This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
An electoral process that contributes to fairness, transparency and accessibility for all participants in accordance with the legislative framework.
Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending |
$87,226 | $118,673 | $115,216 |
Human Resources (FTEs)
Planned | Actual | Difference |
361 | 396 | 35 |
Our Program Activity Architecture (PAA) comprises one main strategic outcome (above) and one program activity – Elections. In 2006–2007, this program was committed to providing four key results for Canadians:
We also identified a number of major initiatives to improve our internal services and operations, with the aim of increasing efficiency and ultimately our ability to deliver our strategic outcome more effectively. The initiatives planned for 2006–2007 were described in the 2006–2007 Report on Plans and Priorities as “Key Program 5: Other Programs and Services.”
Expected Results:
The successful delivery of federal elections, by‑elections and referendums that maintain the integrity of the electoral process, the administration of the political financing provisions of the Canada Elections Act, and compliance with electoral legislation.
Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending |
$31,161 | $40,689 | $40,239 |
Performance Highlights
Sub-program |
Commitment |
Status |
Results |
Electoral Event Delivery |
Submit a statutory report on administration of general elections |
The report on the 39th general election was submitted to the Speaker of the House on May 12, 2006. |
Elections Canada disseminated information on the conduct of the election in a timely fashion to Canadians, political parties and Parliament. The agency administered electoral events transparently. |
|
Submit a report containing recommendations arising from the administration of the elections, using surveys and evaluations |
Elector surveys and more than 40 evaluations were conducted following the 39th general election. A number of findings led to improvements in electoral event delivery; some were implemented during the November 2006 by‑elections in London North Centre and Repentigny. |
Elections Canada’s Public Opinion Survey of Electors showed an increase in voter satisfaction for the 39th general election compared to the 38th general election. Among the results:
|
|
Publish the official voting results |
The official voting results were posted on the Elections Canada Web site. |
Elections Canada made voting results readily available to Canadians. |
|
Conduct an evaluation of polling day activities in Trinity–Spadina during the 39th general election (unplanned) |
Elections Canada implemented this audit’s recommendations on improving operations. |
Elections Canada will evaluate the effectiveness of the changes during future electoral events. |
|
Conduct by‑elections in London North Centre and Repentigny (unplanned) |
By‑elections were delivered successfully. |
As a result of our policy of being ready at all times to conduct elections, Elections Canada delivered these by‑elections successfully. The agency also conducted pilot projects during the events to enhance administration of the electoral process and improve accessibility. Evaluations showed that the pilot projects will benefit future electoral events. |
|
Submit a statutory report on the administration of the by‑elections (unplanned) |
The report was submitted to the Speaker of the House of Commons on March 28, 2007. The report detailed the conduct of electoral activity and provided a further update on agency activities from the time of the 39th general election. |
Elections Canada disseminated information on the conduct of the by-elections in a timely fashion to Canadians, political parties and Parliament. The agency administered electoral events transparently. |
Political Financing |
Administer the provisions of the Canada Elections Act related to political financing |
Elections Canada continued to administer the provisions of the Act by reviewing the returns of candidates, nomination contestants, registered associations and political parties. |
Elections Canada administered the financial provisions of the Act fairly, consistently and efficiently. |
|
Administer the provisions on political financing under the Federal Accountability Act, which came into force on January 1, 2007 (unplanned) |
Elections Canada successfully implemented the new political financing provisions of the Federal Accountability Act. The agency updated all material (guides, manuals and forms) and trained staff on the new provisions. |
Elections Canada is ready to administer the new provisions of the Federal Accountability Act related to political financing. |
Compliance and Enforcement |
Assess and investigate complaints about contraventions of the Canada Elections Act related to the 39th general election and the November 27, 2006, by‑elections. Continue investigating open files from the 38th general election. |
|
90% of all complaints received (3,241 out of 3,591) since the 38th general election have been resolved. |
The Chief Electoral Officer prepared his report on the activities of the 39th general election held on January 23, 2006, and presented it to the Speaker of the House of Commons on May 12, 2006, pursuant to subsection 534(1) of the Canada Elections Act. This requires the report to be submitted to the Speaker of the House no later than 90 days after the return of the writs.
For statutory reports by the Chief Electoral Officer, click here. |
After the 39th general election, Elections Canada undertook more than 40 evaluations of its programs and projects with various stakeholders. These included an exhaustive post-mortem on voter registration services and field technology support. The purpose was to identify short-, medium- and long-term enhancements to improve service delivery and election management.
