This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The GGO supplementary table applies to departments and agencies bound by the Federal Sustainable Development Act, the Policy on Green Procurement, or the Policy Framework for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Major International Events.
Please note:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of completed new construction, build-to-lease and major renovation projects in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Number of completed new construction, build-to-lease and major renovation projects that have achieved an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | To be completed in FY 2011-2012* |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of buildings over 1000m2, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Percentage of buildings over 1000m2 that have been assessed using an industry-recognized assessment tool, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | To be completed in FY 2011-2012* |
Strategies / Comments
*In fiscal year 2011-2012, PWGSC will develop a strategic framework for green buildings which will identify: minimum levels of environmental performance, appropriate thresholds, applicable building types, industry recognized assessment and verification tools to be used, and the expected number of projects / buildings to achieve the target within each fiscal year.
In PWGSC SDS 2007-2009, PWGSC made the commitment to assess existing Crown-owned office buildings using BOMA Go Green Plus.
As of March 2010, 258 existing Crown-owned office buildings have been assessed.
The development of the strategic framework will build on this initial commitment for office buildings to include all buildings.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of completed lease and lease renewal projects over 1000m2 in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Number of completed lease and lease renewal projects over 1000m2 that were assessed using an industry-recognized assessment tool in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | To be completed in FY 2011-2012* |
Strategies / Comments
*In fiscal year 2011-2012, PWGSC will develop a strategic framework for green buildings which will identify: minimum levels of environmental performance, appropriate thresholds, applicable building types, industry recognized assessment and verification tools to be used, and the expected number of projects / buildings to achieve the target within each fiscal year.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of completed fit-up and refit projects in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Number of completed fit-up and refit projects that have achieved an industry-recognized level of high environmental performance in the given fiscal year, as per departmental strategic framework. (Optional in FY 2011-2012) | Not applicable in FY 2011-2012 | |
Existence of strategic framework. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | To be completed in FY 2011-2012* |
Strategies / Comments
*In fiscal year 2011-2012, PWGSC will develop a strategic framework for green buildings which will identify: minimum levels of environmental performance, appropriate thresholds, applicable building types, industry recognized assessment and verification tools to be used, and the expected number of projects / buildings to achieve the target within each fiscal year.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Departmental GHG reduction target: Percentage of absolute reduction in GHG emissions by fiscal year 2020-2021, relative to fiscal year 2005-2006. | Target for FY 2020-2021: 17% | ||
Departmental GHG emissions in fiscal year 2005-2006, in kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent. | Baseline: 278 (FY 2005-2006) | ||
Departmental GHG emissions in the given fiscal year, in kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent. | FY 2011-2012 | 270 | |
FY 2012-2013 | |||
FY 2013-2014 | |||
FY 2014-2015 | |||
FY 2015-2016 | |||
FY 2016-2017 | |||
FY 2017-2018 | |||
FY 2018-2019 | |||
FY 2019-2020 | |||
FY 2020-2021 | |||
Percent change in departmental GHG emissions from fiscal year 2005-2006 to the end of the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | - 3% | |
FY 2012-2013 | |||
FY 2013-2014 | |||
FY 2014-2015 | |||
FY 2015-2016 | |||
FY 2016-2017 | |||
FY 2017-2018 | |||
FY 2018-2019 | |||
FY 2019-2020 | |||
FY 2020-2021 |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Existence of implementation plan for the disposal of all departmentally-generated EEE. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | Completed in FY 2010-2011 | |
Total number of departmental locations with EEE implementation plan fully implemented, expressed as a percentage of all locations, by the end of the given fiscal year. | 100% |
Strategies / Comments
The PWGSC definition of ‘location’ is Region. The National Capital Area is considered a separate region; there are 6 locations for this target.
PWGSC’s implementation plan addresses the disposal of all departmentally generated surplus electronic and electrical equipment (EEE) in a manner consistent with the Guideline for the Disposal of Federal Surplus EEE.
PWGSC’s plan identifies responsibilities, including delegated authority, for EEE disposal at all ‘locations’.
PWGSC is updating its departmental integrated financial and materiel management system to enable reporting of quantities of key equipment types directed to each disposal mechanism.
PWGSC departmental disposal authorities meet regularly to ensure consistent application of the e-waste implementation plan.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Ratio of departmental office employees to printing units in fiscal year 2010-2011, where building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration allow. (Optional) | Actual Results for FY 2010-2011: 4:1 | ||
Ratio of departmental office employees to printing units at the end of the given fiscal year, where building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration allow. | FY 2011-2012 | 6:1 | |
FY 2012-2013 | 8:1 | ||
FY 2013-2014 |
Strategies / Comments
Definition of Printing Units: As per PWGSC’s IT Asset Alignment Program’s Phase II Program Ratio, including networked printers, multifunctional devices, photocopiers, faxes and scanners.
Scope: The ratios include all printing units and office employees within the department. During the 2011-2012 fiscal year, PWGSC will determine any additional scope for this target, including building occupancy levels, security considerations and space configuration.
