This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Performance Indicator | Five-year Target (2008-2009 to 2012-2013) |
Performance Status and Summary |
---|---|---|
Increase in Atlantic GDP for every dollar of ACOA expenditure in direct support of business |
$4 to $5 |
On track. $7.20 (Performance is calculated over a five-year period, which will end in 2012-2013. Result reported is for the 2003-2008 period.) |
Performance Measurement Strategy: Increasing income and employment in Atlantic Canada is a long-term, multi-dimensional undertaking. The Agency reports results every five years, based on analysis of data from Statistics Canada and internal systems, using econometric modelling. This performance indicator is under review and may be adjusted at a
later date. |
ACOA aims to achieve a competitive Atlantic Canadian economy for the long-term benefit of all Atlantic Canadians. A competitive region will grow faster over the medium to long run. A competitive economy will increase opportunities for economic development in the region, specifically through the growth of earned incomes and employment opportunities for Atlantic Canadians.
Competitiveness is determined by the set of institutions, policies and factors that affect the capacity of firms to sell their products globally. Productivity is an important determinant of competitiveness and, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; it is the most important source of long-term prosperity for a region. Productivity, defined as the efficiency with which resources are used in the economy, is a key measure of how well small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Atlantic Canada are performing when compared with those in other regions of the country and elsewhere around the world.
Achieving a competitive Atlantic economy for the long-term benefit of all Atlantic Canadians continued to be ACOA's focus in 2009-2010. ACOA directed its efforts toward improving competitiveness in three key areas: productivity, infrastructure support and access to international trade. To increase the performance of Atlantic Canadian SMEs, the Agency targeted key productivity drivers, including innovation, the acquisition of technology and equipment, business skills development, and access to capital for firms and communities. ACOA also focused on trade and investment to increase export capabilities and encourage international trade, and played a strategic role in supporting community infrastructure required for economic development. By concentrating its efforts in these areas, the Agency, along with its many partners, was able to link its regional economic development priorities to its goal of a competitive Atlantic economy and to the Government of Canada’s outcome of “Strong Economic Growth”.
Three program activities (Enterprise Development, Community Development, and Policy, Advocacy and Coordination) were directed at helping Atlantic Canadians and the region to prosper and compete on a national and global scale. In 2009-2010 the Agency continued to:
A measure of the impact of ACOA’s expenditures in direct support of businesses in Atlantic Canada is the increase in the gross domestic product (GDP) resulting from these investments. The results are obtained through investment expenditures from commercial projects, as well as the direct creation of jobs from these projects. In the Agency’s most recent Five-Year Report to Parliament (2003-2008), it is estimated that real GDP was $1.2 billion higher (in constant 1997 dollars) in 2007 than it would have been in the absence of ACOA’s expenditures in direct support of businesses. (Real GDP is the inflation-adjusted value added of products and services produced in a given year in an economy.) Furthermore, over the five-year period covered by the report, direct ACOA support to businesses for commercial projects produced increases of over $7 in GDP gains for every dollar of ACOA expenditure.
STRATEGIC OUTCOME | PROGRAM ACTIVITY | PROGRAM SUB-ACTIVITY |
---|---|---|
A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy (1.0) |
Enterprise Development (1.1) |
|
Expected Result |
Performance Indicator |
Annual Target (2009-2010) | Performance Status and Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Improved growth and competitiveness of Atlantic SMEs |
Survival rate ratio of ACOA-assisted firms | 1 to 2 times higher than comparable firms | Met all. (1.3) |
Number of new business start-ups that have received funding from ACOA to help them become established | 43 | Not met. (15) | |
Performance Measurement Strategy: Undertake analysis of data from Statistics Canada and internal systems data by comparing ACOA clients to “comparable firms” ― those that are of similar age, size, sector and geographic region, but that have not received a direct monetary contribution from the Agency. |
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
Human Resources (FTEs) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending 7 |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
200.7 | 212.5 | 192.2 | 206 | 212 | (6) |
ACOA works in partnership with Atlantic Canadian enterprises, stakeholders, industry and institutions to improve the growth and productivity of Atlantic Canada’s economy, leading to increased competitiveness, earned incomes and job creation.
Through sustained efforts in innovation, entrepreneurship and business skills development, as well as in trade and investment, the Enterprise Development objective is to work with SMEs throughout their business life cycle. This includes providing advice prior to start-up; assisting them to start, expand or modernize, or to establish and expand their export activities; partnering
with universities and other institutions to increase the region’s research and development capacity, commercialization and productivity; and promoting and participating in the region’s transition to a knowledge economy.