Did you know? |
All election materials and supplies returned to Elections Canada from across the country after the 39th general election were sorted. Reusable materials were stored. If certain materials had to be kept under the Canada Elections Act in case they might be needed for review or evaluation of a contested decision, they were stored appropriately in a secure facility.
Elections Canada also undertook an audit on election day registration in the Ontario riding of Trinity–Spadina after the January 23, 2006, federal election. The audit found no evidence of any organized or systematic attempt to influence the outcome of the election results through abuse of the election day registration process. The audit was conducted in response to concerns about the high number of election day registrations, raised by a member of Parliament during a June 2006 appearance of the Chief Electoral Officer before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
The audit did identify areas in which operations could be improved. As a result, and in accordance with our ongoing efforts to ensure adequate administrative controls on electoral procedures, Elections Canada has implemented changes to field operations related to polling day registration processes:
These changes will be in effect in future electoral events.
For the report on the audit, Polling Day Registrants in the Riding of Trinity–Spadina for the 39th Canadian General Election, click here. |
Immediately after the 39th general election, Elections Canada commissioned a Public Opinion Survey of Electors to measure public opinions, attitudes and knowledge of our various electoral processes. The survey was also designed to improve our understanding of the values, attitudes and electoral behaviours among groups that are less likely to vote, such as youth and Aboriginal people. The responses will be taken into account in the agency’s ongoing efforts to improve electoral processes.
Indicator of Success
– Survey of electors,
Elections Canada |
Highlights of the survey were published in the Chief Electoral Officer’s statutory report on the 39th general election. The survey results showed high levels of satisfaction with all aspects of delivery of the election. Several indicators showed improvements over the delivery of the 38th general election in 2004.
Satisfaction Level – Electoral Event Delivery (%) |
|||
Elements Surveyed |
2004 |
2006 |
Difference |
Percentage of electors who said they received their voter information card |
85 |
89 |
+4 |
Of the respondents who received a voter information card, percentage who did not report any error in their personal information, such as registration status or address |
95 |
96 |
+1 |
Percentage of electors who recalled seeing or hearing a non-partisan ad encouraging people to vote |
50 |
52 |
+2 |
Percentage of electors who recalled hearing the slogan “Why not speak up when everyone is listening?” |
56 |
70 |
+14 |
Percentage of electors who found voting procedures somewhat easy or very easy |
93 |
98 |
+5 |
Percentage of voters who said they were satisfied with the distance they had to travel to the polling station |
93 |
97 |
+4 |
Percentage of voters who said they were satisfied with the information they received at the polling station |
91 |
97 |
+6 |
Percentage of voters who said they were satisfied with the language spoken at the polling station |
96 |
98 |
+2 |
A presentation on the results of the survey was provided to the Advisory Committee of Political Parties on October 13, 2006.
For information on the report, click here. |
Elections Canada also partnered with the 2006 Canadian Election Study (CES). This is a research project undertaken by academics from the Université de Montréal, McGill University, the University of New Brunswick and the University of Toronto. The study is based primarily on a two-wave survey of Canadian voters. The main goal is to better understand voter behaviours. Elections Canada contributed to a campaign-period survey and a post-election survey, and participated in the design of over 30 survey questions of interest to the agency. The questions dealt with voter registration and voting, Elections Canada advertising, election financing, political engagement (party membership) and representation. The CES data set was published in January 2007. Elections Canada’s participation in the study allowed for academic monitoring and extensive collection of longitudinal data on federal elections. It also provided support for important research on the Canadian democratic process and generated material for ongoing academic research.
