This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
As Minister of Public Safety, I am pleased to present to Parliament the Correctional Service of Canada’s (CSC’s) 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report for the period ending March 31, 2011.
CSC is part of a larger public safety continuum – under the umbrella of Public Safety Canada – that works to keep Canadians safe through delivering programs and services in areas such as law enforcement, border security, emergency management, national security, crime prevention, and conditional release.
For its part, CSC is focused on the care and custody of federal offenders serving sentences of more than two years as imposed by the courts. This involves managing institutions of different security levels, supervising offenders on various forms of release in the community, and providing programs and services to offenders that will contribute to their rehabilitation and eventual safe return to society. CSC also provides information about federal offenders to registered victims, and invites them to provide statements which are considered when making offender case decisions.
In the fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC continued to integrate its Transformation Agenda into its day-to-day operations, in accordance with the Government's new vision for the federal correctional system. The changes CSC has enacted thus far, and those which continue to evolve, will better position CSC to fulfill its mandate and contribute to greater safety for Canada and its citizens.
Furthermore, the organization has ably responded to the challenges of managing a growing, complex and diverse offender population. This includes the development of accommodation strategies that better position the organization to continue to provide safe, secure and humane control of offenders, in institutions and in the community. In this vein, and in order to reflect the multi-faceted approach the organization is taking to respond to its changing environment, I was delighted to include in the 2011-2012 Report on Plans and Priorities a new strategic priority for CSC: “Productive relationships with increasingly diverse partners, stakeholders and others involved in public safety.” This reflects the reality that CSC cannot – and does not – work alone to fulfil its mandate.
CSC continues to adapt and evolve as an organization, in order to remain focused and flexible in a dynamic security environment. I am proud of the professional manner with which the more than 17,000 CSC employees carry out their duties every day, and I remain confident they will use this same approach to meet whatever future challenges may come their way.
The Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Public Safety
The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) is one of several federal organizations operating within the public safety portfolio led by the Minister of Public Safety. CSC is the agency responsible for administering court-imposed sentences for offenders sentenced to a term of two years or more.
The Corrections and Conditional Release Act and related regulations provide CSC’s legislative mandate, and it is the Service’s longstanding Mission Statement that guides its day-to-day activities:
The Correctional Service of Canada, as part of the criminal justice system and respecting the rule of law, contributes to public safety by actively encouraging and assisting offenders to become law-abiding citizens, while exercising reasonable, safe, secure and humane control.1
Federally managed facilities include:
CSC manages institutions for men and women, mental health treatment centres, Aboriginal healing lodges, community correctional centres, parole offices, and also supervises offenders under several different kinds of conditional release in the community.
On an average day in fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC was responsible for 14,200 federally incarcerated offenders and 8,600 offenders in the community. Including all admissions and releases in the year, CSC managed 20,233 incarcerated offenders and 13,971 supervised offenders in the community.2 Of the approximately 17,900 people3 who comprise CSC’s workforce, about 83 percent of them work in institutions or in communities. Two occupational groups represent over half of all staff employed in operations: the Correctional Officer group makes up 40 percent of staff while 15 percent are in the Welfare Programs group that includes Parole and Program Officers who work in institutions and in the community. The rest of CSC’s workforce reflects the wide variety of other skills needed to operate institutions and community offices such as health professionals, electricians, food service staff, and staff providing corporate and administrative functions at local, regional and national levels. About 47.8 percent of CSC staff are women; 5.8 percent are from visible minority groups, 4.4 percent are persons with disabilities and 7.8 percent are Aboriginal.
In recent years, the profile of offenders entering CSC institutions has become more complex and diverse. CSC has continued to integrate transformative initiatives, and has adapted and changed operations and programs to ensure most appropriate and effective responses to meet the needs of the offenders under its supervision. CSC is focused on ensuring that effective communications occur at all levels of the organization and correctional efforts are fully integrated from offender admission to warrant expiry. In addition, CSC is strategically aligning its business planning and addressing infrastructure and accommodation enhancement, human resource renewal and strategic review exercises.
CSC does not and cannot work alone to fulfil its mandate, and has productive and collaborative relationships with many stakeholders and partners involved in the delivery of services. For example, some 8,700 volunteers are active in institutions and the communities, and they are essential contributors. They enhance and support the work of CSC staff and create links between the community and the offender. CSC also has volunteer Citizen Advisory Committees at the local, regional and national levels to foster citizen input to CSC policies and practices.
The Service also has a proud history of playing an important role outside of Canada, mostly through its International Development Program that contributes to international peace and stability by promoting good governance, human rights and democratization. As part of this involvement, CSC has continued to assist with training and mentoring staff at the Sarpoza Prison in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and in various prisons in Haiti. CSC also had an active role with Sweden through the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations in developing standards and training for the deployment of correctional professionals from African countries to post-conflict regions of that continent. As well, the Service facilitates research requests from individuals, university academics and organizations in other countries, and also plays a key role in building partnerships and sharing research data and outcomes to assist in advancing the correctional agendas of other countries.
CSC contributes to the overall goal of a safe and secure Canada through its one strategic outcome, which is “The custody, correctional interventions, and supervision of offenders, in communities and institutions contributes to public safety.”
