |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved monitoring of consumer and cosmetic products |
In 2009-10 compliance and enforcement activities continue as per cyclical enforcement plan:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Pesticide Regulation | Active Prevention | 6.9 | 1.34 | 1.15 | Increased industry (manufacturers and retailers) awareness of risks and related regulatory requirements |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Pesticide Regulation | Rapid Response | 8.0 | 1.00 | 0.76 | Improved monitoring of pest management products using a risk management approach |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Food Nutrition | Active Prevention | 29.6 | 4.90 | 4.78 | Establishment of the appropriate instrument or mix of instruments, including regulatory and non-regulatory measures (standards, policies, etc.) to address immediate areas of concern | HC developed and published several guidance documents that provided Canadians with better information on what they are eating and how to handle food safely, e.g., caffeine, allergens, fresh produce and powdered infant formulas. As part of its Amendments to the Food Additive Tables, Health Canada published 9 Interim Marketing Authorization notices in Canada Gazette Part I. Health Canada published in Canada Gazette Part II three regulatory amendments for food additives for a total of 13 submissions. Amendments have been drafted for several other additives and publication is expected in Summer 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||
Increased understanding of food safety risks by HC, PHAC & CFIA |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased engagement by Canadians in the regulatory system Increased industry knowledge regarding food labelling |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased industry understanding of and engagement in the development and implementation of food safety risk mitigation processes Improved international collaboration in addressing common import risks |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Canada | Food Nutrition | Rapid Response | 1.3 | 0.20 | 0.17 | Increased public understanding of food safety risks, alert systems and safety systems |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Food Inspection Agency | Food Safety | Active Prevention | 114.2 | 20.10 | 16.40 | Increased understanding of food safety risks by HC, PHAC & CFIA |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Establishment of the appropriate instrument or mix of instruments, including regulatory and non-regulatory measures (standards, policies, etc.) to address immediate areas of concern |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased industry understanding of and engagement in the development and implementation of food safety risk mitigation processes Improved international collaboration in addressing common import risks |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased engagement by Canadians in the regulatory system Increased industry knowledge regarding food labelling |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Food Inspection Agency | Food Safety | Targeted Oversight | 77.0 | 13.20 | 8.30 | Increased verification of industry food safety measures |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Improved ability to monitor and control importation of food |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Food Inspection Agency | Food Safety | Rapid Response | 32.2 | 6.00 | 8.60 | Timely and efficient recall capacity |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Increased public understanding of food safety risks, alert systems and safety systems |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Health Agency of Canada | Infectious Disease Prevention and Control | Active Prevention | 18.3 | 4.00 | 3.20 | Increased understanding of food safety risks by HC, PHAC, & CFIA |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Public Health Agency of Canada | Health Promotion/Chronic Disease Prevention and Control | Targeted Oversight | 8.0 | 1.00 | 0.47 | More and better data on accidents, injuries, illnesses and deaths due to consumer products Engagement of risk assessment stakeholders |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Institute of Health Research | Strategic Priority Research | Targeted Oversight | 27.1 | 2.30 | 1.90 | Increased knowledge of post-market drug safety and effectiveness to inform decisions Increased capacity in Canada to address priority research on post-market drug safety and effectiveness |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total | 489.4 | 78.40 | 66.23 |
Comments on Variances:
Health Products | In 2009-10 the pre-submission meeting with industry target was not achieved. This was due primarily to backlog and other work load pressures. Additionally, the process has been in place for a number of years, hence there might be an understanding as to when to request a meeting and the type of questions and information that would require a meeting. The target for mandatory reports processed was not achieved as a result of staff turnover and Branch budget limitations in the Pharmacovigilance unit. Limited staffing now initiated within 2010-11 budget allocations. With Border Integrity two performance measures listed are not the most representative of the programs success. As the program develops and evolves in 2010/11, the available tools will be reviewed and more representative performance measures will be developed. |
---|---|
Consumer Products | Due to the prorogation of Parliament in 2009-10, Royal Assent of the proposed Canada Consumer Product Safety Act did not take place. Several planned activities, including staffing, were deferred which resulted in a variance of ~1M. The planning schedule for the development of IT systems for Mandatory Reporting of Product Safety Incidents was amended due to delays in the passage of the proposed Canada Consumer Product Safety Act, which includes provisions for mandatory reporting. This resulted in a planned transfer of 1M in O&M funds for system development to be deferred until 2010-11. |
Food Safety | The second year of the Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan for the CFIA saw a continued effort to provide the necessary training to enhance the capability of for the additional capacity acquired in year one . Additionally, foundational work in a number of areas (e.g. establishment of policies) was completed, which will facilitate achievement of expected outcomes. Funds lapsed are being carried forward. |
Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable):
N/A
Contact information:
H�l�ne Quesnel, Director General
Policy Development Directorate
Strategic Policy Branch
Health Canada
Telephone: (613) 952-3484
E-mail: helene_quesnel@hc-sc.gc.ca
Weblinks
Name of Horizontal Initiative:
Early Childhood Development and Early Learning and Child Care
Name of Lead Department(s):
Health Canada (HC)
Lead Department Program Activity:
First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
ECD - October 2002
ELCC - December 2004
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
ECD Strategy - ongoing.