ACOA provides assistance to enterprises in Atlantic Canada with the objective of improving their growth and competitiveness in the marketplace. Business survival rates can be used to measure the Agency’s performance in terms of competitiveness. A company’s survival depends on many factors including the age of the business, location and size. The five-year survival rate8 for ACOA-assisted firms is notably above the rate for comparable firms. In fact, the business survival rate for ACOA-assisted firms is 47% after the crucial fifth year following start-up, compared with 36% for comparable firms.
The Agency did not meet its target of funding the establishment of new business start-ups in 2009-2010 (15 actual vs. 43 targeted). This was due to a combination of challenging economic conditions and a shift in Agency priorities. To respond to the national priority of productivity improvement as established in Advantage Canada, ACOA has increased its focus on improving the productivity of existing SMEs, while being more selective and strategic in investing in business start-ups where employment opportunities would be the greatest. The Agency is in the process of developing indicators to measure the impact of its increased focus on productivity and competitiveness.
ACOA’s focus on improving productivity and commercialization is demonstrated through solid investments. In 2009-2010, the Agency approved the funding of 30 new projects under the AIF, committing $62.4 million and leveraging an additional $49 million from other sources such as universities and other research institutions, provincial governments, the private sector, and national research and development (R&D) programs. In addition to the AIF, ACOA funds R&D, technology adoption/adaptation, business support activities, and productivity improvement projects under the Business Development Program (BDP). During 2009-2010, a further $43 million was approved under the BDP for projects related to innovation.
The 2010 impact evaluation9 of the innovation program sub-activity found that ACOA’s support for innovation is contributing to enhanced commercialization capacity and productivity levels in Atlantic Canada. Funded projects are resulting in the acquisition and installation of leading-edge technology, improved production strategies, new products, certifications, and access to new markets. An increase in commercialization activity has been identified through patent awards, spinoff firm creation, and the commercialization of many products, services, technologies, and processes. These results are having a significant impact on revenue generation. For example, the 22 organizations represented in the case studies indicated that commercialization activities resulting from AIF funding have contributed to additional sales of approximately $248 million.
Also in 2009, under the AIF’s commercialization initiative, the Agency developed and approved a project to help Atlantic Canadian high growth companies raise capital and avail themselves of opportunities in emerging international markets. A second project will undertake strategic activities aimed at mentoring and educating key industry stakeholders, as well as promoting partnerships and building strategic alliances aimed at commercialization and growth in the medical technologies industry.
Atlantic Canada’s ability to be competitive and maintain prosperity is a direct outcome of productivity. Productivity improvements in the region can be achieved by ensuring that entrepreneurs have the right business skills to be successful. ACOA’s investments in business skills development activities have enabled Atlantic Canadian entrepreneurs to acquire the skills relevant to enhancing the start-up, survival and growth of their businesses. Doing so has helped build SMEs’ skill capacities and ultimately improve productivity. In addition, the Agency has invested in projects that help increase the pool of Atlantic Canadians who have the motivation and skills to plan and start new businesses in the region. Seventy-seven per cent of participants in entrepreneurship awareness and promotion activities indicated that the activity increased their intent to start a business, and 87% of participants in business skills development activities indicated that they improved their business skills.
The Agency’s activities in the area of trade are not only intended to help SMEs improve their export-readiness potential, but also to bring them to a point where they can start actively exporting. ACOA continued its efforts to ensure that programs are sustainable and capable of supporting a growing number of exporters pursuing a broader range of markets. Consolidation of the Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (ATIP) and the International Business Development Program (IBDP) into the BDP, will streamline operations and access to service.
ACOA’s efforts in international markets are aligned with priorities identified in Canada’s Global Commerce Strategy. During the past year, the Agency led four projects related to India, including an incoming mission of delegates in August 2009 and an exploratory mission in January 2010 with business delegates in education, biotechnology, food and beverages, and digital media. In the Americas, the Agency has conducted two trade missions to Panama and one to Peru.
Several marketing projects were undertaken related to strategic gateways and trade corridors, including Breakbulk Europe, Air Cargo Europe, Jumpstart North America, a mission to Vietnam, an outreach event in NYC/Newark, and Breakbulk North America.
The Agency continued to play a key role in building awareness of Atlantic Canada in international markets through initiatives such as ACOA’s Invest in Atlantic Canada website. Nearly 35,000 potential investors and clients visited http://www.acoa.gc.ca/invest during the year, seeking and finding information on Atlantic Canada and its unique business advantages.