Following are some of the findings of the study:
CES Question |
Percentage |
Saw or heard an ad saying “Why not speak up when everyone is listening?” |
43 |
|
16 |
|
46 |
|
31 |
Reported having received their voter information card |
91 |
|
97 |
Believed that “the public has the right to know the sources from which political parties, candidates and electoral district associations get their money” |
96 |
Favoured the ban on direct contributions from corporations and unions to registered political parties |
60 |
|
5 |
Said that they had made a financial contribution at least once to: |
|
|
15 |
|
8 |
|
7 |
Supported the principle of public funding for federal political parties |
35 |
|
57 |
|
40 |
As opposed to imposing rules, would rather let political parties decide how to increase their number of candidates who are: |
|
|
75 |
|
77 |
|
76 |
|
78 |
Notes: | Comparisons between 2004 and 2006 are not possible because the same questions are not necessarily repeated from one study to another. |
For more details and information on the 2006 Canadian Election Study, click here. |
Elections Canada again conducted a study to estimate voter turnout rates by age group in the 39th general election, as it had done for the 38th general election in 2004. The aim was to enhance our understanding of voting patterns by age group, with a focus on youth. Under the Chief Electoral Officer’s authority, Elections Canada took data compiled for the purpose of administering the electoral process and used the information to create a sample of electors who voted at an advance poll, by special ballot or at a polling station on election day. To develop estimates by age group, we obtained the year of birth of each sampled elector from the National Register of Electors. For the 2006 general election, the estimated overall turnout increased by 4.4 percent nationwide and in all age groups except the oldest (75 years and over, where it dropped by 2.3 percentage points). The overall increase is concentrated among the three youngest groups (under 45 years old). The turnout rate for the youngest group (18- to 24-year-olds) was 43.8 percent in 2006, compared with 37.0 percent in 2004 – a notable 6.8 percent increase.
Indicators from the Voter Turnout Study, 2004 and 2006 (%) | |||
|
2004 |
2006 |
Difference |
First-time voters |
39.6 |
42.2 |
+2.7 |
Previously eligible |
34.3 |
44.2 |
+9.9 |
18 to 24 yrs. |
37.0 |
43.8 |
+6.8 |
25 to 34 yrs. |
44.0 |
49.8 |
+5.7 |
35 to 44 yrs. |
54.5 |
61.6 |
+7.1 |
45 to 54 yrs. |
66.0 |
70.0 |
+4.0 |
55 to 64 yrs. |
72.9 |
75.4 |
+2.4 |
65 to 74 yrs. |
75.5 |
77.5 |
+2.0 |
75 yrs. and over |
63.9 |
61.6 |
-2.3 |
A report on the findings is being finalized and will be posted on the Elections Canada’s Web site.
On August 28, 2006, Benoît Sauvageau, the Bloc Québécois Member of Parliament for Repentigny since October 25, 1993, died, leaving his seat vacant.
On September 20, 2006, the Honourable Joseph Frank Fontana, the Liberal Party of Canada Member of Parliament for London North Centre since November 21, 1988, resigned, creating a second vacancy.
Writs were issued on October 22, 2006, directing the returning officers in the two ridings to conduct by‑elections on November 27, 2006. The by‑elections were successfully conducted as scheduled.
The two by‑elections were a test bed for a number of pilot initiatives and improvements to electoral systems and processes, arising from the various evaluations and post-election surveys described earlier in this report. They included:
The evaluation of these pilot projects was positive and the improvements will be in place for future electoral events.
Following the by‑elections and in accordance with subsection 534(2) of the Canada Elections Act, the Chief Electoral Officer submitted a report on the administration of the by‑elections to the Speaker of the House of Commons on March 28, 2007. The report also gave details of the administration of Elections Canada for the period from the 39th general election until the by‑elections.
For statutory reports by the Chief Electoral Officer, including the report of the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada following the November 27, 2006, by‑elections held in London North Centre and Repentigny, click here. |
The official voting results for the by‑elections were posted on the Elections Canada Web site, along with other information considered pertinent by the Chief Electoral Officer.
For official voting results of electoral events, click here. |
Since the 39th general election, Elections Canada has continued to fulfill its mandate of administering the financial provisions of the Canada Elections Act. On January 1, 2007, the Federal Accountability Act came into force, including new political financing provisions. To help political entities meet their obligations under the new legislation, Elections Canada produced new guides, manuals, videos, software and other information products.
