This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The original version was signed by
The Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Public Safety
Section 1: Organizational Overview
Section 2: Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome
Section 3: Supplementary Information
Section 4: Other Items of Interest
As Minister of Public Safety, I am pleased to present to Parliament the Correctional Service of Canada’s (CSC’s) 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report for the period ending March 31, 2011.
CSC is part of a larger public safety continuum – under the umbrella of Public Safety Canada – that works to keep Canadians safe through delivering programs and services in areas such as law enforcement, border security, emergency management, national security, crime prevention, and conditional release.
For its part, CSC is focused on the care and custody of federal offenders serving sentences of more than two years as imposed by the courts. This involves managing institutions of different security levels, supervising offenders on various forms of release in the community, and providing programs and services to offenders that will contribute to their rehabilitation and eventual safe return to society. CSC also provides information about federal offenders to registered victims, and invites them to provide statements which are considered when making offender case decisions.
In the fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC continued to integrate its Transformation Agenda into its day-to-day operations, in accordance with the Government's new vision for the federal correctional system. The changes CSC has enacted thus far, and those which continue to evolve, will better position CSC to fulfill its mandate and contribute to greater safety for Canada and its citizens.
Furthermore, the organization has ably responded to the challenges of managing a growing, complex and diverse offender population. This includes the development of accommodation strategies that better position the organization to continue to provide safe, secure and humane control of offenders, in institutions and in the community. In this vein, and in order to reflect the multi-faceted approach the organization is taking to respond to its changing environment, I was delighted to include in the 2011-2012 Report on Plans and Priorities a new strategic priority for CSC: “Productive relationships with increasingly diverse partners, stakeholders and others involved in public safety.” This reflects the reality that CSC cannot – and does not – work alone to fulfil its mandate.
CSC continues to adapt and evolve as an organization, in order to remain focused and flexible in a dynamic security environment. I am proud of the professional manner with which the more than 17,000 CSC employees carry out their duties every day, and I remain confident they will use this same approach to meet whatever future challenges may come their way.
The Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Public Safety
The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) is one of several federal organizations operating within the public safety portfolio led by the Minister of Public Safety. CSC is the agency responsible for administering court-imposed sentences for offenders sentenced to a term of two years or more.
The Corrections and Conditional Release Act and related regulations provide CSC’s legislative mandate, and it is the Service’s longstanding Mission Statement that guides its day-to-day activities:
The Correctional Service of Canada, as part of the criminal justice system and respecting the rule of law, contributes to public safety by actively encouraging and assisting offenders to become law-abiding citizens, while exercising reasonable, safe, secure and humane control.1
Federally managed facilities include:
CSC manages institutions for men and women, mental health treatment centres, Aboriginal healing lodges, community correctional centres, parole offices, and also supervises offenders under several different kinds of conditional release in the community.
On an average day in fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC was responsible for 14,200 federally incarcerated offenders and 8,600 offenders in the community. Including all admissions and releases in the year, CSC managed 20,233 incarcerated offenders and 13,971 supervised offenders in the community.2 Of the approximately 17,900 people3 who comprise CSC’s workforce, about 83 percent of them work in institutions or in communities. Two occupational groups represent over half of all staff employed in operations: the Correctional Officer group makes up 40 percent of staff while 15 percent are in the Welfare Programs group that includes Parole and Program Officers who work in institutions and in the community. The rest of CSC’s workforce reflects the wide variety of other skills needed to operate institutions and community offices such as health professionals, electricians, food service staff, and staff providing corporate and administrative functions at local, regional and national levels. About 47.8 percent of CSC staff are women; 5.8 percent are from visible minority groups, 4.4 percent are persons with disabilities and 7.8 percent are Aboriginal.
In recent years, the profile of offenders entering CSC institutions has become more complex and diverse. CSC has continued to integrate transformative initiatives, and has adapted and changed operations and programs to ensure most appropriate and effective responses to meet the needs of the offenders under its supervision. CSC is focused on ensuring that effective communications occur at all levels of the organization and correctional efforts are fully integrated from offender admission to warrant expiry. In addition, CSC is strategically aligning its business planning and addressing infrastructure and accommodation enhancement, human resource renewal and strategic review exercises.
CSC does not and cannot work alone to fulfil its mandate, and has productive and collaborative relationships with many stakeholders and partners involved in the delivery of services. For example, some 8,700 volunteers are active in institutions and the communities, and they are essential contributors. They enhance and support the work of CSC staff and create links between the community and the offender. CSC also has volunteer Citizen Advisory Committees at the local, regional and national levels to foster citizen input to CSC policies and practices.