A number of financing gaps still exist in Atlantic Canada, and the Agency aims to address these through its financing continuum program sub-activity. ACOA provided financial support of $21.4 million to SMEs needing to expand or modernize their operations in order to remain competitive. This assistance is being leveraged by a further $42.7 million from other sources, allowing a total of $64.1 million of investment to be made by SMEs in the region. Furthermore, 74% of the assistance approved under the financing continuum program sub-activity is being invested in SMEs and organizations in rural areas, whereas 26% has gone toward urban clients.
The Agency is already working to implement recommendations from the recent impact evaluation of the innovation program sub-activity, which focused on reviewing the approach to cluster development; further developing its commercialization strategy; building on the effectiveness of its current innovation strategy and supporting activities; and reviewing the effectiveness and efficiency of its processes.
Efforts were launched to mitigate the risks related to efficiency and information management. The IBDP, the program supporting the International Business Development Agreement (IBDA), was merged with the BDP. As a result, starting in April 2010, IBDA is being funded through BDP. ATIP was folded into regular operations. Necessary work will be done to consolidate the program sub-activities trade and investment into one program sub-activity, international business development. Also, an evaluation of the trade and investment program sub-activities was conducted, and preliminary findings pointed toward a high level of need, satisfaction and effectiveness. It also showed room for strengthening coordination, simplifying process, and improving performance measurement.
Finally, the suite of enterprise development programs will continue to be examined in support of the Agency’s long-term strategic direction to ensure that the repositioning of its programs is in accordance with the priorities of the Government of Canada.
Results provided through the recent impact evaluation of the innovation program sub-activity demonstrated that ACOA has been successful in investing in R&D, enhancing productivity and commercialization capacity, and fostering partnerships and collaborative arrangements. Collectively, activities undertaken in each of these key areas are helping to strengthen innovation and commercialization capacity in Atlantic Canada. In addition, through the support of the AIF and the BDP (including the productivity and business skills initiative), the ACOA innovation program sub-activity is considered to be effective in providing value for money.
Furthermore, ACOA strives to apply its limited resources to areas offering the greatest potential impact. Given its mandate, the Agency focuses on SMEs as they have the most significant and sustained impact on jobs in Atlantic Canada.10 By adopting a balanced rural/urban approach in helping SMEs to become more innovative, productive and competitive, the Agency assists all regions of Atlantic Canada to become stronger, thereby facilitating their increased contributions to the national economy.
Budget 2009 provided $30 million over two years for the renewal of the national Canada Business Network. Of this amount, ACOA receives $2.6 million annually to deliver this service in the Atlantic provinces.
Expected Result |
Performance Indicator |
Two-year Target (2009-2010 through 2010-2011) |
Performance Status and Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Access for Atlantic Canadians to accurate, timely and relevant business information | Level of client satisfaction 11 | 80% | Data not available for 2009-2010. Last survey performed in 2007-2008 indicated a satisfaction rate of 85%. |
Performance measurement strategy: Undertake analysis of data from client surveys, Canada Business Network’s national client survey, and internal database systems/reports. |
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
||
---|---|---|
Planned Spending 12 |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
0.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
A key indicator of the Canada Business Network’s performance is client satisfaction. Although no official survey was completed in 2009-2010, an internal review of the Canada Business Network was performed in 2008-2009, which included client and stakeholder consultations. This review validated the need for the service and led to the renewal of the initiative and a revised service strategy. Implementation of the revised service strategy began in 2009-2010, with enhanced efforts in outreach and promotion to ensure more Canadians are aware of and use the service.
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
||
---|---|---|
Planned Spending 13 |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
0.0 | 5.1 | 6.0 |
The Community Adjustment Fund (CAF) is delivered via the Innovative Communities Fund, as well as the BDP. While most projects funded under CAF are aligned with ACOA's Community Development program activity, some are of a commercial nature and are aligned with ACOA’s Enterprise Development program activity. CAF expected results and performance indicators are reported in Section 2.1.2.