ELCC Single Window - ongoing.
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start to end date):
$365 million 2002-03 to 2006-07 (ECD $320 million and ELCC $45 million). ECD $65 million and ELCC $14 million/year on going.
ECD: $320 million 2002-03 to 2006-07 ($60 million in 2002-03 and $65 million thereafter). $65 million per year ongoing.
ELCC: $45 million 2005-06 to 2007-08 ($14.5 million in 2005-06; $15.3 million in 2006-07; $15.2 million in 2007-08). $14 million/year ongoing.
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The ECD Strategy for First Nations and Other Aboriginal Children was announced on October 31, 2002. The strategy provides $320 million over five years to: improve and expand existing ECD programs and services for Aboriginal children; expand ECD capacity and networks; introduce new research initiatives to improve understanding of how Aboriginal children are doing; and work towards the development of a "single window" approach to ensure better integration and coordination of federal Aboriginal ECD programming.
In December 2004, as first phase of a "single window", Cabinet approved an additional $45 million over three years ($14 million ongoing) to improve integration and coordination of two ECD programs-- Aboriginal Head Start on Reserve and the First Nations and Inuit Child Care Initiative-- beginning in 2005-06.
The objectives of these funds are to increase access to and improve the quality of ELCC programming for First Nations children on reserve, and improve integration and coordination between the two programs through joint planning, joint training and co-location.
Joint planning will also include INAC-funded child/day care programs in Alberta and Ontario.
Shared Outcome(s):
The federal ECD Strategy complements the September 2000 First Ministers F/P/T ECD Agreement. It seeks to address the gap in life chances between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children by improving the developmental opportunities to which Aboriginal children (and their families) are exposed at an early age (0-6 years).
The funding approved in December 2004 for ELCC for First Nations Children Living on Reserve and Working Towards the First Phase of a Single Window" complements funding released to provinces and territories under the March 2003 Multilateral Framework for Early Learning and Childcare (ELCC) to improve access to ELCC programs and services.