In 2006–2007, Elections Canada received:
Candidate Filing Comparison: 39th and 38th General Elections |
||||
|
39th GE |
38th GE |
||
Filed within four-month filing deadline |
1,226 |
74.9% |
1,381 |
81.9% |
Filed within CEO extension deadline |
323 |
19.7% |
255 |
15.1% |
Filed within court extension deadline |
69 |
4.2% |
28 |
1.7% |
Total filed on time |
1,618 |
98.9% |
1,664 |
98.7% |
Total filed late |
10 |
0.6% |
9 |
0.5% |
Total not filed |
8 |
0.5% |
13 |
0.8% |
Total filed |
1,636 |
100.0% |
1,686 |
100.0% |
39th GE (Jan. 23, 2006). Filing deadline: May 23, 2007. Data as of Aug. 23, 2007. |
38th GE (June 28, 2004). Filing deadline: Oct. 28, 2005. Data as of Jan. 28, 2006. |
In 2006, Elections Canada received, from electoral district associations (EDAs), the following:
|
2006 |
2005 |
||
As of Aug. 31, 2007 |
As of Aug. 31, 2006 |
|||
Total filed by May 31 – return and Audit Report (AREP), where applicable |
764 |
|
571 |
|
Total filed within extended deadline – return and AREP, where applicable |
237 |
|
331 |
|
Total filed late – return and AREP, where applicable |
59 |
|
58 |
|
Total filed – return and AREP, where applicable |
1,060 |
91.9% |
960 |
87.6% |
Total outstanding with extensions (return not yet due) |
45 |
3.9% |
15 |
1.4% |
Total not filed – return and/or AREP, where applicable (no extensions) |
49 |
4.2% |
121 |
11.0% |
Total required to file a report (2006 – 1,154, 2005 – 1,096) |
1,154 |
100% |
1,096 |
100% |
Notes: | |
1. | Total number of electoral district associations (EDAs) that complied with the May 31 EDA return filing deadline increased 33% in 2006 from 2005 (571 to 764). |
2. | Total number of non-filing EDAs decreased 60% in 2006 from 2005 (121 to 49). |
For information on the financial reports, click here. |
The Commissioner of Canada Elections, appointed by the Chief Electoral Officer, has the duty to ensure that the Canada Elections Act is complied with and enforced. Any matter that is covered by an offence provision under the Canada Elections Act may be the subject of a complaint or referral to the Commissioner.
Legislative changes took effect with the coming into force of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, contained in the Federal Accountability Act (Bill C-2). The Director of Public Prosecutions Act transfers the authority to initiate and conduct a prosecution under the Canada Elections Act from the Commissioner to the Director of Public Prosecutions.
Bill C-2 made no changes to the Commissioner’s powers to investigate, enter into compliance agreements and apply for injunctions during an election period. The Commissioner therefore continued to assess complaints or referrals and, where warranted, to conduct investigations during 2006–2007.
During the period of this report, the Commissioner undertook the following activities:
For details of convictions, click here. |
|
For details of the terms of compliance agreements, click here. |
Expected Results:
Achieve and maintain a state of readiness to deliver electoral events whenever they may be called, and improve the delivery of electoral events.Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending | Authorities | Actual Spending |
$47,459 |
$70,918 |
$68,435 |
Performance Highlights
Sub-program |
Commitment |
Status |
Results |
Electoral Event Readiness and Improvements |
Well-trained staff and election officers |
Completed |
|
|
Up-to-date electoral processes, systems, databases and materials |
A number of systems, databases, equipment and technology agreements have been updated and improved. |
Elections Canada has improved its information technology capacity and can provide uninterrupted service. To be evaluated in future electoral events. |
|
Maintain a state of readiness to deliver general elections |
Elections Canada is ready to deliver a general election. |
Elections Canada maintained its capacity to deliver electoral events at any time during the period. |
|
Improve the National Register of Electors |
Ongoing |
Targets for improving coverage and currency were met. Preliminary lists of electors were prepared for October 2006 and March 2007. Lists for the latter date contained 92% of all eligible electors (meeting the coverage target of 92%), with 84% of them listed at their current address (exceeding the accuracy target of 77%). New information-sharing agreements yielded further improvements – for example, by providing for more data from federal sources to be updated monthly instead of quarterly. |
|
Maintain relationships with strategic partners and pursue initiatives with them to improve electoral event-readiness processes, systems and databases |
Our ongoing relationship-building has improved the quality, currency and coverage of electors’ lists. |
Elections Canada has improved coverage and currency of the National Register of Electors as a result of collaborative working relationships with provincial and territorial electoral jurisdictions, as well as with federal partners that have common interests in addressing and geography. |
|
Improve content and accessibility of Elections Canada Web site |
Ongoing |
Short-term changes have enhanced the presentation of information and significantly improved accessibility for visitors with special needs. The Web site now meets the Treasury Board Secretariat Accessibility Guidelines. |
Advertising Programs |
Review advertising programs, improve delivery and define metrics |
New creative concepts have been developed for use in the next general election, based on evaluations from the 39th general election. |
The improved effectiveness of our advertising programs will be evaluated during the next general election. |
Technology Renewal |