STRATEGIC OUTCOME | PROGRAM ACTIVITY | PROGRAM SUB-ACTIVITY |
---|---|---|
A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy (1.0) |
Community Development (1.2) |
|
Expected Result |
Performance Indicator |
Target | Performance Status and Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Dynamic and sustainable communities for Atlantic Canada | Increased capacity in community decision making, planning and delivery | Evidence of impact (resulting from evaluations, and supported by data) | Met all. Supported by evaluation findings that the program was well aligned with government priorities. Management action plans approved. |
Annual Target (2009-2010) |
|||
Number of new business start-ups that have received funding from Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs) | 919 | Exceeded. 936 | |
Number of businesses that have received funding from CBDCs to stabilize or expand operations | 894 | Exceeded. 917 | |
Performance measurement strategy: Undertake analysis of evaluations and CBDC e-reports. |
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
Human Resources (FTEs) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
91.6 | 145.8 | 155.714 | 96 | 111 | (15) |
The Atlantic economy is built on the region’s many geographic, linguistic and cultural communities. From small remote villages to larger urban centres, the opportunities and challenges vary significantly. ACOA recognizes the importance of these communities in an economic development framework, and supports their efforts to assume full responsibility for their own economic development. The Agency believes that effective community development is a bottom-up process, and that many communities require help to develop the tools, resources and initiatives that support individual and unique strategic development. This kind of development requires a flexible approach, based on the particular realities of the communities being targeted. Working in close co-operation with communities and community-led organizations involved in economic development planning and mobilization efforts, ACOA provides strategic funding that enables communities to strengthen their economic base and increase prosperity for their citizens. The Agency continues to focus efforts on promoting the vitality of official language minority communities and Aboriginal communities.
In response to the Government of Canada priorities as articulated in CEAP included in Budget 2009, ACOA shifted the focus of its suite of community economic development programs to help Atlantic Canada along the road to economic recovery.
ACOA played a critical role in 2009-2010 in delivering on CEAP results in Atlantic Canada. First, the Agency participated in the design of two CEAP initiatives: CAF and the Recreational Infrastructure Canada (RInC) program. ACOA successfully implemented both programs and delivered timely results. For RInC, a total of 230 projects were approved, fully committing the Agency’s allocation of $34.1 million and leveraging an additional $91.6 million through provincial and municipal governments. For CAF, 159 projects were approved, committing $89.3 million in Atlantic Canadian communities and leveraging an additional $164 million from other sources. Further information on the results achieved under these two initiatives can be found in the following CEAP subsection.
Furthermore, Budget 2010 confirmed the Government of Canada’s ongoing support for the Innovative Communities Fund (ICF). The ICF funds strategic initiatives that respond to the economic development needs of communities. In 2009-2010, over $73 million was disbursed to rural Atlantic Canadian communities for projects such as:
Town of Lewisporte, Newfoundland and Labrador – ACOA invested $98,000 to assist with upgrades to an existing community building with a view to transforming it into a year-round, multi-purpose facility capable of hosting conventions, conferences, trade shows, tourism events and concerts. The enhanced facility will not only support existing business and tourism venues, but will also encourage the development of new activities that will benefit the local economy.
UNESCO Heritage Project in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia – Funding was provided for improvements to the tourism facility of the town of Lunenburg, enabling the construction of the UNESCO Heritage Plaza, together with UNESCO signage and kiosk. A heritage sustainability strategy was also developed to guide the town’s development over the next 10 to 15 years.
Budget 2010 also confirmed the government’s continued support for the Community Futures (CF) program. CF provides funding in support of Atlantic Canada’s CBDCs, which continued to provide an essential source of capital to assist Atlantic Canada’s rural businesses. In 2009-2010, $60.6 million in financing to rural SMEs was provided through these 41 community-based organizations. These investments provided by CBDCs have resulted in 936 new business start-ups, and have assisted in stabilizing or expanding 917 SME operations, slightly exceeding the objectives set forth for 2009-2010. ACOA also provided support to CBDCs to develop a uniform platform for presenting annual reports and results to their communities, and has been working with CBDCs to improve the use of their investments funds.
ACOA continued to work with CBDCs and the Regional Economic Development Organizations (REDOs) to ensure that resources were maximized and results achieved. ACOA invested $9.2 million to support the Atlantic network of 52 REDOs, which help coordinate and focus strategic economic development efforts at the local and regional levels. ACOA’s funding helped leverage over $7.6 million from provincial and municipal governments for the creation of strategic economic plans for rural communities across Atlantic Canada, involving hundreds of local stakeholders and decision-makers.
ACOA also collaborated with several Aboriginal, Acadian and francophone communities across the region to ensure they remain active participants in the Atlantic economy. For example, the Agency provided operational funding to Ulnooweg Development Group Inc., Atlantic Canada’s only Aboriginal capital corporation, which provides commercial lending and business advisory services to new and existing Aboriginal businesses in all four Atlantic provinces. With respect to funding targeting the region’s minority francophone population, the Agency also contributed $1.3 million to the boat building and repair sector in northern New Brunswick, an economic driving force in the Acadian Peninsula. In addition to providing regular ACOA funding, the Agency is also delivering incremental funding under the Economic Development Initiative, a source of federal government financing under the Roadmap for Linguistic Duality 2008-2013: Acting for the Future.