The Service also has a proud history of playing an important role outside of Canada, mostly through its International Development Program that contributes to international peace and stability by promoting good governance, human rights and democratization. As part of this involvement, CSC has continued to assist with training and mentoring staff at the Sarpoza Prison in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and in various prisons in Haiti. CSC also had an active role with Sweden through the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations in developing standards and training for the deployment of correctional professionals from African countries to post-conflict regions of that continent. As well, the Service facilitates research requests from individuals, university academics and organizations in other countries, and also plays a key role in building partnerships and sharing research data and outcomes to assist in advancing the correctional agendas of other countries.
CSC contributes to the overall goal of a safe and secure Canada through its one strategic outcome, which is “The custody, correctional interventions, and supervision of offenders, in communities and institutions contributes to public safety.”
To achieve the strategic outcome, offenders are maintained in “Custody” in institutions. Those who become eligible and are granted conditional release are transferred to the community where they are managed under “Community Supervision”.4
In both the institution and the community, offenders receive “Correctional Interventions” to help them both change the behaviours that contributed to their criminal activity and to become law-abiding citizens. Some interventions begin while the offender is in the institution and continue or are maintained once the offender returns to the community, thus providing opportunities for the safe and successful reintegration of individuals back into the community. Internal Services encompasses all corporate and administrative services that support the effective and efficient delivery of operational programs, services and activities across the organization.
The Program Activity Architecture reflects how CSC organizes its work to deliver best public safety results:
Aligned with, and enhancing CSC’s strategic outcome are five organizational priorities that help guide the day-to-day work of the Service in its delivery of public safety results:
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Safe Transition of Eligible Offenders into the Community | Ongoing |
Results (Mostly Met) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Safety and Security of Staff and Offenders in our Institutions | Ongoing |
Results (Met All) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Enhanced Capacities to Provide Effective Interventions for First Nations, M�tis and Inuit Offenders | Ongoing |
Results (Met All) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Improved capacities to address mental health needs of offenders | Ongoing |
Results (Met All) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Strengthened Management Practices | Ongoing |
Results (Mostly Met) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
During fiscal year 2010–2011, CSC continued to identify, monitor and manage risks in an increasingly complex and challenging environment in order to achieve quality public safety results for all initiatives.
CSC is facing increased pressures and demands as a result of offender population increases, a more diverse and challenging offender population, significant offender mental health needs, a disproportionate representation of Aboriginal offenders, an aging workforce, offender accommodation challenges and a deteriorating physical infrastructure. As a result, CSC will need to manage these multiple challenges in an integrated way that sustains public safety results.
Risk management happens on an ongoing basis at all levels and locations of CSC’s large, decentralized and complex work environment, with the most senior levels of management (CSC’s Executive Committee) overseeing high-level risks, while medium and lower levels of risk are managed at middle management, operational and site levels.
The organization’s Corporate Risk Profile identified 12 higher-level risks that require a mitigation strategy. They are as follows:
To ensure risk management at all levels and locations, CSC uses a Functional Risk Profile that identifies and addresses strategies to manage lower level risks that may escalate to the level of a corporate risk if not managed, or may impact directly or indirectly on efforts to manage existing corporate risks, or are unique risks in a particular functional area.
During this reporting period, CSC’s Executive Committee reviewed progress achieved against its Corporate Risk Profile and identified strategies to manage risks. Progress results are published internally and regular reporting occurs to review the status of risk management strategies.
Most of CSC’s risk management strategies were on time, on budget and on plan, and in some areas, very proactive measures were taken to ensure that risks did not escalate. For example, like other government departments, CSC continues to face challenges in relation to retirement of staff and strong competition in the labour market to attract diverse professionals and skilled workers. As part of the Recruitment Framework, regional outreach plans and calendars were developed and implemented to ensure that workforce gaps were effectively addressed. Learning and development business processes have been developed and are currently being implemented. In addition, CSC continued with the implementation of the Employment Equity Action Plan to address systemic barriers to identified groups and address under-representation where applicable through measurable regional and national results.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities5 | Actual Spending6 |
---|---|---|
2,460.2 | 2,559.7 | 2,375.0 |
Planned | Actual | Difference7 |
---|---|---|
16,587 | 18,045 | 1,458 |
Program Activity | 2009-2010 Actual Spending |
2010-2011 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending5b |
|||
Custody | 1,379.5 | 1,687.4 | 1,687.4 | 1,724.2 | 1,478.5 | Safe and Secure Communities |
Correctional Interventions | 416.3 | 436.0 | 436.0 | 456.8 | 410.1 | Safe and Secure Communities |
Community Supervision | 100.3 | 123.9 | 123.9 | 134.6 | 102.7 | Safe and Secure Communities |
Total | 1,896.1 | 2,247.3 | 2,247.3 | 2,315.6 | 1,991.3 |
Program Activity | 2009-2010 Actual Spending |
2010-2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending5c |
||
Internal Services | 369.0 | 212.9 | 212.9 | 244.1 | 383.7 |
All results reported in this Departmental Performance Report are from the second year of CSC’s five-year initiative to improve correctional results which began in fiscal year 2009-2010. The performance results related to organizational priorities in Section 1, and program activities in Section 2 of this document support CSC’s strategic outcome. The baseline commenced in 2008-2009.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010–2011 Performance8 |
---|---|---|
Violent Re-offending | Reduce violent re-offending | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions for violent offences while under community supervision decreased from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010. |
Non-violent Re-offending | Reduce non-violent re-offending | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions for non-violent offences decreased from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010. |
Community Supervision Performance | Reduce re-offending while on supervision | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions decreased from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010. |
As outlined in the 2009-2010 Departmental Performance Report, for the 2010-2011 reporting year, CSC adopted a rate calculation based on Incidence Rate9. It is an accurate, reliable and complete rate calculation method that allows performance comparisons over different periods of time and provides increased validity or “frequency” of the events being measured. The reporting format consists of a “Rate per 100 Offender Person Years” where the incidence rate is multiplied by 100 to provide for relative context in relation to offender populations.