Method used for determining number of printing units: PWGSC requires all branches / regions to physically count all printing units within the branch every six months. PWGSC also requires branches / regions to estimate the number of printing units that will be part of the branch’s / region’s inventory in six months and in eighteen months.
Method used for determining # of office employees: PWGSC uses a combination of data obtained from HR systems and physical head counts to determine the number of office employees. Office employees includes all employees (Full-Time Equivalents, Part-Time Equivalents, Students, Casuals, and those on Contract).
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Number of sheets of internal office paper purchased or consumed per office employee in the baseline year selected, as per departmental scope. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | Baseline FY 2009-2010 selected | ||
Cumulative reduction (or increase) in paper consumption, expressed as a percentage, relative to baseline year selected. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | FY 2011-2012 | Not available* | |
FY 2012-2013 | |||
FY 2013-2014 |
Strategies / Comments
Scope: PWGSC has elected to include all departmental employees and all paper purchased through the PWGSC Standing Offer for paper.
Method used for determining paper consumption: PWGSC Standing Offer usage data.
Method used for determining # of office employees: PWGSC uses a combination of data obtained from HR systems and physical head counts to determine the number of office employees. Office employees includes all employees (Full-Time Equivalents, Part-Time Equivalents, Students, Casuals, and those on Contract).
*Implementation strategies to reduce paper consumption: PWGSC is in the process of developing implementation strategies to reduce paper consumption. As such, at this time it is not possible to estimate paper consumption for the 2011-2012 fiscal year.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Presence of a green meeting guide. (Optional in RPP 2011-2012) | To be completed in FY 2011-2012 |
Strategies / Comments
The department has initiated the process outlined in the FSDS Guideline for 8.9: Adopting a Departmental Green Meeting Guide for developing a green meeting guide and is on track to meet the 2012 deadline.
The green meeting guide will be approved for adoption through a departmental consultation and approval process.
8.10 As of April 1, 2011, each department will establish at least 3 SMART green procurement targets to reduce environmental impacts.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Average light-duty vehicle fleet fuel consumption relative to kilometres travelled in 2009-2010 | Baseline: 13.2 L/100km (FY 2009-2010) | ||
Average fuel consumption relative to kilometres travelled of new light-duty vehicles purchased | FY 2011-2012 | Not available* | |
FY 2012-2013 | Not available* | ||
FY 2013-2014 | 11.2 L/100km |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC has ensured that this target meets all requirements of the SMART criteria, including specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound.
Incorporating guidance on vehicle right-sizing into the PWGSC Motor Vehicle Fleet Management Policy and incorporating environmental considerations into vehicle procurement processes and controls.
Continuing regular vehicle maintenance program (oil changes, tune-ups, tire pressure checks, etc.).
Replacing light-duty vehicles within the Treasury Board Secretariat Guide to Fleet Management benchmark range.
* At time of RPP, PWGSC was not in a position to forecast average fuel efficiency of vehicles purchased for FY 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. PWGSC’s analysis shows that a 15% improvement in fuel efficiency is achievable within three years.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Purchases meeting the target relative to total of all purchases for IT hardware, as measured by dollar value, expressed as a percentage | Baseline not available | ||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | 95% | |
FY 2012-2013 | 95% | ||
FY 2013-2014 | 95% |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC has ensured that this target meets all requirements of the SMART criteria, including specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound.
Scope: "IT hardware" includes desktops, notebooks, servers and thin clients. "PWGSC consolidated procurement instruments" includes Standing Offers and Requests for Volume Discount (RVDs)
Processes / reporting requirements: Financial database
Implementation strategies: Departmental policy mandating use of PWGSC standing offers. For select IT hardware where a consolidated procurement instrument is not available or not suitable, the Department will work to ensure that IT hardware purchases incorporate the environmental criteria included in consolidated procurement instruments. However, it is difficult to attain 100% due to the decentralized nature of operations and operational requirements.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Percentage of trips taken by rail and other green modes of transportation within 500km of the point of origin over all trips taken within 500km of the point of origin. | Baseline not available* | ||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | Not available* | |
FY 2012-2013 | |||
FY 2013-2014 |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC has ensured that this target meets all requirements of the SMART criteria, including specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound.
*In fiscal year 2011-2012, PWGSC will undertake a comprehensive review of travel data, set a baseline, define target scope and develop implementation strategies.
8.11 As of April 1, 2011, each department will establish SMART targets for training, employee performance evaluations, and management processes and controls, as they pertain to procurement decision-making.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Number of materiel managers, procurement personnel, and acquisition cardholders who have completed training relative to the total number of materiel managers, procurement personnel, and acquisition cardholders in 2009-2010. |
Actual results for FY 2009-2010: 100% materiel managers 84% of procurement personnel 100% of acquisition cardholders |
||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | 90% materiel managers and procurement personnel, 100% of acquisition cardholders | |
FY 2012-2013 | Same as 2011-2012 | ||
FY 2013-2014 | Same as 2011-2012 |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC has ensured that this target meets all requirements of the SMART criteria, including specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound.