An independent evaluation of ACOA’s community investment and community development resources program sub-activities was completed in 2009-2010.15 The evaluation also covered the official language minority communities and aboriginal communities program sub-activities. In addition, an evaluation of the Community Futures program was completed in 2009.16 These reports were generally positive, noting that ACOA supported Atlantic Canadian communities in diversifying their economies and attracting new investment that will keep Atlantic Canadians at home, working in and contributing to communities across the region. The evaluations noted that, while ACOA should continue to invest in community-based organizations, the Agency needs to clarify the delineation of roles and responsibilities of organizations of this nature regarding the ACOA contributions. In recognition of the different needs and opportunities across and within regions, ACOA needs to ensure that, by clarifying the roles and responsibilities, it does not negatively affect regional flexibility, as this is an important aspect of the Agency’s programming. For instance, memorandums of understanding (MOUs) between CBDCs and regional development agencies have been signed to promote and build on a collaborative relationship between the two ACOA-funded organizations. In Newfoundland and Labrador, the provincial association of regional economic development boards signed an MOU with the provincial association of CBDCs to strengthen collaboration. ACOA is continuing to work with REDOs and CBDCs in response to this recommendation. An audit of the Community Futures program was also carried out with positive results.17
ACOA is planning continuing improvement in its ability to systematically monitor the longer term impacts of its range of community economic development programs.
Atlantic Canada remains one of the most rural regions in Canada, with more than 40% of its population located in rural communities. The region was affected by the worldwide economic downturn that began in late 2008, which resulted in tightened lending conditions by financial institutions. As a result, industries in rural areas were particularly impacted. Through ACOA’s programs and its network of largely rural community development organizations, Atlantic businesses were able to access capital and adjust to the changing economy, thus retaining jobs that would have otherwise been at risk. ACOA’s ability to efficiently implement CEAP funding initiatives provided improved capacity for Atlantic businesses to recover from the downturn. In fact, ACOA took a coordinating leadership role among the regional development agencies to develop the required tools and processes for a consistent and efficient delivery of RInC.
Key findings of ACOA program evaluations outline that its programs are well aligned with government-wide priorities, and are helping ACOA improve the capacity for economic development in communities throughout Atlantic Canada. Furthermore, independent evaluations18 of ACOA's community development programming confirm that this type of assistance not only helps small businesses grow and prosper in rural communities, but also directly contributes to the capacity and readiness of communities to develop and carry out further community economic development initiatives. In Atlantic Canadian rural communities, traditional sources of funding are limited, and these outcomes would not be achievable in the absence of ACOA programming. These evaluations also conclude that this programming is relevant to the needs of communities across the region, and continues to be well aligned with government-wide priorities. ACOA believes that, through its community-based initiatives, it is providing appropriate and targeted responses to the unique and challenging economic circumstances throughout Atlantic Canada.
Expected Result |
Performance Indicator |
Two-year Target (2009-2010 through 2010-2011) |
Performance Status and Summary (2009-2010) |
---|---|---|---|
Projects resulting in viable, more diversified communities, evidenced by a greater degree of integrated community-based decision making, improved strategic community infrastructure, improved skills in the community and improved access to the skills needed in the community, strengthened community, and sustained partnerships after the projects. | Number of projects and initiatives generated | 150 | Exceeded. 159 |
Dollar value of investments created in enterprises or communities | $260 million | On track. Assessment of the two-year target is ongoing. Results after one year: $253 million (97% of target) | |
Enterprises created, maintained, or expanded | 12 | On track. Assessment of the two-year target is ongoing. Results after one year: 9 (75% of target) | |
Performance measurement strategy: Analysis of data from internal systems and other client and project tracking systems |
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
||
---|---|---|
Planned Spending20 |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
0.0 | 40.1 | 42.5 |
In its first year, CAF has provided timely and important support to various communities impacted by the economic downturn. Of the total $98.4 million allocation, $90.4 million was designated for “CAF regular” projects, with 94% of this amount committed as of March 31, 2010. The remainder of the fund, $8 million, was allocated to “CAF lobster” projects, with 58% of this portion committed by the end of the fiscal year. The above performance status relates to the first year of CAF, while the target is for the program’s full duration. Results after one year exceeded expectations. Below are examples of projects funded.
Investment in the forestry industry in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick
ACOA and Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation have committed a total of $15.5 million over two fiscal years (2009-2010 to 2010-2011) to support the forest industry’s long-term viability. Combined, these projects are providing employment opportunities throughout Atlantic Canada, while at the same time increasing wood supply to meet future demands.