For information on our organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the 2010–2011 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II) publication.
The Service’s single strategic outcome has four related and aligned program activities: custody, correctional interventions, community supervision, and internal services. CSC’s effectiveness and efficiencies in managing these areas provide the foundation for public safety results.
This program activity signals the importance of ensuring that offenders are provided with reasonable, safe, secure and humane custody while serving their sentences. Many of the day-to-day needs of offenders in custody include basics such as food, clothing, mental health services, and physical healthcare. Also included in this program activity are security measures within institutions including drug interdiction, and appropriate control practices to prevent incidents.
Strategic Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|
The custody, correctional interventions, and supervision of offenders, in communities and institutions, contribute to public safety | |||
Program Activities | |||
Custody | Correctional Interventions | Community Supervision | Internal Services |
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
1,687.4 | 1,724.2 | 1,478.5 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
9,423 | 10,452 | 1,029 |
Expected Result
Offenders in institutions are provided reasonable, safe, secure and humane custody.
Result
CSC has somewhat met its identified targets against this program activity.
Performance Indicators |
Targets | Performance Status |
Data type11 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Escapes from federal institutions | Rate of escapes from federal institutions12 | Reduce over five years | The overall rate of escapes from custody has decreased | OPY | .18 | .24 | .13 |
Offender deaths by other than natural causes | Rate of offender deaths by other than natural causes13 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offender deaths by other than natural causes has increased slightly | OPY | .14 | .14 | .15 |
Rate of assaultive behaviour by offenders | Staff assaulted by inmates14 | Reduce over five years | The rate of staff assaults by inmates has decreased | OPY | 2.00 | 2.07 | 1.92 |
Inmates assaulted by inmates15 | Reduce over five years | The rate of inmates assaults by other inmates has increased slightly | OPY | 4.22 | 4.25 | 4.96 | |
Staff injured by inmates16 | Reduce over five years | The rate of staff injured by inmates has fluctuated slightly yet decreased | OPY | .39 | .32 | .35 | |
Inmates injured by inmates17 | Reduce over five years | The rate of inmates injured by other inmates has increased | OPY | 3.86 | 3.72 | 4.65 | |
Availability of drugs in Institutions | Drug related seizures18 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offender drug-related seizures has increased | OPY | 10.56 | 13.71 | 15.37 |
Random urinalysis testing (positive results)19 | Reduce over five years | The rate of positive urinalysis has increased slightly | % | 7.16 | 7.36 | 7.43 | |
Random Urinalysis testing (refusals to provide)20 | Reduce over five years | The rate of refusals to provide urine samples has decreased | % | 10.47 | 8.61 | 8.01 | |
Offenders with identified mental health needs granted parole at eligibility21 | Percentage of offenders with identified mental health needs granted parole at eligibility | Reduce over five years | Number of offenders denied conditional release at eligibility due to unaddressed mental health problems | % | 38.7% (431 of 1,114) of offenders with mental health needs22 who were released received day or full parole. |
Offenders admitted to CSC’s institutions have increasingly extensive histories of violence, previous youth and adult convictions, affiliations with gangs and organized crime, and increased prevalence of infectious diseases and mental health concerns, and there is still a disproportionate representation of Aboriginal people. All of these issues can have impacts on custody-related results, but despite the many challenges, there were several notable operational successes related to the “Custody” program activity, including:
CSC also continued to strengthen staff training capacity through a number of measures:
A number of CSC staff attended a workshop on risk assessment of radicalized offenders as a measure to enhance staff understanding and capacity to assess and deal with radicalized offenders. In addition, CSC also conducted research in this area to garner a fuller understanding of radicalized offenders.
To address the issue of drugs in institutions, CSC took action that included:
CSC conducts investigations into incidents including offender deaths or serious bodily injury and any matter relating to the operations of CSC. During fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC convened 143 national investigations.