Governance Structure(s):
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2009-10 |
Actual Spending for 2009-10 |
Expected Results for 2009-10 |
Results Achieved in 2009-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Health Canada | First Nations and Inuit Health Programming and Services | a. Aboriginal Head Start on Reserve (AHSOR) | 107.595 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 21.519/year). 21.519/year ongoing. Committed in 2002. 24.000 (2005-06 through to 2007-08, 7.500 in 2005-06, 8.300 in 2006-07; 8.200 in 2007-08). 7.500 in 2008-09 and ongoing Committed in 2005. |
21.519 7.500 |
27.293 (ECD and ELCC) | Program support and enhancement Increase integration, coordination, access, and quality |
Approximately one third of AHSOR sites across Canada use outreach/home visiting as a way of increasing the number of children that they are able to serve, and a significant number of these sites rely on outreach/home visiting as the sole means of providing services to children. In 2009-10, a review of AHSOR Community Exchange Program was completed which provided a clear picture of the progress of the program, the perceived benefits and challenges for participants, the lessons learned to date and recommendations for future improvements. The program objective is to provide an opportunity to AHSOR community workers to share their knowledge and experiences and to explore how other First Nations communities operate their AHSOR sites. Work continues with partner departments to improve integration and coordination among AHSOR, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada's (HRSDC) FNICCI, and INAC funded daycares in Alberta and Ontario. |
b. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder - First Nations and Inuit Component (FASD-FNIC) |
70.000 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 10.000 in 2002-03 and 15.000 thereafter). 15.000/ year ongoing. Committed in 2002. |
15.000 | 13.272 | Complete the Mentoring Project Special Study to guide mentoring projects and to provide further training and support Support and evaluate FASD Community Coordinator pilot projects towards the development of an evidence-based project framework Develop strategies to incorporate findings on support for FN/I women with addictions |
The FNIHB FASD Mentoring Program Special Study was completed in March 2010. Nine FASD Community Coordinator pilot projects have been completed. Eight of the projects participated in a group review process and three have completed their individual consultations. The remaining individual consultations will be completed by June 2010. Year one of the two year project was successfully completed. |
||
c. Capacity Building | 5.075 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 1.015/year). 1.015/ year ongoing. Committed in 2002. |
1.015 | 0.868 | Increase capacity with National Aboriginal Organizations Enhance capacity of community ECE practitioners |
As part of the 2002 Federal Strategy's capacity-building component, Health Canada provides funding to build capacity and expertise relating to early childhood development to National Aboriginal Organizations. In 2009-10, funds were provided to the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), and the Native Women's Association of Canada
(NWAC). As well, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada is providing annual funding to Pauktuutit Inuit Women of Canada. In 2009-10, funding enabled these organizations to contribute to the development of the Federal Strategy through strategic planning and capacity building in their own organizations. Funding from the Federal Strategy also continued to support the development of an Aboriginal service providers' network named the Aboriginal Children's Circle of Early Learning (ACCEL). During 2008-09, ACCEL was updated and maintained by the National Aboriginal Health Organization (NAHO). Horizontal training funding was provided to regions to support training for ECD workers in AHSOR and FNICCI sites. HC is working to develop a training strategy for ECD and other community workers that will lead to culturally appropriate training and certification of providers of healthy child development programming on reserve, and support coordination between HC, HRSDC and INAC programs. |
||
2. PHAC |
Child and Adolescent Health Promotion | a. Aboriginal Head Start in Urban and Northern Communities (AHSUNC) | 62.880 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 12.576/ year and ongoing. Committed in 2002. |
12.576 | 10.788 | Enrolment in the AHSUNC program has increased by almost 10%. Program expansion and enhancement will address the increasing special needs requirements of children and provide staff with the tools to address these needs. | AHSUNC program has maintained enrolment levels (i.e. 6.1% increase of children since 2004). Expansion of services and support for at-risk children and their families includes increased use of assessment tools to screen for special needs and developmental delays. |
Child and Adolescent Health Promotion | b. Capacity Building | 2.500 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 0.500/year) and ongoing Committed in 2002 |