Investments in the lobster industry through various lobster initiatives
The federal government has identified $10 million, of which ACOA is delivering $8 million, to provide support to the lobster industry, which is facing difficult economic circumstances. ACOA has been working closely with Fisheries and Oceans Canada and other federal departments, the provinces, and the industry on the marketing and promotion of lobster, as well as fostering innovation within the lobster industry via technology acquisition and development. As of March 31, 2010, 17 projects had been approved, having a total contribution of $4.6 million.
Expected Result |
Performance Indicator |
Two-year Target (2009-2010 through 2010-2011) |
Performance Status and Summary (2009-2010) |
---|---|---|---|
Timely, targeted, and temporary stimulus to the Canadian economy, and mitigation of the impacts of the global economic recession, by increasing the total amount of construction activity related to recreational infrastructure. | Demonstrated linkages between projects and economic opportunities | Evidence of impact through examples provided by clients | On track. Assessment of the two-year target is ongoing. Results after one year: 18 examples collected. |
Dollars leveraged on federal investments | 2:1 (every dollar invested by RInC will leverage two dollars) | Exceeded. 2.67:1.00 (every dollar invested by RInC leveraged $2.67) | |
Number of projects successfully completed | 200 | Progress being made toward target. Assessment of the two-year target is ongoing. Results after one year: 38 (19.5% of target). | |
Performance measurement strategy: Analysis of data collected from internal systems, client progress reports, and anecdotal information from client interviews. |
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
||
---|---|---|
Planned Spending21 |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
0.0 | 10.4 | 12.9 |
In its first year of implementation, the RInC initiative provided immediate, targeted stimulus to the economy of Atlantic Canada by assisting to mitigate the impact of the global economic recession through increased construction activity in the recreational sector. As of March 31, 2010, ACOA had fully committed its RInC allocation by committing $34.1 million in projects across Atlantic Canada and leveraging $91.6 million.
The results indicated are for the first year of the delivery of RInC, while the target set was for the duration of the two-year program, ending March 31, 2011. The performance indicated above is seen as positive results. Evidence of the impact of RInC investments includes:
Bathurst, New Brunswick – Coronation Park and arena repairs
The City of Bathurst received $118,000 for repairs to Coronation Park and its arena. One component of the project was the replacement of flooring to cover the ice surface when no hockey games were scheduled, in order to be able to host other events. The repairs resulted in lower costs of operations for the K.C. Irving Civic Centre and the City of Bathurst.
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island – Arena Upgrades
The Cody Banks arena in Charlottetown is able to accommodate the increasing number of female athletes using the facility, thanks to a Government of Canada investment of $55,232. The investment will go toward a project that will add two dressing rooms at the arena and provide additional accommodations during tournaments.
STRATEGIC OUTCOME | PROGRAM ACTIVITY | PROGRAM SUB-ACTIVITY |
---|---|---|
A competitive Atlantic Canadian economy (1.0) |
Policy, Advocacy and Coordination (1.3) |
|
Expected Result |
Performance Indicator |
Annual Target (2009-2010) |
Performance Status and Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Policies and programs that strengthen the Atlantic economy. | Atlantic regional economic policies and programs that respond to regional development opportunities | Continued government support to Agency priorities, collaboration with other federal departments, and engagement with other partners in Atlantic Canada in areas that will contribute to increasing the competitiveness of Atlantic Canada’s economy | Successful collaborative efforts with other government departments, as well as the four provincial governments of the region and other partners, on key issues pertaining to ACOA's priorities. Coordinated the renewal of funding for ACOA’s key programming, leading to ongoing funding announced in Budget 2010. |
Performance Measurement Strategy: Undertake analysis of information from ACOA’s Policy Network and key informant surveys, evaluations and qualitative reviews, as well as indicators from the federal government’s budget speech, the Speech from the Throne, and decisions by central agencies. |
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
Human Resources (FTEs) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
11.1 | 12.8 | 13.0 | 99 | 89 | 10 |
ACOA’s Policy, Advocacy and Coordination (PAC) program activity is central to identifying and effectively responding to opportunities and challenges facing the regional economy. PAC provides intelligence, analysis and well-grounded advice on a broad range of issues and topics relevant to the region’s economic development, and informs and supports decision making by the Agency and the minister. PAC helps carry the Agency’s agenda forward, and ensures that ACOA remains relevant and responsive to the opportunities and challenges facing Atlantic Canada. PAC offers strategic, researched policy positions that reflect the region’s potential; influences national policies and programs that affect Atlantic Canada’s development and interests; and coordinates other policies and programs within the region to form integrated approaches to development.