A Death in Custody Accountability Framework was completed and key performance indicators are being analyzed in order to inform decision making.
Incident investigation findings are published routinely within CSC in order to foster a learning environment and contribute to lessons learned, and CSC is enhancing its incident investigations capacity in order to leverage current technology to maximise learning opportunities from these investigation findings.
CSC has begun a review of Practices to Prevent/Respond to Deaths in Custody, which has an objective of providing moderate assurance that key high-risk commitments undertaken by CSC regarding death in custody have been implemented.
The Service is also conducting national studies on self-injurious behaviours of both men and women offenders which will provide information on the nature and motivations for such behaviours. The studies will also serve to provide information related to the mental health, personal and criminal histories of offenders.
Improvements in the provision of mental health services such as the Computerized Mental Health Intake Screening System have improved the Service’s ability to identify and offer treatment to offenders with significant mental health needs, including those at risk for suicide, earlier in their sentences.
There are a number of variables that impact on the incidents of violence being observed within CSC institutions, namely the types of offenders who are being admitted with increasingly extensive histories of violence, prior convictions for criminal activities, and affiliations with gangs and organized crime. Gang-related activities pose a serious threat to safety and security, to CSC’s efficiency and effectiveness in managing its operational units, and in assisting eligible offenders with their safe transition into the community. Anticipating increases in the inmate population, methods to respond to and control incidents of assaultive behaviour are required and specific attention is being paid to increasing dynamic security on one hand, and reducing the effects of aggressive action with additional interventions, personal protective or responsive equipment on the other hand.
This program activity, which reflects CSC initiatives in both institutions and communities, highlights the importance of helping to bring about positive changes in behaviour and to safely and successfully reintegrate offenders back into Canadian communities. This program activity is focused on addressing offender needs across a number of life areas that are associated with criminal behaviour.
Strategic Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|
The custody, correctional interventions, and supervision of offenders, in communities and institutions, contribute to public safety | |||
Program Activities | |||
Custody | Correctional Interventions | Community Supervision | Internal Services |
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
436.0 | 456.8 | 410.1 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
4,172 | 4,365 | 193 |
Expected Results
Correctional interventions address identified individual offender risks and needs and contribute to the offender’s successful rehabilitation and reintegration.
Result
CSC has met all of its identified targets against this program activity.
Performance Indicators |
Targets | Performance Status |
Data type | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participation in correctional interventions | Number of participation in correctional interventions identified in Correctional Plans 25 | Increase over five years | The number of enrolments to nationally recognized correctional programs increased | # | 6,227 | 6,516 | 8,191 |
Number of completion of correctional interventions identified in Correctional Plans 26 | Increase over five years | The number of offenders completing correctional programs increased | # | 4,710 | 5,196 | 6,651 | |
Discretionary releases | Rate of offenders granted discretionary release at eligibility 27 | Increase over five years | The rate of offenders granted discretionary release has increased | % | 43.10 | 43.75 | 43.54 |
Re-admissions after release for a new violent conviction (2 years) | Rate of offender readmission after release for a new violent conviction (within 2 years of warrant expiry) 28 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders readmitted after release for a new violent conviction within two years of warrant expiry has decreased | % | 4.68% (2006-2007) to 4.43% (2008-2009). | ||
Re-admissions after release for a new violent conviction (5 years) | Rate of offender readmission after release for a new violent conviction (within 5 years of warrant expiry) 29 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders admitted after release for a new violent conviction within five years of warrant expiry has decreased | % | 9.51% (2003-2004) to 9.40% (2005-2006). | ||
Re-admissions after release for a new conviction (2 years) | Rate of offender readmission after release for a new conviction 30 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders readmitted after release for a new conviction within two years of warrant expiry has decreased | % | 11.20% (2006-2007) to 10.31% in (2008-2009). | ||
Re-admissions after release for a new conviction (5 years) | Rate of offender readmission after release for a new conviction 31 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders readmitted after release for a new conviction within five years of warrant expiry has increased | % | 21.32% (2003-2004) to 21.81% (2005-2006). |
CSC continues to face challenges regarding the effective and efficient delivery of correctional programs to offenders with increasing levels of educational and learning deficits, mental health disorders, shorter sentences and higher security levels.
A number of new initiatives were launched to increase operational efficiencies and capacity to deliver effective interventions to offender populations:
Capacity to deliver effective and timely correctional interventions to violent offenders has been enhanced with a 22 percent increase in program enrolment compared to 2009-2010 and an 82 percent completion rate.33
CSC implemented the Aboriginal Corrections Accountability Framework to better monitor, measure and improve the organization’s capacity to address the unique needs and risks of Aboriginal offenders. CSC has continued to develop and implement programs that are culturally appropriate and designed to address the unique needs of Aboriginal offenders.