To achieve the strategic outcome, offenders are maintained in “Custody” in institutions. Those who become eligible and are granted conditional release are transferred to the community where they are managed under “Community Supervision”.4
In both the institution and the community, offenders receive “Correctional Interventions” to help them both change the behaviours that contributed to their criminal activity and to become law-abiding citizens. Some interventions begin while the offender is in the institution and continue or are maintained once the offender returns to the community, thus providing opportunities for the safe and successful reintegration of individuals back into the community. Internal Services encompasses all corporate and administrative services that support the effective and efficient delivery of operational programs, services and activities across the organization.
The Program Activity Architecture reflects how CSC organizes its work to deliver best public safety results:
Aligned with, and enhancing CSC’s strategic outcome are five organizational priorities that help guide the day-to-day work of the Service in its delivery of public safety results:
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Safe Transition of Eligible Offenders into the Community | Ongoing |
Results (Mostly Met) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Safety and Security of Staff and Offenders in our Institutions | Ongoing |
Results (Met All) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Enhanced Capacities to Provide Effective Interventions for First Nations, M�tis and Inuit Offenders | Ongoing |
Results (Met All) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Improved capacities to address mental health needs of offenders | Ongoing |
Results (Met All) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
Priority | Type |
---|---|
Strengthened Management Practices | Ongoing |
Results (Mostly Met) | |
|
|
Links to Strategic Outcome | |
|
During fiscal year 2010–2011, CSC continued to identify, monitor and manage risks in an increasingly complex and challenging environment in order to achieve quality public safety results for all initiatives.
CSC is facing increased pressures and demands as a result of offender population increases, a more diverse and challenging offender population, significant offender mental health needs, a disproportionate representation of Aboriginal offenders, an aging workforce, offender accommodation challenges and a deteriorating physical infrastructure. As a result, CSC will need to manage these multiple challenges in an integrated way that sustains public safety results.
Risk management happens on an ongoing basis at all levels and locations of CSC’s large, decentralized and complex work environment, with the most senior levels of management (CSC’s Executive Committee) overseeing high-level risks, while medium and lower levels of risk are managed at middle management, operational and site levels.
The organization’s Corporate Risk Profile identified 12 higher-level risks that require a mitigation strategy. They are as follows:
To ensure risk management at all levels and locations, CSC uses a Functional Risk Profile that identifies and addresses strategies to manage lower level risks that may escalate to the level of a corporate risk if not managed, or may impact directly or indirectly on efforts to manage existing corporate risks, or are unique risks in a particular functional area.
During this reporting period, CSC’s Executive Committee reviewed progress achieved against its Corporate Risk Profile and identified strategies to manage risks. Progress results are published internally and regular reporting occurs to review the status of risk management strategies.
Most of CSC’s risk management strategies were on time, on budget and on plan, and in some areas, very proactive measures were taken to ensure that risks did not escalate. For example, like other government departments, CSC continues to face challenges in relation to retirement of staff and strong competition in the labour market to attract diverse professionals and skilled workers. As part of the Recruitment Framework, regional outreach plans and calendars were developed and implemented to ensure that workforce gaps were effectively addressed. Learning and development business processes have been developed and are currently being implemented. In addition, CSC continued with the implementation of the Employment Equity Action Plan to address systemic barriers to identified groups and address under-representation where applicable through measurable regional and national results.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities5 | Actual Spending6 |
---|---|---|
2,460.2 | 2,559.7 | 2,375.0 |
Planned | Actual | Difference7 |
---|---|---|
16,587 | 18,045 | 1,458 |
Program Activity | 2009-2010 Actual Spending |
2010-2011 | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending5b |
|||
Custody | 1,379.5 | 1,687.4 | 1,687.4 | 1,724.2 | 1,478.5 | Safe and Secure Communities |
Correctional Interventions | 416.3 | 436.0 | 436.0 | 456.8 | 410.1 | Safe and Secure Communities |
Community Supervision | 100.3 | 123.9 | 123.9 | 134.6 | 102.7 | Safe and Secure Communities |
Total | 1,896.1 | 2,247.3 | 2,247.3 | 2,315.6 | 1,991.3 |
Program Activity | 2009-2010 Actual Spending |
2010-2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending5c |
||
Internal Services | 369.0 | 212.9 | 212.9 | 244.1 | 383.7 |
All results reported in this Departmental Performance Report are from the second year of CSC’s five-year initiative to improve correctional results which began in fiscal year 2009-2010. The performance results related to organizational priorities in Section 1, and program activities in Section 2 of this document support CSC’s strategic outcome. The baseline commenced in 2008-2009.
Performance Indicators | Targets | 2010–2011 Performance8 |
---|---|---|
Violent Re-offending | Reduce violent re-offending | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions for violent offences while under community supervision decreased from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010. |
Non-violent Re-offending | Reduce non-violent re-offending | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions for non-violent offences decreased from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010. |
Community Supervision Performance | Reduce re-offending while on supervision | The rate of offenders under community supervision who incurred new convictions decreased from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010. |
As outlined in the 2009-2010 Departmental Performance Report, for the 2010-2011 reporting year, CSC adopted a rate calculation based on Incidence Rate9. It is an accurate, reliable and complete rate calculation method that allows performance comparisons over different periods of time and provides increased validity or “frequency” of the events being measured. The reporting format consists of a “Rate per 100 Offender Person Years” where the incidence rate is multiplied by 100 to provide for relative context in relation to offender populations.
For information on our organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the 2010–2011 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II) publication.