Continue development and deployment of new IT and communications equipment necessary for the fulfillment of Elections Canada’s mandate |
A number of systems, databases, equipment and technology agreements have been updated and improved. |
The effectiveness of these improvements will be evaluated during the next general election. |
Electoral Technology Accord |
Developments under the Accord are ongoing. A three-year work plan was proposed to federal and provincial chief electoral officers at their July 2007 conference. |
Ongoing |
The Accord allows for enhanced service delivery and quality, while reducing technology costs through shared systems and data models. To be evaluated during future electoral events. |
Voter Registration Review |
Continue strategic review of voter registration |
A series of consultations with stakeholders produced a report recommending a new vision for voter registration. |
The outcome is the development of a new vision of how voter registration could be enhanced for federal elections in Canada, and an implementation strategy that would result in further improved quality, currency and coverage of the lists of electors. The strategy would also reflect the modernization of the voter registration process, potentially increasing the number of options available to electors for registration. |
In view of the results of the 39th general election, Elections Canada placed the utmost priority on achieving the necessary state of readiness to conduct another general election, a by‑election and/or a referendum.
Did you know? |
Accordingly, much of our activity in 2006–2007 centred on preparing for the 40th general election by implementing a number of recommendations arising from the post-election evaluations.
Elections Canada’s post-event evaluations with returning officers resulted in recommendations that were implemented and tested during the by‑elections held on November 27, 2006, in London North Centre and Repentigny (see section under Key Program 1, “Conducted by-elections in London North Centre and Repentigny”).
Did you know? |
In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Accountability Act, which received royal assent on December 12, 2006, the Chief Electoral Officer reappointed 190 of the previous 308 ROs after consultations with the leaders of the political parties represented in the House of Commons. An open competition was held for the RO positions in the other 118 electoral districts after the Federal Accountability Act came into force.
The appointments were followed up with training sessions for all ROs and assistant ROs.We continued to develop the Field Liaison Officer Program, which was first introduced during the 38th general election. This year, FLOs were more involved in the pre-planning activities conducted by ROs. They also played an important role in the selection of ROs, chairing the selection committees.
We purchased new materials as required to augment existing supplies and assembled them for the next general election. ROs have received the first shipment of materials, including forms and manuals. Other election materials are ready for shipping from Ottawa as soon as the writs are issued for the next election.
Making electoral information more accessible |
Elections Canada has undertaken multiple waves of pre-event activities to ensure that each riding is election-ready. Key activities include:
Elections Canada maintained strategic relationships with major federal partners during 2006–2007. These enabled the agency to obtain key data for use in improving the quality, currency and coverage of lists of electors.
We made further improvements to the Register as a result of strategic relationships with key provincial and territorial driver’s licence and vital statistics bureaus, and electoral agencies. These include increasing address currency, eliminating duplications, identifying potential new electors and removing deceased electors from the Register on a timely basis. Elections Canada also shares its data with provincial electoral agencies to help improve the accuracy of their lists of electors.
Elections Canada is working with Elections Ontario and the Ontario Municipal Property Assessment Corporation to determine the feasibility of developing a single source of elector information for Ontario. This work will continue in 2007–2008.
Our relationships gave us access to multiple data streams. We benefited as well from procedural changes, such as more frequent updates. As a result, the lists of electors prepared for March 2007 as part of regular readiness activities contained 92 percent of all eligible electors, with 84 percent of them listed at their current address. This met our coverage target of 92 percent and exceeded our accuracy target of 77 percent.
These figures are slightly lower than those in our 2005–2006 Departmental Performance Report, which estimated that 94 percent of all eligible electors were listed, with 85 percent of these at their current address. The higher figures resulted from the integration of timely and high-quality updates from the 39th general election revision process; these customarily help to improve Register quality.
Elections Canada made efforts to check suspected non-residential addresses in the Register. By March 2007, we identified 19,000 such addresses, with a total of 32,000 electors associated with them. Through visits by ROs, 10,100 of these addresses were confirmed to be non-residential and the names of the associated electors were removed from the list. Another 140,000 addresses have been identified where electors potentially no longer reside. Activities are under way to verify the status of the addresses and the associated electors.