Mitigation strategies will be in place to ensure that new and outstanding materiel managers, procurement personnel and acquisition cardholders will receive green procurement training (CSPS C215).
All new acquisition cardholders must complete green procurement training in order to receive their acquisition card.
PWGSC notes that setting a target of 100% for materiel managers and procurement personnel is difficult due to employee turnover, individual learning requirements, and other challenges.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Number of performance evaluations of identified positions that have environmental consideration clauses relative to the total of identified positions. | Baseline not available | ||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | 90% | |
FY 2012-2013 | 90% | ||
FY 2013-2014 | 90% |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC has ensured that this target meets all requirements of the SMART criteria, including specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound.
Identify which managers and functional heads should have environmental considerations included in their performance evaluations.
Incorporate standardized green procurement and/or other environmental consideration clauses into performance evaluations.
Monitor the inclusion of environmental/green procurement considerations in performance evaluations taking into consideration the EPMA planning cycle using established system.
PWGSC notes that setting a target of 100% is difficult due to employee turnover, individual performance requirements, and other challenges.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Number of processes, controls and management information systems that will be adjusted as a result of green procurement implementation strategies | Minimum of 3, by FY 2013-2014 | ||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | 1 | |
FY 2012-2013 | 2 | ||
FY 2013-2014 | 3 |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC has ensured that this target meets all requirements of the SMART criteria, including specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound.
PWGSC will continue the ongoing monitoring of procurement and materiel management processes and controls to ensure the integration of green procurement principles into the review process. A minimum of three management processes and controls will be completed in the next three years in the areas of governance and specific commodity procurement processes.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status | |||
Percentage of known contaminated sites with completed remediation or completed risk management plans, as of March 2010. | Actual results for FY 2009-2010: 65% | ||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | 67% | |
FY 2012-2013 | 69% | ||
FY 2013-2014 | 72% |
Strategies / Comments
PWGSC is responsible for 254 known contaminated sites, as of December 2010.
As of March 2010, 172 active contaminated sites (listed on the Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory (FCSI) were listed with a status of either "remediation complete" (i.e., completed remediation or risk management plan implemented) or "assessed, no action required" as indicated in the FCSI effective June 2009.
In 2007-2008, PWGSC completed a report on PWGSC Brownfield sites.
This target is in line with previous sustainable development commitments (PWGSC SDS 2007-2009, Target 4.1.1)
Baseline as of September 2009 when 2009 Contaminated Sites Management Plan was submitted to Treasury Board Secretariat.
PWGSC will continue its ongoing remediation and risk management as per the 2009 Contaminated Sites Management Plan to meet the progress identified in the above table.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status (Optional) | ||
In baseline fiscal year, inventory of hazardous materials used in the operation and maintenance of the Crown-owned buildings. | Baseline FY 2005-2006 selected | |
Percentage reduction of hazardous materials used in the operation and maintenance of the Crown-owned buildings. | 25% |
Strategies / Comments
This target has been carried forward from PWGSC SDS 2007-2009 (Target 4.1.2)
This target will be achieved through the application of the PWGSC National Hazardous Materials Reduction Strategy and Guidelines. This will include product elimination, and /or replacement/ substitution with less toxic and/or non-hazardous alternative products.
In fiscal year 2011-2012, PWSCG will conduct a sample survey of hazardous materials used in the operation and maintenance of the Crown-owned building.
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status (Optional) | ||
Percentage of processes reviewed, as of March 2010. | Actual results for FY 2009-2010: 66%* | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year.(2011-2012) | 100% |
Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR | |
---|---|---|---|
Target Status (Optional) | |||
Percent of processes reviewed. | Actual results for FY 2010-2011: 50%* | ||
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. | FY 2011-2012 | 75% | |
FY 2012-2013 | 100% |
Strategies / Comments
* 50% represents 2 of 4 processes identified below (iii to vi).
This target has been carried forward from PWGSC SDS 2007-2009 (Target 2.1.2)
As of December 2010, clauses have been incorporated in Alternative Forms of Delivery-managed activities.
PWGSC National Project Management System ensures resources used in construction are consumed and recovered in a sustainable manner.
Targets 8.1 – 8.5 (in this document) address major Real Property contracts opportunities in new construction and renovation, leasing, fit-up and refit projects and in building operation and management.
Integration of Sustainable Development in the remaining contractual activities will be addressed in cooperation with Acquisitions Branch.
Notes:
1 This would be demonstrated by achieving LEED NC Silver, Green Globes Design 3 Globes, or equivalent.
2 Assessment tools include: BOMA BESt, Green Globes or equivalent.
3 Assessment tools include: BOMA BESt, an appropriately tailored BOMA International Green Lease Standard, or equivalent.
4 This would be demonstrated by achieving LEED CI Silver, Green Globes Fit-Up 3 Globes, or equivalent.