0.500 | 0.236 | Increased capacity | Capacity building and increased capacity in early child development program evaluation through training workshops (Evaluation and Brigance Screen overview) and meetings in Halifax and Ottawa. | |
3. HRSDC | Lifelong Learning- Health Human Resources (HHR) | a. First Nations and Inuit Child Care Initiative (FNICCI) |
45.700 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 9.140/year) and ongoing. Committed in 2002 21.000 (2005-06 through to 2007-08; 7.000/year). 6.500/ year ongoing. Committed in 2005 |
9,140 and on-going 6,500 and on-going |
9,140 6,500 |
Program expansion and enhancement Increase program integration, coordination, access and quality |
Approximately 8,500 child care spaces supported in 462 First Nations and Inuit sites and administered through 58 Aboriginal Human Resource Development Agreement (AHRDA) holders. |
Lifelong Learning- HHR |
b. Research and Knowledge |
21.200 (2002-03 through to 2006-07); 4.240/year and ongoing. Committed in 2002. |
4,240 and on-going | 0,900 for ACS 0,700 for AUEY |
Information on the well-being of Aboriginal children through an Aboriginal Children's Survey (ACS) and the Aboriginal component of "Understanding the Early Years" (EUY). | Data from the 2006 Aboriginal Children's Survey were released in October 2008 and made available to the policy research community. Series of papers, profiles and presentations on well-being of First Nations, M�tis and Inuit children have been produced or are under preparation. The project with the Prince Albert Grand Council, under the Understanding the Early Years initiative (UEY), engaged the community and completed its data collections. Several other UEY projects included activities for Aboriginal children and their families. |
|
4. INAC | The people- social development | a. Family Capacity Initiatives | 5.050 (2002-03 through to 2006-07; 1.010/year 2007-2008 and ongoing. Committed in 2002. |
1.010 and on-going | 0.999 | Partnerships with other government departments and First Nations to support increased coordination/integration of ECD programs and services | Provided capacity funding to Pauktuutit Inuit Women of Canada, supported Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada to fund research, and supported Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami for a National Inuit Gathering. |
Total | ECD: 320.000 (60.000 in 2002-03 and 65.000/year through to 2006-07); 65.000/year ongoing. ELCC: $45.000 (14.500 in 2005-06; 15.300 in 2006-07; 15.200 in 2007-08); and $14.000/year ongoing. |
ECD: 65.000/ year ongoing. ELCC: 14.000/ year ongoing. |
Comments on Variances:
HRSDC is currently evaluating the possibility of merging data collections on Aboriginal adult and children within an overall Aboriginal data strategy, in which INAC will assume the leadership.
The Aboriginal component of Understanding the Early Years initiative: While the planned spending column reflects an ongoing allocation of $800,000, the actual spending column reflects the actual funds ($700,000) transferred annually to the Initiative.
PHAC planned spending represents the total program budget including departmental corporate costs. Actual expenditures are net of corporate costs (EBP and salary), resulting in an over-estimation of variances.
Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable):
N/A
Contact information:
Cathy Winters
Senior Policy Coordinator
Children and Youth Division
First Nations and Inuit Health Branch, Health Canada
Postal Locator: 1920D Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa
Telephone: (613) 952-5064
Fax: (613) 952-5244
E-mail: cathy.winters@hc-sc.gc.ca
Name Horizontal Initiative:
Federal Tobacco Control Strategy 2007-2011
Name of Lead Department(s):
Health Canada (HC)
Lead Department Program Activity:
3.4 Substance Use and Abuse
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
2001-02
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
2007-08 and ongoing
Federal Funding Allocation:
$368.5 M
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The FTCS establishes a framework for a comprehensive, fully-integrated, and multi-faceted approach to tobacco control. It is driven by the longstanding commitment of the Government of Canada to reduce the serious and adverse health effects of tobacco for Canadians. It focuses on four mutually reinforcing components: prevention, cessation, protection, and product regulation.
Shared Outcome(s):
The long-term outcome of the FTCS is to reduce tobacco-related disease and death in Canada.
To pursue this long-term outcome, the FTCS will contribute the following tobacco control goal and objectives for April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2011.
Goal: Reduce overall smoking prevalence from 19% (2005) to 12% by 2011.
Objectives:
Governance Structure(s):
Resources for the implementation of the FTCS were allocated to a number of departments and agencies. HC is the lead department in the FTCS and is responsible for regulating the manufacture, sale, labelling, and promotion of tobacco products as well as developing, implementing and promoting initiatives that reduce or prevent the negative health impacts associated with smoking.