Improving Services to Canadians |
In 2006–2007, Elections Canada signed new agreements with the provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia to share and maintain geographic information, including a digital national road network. As a result of these agreements and other collaborations, over 92 percent of electors were georeferenced (that is, linked to a point on a map) in the National Geographic Database, enabling them to be assigned to a polling division. This is a slight rise from the 91 percent of electors who were georeferenced following the 39th general election. To maintain or increase this rate will involve maintaining existing partnerships and attempting to establish new ones with other jurisdictions.
Elections Canada began redevelopment of the systems that support the Special Voting Rules for electors unwilling or unable to vote at a polling station. The aim is to replace obsolete technology, accommodate program expansion and establish a foundation for continued growth.
The winter timing of the 39th general election raised awareness of the need to be ready for any major incident, such as a storm, power outage or other threat that could affect the conduct of an electoral event. Elections Canada reviewed and enhanced its plan for detecting and responding to a major incident during a general election or a by‑election, and resuming electoral operations as soon as possible afterwards.
Elections Canada conducted an evaluation of the advertising and outreach programs used for the 39th general election. This included evaluating the effectiveness of the programs, particularly as they were received by Aboriginal people, ethnocultural communities, youth and electors with special needs. Given the short interval between the 38th and 39th general elections, the materials and programs for the two electoral events were essentially the same.
Recommendations from the evaluation included developing new creative materials with simpler visual elements and messages, as well as maintaining ongoing communications with youth between electoral events. Our evaluation of the effectiveness of our programs for the 39th general election also came from the Public Opinion Survey of Electors. Among its findings are the following:
These results have been taken into consideration in reviewing the advertising programs for the next general election.
We have also developed new creative concepts in advance of the 40th general election, building on the theme of social responsibility. We will also be working to develop a new evaluation framework, with performance indicators and benchmarks.
Elections Canada has identified a number of upgrade, replacement and enhancement initiatives for its technology and systems. We began developing and implementing these changes in 2005–2006, and the process continued in 2006–2007. Key elements included the following:
In the past fiscal year, Elections Canada implemented additional features and enhancements to the Voter Information Service, which responds to questions and requests for electoral information from the public 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We enhanced the public self-service Web site by adding links and data safeguards, and including on-line employment applications for use at election time. We upgraded the Voice Response System, providing a dynamic menu structure that updates the options available to callers as an electoral event progresses.
In spring 2004, Canadian federal and provincial electoral agencies signed the Electoral Technology Accord. Its objective is to enhance service delivery and quality of electoral services, lower technology costs, and reduce the threat of technology obsolescence. Since then, a working group comprising most of the jurisdictions has been active on several fronts. A workshop was held in February 2007 on the challenges of training adult learners and identifying opportunities to develop joint training materials to be shared among agencies. The political financing component of the common data model was expanded in 2006–2007. The purpose and direction of the Accord were re-examined at the Chief Electoral Officers Conference in July 2007, at which time a three-year work plan was proposed to the Accord members.
Elections Canada continued its strategic review of voter registration after the 39th general election. The review was conducted alongside preparations for the 40th general election, with the contribution of all stakeholders. A series of consultations was held with Elections Canada staff, returning officers, field liaison officers, political parties, chief electoral officers from other jurisdictions and data suppliers. The consultations identified a new vision for voter registration to be considered. The new vision could further improve the quality of the list of electors and help modernize the voter registration process, ultimately providing electors with more registration options.
Expected Results:
Provide timely and high-quality public education and information programs, as well as assurance that support on electoral matters is available to the public, parliamentarians and political entities.Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending |
Authorities |
Actual Spending |
$8,606 |
$7,066 |
$6,542 |
Performance Highlights
Sub-program |
Commitment |
Status |
Results |
Voter Education and Outreach Programs |
Evaluate and enhance outreach programs |
Ongoing |
In future electoral events, Elections Canada will evaluate the effectiveness of voter education and outreach programs in increasing knowledge and awareness among certain target audiences, as well as raising voter turnout. |
Stakeholder Information and Support |
Provide expert advice and support to stakeholders (i.e. parliamentarians) |
Successfully met |
Legislation before Parliament in 2006–2007 stemmed from recommendations by the Chief Electoral Officer, who also made numerous appearances before various committees to provide expert advice. |
International Assistance |
Help emerging democracies develop capacity to deliver electoral events meeting internationally recognized standards |
Elections Canada led the International Mission for Monitoring Haitian Elections and the Canadian Mission for Accompanying Haitian Elections. |
|
|
Share information and expertise with other electoral authorities and international organizations |
Successfully met |
Elections Canada received numerous international delegations, and participated in various national and international fora for the exchange of electoral knowledge and expertise. |
After the 39th general election, Elections Canada conducted a post-mortem on our outreach initiatives targeting youth, Aboriginal people, ethnocultural communities and electors with special needs. The post-mortem determined that most initiatives undertaken during the election were quite successful. One of the most significant recommendations emerging from this process was that the agency should expand outreach programs to the period between elections. Other initiatives taken as a result of the post-mortem exercises include the following:
Elections Canada continued to provide stakeholders with timely and high-quality information, advice, products and support in 2006–2007.