Enhanced program capacity was realized through the hiring of 48 Aboriginal Correctional Program Officers, and increased numbers of program enrolments, recruitment of Aboriginal program facilitators, managers and Elders. Aboriginal offender program enrolments to Aboriginal-specific programs realized an overall 69.9 percent increase compared to the previous fiscal year.
The data represents the total number of aboriginal offender enrolments to aboriginal-specific nationally recognized correctional programs within federal institutions. | |||
---|---|---|---|
2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | % Change | |
First Nations | 435 | 737 | 69.4 |
Inuit | 30 | 51 | 70.0 |
M�tis | 97 | 167 | 72.2 |
Total | 562 | 955 | 69.9 |
CSC also began piloting the Aboriginal Integrated Correctional Program Model for male Aboriginal offenders at all institutions and community sites in the Pacific and Atlantic Regions. Preliminary results indicate that:
Aboriginal offender completion rates of all correctional programs within federal institutions are up 1.9 percent from 79.5 percent to 81.4 percent. This reporting period also saw the start of new Pathways Initiatives, and these enhanced healing and intervention units will create opportunities for Aboriginal offenders to better prepare for transfer to lower security environments that provide greater potential for a successful release and parole.
Preparing offenders for release was a key area of focus, with many achievements realized in this reporting period:
To address the implementation of strategies and programs that are gender informed for women offenders, CSC implemented the Continuum of Care for women offenders and Circle of Care for Aboriginal women offenders. The manual for the Women's Sex Offender Program was completed and will be implemented by fall 2011. The Women's Violence Prevention Program continues at five sites and it will be incorporated into the High Intensity Programs for all women offenders. The Women Offender Substance Abuse Program was phased out during this reporting period, as the modernized program (Continuum of Care) was implemented. A gender-informed security reclassification tool is in use.
To address the strengthening of services to ethno-cultural offenders,the Service commemorated various ethno-cultural events throughout the fiscal year, including sponsoring a variety of cultural activities. A number of ethno-cultural offenders were provided information sessions regarding release planning. Book and brochures regarding employability were developed and published in various languages to accommodate different cultural groups. The number of volunteers from varying cultural backgrounds has also increased.
The assessment and identification of risks and needs of ethno-cultural offenders have been taken into consideration in the enhancement of the Offender Intake Assessment Process. Further, an ethno-cultural portal was activated in the summer of 2010to provide concrete skills to institutional staff to assist in the delivery of interventions to this culturally diverse group of offenders. CSC also piloted components of an Inter-cultural Conflict Management training package aimed at raising awareness and understanding to promote appropriate and effective staff responses where conflicts may arise.
In order to effectively address the needs of offenders, ensuring a continuum of care is of significant importance and can be effectively achieved by a strong working relationship between institutional and community staff. Ensuring a safe release at the earliest possible date is dependent on effective relationships between institutional and community staff, and the involvement of stakeholders and partners.
There is growing international recognition and support for the development and implementation of programming that is gender specific. CSC has continued to provide programs to women that are structured to respect women’s unique needs, as well as ethnic, cultural, spiritual, and linguistic differences.
This program activity reflects the importance of CSC’s work to help ensure that eligible offenders are safely reintegrated into communities, through strong management of the community corrections infrastructure, accommodations and health services where required, and supervision for the duration of the offender’s sentence. The expected result for this program activity is that offenders will be maintained in the community as law-abiding citizens.
Strategic Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|
The custody, correctional interventions, and supervision of offenders, in communities and institutions, contribute to public safety | |||
Program Activities | |||
Custody | Correctional Interventions | Community Supervision | Internal Services |
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
123.9 | 134.6 | 102.7 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
174 | 201 | 27 |
Expected Result
The provision of a structured and supportive environment during the gradual reintegration process contributes to the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders and to public safety.
Result
CSC has met all of its identified targets against this program activity.
Performance Indicators |
Targets | Performance Status |
Data type36 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 | 2010-2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offenders under community supervision who incur suspensions | Rate of offenders under community supervision who incur suspensions37 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred one or more suspensions of their conditional release decreased | OPY | 72.97 | 69.96 | 65.22 |
Performance Indicators |
Targets | Performance Status |
Data type | 2008-2009 | 2009-201038 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offenders under community supervision who incur new convictions | Rate of offenders under community supervision who incur new convictions 39 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions has decreased | OPY | 12.60 | 11.75 |
Rate of offenders under community supervision who incur new convictions for non-violent offences 40 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions for non-violent offences has decreased | OPY | 10.45 | 9.82 | |
Rate of offenders under community supervision who incur new convictions for violent offences 41 | Reduce over five years | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions for violent offences decreased | OPY | 2.15 | 1.93 |
CSC has continued to focus attention on the integration of correctional effort as it pertains to the Community Supervision activities. Throughout the year, CSC realized the following achievements:
Many offenders will return to the community on some form of release. Efforts made in the area of community supervision have clearly impacted positively as is denoted by the decreasing numbers of suspensions and the incurrence of new convictions for offenders under community supervision.