Agency officials worked closely with other federal departments and central agencies to ensure measures included in CEAP were responsive to the economic challenges of Atlantic Canada. Of particular importance were ACOA’s efforts to ensure that resource industries and resource dependent communities in the region were able to fully participate in the CAF, that Atlantic Canadian communities could benefit from the RInC program, and that Atlantic Canada’s renewable energy potential was advanced with support from the Clean Energy Fund. The Agency’s work in this regard also served to have stimulus funding more directly respond to the lobster industry crisis. ACOA also continued to strengthen its relationship with the other federal regional development agencies, to address national issues from a regional perspective, and to align national policies with regional priorities. This included guidance, advice and assistance to the newly established regional development agencies for southern Ontario and the North in 2009-2010.
In 2009-2010, ACOA developed policy advice and research, provided economic and fiscal analyses, and engaged stakeholders. The Agency’s policy and research work focused on the Atlantic Gateway and international trade, demographics, regional productivity, and the region’s overall economic situation. For example, policy officials developed overviews for a number of industrial sectors such as resource industries and tourism. The Agency continued its leadership for Canada on the Territorial Development Policy Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and engaged with the OECD in a variety of areas, serving as a platform to share the Canadian approach to regional development on an international stage. Engagement activities were also undertaken with the private sector and academia through entities such as the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Board, the Atlantic Gateway Advisory Council (AGAC), and Metropolis. In addition, the policy function offered support and analysis throughout the process that was required to renew ACOA’s programs and other strategic activities, and pursued its collaborative work with provincial and federal partners in the Atlantic Population Table, for which the Agency serves as the federal co-chair.
ACOA continued efforts to ensure that Atlantic Canada’s needs were reflected in federal policies, programs and regulations. The Agency’s advocacy function aimed to advance Atlantic interests in national policy and program development so that government initiatives were responsive to the needs of the region. A core consideration for ACOA advocacy activities in 2009-2010 was to seek out ways federal initiatives could assist Atlantic Canada in facing the current global economic challenges. The advocacy focus was on the Atlantic Gateway, federal facilitation of Atlantic Canada’s energy potential, as well as increased emphasis on the commercialization needs of Atlantic Canadian businesses in federal science and technology investments. Advocacy initiatives were also directed toward aerospace and defence industries’ bolstering of the Atlantic Canadian economy. In 2009-2010, ACOA’s advocacy efforts helped leverage approximately $500 million in industrial regional benefits (IRB) commitments to assist in the building of a strong and thriving aerospace and defence industry in the region. The Agency acted as the lead liaison for Atlantic firms in the delivery of the IRB policy in providing education, awareness and development for Atlantic small and medium-sized enterprises.
Over the past five years, ACOA’s continued procurement advocacy efforts have helped leverage over $2 billion in industrial and regional benefit commitments for Atlantic Canadian firms. During this same period, the Agency has led more than 25 industry tours reaching 30 international prime contractors and over 100 Atlantic firms. These activities have allowed Atlantic firms to become key suppliers within the global aerospace and defence industry.
ACOA played a coordination role in federal-provincial initiatives such as the Atlantic Gateway Federal-Provincial Officials Committee, and also collaborated with the provinces on a number of issues, e.g. tourism, demographics, aboriginal issues, resource sectors, and renewable energy. The regional federal councils addressed an array of topics relevant to the region, including Public Service Renewal and official languages. For example, the New Brunswick Federal Council hosted a symposium celebrating 40 years of linguistic duality in the province, providing an opportunity to reflect on the successes, challenges and best practices in regard to official languages in the federal public service over the last four decades. ACOA also worked with other regional development agencies (RDAs) to ensure a coordinated approach to regional development issues, including the RDAs’ contributions to national policy discussions on the government’s priorities moving out of the recession. The Agency also ensured particular collaborative support to the new regional development agencies for Canada’s North and for southern Ontario.
During the past year, a number of PAC efforts have actively contributed to the Agency’s evolving appreciation and understanding of Atlantic Canada’s competitive economy and its various stakeholders. By strengthening its stakeholder engagement practices and collaborative initiatives, the Agency is ensuring that its policies and programs are innovative and address government priorities in achieving results for Canadians.