The Chief Electoral Officer was invited to appear before House and Senate committees to discuss the administration of elections, reports and recommendations to Parliament, and legislation that amends the Canada Elections Act or the Referendum Act. The Chief Electoral Officer made 12 appearances during 2006–2007, as follows:
Date |
Committee |
Topic |
|
Appearances by Jean-Pierre Kingsley: |
|||
April 27, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs |
Bill C-4, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Income Tax Act (sunset clause) |
|
May 3, 2006 |
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs |
Bill C-4, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Income Tax Act (sunset clause) |
|
May 16, 2006 |
House of Commons Legislative Committee on Bill C-2 |
Bill C-2, Federal Accountability Act |
|
May 30, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development |
Study on Haitian Elections, 2006 |
|
June 13, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs |
Report on the 38th general election, recommendations; study on the election of members to the House |
|
September 19, 2006 |
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs |
Bill C-2, Federal Accountability Act |
|
September 26, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs |
Bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (fixed election dates) |
|
October 26, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs |
Government response to the Committee’s report, Improving the Integrity of the Electoral Process |
|
November 1, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development |
Study on democratic development |
|
December 7, 2006 |
House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs |
Bill C-31, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Public Service Employment Act (identification at the polls) |
|
January 31, 2007 |
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs |
Bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (fixed election dates) |
|
Appearances by Marc Mayrand: |
|||
March 22, 2007 |
Parliamentary Advisory Panel on the Funding and Oversight of Officers of Parliament (in camera) |
To present the Office of the Chief Electoral Officer, describe its sources of funding and the challenges it faces, and initiate a discussion on the annual appropriation it receives from Parliament. |
Following adoption by Parliament of the Federal Accountability Act and its amendments to the Canada Elections Act, Elections Canada reviewed and updated all of its information products affected by the changes, including information sheets providing the agency’s interpretation of certain provisions of the new legislation. As described earlier in this report, one of the consequences of the new law was a change in the way that returning officers are appointed.
Bill C-31, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Public Service Employment Act, was introduced in Parliament in 2006–2007. Some elements of the legislation stem from recommendations made by the Chief Electoral Officer in his 2005 report entitled Completing the Cycle of Electoral Reforms, submitted following the 38th general election.
Through multilateral programs, Elections Canada continued to help emerging democracies develop their institutional capacity for delivering electoral events that strive to meet internationally recognized standards and criteria. This included support for Haiti’s parliamentary, presidential, local and municipal elections. Elections Canada led the International Mission for Monitoring Haitian Elections (IMMHE) and the Canadian Mission for Accompanying Haitian Elections (CMAHE). These activities were carried out in co-operation with Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada and the Canadian International Development Agency, which also provided funding.
In the past fiscal year, we monitored the second round of parliamentary elections held in Haiti on April 21, 2006. This involved deployment of long- and short-term observers, conducting expert assessments, and producing interim statements and a final report in five languages.
For further information on Haitian elections, visit the IMMHE Web site. |
CMAHE provided electoral guidance, advice and observation from October to December 2006 for municipal and local elections in Haiti.
Elections Canada made an important contribution to Haiti’s electoral capacity, a key aspect of Canada’s support for Haiti’s long-term democratic development and security. Our efforts were recognized by members of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development as well as a number of witnesses during the Committee’s studies of Haiti and Canada’s role in international democratic development.