The partner departments and agencies are:
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2009-10 |
Actual Spending for 2009-10 |
Expected Results for 2009-10 |
Results Achieved in 2009-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC | Substance Use and Abuse | FTCS | $287.34 | $52.88 | $49.51 | The FTCS has set a 4-year goal to: Reduce overall smoking prevalence from 19% (2005) to 12% by 2011. All activities are expected to contribute towards achieving this result. | Latest available data (2008) reported a 17.9% overall smoking prevalence. The results below contribute to Health Canada's efforts to reduce the overall smoking prevalence to 12% by 2011. 84.3% of tobacco retailers are in compliance with regulations restricting underage youth from purchasing tobacco products, marking a significant increase from 69.8% in 2000. A step forward in improving the regulatory framework controlling tobacco was Health Canada's support to the Government for the passage of Bill C-32, Cracking Down on Tobacco Marketing Aimed at Youth Act, which received Royal Assent in October 2009 and will help to reduce the use of tobacco products by Canadian youth. Program results show that Health Warning Messages on tobacco product packaging are effective, and retail compliance continues to be high. |
PSC | N/A | FTCS | $3.05 | $0.61 | $0.61 | Enhanced partnership arrangement with Akwasasne Mohawk Police. Leading in preparation and participation in the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Controls. |
See results achieved by Non-federal Partners below. Public Safety leads the Canadian Delegation in the preparation and participation to negotiate a global Protocol to reduce illicit tobacco which takes place in Geneva. Two sessions of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) took place in 2009-10, in June/July and in March. These were the third and fourth negotiating sessions, respectively. |
RCMP | N/A | FTCS | $8.6 | $1.72 | $1.038 |
|
|
ODPP | N/A | FTCS | $12.22 | $2.44 | $2.35 | Expected results for 2009-10 will be reported through the ODPP's Report on Plans and Priorities. |
|
CRA Assessment and Benefit Services (previously Assessment and Collections) Excise and GST/HST Directorate/ Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch |
N/A | FTCS | $4.44 | $0.89 | $.2 $.69 |
|
|
CBSA | Risk Assessment | a. FTCS b. Loss of Duty Free Licensing |
$52.8 | $10.56 | 6.15 |
|
|
Grand Total: | $368.47 | $69.10 | $60.55 |
Comments on Variances:
In 2009-10, $2.5 million in Tobacco contributions were transferred from the Regions and Program Branch's Tobacco Program to cover Departmental funding pressures.
Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable):
Health Canada works with a variety of partners (e.g. Provinces, Territories, NGOs) to achieve results in reductions in tobacco control.
Contact information:
Brenda Paine, Director
Office of Policy and Strategic Planning
Controlled Substance and Tobacco Directorate
Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch
Health Canada
Telephone: (613) 941-9826
E-mail: brenda_paine@hc-sc.gc.ca
Name of Horizontal Initiative:
Chemicals Management Plan
Name/ 3. PAA of Lead Department(s):
Health Canada/Environment Canada
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative::
FY 2007-2008
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative:
FY 2010-2011
Total Federal Funding Allocation:
$299.2 M
Description of the Horizontal Initiative:
The Chemicals Management Plan (CMP) is part of the Government's comprehensive environmental agenda and is managed jointly by Health Canada (HC) and Environment Canada (EC). The activities identified in this plan build on Canada's position as a global leader in the safe management of chemical substances and products, and focus upon timely action on key threats to health and the environment. It includes risk assessment, risk management, monitoring and surveillance, as well as research on chemicals which may be harmful to human health or the environment.
The CMP also puts more responsibility on industry through realistic and enforceable measures, stimulates innovation, and augments Canadian competitiveness in an international market that is increasingly focused on chemical and product safety.
HC and EC collectively manage the CMP funding and ensure that it is aligned with human health and environmental priorities.
The following program areas were involved in CMP activities in 2009-2010:
In Health Canada:
In Environment Canada:
Shared Outcome(s):
High-level outcomes for managing the CMP include:
Governance Structure(s):
HC shares the lead on the CMP with EC. The CMP consists of five inter-related program elements to be planned, delivered and evaluated within an integrated framework, managed jointly by HC and EC.
Governance is assured through a joint HC/EC Assistant Deputy Ministers Committee (CMP ADM Committee) and the Interdepartmental Chemicals Management Executive Committee (CMEC). These Committees were established to maximize the coordination of efforts, while minimizing duplication between the two departments.
The CMP ADM Committee provides strategic direction, coordination and a challenge function for the overall implementation and review of results and resource utilization on CMP initiatives. The Committee serves as a high-level forum for making recommendations on chemicals management to respective Deputy Ministers.
The CMEC is the key management committee at the Director General level to support the development of joint EC-HC strategic directions. It is also a formal body for joint consultations and cooperation to ensure timely and concerted actions in implementing the CMP work activities in an integrated fashion. The CMEC reports to the ADM Committee, providing recommendations on program implementation, results and resource utilization.