One such effort is the third Atlantic Research Money conference, held in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, in 2009. The Agency was a sponsor and a key collaborator in the organization of this event with the four Atlantic Canadian provincial governments. The conference’s theme was Investing for Economic Sustainability, and provided all attendees, including ACOA officials, an opportunity to discuss (a) the region’s unique strengths on which industrial R&D capacity can be built; (b) the role of governments, industry and the research community in contributing to economic sustainability in Atlantic Canada; and (c) what can be learned from other jurisdictions from Canada and around the world.
In early 2010, the Agency, along with a student steering committee, organized the Atlantic Canada Student Summit in Antigonish, Nova Scotia. This event assembled approximately 60 students from Atlantic Canadian universities and colleges, along with public and private stakeholders. Participants at the summit explored a variety of themes including creating new opportunities and choices for people; investing for sustainable growth; and freeing businesses to grow and succeed. Speakers included student leaders and leaders from business, government and academia. Through the student summit, the Agency had the opportunity to gain a better understanding of certain key issues of concern to the region’s future leaders. These types of forums ensure that the Agency’s future efforts and initiatives are aligned with, and are responsive to, key issues reflecting both Atlantic Canadian priorities and the federal agenda.
In 2009-2010 the Agency continued to play a key role in strengthening partnerships and mobilizing stakeholders around the Atlantic Gateway. The close working relationship between ACOA, Transport Canada and the four Atlantic provinces has allowed the Agency to deepen its collective understanding of issues related to the development of an efficient and competitive transportation network in Atlantic Canada. This understanding is built on a variety of studies done collaboratively through the Atlantic Gateway Federal/Provincial Officials Committee. The Agency also expanded its engagement with the business community, notably through the AGAC, and other government departments on issues such as infrastructure and regulatory concerns, trade development, and economic benefits that are brought about in Atlantic Canada by the gateway. The Atlantic Gateway is an area where the Agency has learned from research and recent experiences.
Finally, the Agency conducted an evaluation22 of its Atlantic Policy Research Initiative (APRI) through an assessment of key issues such as relevance, performance, cost-effectiveness, and results achieved over a five-year period. The evaluation indicated that the Agency, through APRI, plays a significant role in meeting policy research and engagement responsibilities identified by the Government of Canada. APRI provides ACOA with the knowledge required to support policy development, advocacy and coordination efforts, and has built a reputation for excellence in policy research. Through this evaluation process, ACOA also learned that an area for improvement would be for heightened collaboration within the Agency to ensure the continued relevancy of its programming in responding to the opportunities and challenges facing Atlantic Canada. These and other recommendations will be considered as the Agency continues to play a key role in producing economic policy research and related engagements in the Atlantic region.
In 2009-2010, ACOA’s PAC program activity assisted the region in facing challenges affecting Atlantic Canada’s overall economic vitality. PAC supported the Agency’s broad-based approach to economic development by addressing key policy issues impacting the growth of the region, by advocating for the interests of Atlantic Canada to ensure that government initiatives are responsive to the needs of the region, and by coordinating federal policies and programs within the region to form integrated approaches to development.
During the year, ACOA’s advocacy helped ensure that government initiatives were responsive to the challenges and opportunities of the Atlantic Canadian economy. ACOA continued its procurement advocacy efforts that have helped secure over $2 billion in industrial and regional benefit commitments for Atlantic Canadian firms over the past five years, and which have helped contribute to a strong and thriving aerospace and defence industry in the region. ACOA also advocated for the interests of Atlantic Canada in other key horizontal and sectoral files to make government initiatives more responsive to the needs of Atlantic Canadians.
The Agency’s PAC program activity assisted ACOA in carrying out the Government of Canada’s priorities. PAC efforts benefited Atlantic Canadians by ensuring the coordination of federal initiatives in the region, such as the CAF and RInC programs. Furthermore, the PAC program activity was directly involved in the renewal process of ACOA programs. These efforts led to the announcement in Budget 2010 of ongoing funding for two key ACOA programs, the AIF and the ICF. This is a testament to how well these programs are working to help shape a strong Atlantic Canadian economy. Finally, via the PAC program activity, ACOA continued its collaborative efforts with other government partners and various stakeholders to ensure the Agency’s approach corresponded to opportunities and challenges facing businesses and communities in the region.
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
Human Resources (FTEs) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
Planned | Actual | Difference |
34.9 | 40.8 | 42.9 | 314 | 306 | 8 |
Internal Services are groups of related activities and resources that support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of an organization. These groups are management and oversight services, communications, legal services, human resources management, financial management, information management, information technology, real property services, materiel services, acquisitions, and travel and other administrative services. Internal Services includes only those activities and resources that apply across an organization, and not those provided specifically to a program.