A Global Role |
The mission in Haiti was modelled on the International Mission for Iraqi Elections (IMIE), also led by the Chief Electoral Officer and carried out in 2005–2006. The IMIE’s successes were recognized in May of this year by Iraq’s ambassador to Canada, who noted that Elections Canada “provided effective, concrete assistance to Iraq’s democratic process.”
During the year, Elections Canada officials received 15 international delegations of electoral officials, met overseas with electoral officials from other countries 14 times and had a number of speaking engagements before various fora such as the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network, the Inter-American Union of Electoral Organizations, the International Organization for Migration, and the Global Electoral Organization Network. These activities provided a valuable opportunity to share electoral expertise internationally. They are an indication of Elections Canada’s significant contribution to Canada’s leading role in supporting democratic processes around the world.
Expected Results:
Administer the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, under which federal electoral boundaries are readjusted by independent commissions after each decennial (10‑year) census to reflect changes and movements in Canada’s population.
Financial Resources ($ thousands)
Planned Spending |
Authorities |
Actual Spending |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Electoral boundaries redistribution was last completed in 2003–2004. Once we receive the 2011 Census return, redistribution will begin again.
(Note: Financial resource included under Key Program 2)
Performance Highlights
Sub-program |
Commitment |
Status |
Results |
Human Resources Modernization |
Formalize human resources plans and services in the context of the Public Service Modernization Act |
Work is ongoing to formalize human resources plans. Policies and guidelines have been developed to support modernization and the new Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Public Service Employment Act. This work will continue into 2007–2008. |
Elections Canada has met all statutory deadlines. |
|
Review key human resources management performance indicators |
Completed |
The agency is complying with its Staffing Management Accountability Framework. |
Modern Management Practices |
Develop performance management framework |
A draft corporate logic model was developed by late March 2007. Work will continue in 2007–2008. |
In progress. |
Review Strategic Plan |
Elections Canada developed a new draft Strategic Plan in 2006–2007 but it was not finalized for several reasons, including the appointment of a new Chief Electoral Officer and the introduction or consideration of significant electoral reforms in legislation. The agency decided to initiate a new strategic planning process in June 2007. |
A new Strategic Plan will be completed in 2007–2008. |
|
Audit and Assurance Services |
Implement Internal Audit framework in accordance with the new Treasury Board Policy. |
Elections Canada is currently implementing the requirements for internal audit in the Treasury Board Policy on Internal Audit, including the development of a three-year risk-based audit plan. |
In progress. |
2006–2007 financial statements audit |
Completed |
The Office of the Auditor General issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements. For the second consecutive year, a formal management letter was deemed unnecessary. |
|
Respond to Auditor General’s recommendations |
Elections Canada will continue to address the recommendations of the Auditor General. |
Elections Canada followed up on specific commitments made in response to the 2005 audit recommendations from the Office of the Auditor General of Canada. A master list and status report of the actions completed are planned for review by the agency’s Audit Committee in 2007–2008. |
Elections Canada has been working to formalize its human resources plan in the context of the Public Service Modernization Act. In 2006–2007, we developed policies and guidelines to support modernization and the new Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Public Service Employment Act. This work included preparing and providing mandatory policies, guidelines, terms of reference, briefing notes to management, information for employees and information sessions for management on the Public Service Modernization Act, and staffing sub-delegation training for managers. We also reviewed our key human resources management performance indicators to improve human resources planning, development and management. The Staffing Management Accountability Framework identifies a total of nine indicators. According to the Public Service Commission’s first Departmental Staffing Accountability Report, Elections Canada met seven of the nine indicators, with the remaining two classified as “in progress.”
Performance Management Framework. Elections Canada completed the first step toward developing a corporate performance management framework by late March 2007, with a documentation review conducted by key managers. This led to the preparation of a draft logic model. Work is continuing toward the development of an overall performance framework for Elections Canada in 2007–2008.
Review of Strategic Plan. Elections Canada developed a new draft Strategic Plan in 2006–2007, but it was not finalized because a new Chief Electoral Officer took office and significant electoral reforms were being considered or introduced in legislation. Elections Canada decided to initiate a new strategic planning process in June 2007. A new Strategic Plan will be completed in 2007–2008.
Elections Canada is currently implementing the requirements for internal audit in accordance with the Treasury Board Policy on Internal Audit.
The 2007–2008 financial statements of Elections Canada were audited by the Office of the Auditor General. The Office of the Auditor General issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements. For the second consecutive year, a formal management letter was deemed unnecessary.