Federal Partners | Program Activity | Names of Programs | ($ millions) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending 2009-10 | Actual Spending 2009-10 | |||
Health Canada | Sustainable Environmental Health (Chemicals Management Sub-Activity) |
a. Risk Assessment | $9.9 | $2.5 | $ 2.5 |
b. Risk Management | $50.1 | $14.0 | $ 11.91 | ||
c. Research | $26.6 | $10.9 | $ 10.6 | ||
d. Monitoring & Surveillance | $34.0 | $11.5 | $ 11.5 | ||
e. Program Management | $5.4 | $1.4 | $ 1.32 | ||
Consumer Products | a. Risk Management | $12.6 | $3.4 | $ 3.03 | |
Pesticide Regulation | a. Risk Assessment | $9.9 | $3.1 | $ 3.1 | |
b. Risk Management | $13.6 | $4.2 | $ 4.2 | ||
Health Products | a. Risk Assessment | $3.3 | $0.8 | $ 0.8 | |
b. Risk Management | $12.5 | $4.3 | $ 4.3 | ||
c. Research | $2.5 | $0.5 | $ 0.5 | ||
d. Monitoring & Surveillance | $1.1 | $0.3 | $ 0.3 | ||
e. Program Management | $0.1 | $ 0.12 | |||
Food & Nutrition | a. Risk Assessment | $3.8 | $1.2 | $ 1.51 | |
b. Risk Management | $6.2 | $1.9 | $ 0.91 | ||
c. Research | $1.2 | $0.3 | $ 1.11 | ||
d. Monitoring & Surveillance | $ 2.11 | ||||
Environment Canada | Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment posed by toxic and other harmful substances are reduced | a. Research | $2.1 | $0.0 | $ 0.0 |
b. Monitoring & Surveillance | $26.4 | $7.3 | $ 7.3 | ||
c. Risk Assessment | $13.1 | $3.1 | $ 3.1 | ||
d. Risk Management | $64.9 | $19.3 | $ 17.04 | ||
Sub-Total (Environment Canada) | $106.5 | $29.7 | $ 27.4 | ||
Sub-Total (Health Canada) | $192.7 | $60.4 | $ 59.7 | ||
Grand Total: | $299.2 | $90.1 | $ 87.1 |
Expected Results for 2009-2010 (From 2009-2010 Report on Plans and Priorities):
Health Canada:
Environment Canada:
Enhanced knowledge of stakeholders and the Canadian public regarding risk assessment/management activities, including knowledge on the effectiveness of control actions.
Results Achieved in 2009-2010:
A key component of the CMP is taking immediate action on the 200 highest priority chemicals identified in the Challenge program. Through the "Challenge to Stakeholders", information is collected and used to inform decisions regarding the best approach to protect Canadians and their environment from risks that certain substances may pose. These 200 substances were divided up into a number of Batches, to be assessed sequentially by 2010. As of March 31, 2010, all of the 12 batches under the CMP have been launched, and draft or final assessment decisions have been published for the 151 substances in Batches 1 through 9.
All of the CMP risk assessments that were scheduled for publication during 2009-2010 were completed. These included the release of the final Screening Assessment Reports for Batches 4 to 7 and the draft Screening Assessment Reports for Batches 6 to 9. In total, draft risk assessment reports were published for 63 substances, or classes of substances, and final assessment reports were published for 65 substances, or classes of substances. In addition, a final assessment report on Aluminum salts, a substance on the second Priority Substances List, was published as well as assessment reports for six pesticide substances, 104 organotin substances and chlorinated naphthalenes as well as two substances from a pilot project for screen assessments initiated in 2001.
During 2009-2010, the assessment of approximately 160 chemicals that are primarily of interest to the petroleum industry gained momentum under the Petroleum Sector Stream Approach.Assessment work continued on approximately 70 petroleum substances (heavy fuel oil, gas oils, low boiling point naphthas and petroleum gases) that have been identified as being restricted to petroleum refineries and upgrader facilities (these are referred to as "site-specific" or "industry-restricted" petroleum substances). Strategies and methods to assess the remaining substances (or groups of substances) that require a risk assessment in the future, where the amount of scientific information on most substances is poor to very poor, continue to be explored and tested.