CSC secured additional resources in 2010-2011 to support increased measures and interventions to manage higher risk offenders who reside in community residential facilities. Implementation of these measures will commence in 2011-2012 and increase over the next two years. CSC continues to work with its partners to ensure that the best strategies and supports are in place for successful reintegration: for example, CSC met with Regional Halfway House Association representatives to further strengthen the working relationship.
In 2010-2011, Community Mental Health Initiative funding was renewed for 5 years (2010-2015). A recent evaluation demonstrated that the Community Mental Health Initiative has significantly improved CSC’s capacity to address the mental health needs of offenders by reducing the risk of suspension and revocation for offenders receiving community mental health services by 34 percent and 59 percent respectively, than a comparison group. With increased access to mental health services, the Community Mental Health Initiative has resulted in enhanced public safety while promoting the principles of offender accountability, continuity of care and community partnerships.CSC’s future responses and actions to the Community Based Residential Facilities Review Paper will be incorporated into a Community Accommodation Strategy and its subsequent action plan scheduled to be completed in 2011. The Community Accommodation Strategy builds on the results of stakeholder engagements that occurred between September 2010 and April 2011 for the Community Corrections Strategy.
This program activity includes corporate and administrative services supporting the effective and efficient delivery of operational programs and activities across the organization, and contributes meaningfully to horizontal and/or government-wide initiatives.
Strategic Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|
The custody, correctional interventions, and supervision of offenders, in communities and institutions, contribute to public safety | |||
Program Activities | |||
Custody | Correctional Interventions | Community Supervision | Internal Services |
Planned Spending43 | Total Authorities | Actual Spending44 |
---|---|---|
212.9 | 244.1 | 383.7 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
2,818 | 3,027 | 209 |
Expected Result
Efficient organizational functioning and support to our Transformation Agenda.
Result
CSC has mostly met its identified targets against this program activity.
Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status |
---|---|---|
An organizational culture and operation respectful of Public Service values and ethics |
Maintain “Strong” Management Accountability Framework rating in this area in addition to increasing positive responses from staff through surveys |
CSC’s rating under the Management Accountability Framework assessment was “Acceptable” in the most recent assessment, compared to “Opportunity for Improvement” in the previous assessment. |
Effective organizational relationships where conflict is appropriately managed |
A decrease over five years in related staff grievances. An increase over five years in positive responses from staff in surveys |
Union of Canadian Correctional Officers grievance committees are in place in every Institution. The number of grievances filed by CSC employees was reduced from 2963 grievances in 2009-2010 to 2847 in 2010-2011, a reduction of 3.9%. |
Public resources are well managed through effective internal controls and timely monitoring |
Financial discrepancies, if any, raised on time and resolved immediately |
CSC will continue maintaining effective processes to regularly monitor, report on and analyse the use of resources. Furthermore, CSC will continue to improve its system of internal controls. |
Effective outreach to community partners and information services for victims |
Increase in satisfaction ratings over five years |
Building on the increased satisfaction from victims as reported in 2009, CSC has implemented initiatives to enhance outreach to Aboriginal victims, partners and stakeholders. CSC has also developed a framework to streamline the delivery of services to victims with other agencies and jurisdictions in two pilot regions. |
Recruitment and retention strategies for healthcare professionals, trades and other occupational groups with low workforce availability |
Reduction in vacancies within CSC healthcare professionals, trades and other occupational groups |
Nurse, social worker and psychology vacancies have been reduced and a Health Recruitment and Retention Strategy has been implemented across regions in order to improve on vacancies of other healthcare professionals. |
A Common Human Resources Business Process is implemented in conjunction with the Canada Public Service Agency |
Reduction in timeframes for staffing processes |
CSC has implemented common business processes for staffing, and learning and development across all regions, thus streamlining and standardizing business processes to further improve efficiencies. Compensation service standards have also been implemented. An "Express Lane Staffing" system and teams have been put in place across regions, thus simplifying the process and reducing timeframes for low risk staffing actions representing more than 60% of all staffing actions. |
Human resource capacities in all areas |
Strengthen human resource capacities in all areas |
Development programs to strengthen skills in areas requiring specific expertise have been put in place. CSC has implemented numerous tools which are accessible to management across regions and allow them to plan, monitor and manage their workforce. The on-line Human Resources Services Portal has been implemented across regions which provides managers with a single window to access all human resources-related information. There are also a series of online tools for Human Resources professionals. As part of the Human Resource Management System, employees, managers and Human Resource professionals have increased self-service capacity and online training and quick reference tools. CSC has collaborated with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for the delivery of correctional training programs (organized as part of national recruitment strategies) at a centralized facility. There is also a service agreement with Canada Border Service Agency for use of its basic facilitation training. |
Relationships with partners |
Enhance relationships with partners |
CSC continues to enhance relationships with partners through citizen engagement activities such as CSC Partners Day, Educational Resources Portal, Regional Halfway House Association, Citizen Advisory Committees, National Volunteer Association, Victims Advisory Committees, Community Forum Program, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and National Associations Active in Criminal Justice, Interfaith Committee on Chaplaincy and Consultation Initiatives. |
Infrastructure and accommodation strategies |
Review infrastructure and accommodation strategies |
The Long Term Accommodation Strategy has been reviewed and updated in the context of the Truth in Sentencing Act coming into force in 2010. |
During this reporting period, internal services areas across the organization focused on strengthening management practices:
CSC’s use of an internal Human Resource Management Dashboard is noted as a best practice according to Treasury Board Secretariat direction as it serves to facilitate workforce planning for operational managers.
The Management Action Plans resulting from various internal audits completed in 2010-2011 are strengthening CSC’s overall governance and management structure by improving its policy framework, communications, training (talent management), monitoring and reporting, and resource management.
The Ontario region is initiating a Formal Internship Program registered with the Association of Psychology, Postdoctoral and Internship Centres and the Canadian Council of Professional Psychology Program. Selected interns will start in the fall of 2011, with this initiative facilitating the recruitment of mental health care professionals.
% Change | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|
Total Assets | 6.6 | 1,655.2 | 1,553.2 |
Total Liabilities | 10.5 | 583.3 | 527.7 |
Equity of Canada | 4.5 | 1,071.9 | 1,025.5 |
Total | 6.6 | 1,655.2 | 1,553.2 |
% Change | 2011 | 2010 | |
---|---|---|---|
Total Expenses | 6.2 | 2,515.6 | 2,368.3 |
Total Revenues | 13.2 | 55.8 | 49.3 |
Net Cost of Operations | 6.1 | 2,459.8 | 2,319.0 |
http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/finance/financl-2010-11-eng.shtml
All electronic supplementary information tables found in the 2010–2011 Departmental Performance Report can be found on the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s website.
Lisa Hardey
Associate Assistant Commissioner
Policy Sector
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0P9
Telephone: 613 992-8723
Facsimile: 613 995-5064
Email: Lisa.Hardey@csc-scc.gc.ca
http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/index-eng.shtml
1 http://infonet/Corporate/National/OurOrganization/MissionPriorities/mission1117.htm?lang=en
2 Note that an offender can appear more than once in the conditional release flow-through count. An offender may be released from an institution more than once during a year and thereby will be counted more than once. In addition, if an offender spent a portion of the year incarcerated and another portion supervised, the offender will appear in both the institutional and community counts.
3 Includes all active employees or employees on paid leave and term employees with a term greater than three months.
4 Offenders are released according to various provisions of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act. Some offenders are released by law, whereas others are released as a result of the decision-making authority of the Parole Board Canada.
5, 5b, 5c The explanation of the variance between the Planned Spending and the Total Authorities is mainly due to an increase in the following items: operating and capital budget carry-forwards; Compensation for employee benefits and collective agreements; CORCAN’s revolving funds; Supplementary Estimates funding for the Renewal of the Strengthening Community Safety Initiative.
6 The variance between the Total Authorities and the Actual Spending is mainly explained by: the re-profiling of resources into future years; Treasury Board freezing resources for funding related to the new mandatory minimum penalties for serious drug offences; operating and capital budget carry-forwards; cost containment measures from Federal Budget 2010.
7 The variance is mainly attributed to the methodology used to derive the planned FTEs and resulted in an underestimation given that the estimated average salary used was slightly higher than the actual average salary. It should also be noted that the overall estimated salary did not include the forecasted transfers between operating and salary budgets. Finally, the planned FTE number is not adjusted to reflect the additional funding received through the Supplementary Estimates during the year. CSC is currently refining its methodology to improve the accuracy of the planned numbers where needed.
8 New criminal conviction data is lagged by one year in order to account for court proceedings and delays in sentencing. Refer to Section 2 Community Supervision for detailed information related to these performance indicators.
9 Incidence rate (or cumulative incidence) is the number of events per population in a given time period as a proportion of a specific population at risk. When the denominator is the sum of the person-time of the ‘at risk’ population, it is also known as Incidence Density or Person-Time incidence rate. Using person-time accounts for situations where the amount of observation time differs among people or when the population at risk varies with time. Use of this measure ensures that the incidence rate is constant over different periods of time. The numerator does not change, however the denominator becomes the sum of each individual's time at risk (or the sum of the time that each person remained under observation) and is therefore a more precise estimate of the rate of occurrence for variable period reporting.
10 The explanation for the variances is presented in the footnote section of the Summary of Performance on page 16.
11 Offender Person Years (OPY) as referenced explanation in Section 1. Urinalysis performance indicators are reported in percentages as opposed to prevalence rates.