Under the Challenge, the launch of section 71 notices under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA, 1999) took place to collect information for Batches 10, 11 and 12 (the final batches of substances in the Challenge). A Compliance Promotion Plan for information gathering initiatives under the CMP continued and stakeholder information sessions were held in Toronto and through a series of webinars offered in June 2009 and January 2010. These sessions explained the Challenge and provided stakeholders with guidance on how to submit information.
A section 71 notice was also launched for data collection on approximately 500 chemicals as part of the Domestic Substances List (DSL) Inventory Update. The information should complement information collected or generated as part of the DSL categorization process to inform prioritization of these substances and subsequent risk assessment and management activities.
As part of the Challenge, risk management approaches were published for 9 substances in batches 4 to 7 that met section 64* of CEPA, 1999 and risk management scopes were published for 13 substances in batches 6 to 9 that were proposed to meet section 64 of CEPA, 1999. This year, actions taken or proposed for substances assessed under the Challenge included proposed additions to Health Canada's Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist (published October 23, 2009), proposed amendments to the registration of Naphthalene as an active ingredient in moth ball preparations (published December 15, 2009), and final regulations prohibiting the advertisement, sale or import of polycarbonate baby bottles containing Bisphenol A (BPA) - published March 31, 2010.
For substances where current exposure is not of concern, but where there are concerns that additional exposure could harm human health or the environment, the Significant New Activity (SNAc) regulatory instrument under CEPA, 1999 provides for information gathering and assessment prior to this significant new activity or use being initiated. SNAcs were either proposed or implemented for 42 Challenge substances concluded to either not meet section 64 of CEPA, 1999 or to not be in commerce in Canada. The implementation of SNAcs for approximately 153 non-Challenge high priority substances continued.
The Government of Canada continued to seek advice and input from the CMP Stakeholder Advisory Council (members include non-governmental organizations and industry). HC and EC co-managed three face-to-face meetings where the Council provided advice and input on CMP related activities. The Government also sought advice from the Challenge Advisory Panel on the application of precaution and weight of evidence in assessments under the CMP Challenge (Batches 6 to 9) and for one non-Challenge chemical.
Under the HC CMP Monitoring and Surveillance Fund, 19 multi-year projects are ongoing with 7 initiated in the 2009-10 fiscal year. A call for proposals for the remaining 2010-2011 funds was launched and resulted in the allocation of the remaining $500K across the existing 19 projects. Preliminary results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) were released, showing a significant decrease in blood lead levels since 1978. Background material for the CHMS Exposure Report is under development. CHMS Cycle 2 was launched in September 2009 with younger children included in the survey.
The Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) Study is monitoring environmental chemicals in mothers and newborns. Recruitment for the MIREC study is underway at several sites across Canada. Results of the study will inform risk management decisions and identify potential sources of exposure and predictors of exposure to environmental chemicals.
Environmental monitoring programs have been integrated and augmented under the CMP to provide a truly National program, capable of meeting the government's existing monitoring commitments as well as being responsive to emerging chemicals of concern. These include environmental monitoring and surveillance of chemicals in air, water, sediments, fish and birds, as well as releases form wastewater and landfills.
To better understand the exposure and effects of a variety of chemicals that were identified as priorities under the CMP, an extensive, competitive research program on CMP priorities has continued. The CMP themes and priorities addressed the following areas: effects, exposure, tool/model development, endocrine disrupting compounds, metals, mixtures, perfluorinated alkyl compounds, and the approximately 3000 remaining priority substances. In addition, work continued on a directed research program to address gaps in regulatory knowledge of BPA.
Other CMP activities undertaken in FY 2009-2010 included:
* A substance is toxic if it is entering or may enter the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that:
Comments on Variances:
Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners:
N/A
Contact Information:
Suzanne Leppinen, Director
Horizontal and International Programs
Safe Environments Directorate
Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch
Health Canada
Ph: (613) 941-8071
E-mail: suzanne_leppinen@hc-sc.gc.ca
Mark Cuddy, Director
Environmental Stewardship Branch Coordination
Environmental Stewardship Branch
Environment Canada
Ph: (819) 994-7467
E-mail: Mark.Cuddy@ec.gc.ca