12 The data for this indicator includes escapes from Medium, Minimum, Multi-level and Section 81 facilities.
13 The data for this indicator includes murder, overdose, suicide and all cases where the cause of death could not be identified as murder, overdose, suicide or natural causes or is still under investigation.
14 The data for this indicator reflects incidents where there is an identified instigator or an identified victim.
15 The data for this indicator reflects incidents where there is an identified instigator or an identified victim.
16 The data for this indicator includes one of: Minor, Non-serious bodily injury, Serious Bodily Injury, Major, or Death.
17 The data for this indicator includes one of: Minor, Non-serious bodily injury, Serious Bodily Injury, Major, or Death.
18 The data for this indicator includes seizures from offenders, visitors, community, staff and contract workers.
19 The data for this indicator is based on the total number of samples requested.
20 The data for this indicator represents the percentage of offender refusals to participate in random-sample urinalysis tests, based on the total number of samples requested.
21 Information related to this indicator is available for this reporting year only. This indicator is not referenced in the 2011-2012 Reports on Plan and Priorities.
22 An offender was considered as having mental health needs if the offender had either an accepted Community Mental Health Initiative referral or had received at least one institutional mental health service as recorded in the Psychology and Mental Health Tracking Database.
23 CSC/Parole Board Canada warehouse database.
24 The explanation for the variances is presented in the footnote section of the Summary of Performance on page 16.
25 The 2010-2011 Report on Plans and Priorities stated a rate for this particular performance indicator. For reporting purposes in the 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report, CSC is using the number of enrolments to correctional programs. Nationally recognized correctional programs refer to all programs that have been developed and implemented on a national level and any regional/local programs that have been recognized at the national level.
26 The data for this indicator includes the following program assignment statuses: Successful, Attend all sessions, and Successful certificate.
27 Discretionary release performance indicators are reported in percentages as opposed to prevalence rates. The data for this indicator includes discretionary releases (Day and Full Parole) based on the total number of first releases from custody.
28 Re-admission after release performance indicators are reported in percentages as opposed to prevalence rates. The years identified for both two and five years post-warrant expiry throughout this document are the years when the offenders actually reached warrant expiry for their earlier sentences. Review period is 2006-2007 to 2008-2009. The data for this indicator includes offenders re-admitted to federal custody on a new sentence for a violent offence within two years of reaching warrant expiry of the previous sentence.
29 Re-admission after release performance indicators are reported in percentages as opposed to prevalence rates. Review period is 2003-2004 to 2005-2006. The data for this indicator includes offenders re-admitted to federal custody on a new sentence for a violent offence within five years of reaching warrant expiry of the previous sentence.
30 Re-admission after release performance indicators are reported in percentages as opposed to prevalence rates. The years identified for both two and five years post-warrant expiry throughout this document are the years when the offenders actually reached warrant expiry for their earlier sentences. Review period is 2006-2007 to 2008-2009. The data for this indicator includes offenders re-admitted to federal custody on a new sentence for a violent or non violent offence within two years of reaching warrant expiry of the previous sentence.
31 Re-admission after release performance indicators are reported in percentages as opposed to prevalence rates. Review period is 2003-2004 to 2005-2006. The data for this indicator includes offenders re-admitted to federal custody on a new sentence for a violent or non violent offence within five years of reaching warrant expiry of the previous sentence.
32 There were no completions in the Integrated Correctional Program Model during the first three quarters of 2009-2010 as the Program was being implemented.
33 Data Source: CSC/ Parole Board Canada Data Warehouse(April 10, 2011 snapshot) Information Source: Performance Management.
34 Data Source: CSC/ Parole Board Canada Data Warehouse(April 10, 2011 snapshot) Information Source: Performance Management.
35 The explanation for the variances is presented in the footnote section of the Summary of Performance on page 16.
36 The 2010-2011 Report on Plans and Priorities stated a percentage for this particular performance indicator. For reporting purposes in the 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report, CSC is using the Offender Person Years as referenced in Section 1.
37 The data for this indicator includes Day Parole, Full Parole, Statutory Release and Long Term Supervision Orders.
38 New criminal conviction data is lagged by one year in order to account for court proceedings and delays in sentencing.
39 The data for this indicator includes conditional releases that ended as a result of one or more violent/non-violent convictions.
40 The data for this indicator includes conditional releases that ended as a result of one or more non-violent convictions.
41 The data for this indicator includes conditional releases that ended as a result of one or more violent convictions.
42 The explanation for the variances is presented in the footnote section of the Summary of Performance on page 16.
43 The Planned Spending amount for Internal Services will be updated in the 2012-2013 RPP to better align with CSC’s approved allocation model. As a result, the variance between the Planned Spending and the Actual Spending should significantly decrease in future years.
44 The variance is mainly related to centrally-managed activities such as Information Management & Information Technology. CSC does not currently allocate these costs on a prorated basis by activities.